Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Identifieur interne : 001422 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001421; suivant : 001423Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Auteurs : Pietro Felice ; Elisa Soardi ; Gerardo Pellegrino ; Roberto Pistilli ; Claudio Marchetti ; Manlio Gessaroli ; Marco EspositoSource :
- European journal of oral implantology [ 1756-2406 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (complications), Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging), Alveolar Bone Loss (rehabilitation), Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery), Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Overlay, Female, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (methods), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (complications), Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Pilot Projects, Postoperative Complications, Radiography, Sinus Floor Augmentation.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- complications : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous.
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal.
- rehabilitation : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla.
- Adult, Aged, Bone Transplantation, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Pilot Projects, Postoperative Complications, Radiography, Sinus Floor Augmentation.
Abstract
To evaluate whether short (5 to 8.5 mm) dental implants could be a suitable alternative to longer (>11.5 mm) implants placed in atrophic maxillae augmented with autogenous bone for supporting dental prostheses.
PubMed: 22043464
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22043464Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Peridontology and Implantology, Univeristy of Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Soardi, Elisa" sort="Soardi, Elisa" uniqKey="Soardi E" first="Elisa" last="Soardi">Elisa Soardi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pistilli, Roberto" sort="Pistilli, Roberto" uniqKey="Pistilli R" first="Roberto" last="Pistilli">Roberto Pistilli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marchetti, Claudio" sort="Marchetti, Claudio" uniqKey="Marchetti C" first="Claudio" last="Marchetti">Claudio Marchetti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gessaroli, Manlio" sort="Gessaroli, Manlio" uniqKey="Gessaroli M" first="Manlio" last="Gessaroli">Manlio Gessaroli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22043464</idno><idno type="pmid">22043464</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001422</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001422</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Peridontology and Implantology, Univeristy of Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Soardi, Elisa" sort="Soardi, Elisa" uniqKey="Soardi E" first="Elisa" last="Soardi">Elisa Soardi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pistilli, Roberto" sort="Pistilli, Roberto" uniqKey="Pistilli R" first="Roberto" last="Pistilli">Roberto Pistilli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marchetti, Claudio" sort="Marchetti, Claudio" uniqKey="Marchetti C" first="Claudio" last="Marchetti">Claudio Marchetti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gessaroli, Manlio" sort="Gessaroli, Manlio" uniqKey="Gessaroli M" first="Manlio" last="Gessaroli">Manlio Gessaroli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1756-2406</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (complications)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (rehabilitation)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (complications)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Sinus Floor Augmentation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Sinus Floor Augmentation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To evaluate whether short (5 to 8.5 mm) dental implants could be a suitable alternative to longer (>11.5 mm) implants placed in atrophic maxillae augmented with autogenous bone for supporting dental prostheses.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22043464</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1756-2406</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>4</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Season>Autumn</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>191-202</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate whether short (5 to 8.5 mm) dental implants could be a suitable alternative to longer (>11.5 mm) implants placed in atrophic maxillae augmented with autogenous bone for supporting dental prostheses.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Twenty-eight patients with fully edentulous atrophic maxillae having 5 to 9 mm of residual crestal bone height at least 5 mm thick, as measured on computerised tomography scans, were randomised into two groups either to receive 4 to 8 short (5 to 8.5 mm) implants (15 patients) or autogenous bone from the iliac crest to allow the placement of at least 11.5 mmlong implants (13 patients). Bone blocks and the windows at maxillary sinuses were covered with rigid resorbable barriers. Grafts were left to heal for 4 months before placing implants, which were submerged. After 4 months, provisional reinforced acrylic prostheses or bar-retained overdentures were delivered. Provisional prostheses were replaced, after 4 months, by definitive screw-retained metal-resin cross-arch fixed dental prostheses. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complications (including prolonged postoperative pain) and patient satisfaction. All patients were followed for 5 months after loading.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">All patients could be rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses and none dropped out. One bilateral sinus lift procedure failed due to infection, though short implants could be placed. One implant failed in the augmented group versus 2 short implants in 2 patients. All failures occurred before loading. Significantly more complications occurred in augmented patients: 8 complications occurred in 5 augmented patients (all complained of pain 1 month after bone harvesting from the iliac crest). No complications occurred in the short implant group. All patients were fully satisfied with the treatment and would do it again.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">This pilot study suggests that short implants may be a suitable, cheaper and faster alternative to longer implants placed in bone augmented with autogenous bone for rehabilitating edentulous atrophic maxillae. However, these preliminary results need to be confirmed by larger trials with follow-ups of at least 5 years.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Felice</LastName><ForeName>Pietro</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Peridontology and Implantology, Univeristy of Bologna, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Soardi</LastName><ForeName>Elisa</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pellegrino</LastName><ForeName>Gerardo</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pistilli</LastName><ForeName>Roberto</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marchetti</LastName><ForeName>Claudio</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gessaroli</LastName><ForeName>Manlio</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Esposito</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101473719</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1756-2406</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="Y">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016557" MajorTopicYN="N">Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059546" MajorTopicYN="Y">Sinus Floor Augmentation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22043464</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">22278</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001422 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001422 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22043464
|texte= Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22043464" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |