Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.
Identifieur interne : 000554 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000553; suivant : 000555Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.
Auteurs : Matteo Chiapasco ; Giuseppe Di Martino ; Tommaso Anello ; Marco Zaniboni ; Eugenio RomeoSource :
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research [ 1708-8208 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla.
- transplantation : Ilium.
- Adult, Aged, Bone Resorption, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare (1) the clinical outcome of the reconstruction of extremely atrophic edentulous maxillae with fresh frozen allogeneic bone (FFB) (group A) and autogenous bone (AB) (group B) iliac blocks; and (2) the peri-implant bone resorption and the survival rate of implants in the two groups.
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12191
PubMed: 24373321
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24373321Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Chiapasco, Matteo" sort="Chiapasco, Matteo" uniqKey="Chiapasco M" first="Matteo" last="Chiapasco">Matteo Chiapasco</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Unit of Oral Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Di Martino, Giuseppe" sort="Di Martino, Giuseppe" uniqKey="Di Martino G" first="Giuseppe" last="Di Martino">Giuseppe Di Martino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Anello, Tommaso" sort="Anello, Tommaso" uniqKey="Anello T" first="Tommaso" last="Anello">Tommaso Anello</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zaniboni, Marco" sort="Zaniboni, Marco" uniqKey="Zaniboni M" first="Marco" last="Zaniboni">Marco Zaniboni</name></author><author><name sortKey="Romeo, Eugenio" sort="Romeo, Eugenio" uniqKey="Romeo E" first="Eugenio" last="Romeo">Eugenio Romeo</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24373321</idno><idno type="pmid">24373321</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/cid.12191</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000554</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000554</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Chiapasco, Matteo" sort="Chiapasco, Matteo" uniqKey="Chiapasco M" first="Matteo" last="Chiapasco">Matteo Chiapasco</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Unit of Oral Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Di Martino, Giuseppe" sort="Di Martino, Giuseppe" uniqKey="Di Martino G" first="Giuseppe" last="Di Martino">Giuseppe Di Martino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Anello, Tommaso" sort="Anello, Tommaso" uniqKey="Anello T" first="Tommaso" last="Anello">Tommaso Anello</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zaniboni, Marco" sort="Zaniboni, Marco" uniqKey="Zaniboni M" first="Marco" last="Zaniboni">Marco Zaniboni</name></author><author><name sortKey="Romeo, Eugenio" sort="Romeo, Eugenio" uniqKey="Romeo E" first="Eugenio" last="Romeo">Eugenio Romeo</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Bone Transplantation (methods)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Ilium (transplantation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Survival Rate</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="transplantation" xml:lang="en"><term>Ilium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Survival Rate</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study was to compare (1) the clinical outcome of the reconstruction of extremely atrophic edentulous maxillae with fresh frozen allogeneic bone (FFB) (group A) and autogenous bone (AB) (group B) iliac blocks; and (2) the peri-implant bone resorption and the survival rate of implants in the two groups.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24373321</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1708-8208</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>17 Suppl 1</Volume><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e251-66</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/cid.12191</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The purpose of this study was to compare (1) the clinical outcome of the reconstruction of extremely atrophic edentulous maxillae with fresh frozen allogeneic bone (FFB) (group A) and autogenous bone (AB) (group B) iliac blocks; and (2) the peri-implant bone resorption and the survival rate of implants in the two groups.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In a 1-year period, eight patients were treated with FFB and seven with AB iliac grafts. Five to seven months afterward, 108 implants were inserted (59 in group A and 49 in group B). Four to five months afterward, patients were rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses. The mean follow-up was 24 months.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Prior to implant placement, graft exposure occurred in two patients in group A and in one patient in group B. The mean graft resorption prior to implant placement was 0.78 mm and 0.54 mm in group A and B, respectively. After implant placement, bone graft exposures with partial loss of the graft occurred in six out of eight patients in group A and in none of the group B patients. The survival rate of implants was 90.1% and 100% in group A and B, respectively. The mean values of peri-implant bone resorption at the end of the follow-up period were 1.64 mm and 0.92 mm in group A and B, respectively.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Results of this study seem to demonstrate that FFB does not represent a reliable alternative to AB blocks because of the higher rate of bone exposure and partial loss of the grafts, the lower implant survival, and the higher peri-implant bone resorption in FFB patients.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chiapasco</LastName><ForeName>Matteo</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Unit of Oral Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Di Martino</LastName><ForeName>Giuseppe</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Anello</LastName><ForeName>Tommaso</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zaniboni</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Romeo</LastName><ForeName>Eugenio</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>27</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100888977</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1523-0899</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001862" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Resorption</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007085" MajorTopicYN="N">Ilium</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000637" MajorTopicYN="Y">transplantation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015996" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Rate</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">allogeneic bone</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">autogenous bone</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">bone atrophy</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">bone graft</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">complication</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental prosthesis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">edentulism</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">endosseous implant</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">fresh frozen</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>31</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24373321</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/cid.12191</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000554 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000554 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24373321
|texte= Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24373321" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |