Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients.
Identifieur interne : 000F70 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000F69; suivant : 000F71Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients.
Auteurs : Amir Moeintaghavi ; Mehrdad Radvar ; Hamid Reza Arab ; Hamid Reza Boostani ; Elham GhiamiSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure (classification), Dental Restoration Failure (statistics & numerical data), Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Radiography, Single-Blind Method, Stress, Mechanical, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- classification : Dental Restoration Failure.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Restoration Failure.
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Radiography, Single-Blind Method, Stress, Mechanical, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The use of osseointegrated implants as a foundation for the prosthetic replacement of missing teeth has become widespread, with new dental implant systems being introduced every year. There is growing interest in identifying the factors associated with implant failure, such as implant type. This study was designed to establish the relationship between implant type and success. Eighty-eight patients (mean age, 52 years) with 268 implants (110 BioHorizons, 60 ITI, 60 Paragon, 18 Xive, six 3i, and 19 Allfit) participated in this 5-year retrospective study. Statistical significance was defined for P < .05. Peri-implant probing depth was associated with bone loss and bleeding on probing. Implant failure was not associated with implant brand. Maximal (or minimal) peri-implant probing depth and bone loss values were seen at anterior regions (or premolars). Maximal (or minimal) bleeding on probing was seen at the posterior (or anterior) region. No significant differences were observed between the different systems in terms of implant failure.
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00117
PubMed: 21126151
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21126151Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients.</title><author><name sortKey="Moeintaghavi, Amir" sort="Moeintaghavi, Amir" uniqKey="Moeintaghavi A" first="Amir" last="Moeintaghavi">Amir Moeintaghavi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. moeentaghavia@mums.ac.ir</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Radvar, Mehrdad" sort="Radvar, Mehrdad" uniqKey="Radvar M" first="Mehrdad" last="Radvar">Mehrdad Radvar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Arab, Hamid Reza" sort="Arab, Hamid Reza" uniqKey="Arab H" first="Hamid Reza" last="Arab">Hamid Reza Arab</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boostani, Hamid Reza" sort="Boostani, Hamid Reza" uniqKey="Boostani H" first="Hamid Reza" last="Boostani">Hamid Reza Boostani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ghiami, Elham" sort="Ghiami, Elham" uniqKey="Ghiami E" first="Elham" last="Ghiami">Elham Ghiami</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21126151</idno><idno type="pmid">21126151</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00117</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F70</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F70</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients.</title><author><name sortKey="Moeintaghavi, Amir" sort="Moeintaghavi, Amir" uniqKey="Moeintaghavi A" first="Amir" last="Moeintaghavi">Amir Moeintaghavi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. moeentaghavia@mums.ac.ir</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Radvar, Mehrdad" sort="Radvar, Mehrdad" uniqKey="Radvar M" first="Mehrdad" last="Radvar">Mehrdad Radvar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Arab, Hamid Reza" sort="Arab, Hamid Reza" uniqKey="Arab H" first="Hamid Reza" last="Arab">Hamid Reza Arab</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boostani, Hamid Reza" sort="Boostani, Hamid Reza" uniqKey="Boostani H" first="Hamid Reza" last="Boostani">Hamid Reza Boostani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ghiami, Elham" sort="Ghiami, Elham" uniqKey="Ghiami E" first="Elham" last="Ghiami">Elham Ghiami</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure (classification)</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Single-Blind Method</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Single-Blind Method</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The use of osseointegrated implants as a foundation for the prosthetic replacement of missing teeth has become widespread, with new dental implant systems being introduced every year. There is growing interest in identifying the factors associated with implant failure, such as implant type. This study was designed to establish the relationship between implant type and success. Eighty-eight patients (mean age, 52 years) with 268 implants (110 BioHorizons, 60 ITI, 60 Paragon, 18 Xive, six 3i, and 19 Allfit) participated in this 5-year retrospective study. Statistical significance was defined for P < .05. Peri-implant probing depth was associated with bone loss and bleeding on probing. Implant failure was not associated with implant brand. Maximal (or minimal) peri-implant probing depth and bone loss values were seen at anterior regions (or premolars). Maximal (or minimal) bleeding on probing was seen at the posterior (or anterior) region. No significant differences were observed between the different systems in terms of implant failure.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21126151</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0160-6972</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>38 Spec No</Volume><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>441-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00117</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The use of osseointegrated implants as a foundation for the prosthetic replacement of missing teeth has become widespread, with new dental implant systems being introduced every year. There is growing interest in identifying the factors associated with implant failure, such as implant type. This study was designed to establish the relationship between implant type and success. Eighty-eight patients (mean age, 52 years) with 268 implants (110 BioHorizons, 60 ITI, 60 Paragon, 18 Xive, six 3i, and 19 Allfit) participated in this 5-year retrospective study. Statistical significance was defined for P < .05. Peri-implant probing depth was associated with bone loss and bleeding on probing. Implant failure was not associated with implant brand. Maximal (or minimal) peri-implant probing depth and bone loss values were seen at anterior regions (or premolars). Maximal (or minimal) bleeding on probing was seen at the posterior (or anterior) region. No significant differences were observed between the different systems in terms of implant failure.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moeintaghavi</LastName><ForeName>Amir</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. moeentaghavia@mums.ac.ir</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Radvar</LastName><ForeName>Mehrdad</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Arab</LastName><ForeName>Hamid Reza</ForeName><Initials>HR</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Boostani</LastName><ForeName>Hamid Reza</ForeName><Initials>HR</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ghiami</LastName><ForeName>Elham</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7801086</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0160-6972</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016037" MajorTopicYN="N">Single-Blind Method</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21126151</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00117</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F70 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F70 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21126151
|texte= Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with 6 implant brands in partially edentulous patients.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21126151" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |