Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.
Identifieur interne : 000062 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000061; suivant : 000063Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.
Auteurs : I. Hasan ; C. Madarlis ; L. Keilig ; C. Dirk ; A. Weber ; C. Bourauel ; F. HeinemannSource :
- Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft [ 1618-0402 ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Bite Force, Combined Modality Therapy (instrumentation), Combined Modality Therapy (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Stress Analysis (instrumentation), Dental Stress Analysis (methods), Denture, Overlay, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Mandible (physiopathology), Mandible (surgery), Mouth, Edentulous (diagnosis), Mouth, Edentulous (physiopathology), Mouth, Edentulous (therapy), Pilot Projects, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnosis : Mouth, Edentulous.
- instrumentation : Combined Modality Therapy, Dental Stress Analysis.
- methods : Combined Modality Therapy, Dental Stress Analysis.
- physiopathology : Mandible, Mouth, Edentulous.
- surgery : Mandible.
- therapy : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Aged, Bite Force, Dental Prosthesis Design, Denture, Overlay, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The biting ability of patients improves noticeably after receiving implant-supported overdentures in comparison to conventional complete dentures. However, the change of biting with such treatment concepts has been quantitatively investigated in only a limited number of studies. The aim of the present study has been to measure the biting forces of edentulous patients with complete dentures and after receiving implant-supported overdentures. A total of 26 edentulous patients were included. Ten patients received two to four conventional implants (control group, Ø3.3-3.7mm, L11-13mm) and 16 patients received four to five mini implants (study group, Ø1.8-2.4mm, L13-15mm) inserted in the mandibular interforaminal region. All patients received a lower overdenture with ball/rubber ring attachments and a complete denture for the maxilla. The biting forces were measured using Prescale pressure sheets type low before the insertion of implants and after receiving implant-supported overdenture. The measured sheets were later scanned and analysed using FPD-8010E software. The range of biting forces before the insertion of implants was 80N-122N for the control group and 66-88N for the study group. After the insertion of implants, the range of biting forces increased to 167N-235N for the control group and to 81N-138N for the study group. However, the increase in biting forces after the insertion of implants was not significant for either group. No significant difference was obtained between the two implant systems. The biting forces improved after insertion of implants regardless of which implant system was used. However, the degree of improvement is noticeably related to the original bone quality of the mandible at the insertion regions of implants.
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.011
PubMed: 27496252
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:27496252Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Hasan, I" sort="Hasan, I" uniqKey="Hasan I" first="I" last="Hasan">I. Hasan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, Dental School, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: ihasan@uni-bonn.de.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Madarlis, C" sort="Madarlis, C" uniqKey="Madarlis C" first="C" last="Madarlis">C. Madarlis</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Keilig, L" sort="Keilig, L" uniqKey="Keilig L" first="L" last="Keilig">L. Keilig</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, Dental School, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dirk, C" sort="Dirk, C" uniqKey="Dirk C" first="C" last="Dirk">C. Dirk</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weber, A" sort="Weber, A" uniqKey="Weber A" first="A" last="Weber">A. Weber</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bourauel, C" sort="Bourauel, C" uniqKey="Bourauel C" first="C" last="Bourauel">C. Bourauel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heinemann, F" sort="Heinemann, F" uniqKey="Heinemann F" first="F" last="Heinemann">F. Heinemann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University of Greifswald, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:27496252</idno><idno type="pmid">27496252</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.011</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000062</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000062</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Hasan, I" sort="Hasan, I" uniqKey="Hasan I" first="I" last="Hasan">I. Hasan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, Dental School, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: ihasan@uni-bonn.de.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Madarlis, C" sort="Madarlis, C" uniqKey="Madarlis C" first="C" last="Madarlis">C. Madarlis</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Keilig, L" sort="Keilig, L" uniqKey="Keilig L" first="L" last="Keilig">L. Keilig</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, Dental School, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dirk, C" sort="Dirk, C" uniqKey="Dirk C" first="C" last="Dirk">C. Dirk</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weber, A" sort="Weber, A" uniqKey="Weber A" first="A" last="Weber">A. Weber</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bourauel, C" sort="Bourauel, C" uniqKey="Bourauel C" first="C" last="Bourauel">C. Bourauel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heinemann, F" sort="Heinemann, F" uniqKey="Heinemann F" first="F" last="Heinemann">F. Heinemann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University of Greifswald, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft</title><idno type="eISSN">1618-0402</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Bite Force</term><term>Combined Modality Therapy (instrumentation)</term><term>Combined Modality Therapy (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis (methods)</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Equipment Failure Analysis</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (physiopathology)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (diagnosis)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (physiopathology)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (therapy)</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Combined Modality Therapy</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Combined Modality Therapy</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="therapy" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Bite Force</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Equipment Failure Analysis</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The biting ability of patients improves noticeably after receiving implant-supported overdentures in comparison to conventional complete dentures. However, the change of biting with such treatment concepts has been quantitatively investigated in only a limited number of studies. The aim of the present study has been to measure the biting forces of edentulous patients with complete dentures and after receiving implant-supported overdentures. A total of 26 edentulous patients were included. Ten patients received two to four conventional implants (control group, Ø3.3-3.7mm, L11-13mm) and 16 patients received four to five mini implants (study group, Ø1.8-2.4mm, L13-15mm) inserted in the mandibular interforaminal region. All patients received a lower overdenture with ball/rubber ring attachments and a complete denture for the maxilla. The biting forces were measured using Prescale pressure sheets type low before the insertion of implants and after receiving implant-supported overdenture. The measured sheets were later scanned and analysed using FPD-8010E software. The range of biting forces before the insertion of implants was 80N-122N for the control group and 66-88N for the study group. After the insertion of implants, the range of biting forces increased to 167N-235N for the control group and to 81N-138N for the study group. However, the increase in biting forces after the insertion of implants was not significant for either group. No significant difference was obtained between the two implant systems. The biting forces improved after insertion of implants regardless of which implant system was used. However, the degree of improvement is noticeably related to the original bone quality of the mandible at the insertion regions of implants.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27496252</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1618-0402</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>208</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ann. Anat.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>116-122</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0940-9602(16)30130-3</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.011</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The biting ability of patients improves noticeably after receiving implant-supported overdentures in comparison to conventional complete dentures. However, the change of biting with such treatment concepts has been quantitatively investigated in only a limited number of studies. The aim of the present study has been to measure the biting forces of edentulous patients with complete dentures and after receiving implant-supported overdentures. A total of 26 edentulous patients were included. Ten patients received two to four conventional implants (control group, Ø3.3-3.7mm, L11-13mm) and 16 patients received four to five mini implants (study group, Ø1.8-2.4mm, L13-15mm) inserted in the mandibular interforaminal region. All patients received a lower overdenture with ball/rubber ring attachments and a complete denture for the maxilla. The biting forces were measured using Prescale pressure sheets type low before the insertion of implants and after receiving implant-supported overdenture. The measured sheets were later scanned and analysed using FPD-8010E software. The range of biting forces before the insertion of implants was 80N-122N for the control group and 66-88N for the study group. After the insertion of implants, the range of biting forces increased to 167N-235N for the control group and to 81N-138N for the study group. However, the increase in biting forces after the insertion of implants was not significant for either group. No significant difference was obtained between the two implant systems. The biting forces improved after insertion of implants regardless of which implant system was used. However, the degree of improvement is noticeably related to the original bone quality of the mandible at the insertion regions of implants.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hasan</LastName><ForeName>I</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, Dental School, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: ihasan@uni-bonn.de.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Madarlis</LastName><ForeName>C</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Keilig</LastName><ForeName>L</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, Dental School, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dirk</LastName><ForeName>C</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weber</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bourauel</LastName><ForeName>C</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Endowed Chair of Oral Technology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heinemann</LastName><ForeName>F</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University of Greifswald, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>02</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Ann Anat</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100963897</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0940-9602</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001732" MajorTopicYN="Y">Bite Force</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003131" MajorTopicYN="N">Combined Modality Therapy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003799" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Stress Analysis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019544" MajorTopicYN="N">Equipment Failure Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnosis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapy</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Biting forces</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Conventional implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Mini implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Pressure sheets</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2016</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27496252</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0940-9602(16)30130-3</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.011</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000062 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000062 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:27496252
|texte= Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27496252" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |