[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible].
Identifieur interne : 001373 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001372; suivant : 001374[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible].
Auteurs : D. Wismeijer ; Bruggenkate C M. Ten ; E A J M. SchultenSource :
- Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde [ 0028-2200 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- standards : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- Denture, Overlay, Humans, Mandible, Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Patients with an edentulous mandible often have difficulty retaining conventional dentures. It was formerly the case that, as a rule, 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal area of the mandible in order to provide retention for the mandibular denture. A large body of research, however, revealed good results with 2 implants with various mesostructures. The 2 implant overdenture in the mandible has since become standard for edentulous patients. Research results indicate that this treatment should be the primary option under certain conditions. The appropriate types of care which are indicated by these conditions should, however, be carefully distinguished. Under certain anatomical conditions, such as a low and narrow alveolar ridge, exposed mandibular nerves, very low density alveolar bone (Class IV bone) and very sensitive mucous membranes, 4 implants are indicated. Patients who are less manually dextrous might be better served with 2 implants and a single mesostructure.
PubMed: 22292356
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22292356Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Uit 'de sectie Orale Implantologie en Prothetische Tandheelkunde van het Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA). d.wismeijer@acta.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ten, Bruggenkate C M" sort="Ten, Bruggenkate C M" uniqKey="Ten B" first="Bruggenkate C M" last="Ten">Bruggenkate C M. Ten</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schulten, E A J M" sort="Schulten, E A J M" uniqKey="Schulten E" first="E A J M" last="Schulten">E A J M. Schulten</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22292356</idno><idno type="pmid">22292356</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001373</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001373</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Uit 'de sectie Orale Implantologie en Prothetische Tandheelkunde van het Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA). d.wismeijer@acta.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ten, Bruggenkate C M" sort="Ten, Bruggenkate C M" uniqKey="Ten B" first="Bruggenkate C M" last="Ten">Bruggenkate C M. Ten</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schulten, E A J M" sort="Schulten, E A J M" uniqKey="Schulten E" first="E A J M" last="Schulten">E A J M. Schulten</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</title><idno type="ISSN">0028-2200</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (methods)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (standards)</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Humans</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Patients with an edentulous mandible often have difficulty retaining conventional dentures. It was formerly the case that, as a rule, 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal area of the mandible in order to provide retention for the mandibular denture. A large body of research, however, revealed good results with 2 implants with various mesostructures. The 2 implant overdenture in the mandible has since become standard for edentulous patients. Research results indicate that this treatment should be the primary option under certain conditions. The appropriate types of care which are indicated by these conditions should, however, be carefully distinguished. Under certain anatomical conditions, such as a low and narrow alveolar ridge, exposed mandibular nerves, very low density alveolar bone (Class IV bone) and very sensitive mucous membranes, 4 implants are indicated. Patients who are less manually dextrous might be better served with 2 implants and a single mesostructure.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22292356</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2012</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>01</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0028-2200</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>118</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>633-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Patients with an edentulous mandible often have difficulty retaining conventional dentures. It was formerly the case that, as a rule, 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal area of the mandible in order to provide retention for the mandibular denture. A large body of research, however, revealed good results with 2 implants with various mesostructures. The 2 implant overdenture in the mandible has since become standard for edentulous patients. Research results indicate that this treatment should be the primary option under certain conditions. The appropriate types of care which are indicated by these conditions should, however, be carefully distinguished. Under certain anatomical conditions, such as a low and narrow alveolar ridge, exposed mandibular nerves, very low density alveolar bone (Class IV bone) and very sensitive mucous membranes, 4 implants are indicated. Patients who are less manually dextrous might be better served with 2 implants and a single mesostructure.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wismeijer</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Uit 'de sectie Orale Implantologie en Prothetische Tandheelkunde van het Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA). d.wismeijer@acta.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>ten</LastName><ForeName>Bruggenkate C M</ForeName><Initials>BC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schulten</LastName><ForeName>E A J M</ForeName><Initials>EA</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>dut</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Kanttekeningen bij een overkappingsprothese op 2 implantaten als gouden standaard voor de behandeling van een edentate onderkaak.</VernacularTitle></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0400771</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0028-2200</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22292356</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001373 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001373 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22292356
|texte= [Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22292356" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |