Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics.
Identifieur interne : 003294 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003293; suivant : 003295Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics.
Auteurs : B. Fartash [Suède] ; K. ArvidsonSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1997.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Couronnes, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Implants dentaires unitaires, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Ostéo-intégration, Oxyde d'aluminium, Piliers dentaires, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention de prothèse dentaire, Sujet âgé, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études prospectives.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Couronnes, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Implants dentaires unitaires, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâle, Ostéo-intégration, Oxyde d'aluminium, Piliers dentaires, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention de prothèse dentaire, Sujet âgé, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aluminum Oxide, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implants, Dental Implants, Single-Tooth, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Male, Mandible, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Aluminum Oxide, Dental Implants.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Adult, Aged, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implants, Single-Tooth, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mandible, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
49 patients participated in a prospective study of treatment of total or partial edentulism with fixed prosthodontics supported by Bioceram sapphire implants. 15 patients were treated for maxillary or mandibular edentulism, and 7 for a missing maxillary anterior tooth. The remaining 27 patients, with Applegate-Kennedy Class I-IV residual dentitions, were treated with fixed bridges supported by free-standing implants, or bridges supported by teeth and implants. Implant success, prosthesis stability, radiographic marginal bone level as well as parameters for peri-implant health were evaluated. The study began in 1982, and clinical treatment of the last patients was completed in 1988, i.e., a follow-up period ranging from 7 to 13 years. Of the patients treated for total mandibular edentulism, one implant fractured after 6 years in situ. The bone implant score (BIS) values for those implants were at the time for the bridge cementation 63.5 +/- 1.4 and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 year follow-ups 62.1 +/- 1.4, 61.9 +/- 1.5, 61.5 +/- 1.6, and 60.95 +/- 1.3, respectively. The success rate was 100%, 100% and 97.7% for the mandible at 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Of the 7 edentulous patients treated with maxillary fixed bridges, 6 implants in 1 patient had to be removed after 1 year in service. Another 2 patients lost all their implants, 6 each, after 36 months. 6 implants in the 4th patient did not fulfil the criteria for success and were rated as failures at the four year follow-up. The success rate was thus 58.1%, 44.2% and 44.2% for the maxilla at 3, 5 and 10 year follow-ups, respectively. Of the 7 patients in whom single missing teeth were replaced, 1 implant in the premolar region was lost during the 1st year post-operatively, but no other complications or changes in BIS were observed. Of the 27 patients treated for partial edentulism (56 implants total) 1 implant, of a 4-unit free standing maxillary bridge fractured after 6 years and was later replaced. There were no statistically significant differences in BIS changes for the implants when used as abutments for partial maxillary or mandibular edentulism. The cumulative success rates for the implants in the partially maxilla were 96.3, 92.6 and 92.6 at the 3, 5 and 10 years respectively and 100% in the mandible over the whole period.
PubMed: 9586457
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9586457Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fartash, B" sort="Fartash, B" uniqKey="Fartash B" first="B" last="Fartash">B. Fartash</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Stockholm</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Svealand</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Arvidson, K" sort="Arvidson, K" uniqKey="Arvidson K" first="K" last="Arvidson">K. Arvidson</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:9586457</idno>
<idno type="pmid">9586457</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003E87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003E87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003E87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003E87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003E87</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003E87</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fartash, B" sort="Fartash, B" uniqKey="Fartash B" first="B" last="Fartash">B. Fartash</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Stockholm</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Svealand</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Arvidson, K" sort="Arvidson, K" uniqKey="Arvidson K" first="K" last="Arvidson">K. Arvidson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint><date when="1997" type="published">1997</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aluminum Oxide</term>
<term>Crowns</term>
<term>Dental Abutments</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Osseointegration</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Couronnes</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Implants dentaires unitaires</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Ostéo-intégration</term>
<term>Oxyde d'aluminium</term>
<term>Piliers dentaires</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Aluminum Oxide</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Crowns</term>
<term>Dental Abutments</term>
<term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Osseointegration</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Couronnes</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Implants dentaires unitaires</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Ostéo-intégration</term>
<term>Oxyde d'aluminium</term>
<term>Piliers dentaires</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">49 patients participated in a prospective study of treatment of total or partial edentulism with fixed prosthodontics supported by Bioceram sapphire implants. 15 patients were treated for maxillary or mandibular edentulism, and 7 for a missing maxillary anterior tooth. The remaining 27 patients, with Applegate-Kennedy Class I-IV residual dentitions, were treated with fixed bridges supported by free-standing implants, or bridges supported by teeth and implants. Implant success, prosthesis stability, radiographic marginal bone level as well as parameters for peri-implant health were evaluated. The study began in 1982, and clinical treatment of the last patients was completed in 1988, i.e., a follow-up period ranging from 7 to 13 years. Of the patients treated for total mandibular edentulism, one implant fractured after 6 years in situ. The bone implant score (BIS) values for those implants were at the time for the bridge cementation 63.5 +/- 1.4 and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 year follow-ups 62.1 +/- 1.4, 61.9 +/- 1.5, 61.5 +/- 1.6, and 60.95 +/- 1.3, respectively. The success rate was 100%, 100% and 97.7% for the mandible at 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Of the 7 edentulous patients treated with maxillary fixed bridges, 6 implants in 1 patient had to be removed after 1 year in service. Another 2 patients lost all their implants, 6 each, after 36 months. 6 implants in the 4th patient did not fulfil the criteria for success and were rated as failures at the four year follow-up. The success rate was thus 58.1%, 44.2% and 44.2% for the maxilla at 3, 5 and 10 year follow-ups, respectively. Of the 7 patients in whom single missing teeth were replaced, 1 implant in the premolar region was lost during the 1st year post-operatively, but no other complications or changes in BIS were observed. Of the 27 patients treated for partial edentulism (56 implants total) 1 implant, of a 4-unit free standing maxillary bridge fractured after 6 years and was later replaced. There were no statistically significant differences in BIS changes for the implants when used as abutments for partial maxillary or mandibular edentulism. The cumulative success rates for the implants in the partially maxilla were 96.3, 92.6 and 92.6 at the 3, 5 and 10 years respectively and 100% in the mandible over the whole period.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9586457</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>1998</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>8</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>1997</Year>
<Month>Feb</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>58-67</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>49 patients participated in a prospective study of treatment of total or partial edentulism with fixed prosthodontics supported by Bioceram sapphire implants. 15 patients were treated for maxillary or mandibular edentulism, and 7 for a missing maxillary anterior tooth. The remaining 27 patients, with Applegate-Kennedy Class I-IV residual dentitions, were treated with fixed bridges supported by free-standing implants, or bridges supported by teeth and implants. Implant success, prosthesis stability, radiographic marginal bone level as well as parameters for peri-implant health were evaluated. The study began in 1982, and clinical treatment of the last patients was completed in 1988, i.e., a follow-up period ranging from 7 to 13 years. Of the patients treated for total mandibular edentulism, one implant fractured after 6 years in situ. The bone implant score (BIS) values for those implants were at the time for the bridge cementation 63.5 +/- 1.4 and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 year follow-ups 62.1 +/- 1.4, 61.9 +/- 1.5, 61.5 +/- 1.6, and 60.95 +/- 1.3, respectively. The success rate was 100%, 100% and 97.7% for the mandible at 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Of the 7 edentulous patients treated with maxillary fixed bridges, 6 implants in 1 patient had to be removed after 1 year in service. Another 2 patients lost all their implants, 6 each, after 36 months. 6 implants in the 4th patient did not fulfil the criteria for success and were rated as failures at the four year follow-up. The success rate was thus 58.1%, 44.2% and 44.2% for the maxilla at 3, 5 and 10 year follow-ups, respectively. Of the 7 patients in whom single missing teeth were replaced, 1 implant in the premolar region was lost during the 1st year post-operatively, but no other complications or changes in BIS were observed. Of the 27 patients treated for partial edentulism (56 implants total) 1 implant, of a 4-unit free standing maxillary bridge fractured after 6 years and was later replaced. There were no statistically significant differences in BIS changes for the implants when used as abutments for partial maxillary or mandibular edentulism. The cumulative success rates for the implants in the partially maxilla were 96.3, 92.6 and 92.6 at the 3, 5 and 10 years respectively and 100% in the mandible over the whole period.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fartash</LastName>
<ForeName>B</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Arvidson</LastName>
<ForeName>K</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country>
<MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>LMI26O6933</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D000537">Aluminum Oxide</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000537" MajorTopicYN="N">Aluminum Oxide</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="N">Crowns</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000044" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Abutments</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019250" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1997</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1998</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1997</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9586457</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Suède</li>
</country>
<region><li>Svealand</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Stockholm</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Arvidson, K" sort="Arvidson, K" uniqKey="Arvidson K" first="K" last="Arvidson">K. Arvidson</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Suède"><region name="Svealand"><name sortKey="Fartash, B" sort="Fartash, B" uniqKey="Fartash B" first="B" last="Fartash">B. Fartash</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003294 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003294 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:9586457 |texte= Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9586457" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |