Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants. Internationales Team für Implantologie.
Identifieur interne : 003113 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003112; suivant : 003114Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants. Internationales Team für Implantologie.
Auteurs : M. Behr [Allemagne] ; R. Lang ; A. Leibrock ; M. Rosentritt ; G. HandelSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1998.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adolescent, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Bouche édentée (), Bouche édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Couronnes, Femelle, Humains, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire (), Pose d'implant dentaire (effets indésirables), Pose d'implant dentaire (instrumentation), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (effets indésirables), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (instrumentation), Prothèse partielle fixe, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études rétrospectives.
- MESH :
- effets indésirables : Pose d'implant dentaire, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Bouche édentée, Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Adolescent, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Bouche édentée, Couronnes, Femelle, Humains, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Crowns, Dental Implantation (adverse effects), Dental Implantation (instrumentation), Dental Implantation (statistics & numerical data), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (adverse effects), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (instrumentation), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (statistics & numerical data), Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Overlay, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (complications), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous (complications), Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Retrospective Studies.
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Dental Implantation, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- complications : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mouth, Edentulous.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mouth, Edentulous.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Implantation, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Crowns, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Overlay, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the complication rate of two implant systems with different prosthodontic concepts: rigid conical or resilient support of the suprastructure. In 66 patients, 138 ITI implants were inserted whereas 31 patients received a total of 50 IMZ implants. Over an average observation period of 3.5 years (range from 0.5 to 8 years), not only was implant survival recorded, but also prosthodontic complications such as screw loosening, fractures of screws, inserts (intramobile elements, intramobile connectors) and abutments, as well as fractures of metal framework and veneers. With the ITI system, 28.8% of all devices placed exhibited such problems during the observation period. With the IMZ system, this rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), in that 77.4% of all reconstructions required a repair at some point. The various complications were divided into those occurrences which affected only the suprastructure, i.e., failures of frameworks, veneers, bar devices or other retentive elements, and those which involved implant components per se, such as screws and abutment components. In the first category, adverse effects occurred more frequently with ITI-supported prostheses (15.1%) versus IMZ suprastructures (6.4%). Regarding complications with implant components, the rate with IMZ components was considerably higher (71%) compared with ITI (13.5%). This was mainly due to the presence of intramobile elements (IME) and connectors (IMC) in the IMZ system. In this retrospective study, precise fitting, non-resilient abutment components leading to rigid connections of suprastructures, proved to be clinically more successful than resilient anchoring components.
PubMed: 9590945
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9590945Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants. Internationales Team für Implantologie.</title><author><name sortKey="Behr, M" sort="Behr, M" uniqKey="Behr M" first="M" last="Behr">M. Behr</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Regensburg, Germany. Michael.Behr@klinik.uni-regensburg.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Regensburg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Regensburg</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>University of Regensburg</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>University of Regensburg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, R" sort="Lang, R" uniqKey="Lang R" first="R" last="Lang">R. Lang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leibrock, A" sort="Leibrock, A" uniqKey="Leibrock A" first="A" last="Leibrock">A. Leibrock</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosentritt, M" sort="Rosentritt, M" uniqKey="Rosentritt M" first="M" last="Rosentritt">M. Rosentritt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Handel, G" sort="Handel, G" uniqKey="Handel G" first="G" last="Handel">G. Handel</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1998">1998</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:9590945</idno><idno type="pmid">9590945</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003B99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003B99</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003B99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003B99</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003B99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003B99</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants. Internationales Team für Implantologie.</title><author><name sortKey="Behr, M" sort="Behr, M" uniqKey="Behr M" first="M" last="Behr">M. Behr</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Regensburg, Germany. Michael.Behr@klinik.uni-regensburg.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Regensburg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Regensburg</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>University of Regensburg</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>University of Regensburg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, R" sort="Lang, R" uniqKey="Lang R" first="R" last="Lang">R. Lang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leibrock, A" sort="Leibrock, A" uniqKey="Leibrock A" first="A" last="Leibrock">A. Leibrock</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosentritt, M" sort="Rosentritt, M" uniqKey="Rosentritt M" first="M" last="Rosentritt">M. Rosentritt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Handel, G" sort="Handel, G" uniqKey="Handel G" first="G" last="Handel">G. Handel</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="1998" type="published">1998</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Implantation (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Implantation (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implantation (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (complications)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (complications)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Bouche édentée ()</term><term>Bouche édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Couronnes</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire ()</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire (effets indésirables)</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire (instrumentation)</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (effets indésirables)</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (instrumentation)</term><term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pose d'implant dentaire</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Couronnes</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to compare the complication rate of two implant systems with different prosthodontic concepts: rigid conical or resilient support of the suprastructure. In 66 patients, 138 ITI implants were inserted whereas 31 patients received a total of 50 IMZ implants. Over an average observation period of 3.5 years (range from 0.5 to 8 years), not only was implant survival recorded, but also prosthodontic complications such as screw loosening, fractures of screws, inserts (intramobile elements, intramobile connectors) and abutments, as well as fractures of metal framework and veneers. With the ITI system, 28.8% of all devices placed exhibited such problems during the observation period. With the IMZ system, this rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), in that 77.4% of all reconstructions required a repair at some point. The various complications were divided into those occurrences which affected only the suprastructure, i.e., failures of frameworks, veneers, bar devices or other retentive elements, and those which involved implant components per se, such as screws and abutment components. In the first category, adverse effects occurred more frequently with ITI-supported prostheses (15.1%) versus IMZ suprastructures (6.4%). Regarding complications with implant components, the rate with IMZ components was considerably higher (71%) compared with ITI (13.5%). This was mainly due to the presence of intramobile elements (IME) and connectors (IMC) in the IMZ system. In this retrospective study, precise fitting, non-resilient abutment components leading to rigid connections of suprastructures, proved to be clinically more successful than resilient anchoring components.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9590945</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1998</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>9</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1998</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants. Internationales Team für Implantologie.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>51-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this study was to compare the complication rate of two implant systems with different prosthodontic concepts: rigid conical or resilient support of the suprastructure. In 66 patients, 138 ITI implants were inserted whereas 31 patients received a total of 50 IMZ implants. Over an average observation period of 3.5 years (range from 0.5 to 8 years), not only was implant survival recorded, but also prosthodontic complications such as screw loosening, fractures of screws, inserts (intramobile elements, intramobile connectors) and abutments, as well as fractures of metal framework and veneers. With the ITI system, 28.8% of all devices placed exhibited such problems during the observation period. With the IMZ system, this rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), in that 77.4% of all reconstructions required a repair at some point. The various complications were divided into those occurrences which affected only the suprastructure, i.e., failures of frameworks, veneers, bar devices or other retentive elements, and those which involved implant components per se, such as screws and abutment components. In the first category, adverse effects occurred more frequently with ITI-supported prostheses (15.1%) versus IMZ suprastructures (6.4%). Regarding complications with implant components, the rate with IMZ components was considerably higher (71%) compared with ITI (13.5%). This was mainly due to the presence of intramobile elements (IME) and connectors (IMC) in the IMZ system. In this retrospective study, precise fitting, non-resilient abutment components leading to rigid connections of suprastructures, proved to be clinically more successful than resilient anchoring components.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Behr</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Regensburg, Germany. Michael.Behr@klinik.uni-regensburg.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lang</LastName><ForeName>R</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Leibrock</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rosentritt</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Handel</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="N">Crowns</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003757" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1998</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1998</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1998</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9590945</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Handel, G" sort="Handel, G" uniqKey="Handel G" first="G" last="Handel">G. Handel</name><name sortKey="Lang, R" sort="Lang, R" uniqKey="Lang R" first="R" last="Lang">R. Lang</name><name sortKey="Leibrock, A" sort="Leibrock, A" uniqKey="Leibrock A" first="A" last="Leibrock">A. Leibrock</name><name sortKey="Rosentritt, M" sort="Rosentritt, M" uniqKey="Rosentritt M" first="M" last="Rosentritt">M. Rosentritt</name></noCountry><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Behr, M" sort="Behr, M" uniqKey="Behr M" first="M" last="Behr">M. Behr</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003113 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003113 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:9590945
|texte= Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants. Internationales Team für Implantologie.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9590945" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |