The animal experiment of a new optimised distraction implant.
Identifieur interne : 000A53 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000A52; suivant : 000A54The animal experiment of a new optimised distraction implant.
Auteurs : Bo Shao ; Yingying Sun ; Yuan Gao ; Tao Li ; Yongfeng Li ; Yongqiang Zhang ; Xu Ge ; Baolin Liu ; Liang KongSource :
- The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery [ 1532-1940 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging), Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery), Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bone Density (physiology), Bone Matrix (diagnostic imaging), Bone Matrix (pathology), Bone Regeneration (physiology), Dogs, Equipment Design, Feasibility Studies, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandibular Diseases (diagnostic imaging), Mandibular Diseases (surgery), Models, Animal, Osseointegration (physiology), Osteogenesis (physiology), Osteogenesis, Distraction (instrumentation), Osteotomy (methods), Stress, Mechanical, Time Factors, X-Ray Microtomography (methods).
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Matrix, Jaw, Edentulous, Mandibular Diseases.
- instrumentation : Osteogenesis, Distraction.
- methods : Osteotomy, X-Ray Microtomography.
- pathology : Bone Matrix.
- physiology : Bone Density, Bone Regeneration, Osseointegration, Osteogenesis.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous, Mandibular Diseases.
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Dogs, Equipment Design, Feasibility Studies, Models, Animal, Stress, Mechanical, Time Factors.
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate the function of a new optimised distraction implant. Six dogs with alveolar bone defects had a total of 18 distraction, and 6 normal, implants inserted into edentulous mandibular ridges after osteotomy. Five days after insertion the distraction implants were activated at a rate of 1 mm/2 days to achieve a distraction height of 6mm. Radiographs were taken at 0, 1, 2, and 3 months after distraction. Two dogs were killed after 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively, and 12 distraction implants taken from the different time points were evaluated by microcomputed tomographic (MicroCT) scanning and histological examination. The other 6 distraction, and the 6 normal, implants were compared after osseointegration with a fatigue test. The results showed that all the distraction implants had successfully distracted the bone to the anticipated height. Radiographs showed that the density of the regenerated bone increased steadily during the consolidation period. MicroCT showed that the regenerated bone was comparable with the native bone 3 months after distraction. Both native and regenerated bone had osseointegrated histologically by 1 month and 3 months after distraction. The experiment successfully confirmed the usefulness and feasibility of this new distraction implant, and suggests interesting clinical uses.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.03.003
PubMed: 23601834
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23601834Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The animal experiment of a new optimised distraction implant.</title><author><name sortKey="Shao, Bo" sort="Shao, Bo" uniqKey="Shao B" first="Bo" last="Shao">Bo Shao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi' an, 710032, PR China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sun, Yingying" sort="Sun, Yingying" uniqKey="Sun Y" first="Yingying" last="Sun">Yingying Sun</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gao, Yuan" sort="Gao, Yuan" uniqKey="Gao Y" first="Yuan" last="Gao">Yuan Gao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Tao" sort="Li, Tao" uniqKey="Li T" first="Tao" last="Li">Tao Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Yongfeng" sort="Li, Yongfeng" uniqKey="Li Y" first="Yongfeng" last="Li">Yongfeng Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Yongqiang" sort="Zhang, Yongqiang" uniqKey="Zhang Y" first="Yongqiang" last="Zhang">Yongqiang Zhang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ge, Xu" sort="Ge, Xu" uniqKey="Ge X" first="Xu" last="Ge">Xu Ge</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Baolin" sort="Liu, Baolin" uniqKey="Liu B" first="Baolin" last="Liu">Baolin Liu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kong, Liang" sort="Kong, Liang" uniqKey="Kong L" first="Liang" last="Kong">Liang Kong</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23601834</idno><idno type="pmid">23601834</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.03.003</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A53</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A53</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The animal experiment of a new optimised distraction implant.</title><author><name sortKey="Shao, Bo" sort="Shao, Bo" uniqKey="Shao B" first="Bo" last="Shao">Bo Shao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi' an, 710032, PR China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sun, Yingying" sort="Sun, Yingying" uniqKey="Sun Y" first="Yingying" last="Sun">Yingying Sun</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gao, Yuan" sort="Gao, Yuan" uniqKey="Gao Y" first="Yuan" last="Gao">Yuan Gao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Tao" sort="Li, Tao" uniqKey="Li T" first="Tao" last="Li">Tao Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Yongfeng" sort="Li, Yongfeng" uniqKey="Li Y" first="Yongfeng" last="Li">Yongfeng Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Yongqiang" sort="Zhang, Yongqiang" uniqKey="Zhang Y" first="Yongqiang" last="Zhang">Yongqiang Zhang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ge, Xu" sort="Ge, Xu" uniqKey="Ge X" first="Xu" last="Ge">Xu Ge</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Baolin" sort="Liu, Baolin" uniqKey="Liu B" first="Baolin" last="Liu">Baolin Liu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kong, Liang" sort="Kong, Liang" uniqKey="Kong L" first="Liang" last="Kong">Liang Kong</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><idno type="eISSN">1532-1940</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term><term>Animals</term><term>Biomechanical Phenomena</term><term>Bone Density (physiology)</term><term>Bone Matrix (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Bone Matrix (pathology)</term><term>Bone Regeneration (physiology)</term><term>Dogs</term><term>Equipment Design</term><term>Feasibility Studies</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandibular Diseases (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandibular Diseases (surgery)</term><term>Models, Animal</term><term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term><term>Osteogenesis (physiology)</term><term>Osteogenesis, Distraction (instrumentation)</term><term>Osteotomy (methods)</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>X-Ray Microtomography (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Bone Matrix</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandibular Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Osteogenesis, Distraction</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Osteotomy</term><term>X-Ray Microtomography</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Matrix</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Density</term><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteogenesis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandibular Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Biomechanical Phenomena</term><term>Dogs</term><term>Equipment Design</term><term>Feasibility Studies</term><term>Models, Animal</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Our aim was to evaluate the function of a new optimised distraction implant. Six dogs with alveolar bone defects had a total of 18 distraction, and 6 normal, implants inserted into edentulous mandibular ridges after osteotomy. Five days after insertion the distraction implants were activated at a rate of 1 mm/2 days to achieve a distraction height of 6mm. Radiographs were taken at 0, 1, 2, and 3 months after distraction. Two dogs were killed after 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively, and 12 distraction implants taken from the different time points were evaluated by microcomputed tomographic (MicroCT) scanning and histological examination. The other 6 distraction, and the 6 normal, implants were compared after osseointegration with a fatigue test. The results showed that all the distraction implants had successfully distracted the bone to the anticipated height. Radiographs showed that the density of the regenerated bone increased steadily during the consolidation period. MicroCT showed that the regenerated bone was comparable with the native bone 3 months after distraction. Both native and regenerated bone had osseointegrated histologically by 1 month and 3 months after distraction. The experiment successfully confirmed the usefulness and feasibility of this new distraction implant, and suggests interesting clinical uses.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23601834</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>28</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>28</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-1940</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>51</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The animal experiment of a new optimised distraction implant.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e234-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.03.003</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0266-4356(13)00092-2</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Our aim was to evaluate the function of a new optimised distraction implant. Six dogs with alveolar bone defects had a total of 18 distraction, and 6 normal, implants inserted into edentulous mandibular ridges after osteotomy. Five days after insertion the distraction implants were activated at a rate of 1 mm/2 days to achieve a distraction height of 6mm. Radiographs were taken at 0, 1, 2, and 3 months after distraction. Two dogs were killed after 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively, and 12 distraction implants taken from the different time points were evaluated by microcomputed tomographic (MicroCT) scanning and histological examination. The other 6 distraction, and the 6 normal, implants were compared after osseointegration with a fatigue test. The results showed that all the distraction implants had successfully distracted the bone to the anticipated height. Radiographs showed that the density of the regenerated bone increased steadily during the consolidation period. MicroCT showed that the regenerated bone was comparable with the native bone 3 months after distraction. Both native and regenerated bone had osseointegrated histologically by 1 month and 3 months after distraction. The experiment successfully confirmed the usefulness and feasibility of this new distraction implant, and suggests interesting clinical uses.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2013 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shao</LastName><ForeName>Bo</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi' an, 710032, PR China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sun</LastName><ForeName>Yingying</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gao</LastName><ForeName>Yuan</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Li</LastName><ForeName>Tao</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Li</LastName><ForeName>Yongfeng</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhang</LastName><ForeName>Yongqiang</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ge</LastName><ForeName>Xu</ForeName><Initials>X</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Liu</LastName><ForeName>Baolin</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kong</LastName><ForeName>Liang</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>17</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Scotland</Country><MedlineTA>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8405235</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0266-4356</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001696" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomechanical Phenomena</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001857" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Matrix</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001861" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Regeneration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004285" MajorTopicYN="N">Dogs</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004867" MajorTopicYN="N">Equipment Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005240" MajorTopicYN="N">Feasibility Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008336" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandibular Diseases</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D023421" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Animal</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010012" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteogenesis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019857" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteogenesis, Distraction</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010027" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteotomy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055114" MajorTopicYN="N">X-Ray Microtomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Animal experiment</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Distraction implant</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Distraction osteogenesis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Histology</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Micro-computed tomography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Radiographs</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23601834</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0266-4356(13)00092-2</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.03.003</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A53 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A53 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23601834
|texte= The animal experiment of a new optimised distraction implant.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23601834" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |