Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients.
Identifieur interne : 001033 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001032; suivant : 001034Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients.
Auteurs : Kunaal DhingraSource :
- Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists [ 1532-849X ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Chronic Periodontitis (complications), Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Denture, Partial, Removable, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (complications), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Patient Preference.
- MESH :
Abstract
Traditional tooth-supported and implant-supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant-supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant-supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth-supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant-supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long-term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant-supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth-supported and implant-supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient-centered outcomes.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x
PubMed: 22681519
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22681519Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dhingra, Kunaal" sort="Dhingra, Kunaal" uniqKey="Dhingra K" first="Kunaal" last="Dhingra">Kunaal Dhingra</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics, NSVK. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. kunaaldhingra@yahoo.co.in</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:22681519</idno>
<idno type="pmid">22681519</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001033</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001033</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dhingra, Kunaal" sort="Dhingra, Kunaal" uniqKey="Dhingra K" first="Kunaal" last="Dhingra">Kunaal Dhingra</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics, NSVK. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. kunaaldhingra@yahoo.co.in</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Chronic Periodontitis (complications)</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Removable</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (complications)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Patient Preference</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en"><term>Chronic Periodontitis</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Removable</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Patient Preference</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Traditional tooth-supported and implant-supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant-supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant-supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth-supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant-supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long-term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant-supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth-supported and implant-supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient-centered outcomes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22681519</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-849X</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>21</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>Aug</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Prosthodont</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>494-513</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Traditional tooth-supported and implant-supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant-supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant-supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth-supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant-supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long-term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant-supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth-supported and implant-supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient-centered outcomes.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>© 2012 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dhingra</LastName>
<ForeName>Kunaal</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontics, NSVK. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. kunaaldhingra@yahoo.co.in</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>09</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Prosthodont</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9301275</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1059-941X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055113" MajorTopicYN="N">Chronic Periodontitis</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="Y">complications</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003832" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Removable</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="Y">complications</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057240" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Preference</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22681519</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001033 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001033 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:22681519 |texte= Oral rehabilitation considerations for partially edentulous periodontal patients. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22681519" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |