Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.
Identifieur interne : 000244 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000243; suivant : 000245Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.
Auteurs : Fabrizia Luongo ; Francesco Guido Mangano ; Aldo Macchi ; Giuseppe Luongo ; Carlo ManganoSource :
- BioMed research international [ 2314-6141 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Process (surgery), Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Bone Transplantation (methods), Bone and Bones (pathology), Bone and Bones (physiology), Bone and Bones (surgery), Computer-Aided Design, Dental Implants, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures (methods), Retrospective Studies, Tissue Scaffolds (chemistry), Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- chemistry : Tissue Scaffolds.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Transplantation, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures.
- pathology : Bone and Bones.
- physiology : Bone and Bones.
- surgery : Alveolar Process, Bone and Bones, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Computer-Aided Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Purpose. To present a computer-assisted-design/computer-assisted-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique for the design, fabrication, and clinical application of custom-made synthetic scaffolds, for alveolar ridge augmentation. Methods. The CAD/CAM procedure consisted of (1) virtual planning/design of the custom-made scaffold; (2) milling of the scaffold into the exact size/shape from a preformed synthetic bone block; (3) reconstructive surgery. The main clinical/radiographic outcomes were vertical/horizontal bone gain, any biological complication, and implant survival. Results. Fifteen patients were selected who had been treated with a custom-made synthetic scaffold for ridge augmentation. The scaffolds closely matched the shape of the defects: this reduced the operation time and contributed to good healing. A few patients experienced biological complications, such as pain/swelling (2/15: 13.3%) and exposure of the scaffold (3/15: 20.0%); one of these had infection and complete graft loss. In all other patients, 8 months after reconstruction, a well-integrated newly formed bone was clinically available, and the radiographic evaluation revealed a mean vertical and horizontal bone gain of 2.1 ± 0.9 mm and 3.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Fourteen implants were placed and restored with single crowns. The implant survival rate was 100%. Conclusions. Although positive outcomes have been found with custom-made synthetic scaffolds in alveolar ridge augmentation, further studies are needed to validate this technique.
DOI: 10.1155/2016/5862586
PubMed: 28070512
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28070512Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Luongo, Fabrizia" sort="Luongo, Fabrizia" uniqKey="Luongo F" first="Fabrizia" last="Luongo">Fabrizia Luongo</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Private Practice, 00193 Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Francesco Guido" sort="Mangano, Francesco Guido" uniqKey="Mangano F" first="Francesco Guido" last="Mangano">Francesco Guido Mangano</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Macchi, Aldo" sort="Macchi, Aldo" uniqKey="Macchi A" first="Aldo" last="Macchi">Aldo Macchi</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Luongo, Giuseppe" sort="Luongo, Giuseppe" uniqKey="Luongo G" first="Giuseppe" last="Luongo">Giuseppe Luongo</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Carlo" sort="Mangano, Carlo" uniqKey="Mangano C" first="Carlo" last="Mangano">Carlo Mangano</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Sciences, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:28070512</idno>
<idno type="pmid">28070512</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1155/2016/5862586</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000244</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000244</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Luongo, Fabrizia" sort="Luongo, Fabrizia" uniqKey="Luongo F" first="Fabrizia" last="Luongo">Fabrizia Luongo</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Private Practice, 00193 Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Francesco Guido" sort="Mangano, Francesco Guido" uniqKey="Mangano F" first="Francesco Guido" last="Mangano">Francesco Guido Mangano</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Macchi, Aldo" sort="Macchi, Aldo" uniqKey="Macchi A" first="Aldo" last="Macchi">Aldo Macchi</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Luongo, Giuseppe" sort="Luongo, Giuseppe" uniqKey="Luongo G" first="Giuseppe" last="Luongo">Giuseppe Luongo</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Carlo" sort="Mangano, Carlo" uniqKey="Mangano C" first="Carlo" last="Mangano">Carlo Mangano</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Sciences, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">BioMed research international</title>
<idno type="eISSN">2314-6141</idno>
<imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process (surgery)</term>
<term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term>
<term>Bone Transplantation (methods)</term>
<term>Bone and Bones (pathology)</term>
<term>Bone and Bones (physiology)</term>
<term>Bone and Bones (surgery)</term>
<term>Computer-Aided Design</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pain</term>
<term>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures (methods)</term>
<term>Retrospective Studies</term>
<term>Tissue Scaffolds (chemistry)</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Tissue Scaffolds</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term>
<term>Bone Transplantation</term>
<term>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone and Bones</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone and Bones</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term>
<term>Bone and Bones</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pain</term>
<term>Retrospective Studies</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose. To present a computer-assisted-design/computer-assisted-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique for the design, fabrication, and clinical application of custom-made synthetic scaffolds, for alveolar ridge augmentation. Methods. The CAD/CAM procedure consisted of (1) virtual planning/design of the custom-made scaffold; (2) milling of the scaffold into the exact size/shape from a preformed synthetic bone block; (3) reconstructive surgery. The main clinical/radiographic outcomes were vertical/horizontal bone gain, any biological complication, and implant survival. Results. Fifteen patients were selected who had been treated with a custom-made synthetic scaffold for ridge augmentation. The scaffolds closely matched the shape of the defects: this reduced the operation time and contributed to good healing. A few patients experienced biological complications, such as pain/swelling (2/15: 13.3%) and exposure of the scaffold (3/15: 20.0%); one of these had infection and complete graft loss. In all other patients, 8 months after reconstruction, a well-integrated newly formed bone was clinically available, and the radiographic evaluation revealed a mean vertical and horizontal bone gain of 2.1 ± 0.9 mm and 3.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Fourteen implants were placed and restored with single crowns. The implant survival rate was 100%. Conclusions. Although positive outcomes have been found with custom-made synthetic scaffolds in alveolar ridge augmentation, further studies are needed to validate this technique.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28070512</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">2314-6141</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>2016</Volume>
<PubDate><Year>2016</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>BioMed research international</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Biomed Res Int</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>5862586</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1155/2016/5862586</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Purpose. To present a computer-assisted-design/computer-assisted-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique for the design, fabrication, and clinical application of custom-made synthetic scaffolds, for alveolar ridge augmentation. Methods. The CAD/CAM procedure consisted of (1) virtual planning/design of the custom-made scaffold; (2) milling of the scaffold into the exact size/shape from a preformed synthetic bone block; (3) reconstructive surgery. The main clinical/radiographic outcomes were vertical/horizontal bone gain, any biological complication, and implant survival. Results. Fifteen patients were selected who had been treated with a custom-made synthetic scaffold for ridge augmentation. The scaffolds closely matched the shape of the defects: this reduced the operation time and contributed to good healing. A few patients experienced biological complications, such as pain/swelling (2/15: 13.3%) and exposure of the scaffold (3/15: 20.0%); one of these had infection and complete graft loss. In all other patients, 8 months after reconstruction, a well-integrated newly formed bone was clinically available, and the radiographic evaluation revealed a mean vertical and horizontal bone gain of 2.1 ± 0.9 mm and 3.0 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Fourteen implants were placed and restored with single crowns. The implant survival rate was 100%. Conclusions. Although positive outcomes have been found with custom-made synthetic scaffolds in alveolar ridge augmentation, further studies are needed to validate this technique.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Luongo</LastName>
<ForeName>Fabrizia</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-7998-613X</Identifier>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Private Practice, 00193 Rome, Italy.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mangano</LastName>
<ForeName>Francesco Guido</ForeName>
<Initials>FG</Initials>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-5488-4268</Identifier>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Macchi</LastName>
<ForeName>Aldo</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, Dental School, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Luongo</LastName>
<ForeName>Giuseppe</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mangano</LastName>
<ForeName>Carlo</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-4419-4674</Identifier>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Dental Sciences, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Biomed Res Int</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101600173</NlmUniqueID>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(5):720-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22670038</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;47(7):511-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19278759</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):123-130</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27189627</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):167-84</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20467628</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Aug;22(4):307-15</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24979244</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2014 Oct;40(5):561-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23343341</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Res Int. 2015 ;2015 :957518</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26509173</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Mar 01;20(2):e251-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">25662543</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2016 Aug;87(8):880-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26944409</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jul 12;:null</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27402427</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):933-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23621393</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1095-1102</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26856530</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Craniofac Surg. 2013 May;24(3):856-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23714896</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2014 Feb;23(1):22-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24378654</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):434-44</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24750435</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):610-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24004190</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan 4;38(1):2</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26767187</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S26-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21714968</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Oct;122(4):392-402</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27496576</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:941265</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26064701</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:982104</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24877155</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Med Robot. 2013 Sep;9(3):331-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22961733</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10 ):1229-36</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24954285</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:305217</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26106425</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2000 May;71(5 Suppl):856-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10875691</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan-Jun;6(1):78-90</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27563613</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1460-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24942093</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):13-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">25123759</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZE10-3</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">25954718</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):6-15</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26630463</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):471-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">25159462</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent. 2016 May;48:1-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27012858</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;69(9):2298-304</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21470738</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Oct;59(4):220-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26022542</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biotechnol. 2011 Jan 10;151(1):87-93</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21056602</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;40(3):e65-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21640597</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3299-304</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19820164</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):530-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14668753</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;54(1):83-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">26602586</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8927156</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">27517052</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001842" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone and Bones</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017076" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer-Aided Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010146" MajorTopicYN="N">Pain</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019651" MajorTopicYN="N">Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054457" MajorTopicYN="N">Tissue Scaffolds</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<CoiStatement>No conflict of interests is reported for this study, since the authors have not received any kind of support (financial support or supply of materials from industrial companies) for the realisation of the present clinical investigation.</CoiStatement>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28070512</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1155/2016/5862586</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5192311</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000244 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000244 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:28070512 |texte= Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28070512" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |