Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Identifieur interne : 000A55 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000A54; suivant : 000A56Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Auteurs : Felix Guljé ; Ingemar Abrahamsson ; Stephen Chen ; Clark Stanford ; Homayoun Zadeh ; Richard PalmerSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 1600-0501 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Plaque Index, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Periodontal Index, Radiography, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Adult, Aged, Dental Plaque Index, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Periodontal Index, Radiography, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12001
PubMed: 22938573
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22938573Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Gulje, Felix" sort="Gulje, Felix" uniqKey="Gulje F" first="Felix" last="Guljé">Felix Guljé</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Private practice "de Mondhoek", Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" sort="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" uniqKey="Abrahamsson I" first="Ingemar" last="Abrahamsson">Ingemar Abrahamsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Stephen" sort="Chen, Stephen" uniqKey="Chen S" first="Stephen" last="Chen">Stephen Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stanford, Clark" sort="Stanford, Clark" uniqKey="Stanford C" first="Clark" last="Stanford">Clark Stanford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zadeh, Homayoun" sort="Zadeh, Homayoun" uniqKey="Zadeh H" first="Homayoun" last="Zadeh">Homayoun Zadeh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Richard" sort="Palmer, Richard" uniqKey="Palmer R" first="Richard" last="Palmer">Richard Palmer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22938573</idno><idno type="pmid">22938573</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/clr.12001</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A55</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A55</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Gulje, Felix" sort="Gulje, Felix" uniqKey="Gulje F" first="Felix" last="Guljé">Felix Guljé</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Private practice "de Mondhoek", Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" sort="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" uniqKey="Abrahamsson I" first="Ingemar" last="Abrahamsson">Ingemar Abrahamsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Stephen" sort="Chen, Stephen" uniqKey="Chen S" first="Stephen" last="Chen">Stephen Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stanford, Clark" sort="Stanford, Clark" uniqKey="Stanford C" first="Clark" last="Stanford">Clark Stanford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zadeh, Homayoun" sort="Zadeh, Homayoun" uniqKey="Zadeh H" first="Homayoun" last="Zadeh">Homayoun Zadeh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Richard" sort="Palmer, Richard" uniqKey="Palmer R" first="Richard" last="Palmer">Richard Palmer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Plaque Index</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Dental Plaque Index</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22938573</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0501</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>24</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1325-31</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/clr.12001</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND AND AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In this multicenter trial (six study sites), 95 subjects were included. Subjects were randomly allocated to receiving implants with lengths of either 6 or 11 mm both with a diameter of 4 mm (OsseoSpeed(™) 4.0 S; Astra Tech AB; Mölndal, Sweden). In all cases, there had to be sufficient bone height to allow placement of an implant of at least 11 mm in length. Two or three implants were placed per subject using one-stage surgery with a 42-48 days' healing period before loading. They were restored with a screw-retained splinted fixed prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively, postsurgery, at loading, and 6 and 12 months after prosthesis placement.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">A total of 208 implants were inserted in 49 subjects receiving 6-mm implants (test) and in 46 subjects receiving 11 mm implants (control). Two 6-mm implants failed before loading and one 6 and 11 mm implants failed before 1-year evaluation. From loading to the 12 months' follow-up, a mean marginal bone gain of 0.06 mm in the 6 mm group and 0.02 mm in the 11 mm group was found (P = 0.478). Soft tissue behavior was equal in both groups (Bleeding and plaque [P = 1.0] probing depth [P = 0.91]).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">One-year data indicate that treatment with the 6 mm implants is as reliable as treatment with the 11 mm implants. This provides a good treatment option in situations with limited bone height in the premolar and molar regions. Whether or not short implants provide a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation procedures remains to be investigated in the future randomized controlled clinical trials.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guljé</LastName><ForeName>Felix</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Private practice "de Mondhoek", Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Abrahamsson</LastName><ForeName>Ingemar</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chen</LastName><ForeName>Stephen</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stanford</LastName><ForeName>Clark</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zadeh</LastName><ForeName>Homayoun</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Palmer</LastName><ForeName>Richard</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>03</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003774" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Plaque Index</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010512" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Index</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">implant</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">marginal bone loss</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">posterior</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">randomized controlled trial</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">short</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22938573</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/clr.12001</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A55 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A55 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22938573
|texte= Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22938573" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |