Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
Identifieur interne : 000A49 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000A48; suivant : 000A50Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
Auteurs : Aron Ascher ; Gunnar E. Carlsson ; Mats KronströmSource :
- Swedish dental journal [ 0347-9994 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Cost Savings, Dental Implant-Abutment Design (statistics & numerical data), Dental Implants (statistics & numerical data), Dental Implants (utilization), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (statistics & numerical data), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (utilization), Dentists (psychology), Denture Retention (instrumentation), Denture, Overlay (economics), Denture, Overlay (statistics & numerical data), Denture, Overlay (utilization), Dentures (statistics & numerical data), Dentures (utilization), Health Services Needs and Demand (statistics & numerical data), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandible (pathology), Mandible (surgery), Patient Satisfaction, Prosthodontics (statistics & numerical data), Sweden.
- MESH :
- chemical , statistics & numerical data : Dental Implants.
- geographic : Sweden.
- economics : Denture, Overlay.
- instrumentation : Denture Retention.
- pathology : Mandible.
- psychology : Dentists.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Overlay, Dentures, Health Services Needs and Demand, Prosthodontics.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- chemical , utilization : Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Overlay, Dentures.
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Cost Savings, Humans, Patient Satisfaction.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the production of mandibular implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses among prosthodontic specialists in Sweden and to compare the results with findings in a similar study made in 2001 (17). Questionnaires regarding treatment with mandibular implant prostheses during 20011 were mailed to all specialists in prosthodontics in Sweden (n = 156, according to available data). Of the 156 questionnaires, 129 (83%) were returned and of those 114 were completed. The reported number of treatments with mandibular implant-supported prostheses varied much among the specialists. Fixed implant prostheses were more common than overdentures (means 11 and 3, median values 8 and 2, respectively). However, the range was large for both alternatives. Ten (9%) of the specialists reported no treatment with fixed implant prostheses while 29 (25%) had not made any implant overdenture during 2011. The most common anchorage system for overdentures in 2011 (as well as in 2001) was two un-splinted implants with ball attachments or Locator abutments. The most common reasons for choosing overdenture treatment instead of a fixed implant prosthesis in 2011 were the reduced cost and the patient's main wish to improve denture retention. A majority of the prosthodontists (58%) reported that patients with implant overdentures were as satisfied as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses, whereas 40% claimed they were less satisfied. Two respondents (2%) considered that overdenture patients were more satisfied than those with a fixed prosthesis. It can be concluded that the general attitude among Swedish prosthodontists towards implant overdentures has not changed much during the 10-year period between the present and the previous investigation.An overdenture is still a seldom-used option in implant treatment of patients with edentulous mandibles in Sweden. Instead, a fixed implant-supported prosthesis continues to be the preferred option,
PubMed: 25771650
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25771650Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.</title><author><name sortKey="Ascher, Aron" sort="Ascher, Aron" uniqKey="Ascher A" first="Aron" last="Ascher">Aron Ascher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E" last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25771650</idno><idno type="pmid">25771650</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A49</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.</title><author><name sortKey="Ascher, Aron" sort="Ascher, Aron" uniqKey="Ascher A" first="Aron" last="Ascher">Aron Ascher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E" last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Swedish dental journal</title><idno type="ISSN">0347-9994</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Cost Savings</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Implants (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Implants (utilization)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (utilization)</term><term>Dentists (psychology)</term><term>Denture Retention (instrumentation)</term><term>Denture, Overlay (economics)</term><term>Denture, Overlay (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Denture, Overlay (utilization)</term><term>Dentures (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dentures (utilization)</term><term>Health Services Needs and Demand (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (pathology)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Prosthodontics (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Sweden</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Sweden</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture, Overlay</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dentists</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Dentures</term><term>Health Services Needs and Demand</term><term>Prosthodontics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="utilization" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Dentures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Cost Savings</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to investigate the production of mandibular implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses among prosthodontic specialists in Sweden and to compare the results with findings in a similar study made in 2001 (17). Questionnaires regarding treatment with mandibular implant prostheses during 20011 were mailed to all specialists in prosthodontics in Sweden (n = 156, according to available data). Of the 156 questionnaires, 129 (83%) were returned and of those 114 were completed. The reported number of treatments with mandibular implant-supported prostheses varied much among the specialists. Fixed implant prostheses were more common than overdentures (means 11 and 3, median values 8 and 2, respectively). However, the range was large for both alternatives. Ten (9%) of the specialists reported no treatment with fixed implant prostheses while 29 (25%) had not made any implant overdenture during 2011. The most common anchorage system for overdentures in 2011 (as well as in 2001) was two un-splinted implants with ball attachments or Locator abutments. The most common reasons for choosing overdenture treatment instead of a fixed implant prosthesis in 2011 were the reduced cost and the patient's main wish to improve denture retention. A majority of the prosthodontists (58%) reported that patients with implant overdentures were as satisfied as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses, whereas 40% claimed they were less satisfied. Two respondents (2%) considered that overdenture patients were more satisfied than those with a fixed prosthesis. It can be concluded that the general attitude among Swedish prosthodontists towards implant overdentures has not changed much during the 10-year period between the present and the previous investigation.An overdenture is still a seldom-used option in implant treatment of patients with edentulous mandibles in Sweden. Instead, a fixed implant-supported prosthesis continues to be the preferred option,</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25771650</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>16</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0347-9994</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>38</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Swedish dental journal</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Swed Dent J</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>161-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this study was to investigate the production of mandibular implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses among prosthodontic specialists in Sweden and to compare the results with findings in a similar study made in 2001 (17). Questionnaires regarding treatment with mandibular implant prostheses during 20011 were mailed to all specialists in prosthodontics in Sweden (n = 156, according to available data). Of the 156 questionnaires, 129 (83%) were returned and of those 114 were completed. The reported number of treatments with mandibular implant-supported prostheses varied much among the specialists. Fixed implant prostheses were more common than overdentures (means 11 and 3, median values 8 and 2, respectively). However, the range was large for both alternatives. Ten (9%) of the specialists reported no treatment with fixed implant prostheses while 29 (25%) had not made any implant overdenture during 2011. The most common anchorage system for overdentures in 2011 (as well as in 2001) was two un-splinted implants with ball attachments or Locator abutments. The most common reasons for choosing overdenture treatment instead of a fixed implant prosthesis in 2011 were the reduced cost and the patient's main wish to improve denture retention. A majority of the prosthodontists (58%) reported that patients with implant overdentures were as satisfied as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses, whereas 40% claimed they were less satisfied. Two respondents (2%) considered that overdenture patients were more satisfied than those with a fixed prosthesis. It can be concluded that the general attitude among Swedish prosthodontists towards implant overdentures has not changed much during the 10-year period between the present and the previous investigation.An overdenture is still a seldom-used option in implant treatment of patients with edentulous mandibles in Sweden. Instead, a fixed implant-supported prosthesis continues to be the preferred option,</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ascher</LastName><ForeName>Aron</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Carlsson</LastName><ForeName>Gunnar E</ForeName><Initials>GE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kronström</LastName><ForeName>Mats</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Sweden</Country><MedlineTA>Swed Dent J</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7706129</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0347-9994</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001291" MajorTopicYN="N">Attitude of Health Personnel</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017046" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost Savings</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059605" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implant-Abutment Design</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000656" MajorTopicYN="N">utilization</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000656" MajorTopicYN="Y">utilization</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003815" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentists</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000656" MajorTopicYN="N">utilization</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003778" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentures</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000656" MajorTopicYN="N">utilization</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006301" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Services Needs and Demand</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011476" MajorTopicYN="N">Prosthodontics</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013548" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Sweden</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25771650</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A49 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A49 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25771650
|texte= Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25771650" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |