Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study.
Identifieur interne : 000523 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000522; suivant : 000524Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study.
Auteurs : Christoph Vasak ; Georg D. Strbac ; Christian D. Huber ; Stefan Lettner ; André Gahleitner ; Werner ZechnerSource :
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research [ 1708-8208 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants, Polyurethanes.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Computer-Aided Design, Dental Prosthesis Design, In Vitro Techniques, Mandible, Software, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the NobelGuide™ (Medicim/Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) concept maximally reducing the influence of clinical and surgical parameters. Moreover, the study was to compare and validate two validation procedures versus a reference method.
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12085
PubMed: 23679124
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23679124Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study.</title><author><name sortKey="Vasak, Christoph" sort="Vasak, Christoph" uniqKey="Vasak C" first="Christoph" last="Vasak">Christoph Vasak</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb University School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Strbac, Georg D" sort="Strbac, Georg D" uniqKey="Strbac G" first="Georg D" last="Strbac">Georg D. Strbac</name></author><author><name sortKey="Huber, Christian D" sort="Huber, Christian D" uniqKey="Huber C" first="Christian D" last="Huber">Christian D. Huber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lettner, Stefan" sort="Lettner, Stefan" uniqKey="Lettner S" first="Stefan" last="Lettner">Stefan Lettner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gahleitner, Andre" sort="Gahleitner, Andre" uniqKey="Gahleitner A" first="André" last="Gahleitner">André Gahleitner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zechner, Werner" sort="Zechner, Werner" uniqKey="Zechner W" first="Werner" last="Zechner">Werner Zechner</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23679124</idno><idno type="pmid">23679124</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/cid.12085</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000523</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000523</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study.</title><author><name sortKey="Vasak, Christoph" sort="Vasak, Christoph" uniqKey="Vasak C" first="Christoph" last="Vasak">Christoph Vasak</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb University School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Strbac, Georg D" sort="Strbac, Georg D" uniqKey="Strbac G" first="Georg D" last="Strbac">Georg D. Strbac</name></author><author><name sortKey="Huber, Christian D" sort="Huber, Christian D" uniqKey="Huber C" first="Christian D" last="Huber">Christian D. Huber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lettner, Stefan" sort="Lettner, Stefan" uniqKey="Lettner S" first="Stefan" last="Lettner">Stefan Lettner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gahleitner, Andre" sort="Gahleitner, Andre" uniqKey="Gahleitner A" first="André" last="Gahleitner">André Gahleitner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zechner, Werner" sort="Zechner, Werner" uniqKey="Zechner W" first="Werner" last="Zechner">Werner Zechner</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>In Vitro Techniques</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Polyurethanes</term><term>Software</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Polyurethanes</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>In Vitro Techniques</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Software</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the NobelGuide™ (Medicim/Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) concept maximally reducing the influence of clinical and surgical parameters. Moreover, the study was to compare and validate two validation procedures versus a reference method.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23679124</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1708-8208</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>17</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>142-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/cid.12085</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the NobelGuide™ (Medicim/Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) concept maximally reducing the influence of clinical and surgical parameters. Moreover, the study was to compare and validate two validation procedures versus a reference method.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Overall, 60 implants were placed in 10 artificial edentulous mandibles according to the NobelGuide™ protocol. For merging the pre- and postoperative DICOM data sets, three different fusion methods (Triple Scan Technique, NobelGuide™ Validation software, and AMIRA® software [VSG - Visualization Sciences Group, Burlington, MA, USA] as reference) were applied. Discrepancies between the virtual and the actual implant positions were measured.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The mean deviations measured with AMIRA® were 0.49 mm (implant shoulder), 0.69 mm (implant apex), and 1.98°mm (implant axis). The Triple Scan Technique as well as the NobelGuide™ Validation software revealed similar deviations compared with the reference method. A significant correlation between angular and apical deviations was seen (r = 0.53; p < .001). A greater implant diameter was associated with greater deviations (p = .03).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The Triple Scan Technique as a system-independent validation procedure as well as the NobelGuide™ Validation software are in accordance with the AMIRA® software. The NobelGuide™ system showed similar or less spatial and angular deviations compared with others.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vasak</LastName><ForeName>Christoph</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb University School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Strbac</LastName><ForeName>Georg D</ForeName><Initials>GD</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Huber</LastName><ForeName>Christian D</ForeName><Initials>CD</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lettner</LastName><ForeName>Stefan</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gahleitner</LastName><ForeName>André</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zechner</LastName><ForeName>Werner</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D023361">Validation Studies</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>16</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100888977</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1523-0899</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011140">Polyurethanes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017076" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer-Aided Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D066298" MajorTopicYN="N">In Vitro Techniques</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011140" MajorTopicYN="N">Polyurethanes</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012984" MajorTopicYN="N">Software</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="Y">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">computer-assisted</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">computerized tomography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">flapless implant surgery</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">precision</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">stereo lithography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">surgical guides</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23679124</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/cid.12085</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000523 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000523 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23679124
|texte= Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23679124" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |