Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.
Identifieur interne : 000543 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000542; suivant : 000544Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.
Auteurs : Charles A. Babbush ; Ali KanawatiSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery), Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Bone Regeneration (physiology), Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use), Calcium Compounds (therapeutic use), Calcium Phosphates (therapeutic use), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Middle Aged, Osseointegration (physiology), Peri-Implantitis (surgery), Radiography, Bitewing, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Silicates (therapeutic use), Survival Analysis, Tooth Extraction, Tooth Socket (surgery), Treatment Outcome, Viscosity.
- MESH :
- chemical , therapeutic use : Bone Substitutes, Calcium Compounds, Calcium Phosphates, Silicates.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- physiology : Bone Regeneration, Osseointegration.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous, Peri-Implantitis, Tooth Socket.
- chemical : Dental Implants, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Radiography, Bitewing, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Tooth Extraction, Treatment Outcome, Viscosity.
Abstract
Along with the widespread use of dental implants, regenerative procedures have become an indispensable tool for implant surgeons in managing residual ridges and the surrounding bone. Putty bone grafts have significantly superior handling characteristics in comparison to particulates. These include ease of placement, enhanced particle containment, and a viscous consistency that has allowed for unique delivery systems to be developed. The aim of this study was to report the clinical efficacy of calcium phosphosilicate (CPS) putty in a wide variety of indications related to implant reconstruction and to report the survival rate of implants placed in these grafted sites. The CPS putty was used as the graft material of choice. Treatments were categorized into following groups: extraction graft, extraction with immediate implant placement, all-on-four concept, peri-implantitis treatment, bone augmentation before implant placement, implant replacement graft, and grafting around implant placed in resorbed ridges. Included in the analysis were 65 patients (36 men, 29 women) with a mean age of 63 ± 12 years. In total, 262 implants were placed. Four implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and were treated as described in category 4, for a total of 266 grafted sites. Two implants from the extraction graft category and 3 implants from the all-on-four group were lost and replaced with successfully osseointegrated implants during a mean study follow-up period of 12.24 ± 2.32 months. The implant success rate at 1 year was 98.1% (257/262). Based on results of this large-scale, retrospective study we conclude that (1) the use of putty bone grafts can simplify bone-grafting procedures and reduce intraoperative time in various grafting indications, (2) this study verified the efficacy of a CPS putty bone graft biomaterial in a large array of implant-related surgical indications, and (3) implants placed in sites grafted with CPS putty yield very high survival rates.
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00336
PubMed: 25072734
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25072734Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.</title><author><name sortKey="Babbush, Charles A" sort="Babbush, Charles A" uniqKey="Babbush C" first="Charles A" last="Babbush">Charles A. Babbush</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>1 ClearChoice Dental Implant Center, Cleveland, Ohio.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kanawati, Ali" sort="Kanawati, Ali" uniqKey="Kanawati A" first="Ali" last="Kanawati">Ali Kanawati</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25072734</idno><idno type="pmid">25072734</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00336</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000543</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000543</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.</title><author><name sortKey="Babbush, Charles A" sort="Babbush, Charles A" uniqKey="Babbush C" first="Charles A" last="Babbush">Charles A. Babbush</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>1 ClearChoice Dental Implant Center, Cleveland, Ohio.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kanawati, Ali" sort="Kanawati, Ali" uniqKey="Kanawati A" first="Ali" last="Kanawati">Ali Kanawati</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term><term>Bone Regeneration (physiology)</term><term>Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use)</term><term>Calcium Compounds (therapeutic use)</term><term>Calcium Phosphates (therapeutic use)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term><term>Peri-Implantitis (surgery)</term><term>Radiography, Bitewing</term><term>Reoperation</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Silicates (therapeutic use)</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Tooth Extraction</term><term>Tooth Socket (surgery)</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>Viscosity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="therapeutic use" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Substitutes</term><term>Calcium Compounds</term><term>Calcium Phosphates</term><term>Silicates</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Osseointegration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Peri-Implantitis</term><term>Tooth Socket</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Radiography, Bitewing</term><term>Reoperation</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Tooth Extraction</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>Viscosity</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Along with the widespread use of dental implants, regenerative procedures have become an indispensable tool for implant surgeons in managing residual ridges and the surrounding bone. Putty bone grafts have significantly superior handling characteristics in comparison to particulates. These include ease of placement, enhanced particle containment, and a viscous consistency that has allowed for unique delivery systems to be developed. The aim of this study was to report the clinical efficacy of calcium phosphosilicate (CPS) putty in a wide variety of indications related to implant reconstruction and to report the survival rate of implants placed in these grafted sites. The CPS putty was used as the graft material of choice. Treatments were categorized into following groups: extraction graft, extraction with immediate implant placement, all-on-four concept, peri-implantitis treatment, bone augmentation before implant placement, implant replacement graft, and grafting around implant placed in resorbed ridges. Included in the analysis were 65 patients (36 men, 29 women) with a mean age of 63 ± 12 years. In total, 262 implants were placed. Four implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and were treated as described in category 4, for a total of 266 grafted sites. Two implants from the extraction graft category and 3 implants from the all-on-four group were lost and replaced with successfully osseointegrated implants during a mean study follow-up period of 12.24 ± 2.32 months. The implant success rate at 1 year was 98.1% (257/262). Based on results of this large-scale, retrospective study we conclude that (1) the use of putty bone grafts can simplify bone-grafting procedures and reduce intraoperative time in various grafting indications, (2) this study verified the efficacy of a CPS putty bone graft biomaterial in a large array of implant-related surgical indications, and (3) implants placed in sites grafted with CPS putty yield very high survival rates.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25072734</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0160-6972</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>41</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>63-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00336</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Along with the widespread use of dental implants, regenerative procedures have become an indispensable tool for implant surgeons in managing residual ridges and the surrounding bone. Putty bone grafts have significantly superior handling characteristics in comparison to particulates. These include ease of placement, enhanced particle containment, and a viscous consistency that has allowed for unique delivery systems to be developed. The aim of this study was to report the clinical efficacy of calcium phosphosilicate (CPS) putty in a wide variety of indications related to implant reconstruction and to report the survival rate of implants placed in these grafted sites. The CPS putty was used as the graft material of choice. Treatments were categorized into following groups: extraction graft, extraction with immediate implant placement, all-on-four concept, peri-implantitis treatment, bone augmentation before implant placement, implant replacement graft, and grafting around implant placed in resorbed ridges. Included in the analysis were 65 patients (36 men, 29 women) with a mean age of 63 ± 12 years. In total, 262 implants were placed. Four implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and were treated as described in category 4, for a total of 266 grafted sites. Two implants from the extraction graft category and 3 implants from the all-on-four group were lost and replaced with successfully osseointegrated implants during a mean study follow-up period of 12.24 ± 2.32 months. The implant success rate at 1 year was 98.1% (257/262). Based on results of this large-scale, retrospective study we conclude that (1) the use of putty bone grafts can simplify bone-grafting procedures and reduce intraoperative time in various grafting indications, (2) this study verified the efficacy of a CPS putty bone graft biomaterial in a large array of implant-related surgical indications, and (3) implants placed in sites grafted with CPS putty yield very high survival rates.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Babbush</LastName><ForeName>Charles A</ForeName><Initials>CA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>1 ClearChoice Dental Implant Center, Cleveland, Ohio.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kanawati</LastName><ForeName>Ali</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>29</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7801086</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0160-6972</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018786">Bone Substitutes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D017610">Calcium Compounds</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002130">Calcium Phosphates</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D017640">Silicates</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>97Z1WI3NDX</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C020243">calcium phosphate</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>S4255P4G5M</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C031293">calcium silicate</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001861" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Regeneration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018786" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Substitutes</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017610" MajorTopicYN="N">Calcium Compounds</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002130" MajorTopicYN="N">Calcium Phosphates</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057873" MajorTopicYN="N">Peri-Implantitis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016300" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Bitewing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012086" MajorTopicYN="N">Reoperation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017640" MajorTopicYN="N">Silicates</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014081" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth Extraction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020390" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth Socket</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014783" MajorTopicYN="N">Viscosity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">bone grafting</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">implant dentistry</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">maxillofacial surgery</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">oral surgery</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">prosthodontics</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25072734</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00336</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000543 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000543 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25072734
|texte= Clinical evaluation of 262 osseointegrated implants placed in sites grafted with calcium phosphosilicate putty: a retrospective study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25072734" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |