Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.
Identifieur interne : 001509 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001508; suivant : 001510Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.
Auteurs : Torsten Jemt ; Victoria Stenport ; Bertil FribergSource :
- The International journal of prosthodontics [ 0893-2174 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Implant treatment has been performed for more than 45 years, but there is still limited knowledge on how treatment outcomes are changing over time. The aim of this study was to report and compare the treatment outcomes of two patient cohorts from the same clinic, rehabilitated with fixed implant prostheses in the edentulous maxilla between 1986 and 1987 (early) and 2001 to 2004 (late).
PubMed: 21716973
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21716973Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.</title><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stenport, Victoria" sort="Stenport, Victoria" uniqKey="Stenport V" first="Victoria" last="Stenport">Victoria Stenport</name></author><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2011 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21716973</idno><idno type="pmid">21716973</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001509</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001509</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.</title><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stenport, Victoria" sort="Stenport, Victoria" uniqKey="Stenport V" first="Victoria" last="Stenport">Victoria Stenport</name></author><author><name sortKey="Friberg, Bertil" sort="Friberg, Bertil" uniqKey="Friberg B" first="Bertil" last="Friberg">Bertil Friberg</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of prosthodontics</title><idno type="ISSN">0893-2174</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Biological Products</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Biological Products</term><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Implant treatment has been performed for more than 45 years, but there is still limited knowledge on how treatment outcomes are changing over time. The aim of this study was to report and compare the treatment outcomes of two patient cohorts from the same clinic, rehabilitated with fixed implant prostheses in the edentulous maxilla between 1986 and 1987 (early) and 2001 to 2004 (late).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21716973</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2011</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0893-2174</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>24</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2011 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of prosthodontics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Prosthodont</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>345-55</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Implant treatment has been performed for more than 45 years, but there is still limited knowledge on how treatment outcomes are changing over time. The aim of this study was to report and compare the treatment outcomes of two patient cohorts from the same clinic, rehabilitated with fixed implant prostheses in the edentulous maxilla between 1986 and 1987 (early) and 2001 to 2004 (late).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The early group included 76 edentulous patients who were consecutively provided with 450 turned Branemark System implants; the late group included 109 edentulous patients provided with 360 turned and 310 TiUnite Branemark System implants. Both groups were followed and evaluated clinically and radiographically for 5 years according to similar protocols.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Altogether, 37 patients (20%) were lost to follow-up over 5 years; more patients were noncompliant in the late group (P < .05). The 5-year overall implant cumulative survival rates were 93.4% and 97.3% for the early and late groups, respectively. In the early group, significantly more turned implants failed before prosthesis insertion compared to the outcome of TiUnite implants in the late group (P < .05). Mean bone loss was comparable for the early and late groups during the 5 years of follow-up (0.5 ± 0.46 and 0.7 ± 0.76 mm, respectively), but more patients presented at least 1 implant with more than 2 mm of bone loss during the follow-up period in the late group (P < .05). Mucosal hyperplasia and inflammation showed a trend of higher frequency at implants in the early group of patients (P > .05).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Implant treatment was more predictable before loading in the late group of patients, related to the change in the implant surface (P < .05). On the other hand, it was observed that the prevalence of patients with more bone loss at at least 1 implant (> 2 mm) was higher in the late group (P < .05). This could possibly be attributed to a more bioactive implant surface and shorter healing period before implant surgery in the late group. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:345-355.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jemt</LastName><ForeName>Torsten</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stenport</LastName><ForeName>Victoria</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Friberg</LastName><ForeName>Bertil</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Prosthodont</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8900938</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0893-2174</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D001688">Biological Products</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001688" MajorTopicYN="N">Biological Products</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="Y">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21716973</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001509 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001509 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21716973
|texte= Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21716973" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |