Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.
Identifieur interne : 000577 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000576; suivant : 000578Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.
Auteurs : Mahmoud Sabouhi ; Farshad Bajoghli ; Majid AbolhasaniSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analysis of Variance, Computer-Aided Design, Dental Implants, Dental Impression Technique (standards), Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (methods), Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods), Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation).
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Imaging, Three-Dimensional.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- standards : Dental Impression Technique.
- Analysis of Variance, Computer-Aided Design, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans.
Abstract
The success of an implant-supported prosthesis is dependent on the passive fit of its framework fabricated on a precise cast. The aim of this in vitro study was to digitally compare the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in partially and completely edentulous conditions.
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3487
PubMed: 25506645
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25506645Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.</title><author><name sortKey="Sabouhi, Mahmoud" sort="Sabouhi, Mahmoud" uniqKey="Sabouhi M" first="Mahmoud" last="Sabouhi">Mahmoud Sabouhi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bajoghli, Farshad" sort="Bajoghli, Farshad" uniqKey="Bajoghli F" first="Farshad" last="Bajoghli">Farshad Bajoghli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abolhasani, Majid" sort="Abolhasani, Majid" uniqKey="Abolhasani M" first="Majid" last="Abolhasani">Majid Abolhasani</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2015 Jan-Feb</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25506645</idno><idno type="pmid">25506645</idno><idno type="doi">10.11607/jomi.3487</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000577</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000577</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.</title><author><name sortKey="Sabouhi, Mahmoud" sort="Sabouhi, Mahmoud" uniqKey="Sabouhi M" first="Mahmoud" last="Sabouhi">Mahmoud Sabouhi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bajoghli, Farshad" sort="Bajoghli, Farshad" uniqKey="Bajoghli F" first="Farshad" last="Bajoghli">Farshad Bajoghli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abolhasani, Majid" sort="Abolhasani, Majid" uniqKey="Abolhasani M" first="Majid" last="Abolhasani">Majid Abolhasani</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Impression Technique (standards)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Humans</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The success of an implant-supported prosthesis is dependent on the passive fit of its framework fabricated on a precise cast. The aim of this in vitro study was to digitally compare the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in partially and completely edentulous conditions.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25506645</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>30</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2015 Jan-Feb</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>26-34</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/jomi.3487</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The success of an implant-supported prosthesis is dependent on the passive fit of its framework fabricated on a precise cast. The aim of this in vitro study was to digitally compare the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in partially and completely edentulous conditions.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The master model simulated two clinical conditions. The first condition was a partially edentulous mandibular arch with an anterior edentulous space (D condition). Two implant analogs were inserted in bilateral canine sites. After elimination of the teeth, the model was converted to a completely edentulous condition (E condition). Three different impression techniques were performed (open splinted [OS], open unsplinted [OU], closed [C]) for each condition. Six groups of casts (DOS, DOU, DC, EOS, EOU, EC) (n = 8), totaling 48 casts, were made. Two scan bodies were secured onto the master edentulous model and onto each test cast and digitized by an optical scanning system. The related scans were superimposed, and the mean discrepancy for each cast was determined.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the accuracy of casts as a function of model status (P = .78, analysis of variance [ANOVA] test), impression technique (P = .57, ANOVA test), or as the combination of both (P = .29, ANOVA test). The distribution of data was normal (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Model status (dentate or edentulous) and impression technique did not influence the precision of the casts. There is no difference among any of the impression techniques in either simulated clinical condition.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sabouhi</LastName><ForeName>Mahmoud</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bajoghli</LastName><ForeName>Farshad</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Abolhasani</LastName><ForeName>Majid</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>05</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017076" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer-Aided Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25506645</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.11607/jomi.3487</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000577 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000577 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25506645
|texte= Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25506645" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |