Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.
Identifieur interne : 000644 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000643; suivant : 000645Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.
Auteurs : Mariano Herrero-Climent ; Manuel María Romero Ruiz ; Carmen María Díaz-Castro ; Pedro Bull N ; Jose Vincente Ríos-SantosSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Bone Loss (classification), Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging), Bone Density (physiology), Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Double-Blind Method, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Osseointegration (physiology), Radiography, Bitewing, Surface Properties.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- classification : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- physiology : Bone Density, Osseointegration.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Double-Blind Method, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Radiography, Bitewing, Surface Properties.
Abstract
The purpose of this trial was to evaluate crestal bone level changes radiographically in a standardized fashion over a period of 12 months in humans for implants with a 0.7-mm machined collar (implant type A) versus type B implants with a 1.5-mm machined collar.
PubMed: 25397800
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25397800Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.</title><author><name sortKey="Herrero Climent, Mariano" sort="Herrero Climent, Mariano" uniqKey="Herrero Climent M" first="Mariano" last="Herrero-Climent">Mariano Herrero-Climent</name></author><author><name sortKey="Romero Ruiz, Manuel Maria" sort="Romero Ruiz, Manuel Maria" uniqKey="Romero Ruiz M" first="Manuel María" last="Romero Ruiz">Manuel María Romero Ruiz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Diaz Castro, Carmen Maria" sort="Diaz Castro, Carmen Maria" uniqKey="Diaz Castro C" first="Carmen María" last="Díaz-Castro">Carmen María Díaz-Castro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bull N, Pedro" sort="Bull N, Pedro" uniqKey="Bull N P" first="Pedro" last="Bull N">Pedro Bull N</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rios Santos, Jose Vincente" sort="Rios Santos, Jose Vincente" uniqKey="Rios Santos J" first="Jose Vincente" last="Ríos-Santos">Jose Vincente Ríos-Santos</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2014 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25397800</idno><idno type="pmid">25397800</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000644</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000644</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.</title><author><name sortKey="Herrero Climent, Mariano" sort="Herrero Climent, Mariano" uniqKey="Herrero Climent M" first="Mariano" last="Herrero-Climent">Mariano Herrero-Climent</name></author><author><name sortKey="Romero Ruiz, Manuel Maria" sort="Romero Ruiz, Manuel Maria" uniqKey="Romero Ruiz M" first="Manuel María" last="Romero Ruiz">Manuel María Romero Ruiz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Diaz Castro, Carmen Maria" sort="Diaz Castro, Carmen Maria" uniqKey="Diaz Castro C" first="Carmen María" last="Díaz-Castro">Carmen María Díaz-Castro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bull N, Pedro" sort="Bull N, Pedro" uniqKey="Bull N P" first="Pedro" last="Bull N">Pedro Bull N</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rios Santos, Jose Vincente" sort="Rios Santos, Jose Vincente" uniqKey="Rios Santos J" first="Jose Vincente" last="Ríos-Santos">Jose Vincente Ríos-Santos</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (classification)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Bone Density (physiology)</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Double-Blind Method</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term><term>Radiography, Bitewing</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Density</term><term>Osseointegration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Double-Blind Method</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Radiography, Bitewing</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this trial was to evaluate crestal bone level changes radiographically in a standardized fashion over a period of 12 months in humans for implants with a 0.7-mm machined collar (implant type A) versus type B implants with a 1.5-mm machined collar.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25397800</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>29</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2014 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1374-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/jomi.3583</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The purpose of this trial was to evaluate crestal bone level changes radiographically in a standardized fashion over a period of 12 months in humans for implants with a 0.7-mm machined collar (implant type A) versus type B implants with a 1.5-mm machined collar.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Twenty-five patients with multiple missing teeth in posterior sectors were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: A (0.7-mm machined-collar implants) or B (1.5-mm machined-collar implants). Changes at crestal bone level were assessed by measuring the shoulder-crest distance (SCD) on the mesial and distal aspects of each implant on customized periapical radiographs, which were taken on the day of surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Eighty-one implants were included in the study. Mean SCD was 0.54 ± 0.53 mm at baseline and 1.49 ± 0.40 mm after 12 months. For 0.7-mm-collar implants, mean SCD was 1.40 ± 0.39 mm, while it was 1.56 ± 0.40 mm for 1.5-mm-collar implants. Statistically significant differences were found only between the two types of implants for distal measurements at 3 and 12 months after placement.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Both 0.7- and 1.5-mm machined-collar implants can be used with predictable results, as changes in peri-implant crestal bone levels are similar for both implant types and do not seem to be significant from a clinical point of view. The SCD may well depend more on the location of the abutment-implant interface than on machined-collar height.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Herrero-Climent</LastName><ForeName>Mariano</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Romero Ruiz</LastName><ForeName>Manuel María</ForeName><Initials>MM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Díaz-Castro</LastName><ForeName>Carmen María</ForeName><Initials>CM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bullón</LastName><ForeName>Pedro</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ríos-Santos</LastName><ForeName>Jose Vincente</ForeName><Initials>JV</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059605" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implant-Abutment Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004311" MajorTopicYN="N">Double-Blind Method</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016300" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Bitewing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25397800</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000644 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000644 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25397800
|texte= Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25397800" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |