Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.
Identifieur interne : 001496 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001495; suivant : 001497Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.
Auteurs : Umur Sakall O Lu ; Müge Lütfio Lu ; Elif Eser Sakall O Lu ; Sertaç Sert ; Gözlem CeylanSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 1600-0501 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- pathology : Periodontal Attachment Loss, Periodontal Pocket.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Female, Gingival Crevicular Fluid, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osmotic Pressure, Periodontal Index, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
This study comparatively investigated periimplant sulcular fluid (PISF) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) by means of the osmotic pressure (OP) levels of PISF (PISFOP) and GCF (GCFOP). It was a preliminary research that aimed to quantify PISFOP and GCFOP as well as to evaluate their clinical significances around implants and teeth.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02044.x
PubMed: 21121958
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21121958Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.</title><author><name sortKey="Sakall O Lu, Umur" sort="Sakall O Lu, Umur" uniqKey="Sakall O Lu U" first="Umur" last="Sakall O Lu">Umur Sakall O Lu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayιs University, Samsun, Turkey. umursa@omu.edu.tr</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lutfio Lu, Muge" sort="Lutfio Lu, Muge" uniqKey="Lutfio Lu M" first="Müge" last="Lütfio Lu">Müge Lütfio Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sakall O Lu, Elif Eser" sort="Sakall O Lu, Elif Eser" uniqKey="Sakall O Lu E" first="Elif Eser" last="Sakall O Lu">Elif Eser Sakall O Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sert, Sertac" sort="Sert, Sertac" uniqKey="Sert S" first="Sertaç" last="Sert">Sertaç Sert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ceylan, Gozlem" sort="Ceylan, Gozlem" uniqKey="Ceylan G" first="Gözlem" last="Ceylan">Gözlem Ceylan</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21121958</idno><idno type="pmid">21121958</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02044.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001496</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001496</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.</title><author><name sortKey="Sakall O Lu, Umur" sort="Sakall O Lu, Umur" uniqKey="Sakall O Lu U" first="Umur" last="Sakall O Lu">Umur Sakall O Lu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayιs University, Samsun, Turkey. umursa@omu.edu.tr</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lutfio Lu, Muge" sort="Lutfio Lu, Muge" uniqKey="Lutfio Lu M" first="Müge" last="Lütfio Lu">Müge Lütfio Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sakall O Lu, Elif Eser" sort="Sakall O Lu, Elif Eser" uniqKey="Sakall O Lu E" first="Elif Eser" last="Sakall O Lu">Elif Eser Sakall O Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sert, Sertac" sort="Sert, Sertac" uniqKey="Sert S" first="Sertaç" last="Sert">Sertaç Sert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ceylan, Gozlem" sort="Ceylan, Gozlem" uniqKey="Ceylan G" first="Gözlem" last="Ceylan">Gözlem Ceylan</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Female</term><term>Gingival Crevicular Fluid</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osmotic Pressure</term><term>Periodontal Attachment Loss (pathology)</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Periodontal Pocket (pathology)</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Periodontal Attachment Loss</term><term>Periodontal Pocket</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Female</term><term>Gingival Crevicular Fluid</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osmotic Pressure</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study comparatively investigated periimplant sulcular fluid (PISF) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) by means of the osmotic pressure (OP) levels of PISF (PISFOP) and GCF (GCFOP). It was a preliminary research that aimed to quantify PISFOP and GCFOP as well as to evaluate their clinical significances around implants and teeth.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21121958</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>01</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>10</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0501</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>22</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>706-10</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02044.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">This study comparatively investigated periimplant sulcular fluid (PISF) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) by means of the osmotic pressure (OP) levels of PISF (PISFOP) and GCF (GCFOP). It was a preliminary research that aimed to quantify PISFOP and GCFOP as well as to evaluate their clinical significances around implants and teeth.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Partially edentulous implant patients treated by the same clinicians and using the same implant system were randomized in a split-mouth trial design. Fifty-four implants and teeth from these patients were selected in the same mouth and jaw as matched pairs of samples, i.e. as symmetrical or corresponding implant and tooth. PISFOP/GCFOP measurement was performed by an osmometer following PISF/GCF sampling procedures. Clinical significance was evaluated by the correlations between PISFOP/GCFOP and some clinical examination parameters of periimplant/periodontal soft tissues. These parameters included Silness-Löe plaque index (PI), Löe-Silness gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and probing attachment level (PAL).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">PISFOP was higher than GCFOP, and GI, BOP, PPD and PAL were higher in the implant group than in the tooth group (P<0.05). PISFOP positively correlated with the clinical parameters of implants (P<0.01 for PI, GI and BOP; P<0.05 for PPD and PAL), and GCFOP positively correlated with the clinical parameters of teeth (P<0.01 for PPD; P<0.05 for PI, GI, BOP and PAL).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The results reveal that PISFOP and GCFOP may be measured by osmometer, and their levels may be related with the clinical conditions of periimplant/periodontal soft tissues.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sakallıoğlu</LastName><ForeName>Umur</ForeName><Initials>U</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayιs University, Samsun, Turkey. umursa@omu.edu.tr</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lütfioğlu</LastName><ForeName>Müge</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sakallıoğlu</LastName><ForeName>Elif Eser</ForeName><Initials>EE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sert</LastName><ForeName>Sertaç</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ceylan</LastName><ForeName>Gözlem</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005883" MajorTopicYN="Y">Gingival Crevicular Fluid</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009997" MajorTopicYN="N">Osmotic Pressure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017622" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Attachment Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010512" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Index</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010514" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Pocket</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21121958</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02044.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001496 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001496 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21121958
|texte= Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21121958" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |