Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
Identifieur interne : 001463 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001462; suivant : 001464Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
Auteurs : Oguz Ozan ; Kaan Orhan ; Ilser TurkyilmazSource :
- The Journal of craniofacial surgery [ 1536-3732 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bone Density, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Surgery, Computer-Assisted (methods), Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods), Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Bone Density, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the density of bone where implants were placed and the angular deviations that occurred between the virtually planned and actually placed implants using 2 different stereolithographic surgical guides.
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305
PubMed: 21959426
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21959426Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.</title><author><name sortKey="Ozan, Oguz" sort="Ozan, Oguz" uniqKey="Ozan O" first="Oguz" last="Ozan">Oguz Ozan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin, Turkey. oguzozan@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Orhan, Kaan" sort="Orhan, Kaan" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="Kaan" last="Orhan">Kaan Orhan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21959426</idno><idno type="pmid">21959426</idno><idno type="doi">10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001463</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001463</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.</title><author><name sortKey="Ozan, Oguz" sort="Ozan, Oguz" uniqKey="Ozan O" first="Oguz" last="Ozan">Oguz Ozan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin, Turkey. oguzozan@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Orhan, Kaan" sort="Orhan, Kaan" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="Kaan" last="Orhan">Kaan Orhan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><idno type="eISSN">1536-3732</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Density</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted (methods)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods)</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Density</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the density of bone where implants were placed and the angular deviations that occurred between the virtually planned and actually placed implants using 2 different stereolithographic surgical guides.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21959426</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1536-3732</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>22</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Craniofac Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1755-61</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the density of bone where implants were placed and the angular deviations that occurred between the virtually planned and actually placed implants using 2 different stereolithographic surgical guides.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The study population consisted of 54 patients who received 216 implants. Computed tomography machine was used for preoperative evaluation of the jawbone for implant therapy as well as determination of the bone density values (Hounsfield units [HU]) of the implantation site. All implant sockets were prepared using 2 different types of stereolithographic surgical guide. Ninety-four implants were installed using the surgical guides (Stentcad Beyond, Ay-Design; Kos-gep, ODTU, Ankara, Turkey) in the mouth, whereas 122 implants were placed after the surgical guides (Stentcad Classic; Kos-gep, ODTU) were removed.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The mean bone densities of maxilla and mandible were 561.36 (SD, 229.46) HU and 890.63 (SD, 361.85) HU, respectively. The mean angular deviations between planned and placed implants using Stentcad Classic and Stentcad Beyond surgical guides were 5.32 (SD, 1.96) degrees and 3.73 (SD, 1.14) degrees, respectively. Highly negative correlation was found between the bone density of the placed implant sites and angular deviations in the group in whom implants were installed with freehand.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The lower bone density values have resulted in the greater angular deviations in the group, in whom the implants were placed after the surgical guides were removed. This deviation might have been derived from the freehand placement of the implants and the poor quality of the bone.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ozan</LastName><ForeName>Oguz</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin, Turkey. oguzozan@gmail.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Orhan</LastName><ForeName>Kaan</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Turkyilmaz</LastName><ForeName>Ilser</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Craniofac Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9010410</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1049-2275</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21959426</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">00001665-201109000-00044</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001463 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001463 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21959426
|texte= Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21959426" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |