[Medico-ethical considerations when indicating single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis, and oral implants].
Identifieur interne : 000E62 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000E61; suivant : 000E63[Medico-ethical considerations when indicating single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis, and oral implants].
Auteurs : D J Witter ; W G Brands ; R A Hoefnagel ; N H J. CreugersSource :
- Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde [ 0028-2200 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
The question whether a patient needs extensive and invasive treatment, such as single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis or oral implants, can be established only in a dialogue with mutual respect between the healthcare provider and the patient. With respect to this question, the following principles have to be considered: the patient's autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. These principles are reflected in legislation and are implicitly applied in complaint and disciplinary jurisdiction. When the autonomy of a patient is not sufficiently respected by a healthcare provider, a patient complaint might be the result, such as a complaint of impertinent treatment, lack of informed consent, or poor patient documentation. If beneficence or non-maleficence principles are violated, an intrinsic treatment complaint might be the result, such as a complaint of inadequate treatment planning, often based on inadequate examination, and complications or untimely failure of single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis or oral implants. Respecting the previously mentioned principles promotes appropriate healthcare to the patient also in complex care with other healthcare providers.
PubMed: 23373306
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23373306Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Medico-ethical considerations when indicating single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis, and oral implants].</title><author><name sortKey="Witter, D J" sort="Witter, D J" uniqKey="Witter D" first="D J" last="Witter">D J Witter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>vakgroep Orale Functie en Prothetische Tandheelkunde van het Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud in Nijmegen.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brands, W G" sort="Brands, W G" uniqKey="Brands W" first="W G" last="Brands">W G Brands</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hoefnagel, R A" sort="Hoefnagel, R A" uniqKey="Hoefnagel R" first="R A" last="Hoefnagel">R A Hoefnagel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N H J" last="Creugers">N H J. Creugers</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23373306</idno><idno type="pmid">23373306</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000E62</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000E62</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Medico-ethical considerations when indicating single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis, and oral implants].</title><author><name sortKey="Witter, D J" sort="Witter, D J" uniqKey="Witter D" first="D J" last="Witter">D J Witter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>vakgroep Orale Functie en Prothetische Tandheelkunde van het Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud in Nijmegen.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brands, W G" sort="Brands, W G" uniqKey="Brands W" first="W G" last="Brands">W G Brands</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hoefnagel, R A" sort="Hoefnagel, R A" uniqKey="Hoefnagel R" first="R A" last="Hoefnagel">R A Hoefnagel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N H J" last="Creugers">N H J. Creugers</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</title><idno type="ISSN">0028-2200</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Communication</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term><term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Personal Autonomy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Communication</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term><term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Personal Autonomy</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The question whether a patient needs extensive and invasive treatment, such as single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis or oral implants, can be established only in a dialogue with mutual respect between the healthcare provider and the patient. With respect to this question, the following principles have to be considered: the patient's autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. These principles are reflected in legislation and are implicitly applied in complaint and disciplinary jurisdiction. When the autonomy of a patient is not sufficiently respected by a healthcare provider, a patient complaint might be the result, such as a complaint of impertinent treatment, lack of informed consent, or poor patient documentation. If beneficence or non-maleficence principles are violated, an intrinsic treatment complaint might be the result, such as a complaint of inadequate treatment planning, often based on inadequate examination, and complications or untimely failure of single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis or oral implants. Respecting the previously mentioned principles promotes appropriate healthcare to the patient also in complex care with other healthcare providers.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23373306</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>04</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0028-2200</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>119</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Medico-ethical considerations when indicating single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis, and oral implants].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>611-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The question whether a patient needs extensive and invasive treatment, such as single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis or oral implants, can be established only in a dialogue with mutual respect between the healthcare provider and the patient. With respect to this question, the following principles have to be considered: the patient's autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. These principles are reflected in legislation and are implicitly applied in complaint and disciplinary jurisdiction. When the autonomy of a patient is not sufficiently respected by a healthcare provider, a patient complaint might be the result, such as a complaint of impertinent treatment, lack of informed consent, or poor patient documentation. If beneficence or non-maleficence principles are violated, an intrinsic treatment complaint might be the result, such as a complaint of inadequate treatment planning, often based on inadequate examination, and complications or untimely failure of single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis or oral implants. Respecting the previously mentioned principles promotes appropriate healthcare to the patient also in complex care with other healthcare providers.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Witter</LastName><ForeName>D J</ForeName><Initials>DJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>vakgroep Orale Functie en Prothetische Tandheelkunde van het Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud in Nijmegen.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brands</LastName><ForeName>W G</ForeName><Initials>WG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hoefnagel</LastName><ForeName>R A</ForeName><Initials>RA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Creugers</LastName><ForeName>N H J</ForeName><Initials>NH</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>dut</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Medisch-ethische overwegingen bij de indicatie van kronen, bruggen en implantaten.</VernacularTitle></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0400771</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0028-2200</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003142" MajorTopicYN="N">Communication</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019250" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003812" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dentist-Patient Relations</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D026684" MajorTopicYN="Y">Personal Autonomy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23373306</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E62 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E62 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23373306
|texte= [Medico-ethical considerations when indicating single-tooth fixed prosthesis, multi-teeth fixed prosthesis, and oral implants].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23373306" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |