Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.
Identifieur interne : 002D09 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002D08; suivant : 002D10Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.
Auteurs : H F Morris [États-Unis] ; S. OchiSource :
- Annals of periodontology [ 1553-0841 ] ; 2000.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Alliage dentaire, Analyse de survie, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Densité osseuse, Durapatite, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Implants dentaires unitaires, Mandibule (), Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles, Maxillaire (), Modèles linéaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Titane, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études prospectives.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Alliage dentaire, Analyse de survie, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Densité osseuse, Durapatite, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Implants dentaires unitaires, Mandibule, Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles, Maxillaire, Modèles linéaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Titane, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Density, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Alloys, Dental Implants, Dental Implants, Single-Tooth, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Durapatite, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Linear Models, Male, Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Stress, Mechanical, Survival Analysis, Titanium, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Alloys, Dental Implants, Durapatite, Titanium.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Density, Dental Implants, Single-Tooth, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Stress, Mechanical, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Over the years, the definition of implant failure has varied, with some investigators accounting for all implants placed, while others discard failures that occurred before clinical loading. The influence of stresses transmitted to various bone densities, by different prosthetic appliances as well as the method used to determine failures, needs to be clearly understood. This paper reports on the influence of two different methods of determining 36-month survival of implants used to support different dental prostheses.
DOI: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.90
PubMed: 11885186
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11885186Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.</title><author><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>MI</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2000">2000</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11885186</idno><idno type="pmid">11885186</idno><idno type="doi">10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.90</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003588</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003588</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003588</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003588</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003588</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003588</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.</title><author><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>MI</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annals of periodontology</title><idno type="ISSN">1553-0841</idno><imprint><date when="2000" type="published">2000</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term><term>Dental Alloys</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Alliage dentaire</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Densité osseuse</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Implants dentaires unitaires</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Modèles linéaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Titane</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études prospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term><term>Dental Alloys</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Alliage dentaire</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Densité osseuse</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Implants dentaires unitaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Modèles linéaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Titane</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études prospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Over the years, the definition of implant failure has varied, with some investigators accounting for all implants placed, while others discard failures that occurred before clinical loading. The influence of stresses transmitted to various bone densities, by different prosthetic appliances as well as the method used to determine failures, needs to be clearly understood. This paper reports on the influence of two different methods of determining 36-month survival of implants used to support different dental prostheses.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11885186</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1553-0841</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2000</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Annals of periodontology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ann. Periodontol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>90-100</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Over the years, the definition of implant failure has varied, with some investigators accounting for all implants placed, while others discard failures that occurred before clinical loading. The influence of stresses transmitted to various bone densities, by different prosthetic appliances as well as the method used to determine failures, needs to be clearly understood. This paper reports on the influence of two different methods of determining 36-month survival of implants used to support different dental prostheses.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">More than 2,900 implants with six different designs were placed in 829 patients at 32 study centers and followed for 3 years. The first method of determining survival accounted for all failures from placement through 36 months, while the second method counted only failures from post-loading of the prosthesis to 36 months. Survival curves were used to determine differences in survival outcomes for the two methods.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">For the maxillary single-tooth prosthetic application, implant survival from placement to 36 months was 94.7% when all failures were counted and increased to 98.3% with the post-loading method. For upper completely edentulous applications, implant survival was 85.3% with all failures counted and 95.6% with the post-loading method. This 10.3% difference is clinically important. The survival for implants in lower completely edentulous applications increased by 4.4% simply by using the post-loading approach. Implants used for upper posterior, partially edentulous applications involved only hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants, and the survival rates were similar (96.4% for all implants and 98.2% for the post-loading method). The difference in reported survival rates for implants in the lower posterior, partially edentulous application was 5.8%. Since failures tended to occur in the earlier phases of treatment, the post-loading approach always resulted in more favorable survival data. With the post-loading approach, valuable information related to implant performance before loading is lost. In all comparisons, HA-coated implant survival was always better than non-HA implants. Clinical investigators should clearly state the method used for determining failures. For all implants included in the study, survival curves illustrated different failure patterns for each method of determining overall survival.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Reporting of implant survival rates based on the post-loading method provides more favorable survival rates; however, accounting for all implants provides a more accurate method of determining survival.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Morris</LastName><ForeName>H F</ForeName><Initials>HF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ochi</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Ann Periodontol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9702874</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1553-0841</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D020099">Coated Materials, Biocompatible</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003722">Dental Alloys</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>12743-70-3</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C031462">titanium alloy (TiAl6V4)</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>91D9GV0Z28</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D017886">Durapatite</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>D1JT611TNE</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014025">Titanium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020099" MajorTopicYN="N">Coated Materials, Biocompatible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003722" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Alloys</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019250" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017886" MajorTopicYN="N">Durapatite</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016014" MajorTopicYN="N">Linear Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014025" MajorTopicYN="N">Titanium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11885186</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.90</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D09 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002D09 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:11885186
|texte= Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11885186" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |