The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.
Identifieur interne : 000A20 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000A19; suivant : 000A21The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.
Auteurs : O. Schierz ; N. Klinger ; G. Schön ; D R ReissmannSource :
- International journal of computerized dentistry [ 1463-4201 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Computer Systems, Dental Articulators, Dental Occlusion, Centric, Female, Humans, Jaw Relation Record (instrumentation), Jaw Relation Record (methods), Jaw, Edentulous (physiopathology), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (physiopathology), Male, Mandible (pathology), Mandible (physiopathology), Mandibular Condyle (physiology), Middle Aged, Range of Motion, Articular (physiology), Reproducibility of Results, Temporomandibular Joint (physiology).
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Jaw Relation Record.
- methods : Jaw Relation Record.
- pathology : Mandible.
- physiology : Mandibular Condyle, Range of Motion, Articular, Temporomandibular Joint.
- physiopathology : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible.
- Computer Systems, Dental Articulators, Dental Occlusion, Centric, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results.
Abstract
Recording the track of the mandibular hinge axis and consequently ascertaining the posterior determinants is one of the key requirements for accurately simulating individual oral conditions in the (virtual) articulator. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of computerized condylar path inclination angle (CPIA) measures and to assess whether the reliability depends on the mandibular dentition. Sagittal and transverse CPIA were measured using computerized axiography (Cadiax Compact 2) at two separate sessions in prosthodontic patients (mean age +/- SD: 64.3 +/- 10.3 years; female: 45%) who were classified into three dentition categories (fully dentate: N = 19, partially dentate: N = 27 and edentulous: N = 19). These measurements were repeated three times at both sessions without removing the computerized axiograph. Reliability was assessed in multilevel analyses using the subject as a grouping variable in linear random-intercept models. Considering all assessment procedures, the patient-specific differences explained 75% of the variance for the sagittal and 38% for the transverse condylar path. This corresponds to the overall reliability of both the sagittal and the transverse CPIA assessment. The dentition had no significant impact on the reliability of the measurements. The sagittal CPIA can be assessed with satisfactory reliability using computerized axiography. It is independent of the status of the dentition, which has no statistically significant impact on the measures. Transverse CPIA measurements have shown poor reliability. Therefore, the electronic determination of the sagittal CPIA is a reliable procedure that can be applied in patients irrespective of the status of the mandibular dentition.
PubMed: 24791464
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24791464Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.</title><author><name sortKey="Schierz, O" sort="Schierz, O" uniqKey="Schierz O" first="O" last="Schierz">O. Schierz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Klinger, N" sort="Klinger, N" uniqKey="Klinger N" first="N" last="Klinger">N. Klinger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schon, G" sort="Schon, G" uniqKey="Schon G" first="G" last="Schön">G. Schön</name></author><author><name sortKey="Reissmann, D R" sort="Reissmann, D R" uniqKey="Reissmann D" first="D R" last="Reissmann">D R Reissmann</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24791464</idno><idno type="pmid">24791464</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A20</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A20</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.</title><author><name sortKey="Schierz, O" sort="Schierz, O" uniqKey="Schierz O" first="O" last="Schierz">O. Schierz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Klinger, N" sort="Klinger, N" uniqKey="Klinger N" first="N" last="Klinger">N. Klinger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schon, G" sort="Schon, G" uniqKey="Schon G" first="G" last="Schön">G. Schön</name></author><author><name sortKey="Reissmann, D R" sort="Reissmann, D R" uniqKey="Reissmann D" first="D R" last="Reissmann">D R Reissmann</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of computerized dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">1463-4201</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer Systems</term><term>Dental Articulators</term><term>Dental Occlusion, Centric</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw Relation Record (instrumentation)</term><term>Jaw Relation Record (methods)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (physiopathology)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (physiopathology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (pathology)</term><term>Mandible (physiopathology)</term><term>Mandibular Condyle (physiology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Range of Motion, Articular (physiology)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Temporomandibular Joint (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw Relation Record</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw Relation Record</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandibular Condyle</term><term>Range of Motion, Articular</term><term>Temporomandibular Joint</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer Systems</term><term>Dental Articulators</term><term>Dental Occlusion, Centric</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Recording the track of the mandibular hinge axis and consequently ascertaining the posterior determinants is one of the key requirements for accurately simulating individual oral conditions in the (virtual) articulator. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of computerized condylar path inclination angle (CPIA) measures and to assess whether the reliability depends on the mandibular dentition. Sagittal and transverse CPIA were measured using computerized axiography (Cadiax Compact 2) at two separate sessions in prosthodontic patients (mean age +/- SD: 64.3 +/- 10.3 years; female: 45%) who were classified into three dentition categories (fully dentate: N = 19, partially dentate: N = 27 and edentulous: N = 19). These measurements were repeated three times at both sessions without removing the computerized axiograph. Reliability was assessed in multilevel analyses using the subject as a grouping variable in linear random-intercept models. Considering all assessment procedures, the patient-specific differences explained 75% of the variance for the sagittal and 38% for the transverse condylar path. This corresponds to the overall reliability of both the sagittal and the transverse CPIA assessment. The dentition had no significant impact on the reliability of the measurements. The sagittal CPIA can be assessed with satisfactory reliability using computerized axiography. It is independent of the status of the dentition, which has no statistically significant impact on the measures. Transverse CPIA measurements have shown poor reliability. Therefore, the electronic determination of the sagittal CPIA is a reliable procedure that can be applied in patients irrespective of the status of the mandibular dentition.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24791464</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>05</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1463-4201</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>17</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of computerized dentistry</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Comput Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>35-51</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Recording the track of the mandibular hinge axis and consequently ascertaining the posterior determinants is one of the key requirements for accurately simulating individual oral conditions in the (virtual) articulator. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of computerized condylar path inclination angle (CPIA) measures and to assess whether the reliability depends on the mandibular dentition. Sagittal and transverse CPIA were measured using computerized axiography (Cadiax Compact 2) at two separate sessions in prosthodontic patients (mean age +/- SD: 64.3 +/- 10.3 years; female: 45%) who were classified into three dentition categories (fully dentate: N = 19, partially dentate: N = 27 and edentulous: N = 19). These measurements were repeated three times at both sessions without removing the computerized axiograph. Reliability was assessed in multilevel analyses using the subject as a grouping variable in linear random-intercept models. Considering all assessment procedures, the patient-specific differences explained 75% of the variance for the sagittal and 38% for the transverse condylar path. This corresponds to the overall reliability of both the sagittal and the transverse CPIA assessment. The dentition had no significant impact on the reliability of the measurements. The sagittal CPIA can be assessed with satisfactory reliability using computerized axiography. It is independent of the status of the dentition, which has no statistically significant impact on the measures. Transverse CPIA measurements have shown poor reliability. Therefore, the electronic determination of the sagittal CPIA is a reliable procedure that can be applied in patients irrespective of the status of the mandibular dentition.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schierz</LastName><ForeName>O</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Klinger</LastName><ForeName>N</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schön</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reissmann</LastName><ForeName>D R</ForeName><Initials>DR</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><Language>ger</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Comput Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100891504</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1463-4201</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003199" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003725" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Articulators</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003768" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Occlusion, Centric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007574" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw Relation Record</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008335" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandibular Condyle</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016059" MajorTopicYN="N">Range of Motion, Articular</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013704" MajorTopicYN="N">Temporomandibular Joint</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24791464</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A20 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A20 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24791464
|texte= The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24791464" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |