RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations.
Identifieur interne : 001151 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001150; suivant : 001152RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations.
Auteurs : M. Quirynen ; N. Van AsscheSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 1600-0501 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Biofilms, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Plaque (microbiology), Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Linear Models, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Middle Aged, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Periodontitis (surgery), Polymerase Chain Reaction, Prospective Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surface Properties, Tooth Extraction.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- microbiology : Dental Plaque.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Periodontitis.
- Adult, Biofilms, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Linear Models, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Middle Aged, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Prospective Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surface Properties, Tooth Extraction.
Abstract
Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough "turned" implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split-mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x
PubMed: 22093076
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22093076Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations.</title><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N" last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22093076</idno><idno type="pmid">22093076</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001151</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001151</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations.</title><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N" last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Biofilms</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Plaque (microbiology)</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Male</term><term>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Nucleic Acid Hybridization</term><term>Periodontitis (surgery)</term><term>Polymerase Chain Reaction</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Tooth Extraction</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Plaque</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Periodontitis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Biofilms</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Male</term><term>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Nucleic Acid Hybridization</term><term>Polymerase Chain Reaction</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Tooth Extraction</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough "turned" implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split-mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22093076</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>11</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0501</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>23</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>625-34</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Most current implants have a moderately rough surface (compared with older minimally rough "turned" implants) to facilitate osseointegration. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), with split-mouth design, examined whether this increased surface roughness influenced the initial subgingival plaque formation.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Ten fully edentulous and eight partially edentulous patients, all with a history of severe periodontitis, received 4-6 implants (mandible or maxilla). Per jaw, both minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite) implants (MKIII; Nobel Biocare) were alternated. Also, the healing and final abutments had similar surface characteristics. Subgingival biofilm formation was followed up for 1 year, and samples were analyzed by culture technique, qPCR and checkerboard</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Over the entire period, no statistically significant differences could be detected in subgingival microbiota between the minimally and moderately rough surfaces. In partially edentulous patients, the biofilm matured to a higher concentration of pathogens when compared with fully edentulous patients. The subgingival implant composition and concentration in partially edentulous patients were comparable to the subgingival microbiota along teeth.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The roughness of the more modern implants did not influence the biofilm formation during the first year of implant loading.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quirynen</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Van Assche</LastName><ForeName>N</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018441" MajorTopicYN="Y">Biofilms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059605" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implant-Abutment Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003773" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Plaque</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016014" MajorTopicYN="N">Linear Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008855" MajorTopicYN="N">Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009693" MajorTopicYN="N">Nucleic Acid Hybridization</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010518" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontitis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016133" MajorTopicYN="N">Polymerase Chain Reaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014081" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth Extraction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22093076</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02255.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001151 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001151 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22093076
|texte= RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 2: microbial observations.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22093076" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |