Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.
Identifieur interne : 000F97 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000F96; suivant : 000F98Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.
Auteurs : Gunda Bernhart ; Andreas Koob ; Marc Schmitter ; Olaf Gabbert ; Thomas Stober ; Peter RammelsbergSource :
- Clinical oral investigations [ 1436-3771 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cementation, Cohort Studies, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Peri-Implantitis (etiology), Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties, Tooth Loss (etiology), Tooth, Artificial, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- etiology : Peri-Implantitis, Tooth Loss.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cementation, Cohort Studies, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties, Tooth, Artificial, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective study was to compare biological and technical complications of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) with those of tooth-supported DCRDs. Sixty-three DCRDs were monitored. One study group included 16 prostheses with a combination of implants and natural teeth as double crowns (ti group), whereas in the second study group, 19 dentures were retained exclusively on implants (ii group); a third study group with 28 exclusively tooth-supported dentures served as controls (tt group). Tooth loss, implant failure, and technical complications (loss of retention of primary crown, abutment screw loosening, loss of facing, fracture of resin denture teeth and fracture of saddle resin) were analysed. During the observation period of 24 months, no implants or teeth were lost in the ti group and three technical complications were recorded. In the ii group, two implants were lost, two cases of peri-implantitis occurred and four technical complications were observed. In the tt group, two cases of tooth loss and seven technical complications were observed. At the time of the last examination, all prostheses of the ti group and the ii group were functional. Patients of these two study groups reported high satisfaction with both function and aesthetics with no significant difference between the two groups. Treatment with DCRDs showed comparable results in the three study groups. The 2-year results indicate that double crowns can be recommended for implant and combined tooth-implant-retained dentures.
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1
PubMed: 21789591
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21789591Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.</title><author><name sortKey="Bernhart, Gunda" sort="Bernhart, Gunda" uniqKey="Bernhart G" first="Gunda" last="Bernhart">Gunda Bernhart</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. gunda.bernhart@med.uni-heidelberg.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koob, Andreas" sort="Koob, Andreas" uniqKey="Koob A" first="Andreas" last="Koob">Andreas Koob</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitter, Marc" sort="Schmitter, Marc" uniqKey="Schmitter M" first="Marc" last="Schmitter">Marc Schmitter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stober, Thomas" sort="Stober, Thomas" uniqKey="Stober T" first="Thomas" last="Stober">Thomas Stober</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21789591</idno><idno type="pmid">21789591</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F97</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.</title><author><name sortKey="Bernhart, Gunda" sort="Bernhart, Gunda" uniqKey="Bernhart G" first="Gunda" last="Bernhart">Gunda Bernhart</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. gunda.bernhart@med.uni-heidelberg.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koob, Andreas" sort="Koob, Andreas" uniqKey="Koob A" first="Andreas" last="Koob">Andreas Koob</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitter, Marc" sort="Schmitter, Marc" uniqKey="Schmitter M" first="Marc" last="Schmitter">Marc Schmitter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stober, Thomas" sort="Stober, Thomas" uniqKey="Stober T" first="Thomas" last="Stober">Thomas Stober</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral investigations</title><idno type="eISSN">1436-3771</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cementation</term><term>Cohort Studies</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Peri-Implantitis (etiology)</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Tooth Loss (etiology)</term><term>Tooth, Artificial</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Peri-Implantitis</term><term>Tooth Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cementation</term><term>Cohort Studies</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Tooth, Artificial</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this retrospective study was to compare biological and technical complications of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) with those of tooth-supported DCRDs. Sixty-three DCRDs were monitored. One study group included 16 prostheses with a combination of implants and natural teeth as double crowns (ti group), whereas in the second study group, 19 dentures were retained exclusively on implants (ii group); a third study group with 28 exclusively tooth-supported dentures served as controls (tt group). Tooth loss, implant failure, and technical complications (loss of retention of primary crown, abutment screw loosening, loss of facing, fracture of resin denture teeth and fracture of saddle resin) were analysed. During the observation period of 24 months, no implants or teeth were lost in the ti group and three technical complications were recorded. In the ii group, two implants were lost, two cases of peri-implantitis occurred and four technical complications were observed. In the tt group, two cases of tooth loss and seven technical complications were observed. At the time of the last examination, all prostheses of the ti group and the ii group were functional. Patients of these two study groups reported high satisfaction with both function and aesthetics with no significant difference between the two groups. Treatment with DCRDs showed comparable results in the three study groups. The 2-year results indicate that double crowns can be recommended for implant and combined tooth-implant-retained dentures.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21789591</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1436-3771</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>16</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral investigations</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Investig</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1031-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The objective of this retrospective study was to compare biological and technical complications of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) with those of tooth-supported DCRDs. Sixty-three DCRDs were monitored. One study group included 16 prostheses with a combination of implants and natural teeth as double crowns (ti group), whereas in the second study group, 19 dentures were retained exclusively on implants (ii group); a third study group with 28 exclusively tooth-supported dentures served as controls (tt group). Tooth loss, implant failure, and technical complications (loss of retention of primary crown, abutment screw loosening, loss of facing, fracture of resin denture teeth and fracture of saddle resin) were analysed. During the observation period of 24 months, no implants or teeth were lost in the ti group and three technical complications were recorded. In the ii group, two implants were lost, two cases of peri-implantitis occurred and four technical complications were observed. In the tt group, two cases of tooth loss and seven technical complications were observed. At the time of the last examination, all prostheses of the ti group and the ii group were functional. Patients of these two study groups reported high satisfaction with both function and aesthetics with no significant difference between the two groups. Treatment with DCRDs showed comparable results in the three study groups. The 2-year results indicate that double crowns can be recommended for implant and combined tooth-implant-retained dentures.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bernhart</LastName><ForeName>Gunda</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. gunda.bernhart@med.uni-heidelberg.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Koob</LastName><ForeName>Andreas</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schmitter</LastName><ForeName>Marc</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gabbert</LastName><ForeName>Olaf</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stober</LastName><ForeName>Thomas</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rammelsberg</LastName><ForeName>Peter</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>26</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Investig</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9707115</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1432-6981</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):236-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16752618</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):560-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15355398</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Dec;15(6):643-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15533125</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Investig. 2000 Jun;4(2):87-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11218506</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):29-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15008229</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23 (4):353-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12956479</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent. 2007 Dec;35(12):939-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17961902</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):233-41; discussion 242</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19548404</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19696851</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Jun;9(3):170-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10530131</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Dec;12(6):640-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11737109</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):506-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16958689</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jan;35 Suppl 1:44-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18181933</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):131-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18546767</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Aug;10 (4):297-306</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10551072</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jan;35 Suppl 1:72-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18181936</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Sep;70(3):251-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8410733</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Mar;26(3):195-202</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10194726</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):530-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18371100</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):164-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16602365</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132 Suppl 1:e39-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17530595</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;20(6):617-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18069371</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(4):320-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10898873</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000 Sep;8(3):87-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11307565</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Kidney Int. 2008 Sep;74(5):560-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18596735</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002484" MajorTopicYN="N">Cementation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015331" MajorTopicYN="N">Cohort Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="Y">Crowns</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000044" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Abutments</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059605" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implant-Abutment Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004955" MajorTopicYN="N">Esthetics, Dental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057873" MajorTopicYN="N">Peri-Implantitis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016388" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014093" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth, Artificial</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21789591</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F97 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F97 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21789591
|texte= Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21789591" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |