A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
Identifieur interne : 002758 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002757; suivant : 002759A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
Auteurs : Carl J. Drago [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists [ 1059-941X ] ; 2003.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Bouche édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Essayage de prothèse, Humains, Matériaux empreinte dentaire (), Occlusion dentaire, Polyvinyles (), Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rendez-vous et plannings, Siloxanes (), Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation), Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Bouche édentée.
- Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Essayage de prothèse, Humains, Matériaux empreinte dentaire, Occlusion dentaire, Polyvinyles, Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rendez-vous et plannings, Siloxanes, Technique de prise d'empreinte, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Appointments and Schedules, Dental Impression Materials (chemistry), Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation), Dental Occlusion, Denture Bases, Denture Design, Denture, Complete, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Polyvinyls (chemistry), Prosthesis Fitting, Retrospective Studies, Siloxanes (chemistry), Surface Properties.
- MESH :
- chemical , chemistry : Dental Impression Materials, Polyvinyls, Siloxanes.
- instrumentation : Dental Impression Technique.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Appointments and Schedules, Dental Occlusion, Denture Bases, Denture Design, Denture, Complete, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Prosthesis Fitting, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties.
Abstract
To compare the number of postinsertion adjustment visits required by edentulous patients whose dentures were made from border-molded definitive impressions using modeling plastic impression compound (traditional technique) with patients whose dentures were made from border-molded definitive impressions using heavy-body vinyl polysiloxane impression material.
DOI: 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00082-2
PubMed: 14508741
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:14508741Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.</title><author><name sortKey="Drago, Carl J" sort="Drago, Carl J" uniqKey="Drago C" first="Carl J" last="Drago">Carl J. Drago</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Specialists, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, 1836 South Avenue, LaCrosse, WI 45601, USA. cjdrago@gundluth.org</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Specialists, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, 1836 South Avenue, LaCrosse, WI 45601</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>WI 45601</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2003">2003</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:14508741</idno><idno type="pmid">14508741</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00082-2</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002E56</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002E56</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002E56</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002E56</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002E56</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002E56</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.</title><author><name sortKey="Drago, Carl J" sort="Drago, Carl J" uniqKey="Drago C" first="Carl J" last="Drago">Carl J. Drago</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Specialists, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, 1836 South Avenue, LaCrosse, WI 45601, USA. cjdrago@gundluth.org</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Specialists, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, 1836 South Avenue, LaCrosse, WI 45601</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>WI 45601</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists</title><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno><imprint><date when="2003" type="published">2003</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Appointments and Schedules</term><term>Dental Impression Materials (chemistry)</term><term>Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Occlusion</term><term>Denture Bases</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Polyvinyls (chemistry)</term><term>Prosthesis Fitting</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Siloxanes (chemistry)</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Bouche édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Essayage de prothèse</term><term>Humains</term><term>Matériaux empreinte dentaire ()</term><term>Occlusion dentaire</term><term>Polyvinyles ()</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Rendez-vous et plannings</term><term>Siloxanes ()</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation)</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Materials</term><term>Polyvinyls</term><term>Siloxanes</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Appointments and Schedules</term><term>Dental Occlusion</term><term>Denture Bases</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Prosthesis Fitting</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Essayage de prothèse</term><term>Humains</term><term>Matériaux empreinte dentaire</term><term>Occlusion dentaire</term><term>Polyvinyles</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Rendez-vous et plannings</term><term>Siloxanes</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the number of postinsertion adjustment visits required by edentulous patients whose dentures were made from border-molded definitive impressions using modeling plastic impression compound (traditional technique) with patients whose dentures were made from border-molded definitive impressions using heavy-body vinyl polysiloxane impression material.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">14508741</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2003</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1059-941X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2003</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Prosthodont</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>192-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the number of postinsertion adjustment visits required by edentulous patients whose dentures were made from border-molded definitive impressions using modeling plastic impression compound (traditional technique) with patients whose dentures were made from border-molded definitive impressions using heavy-body vinyl polysiloxane impression material.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In this retrospective clinical study, 78 patients were treated with the traditional technique (custom impression trays border molded with gray modeling plastic impression compound) and 78 were treated with the modified technique (custom impression trays border molded with heavy-body vinyl polysiloxane impression material). In both techniques, definitive wash impressions were made with light-body vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Postinsertion visits were quantified for 1 year after the dentures were inserted.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The average number of adjustment visits for patients treated with the traditional technique was 2.68. The average number of adjustment visits for patients treated with the modified technique was 2.68. The data were compared using Student t tests. There was no significant difference in the number of adjustments required for patients whose dentures were made with either technique (t = 0.000, p = 1.00). There was no significant difference in the number of post-insertion visits required by patients from either population.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Within the limitations of this clinical study, border-molding custom denture impression trays with vinyl polysiloxane impression material provided similar results in terms of postinsertion visits for one year as compared to dentures made from impressions border molded with modeling plastic impression compound.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Drago</LastName><ForeName>Carl J</ForeName><Initials>CJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Dental Specialists, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, 1836 South Avenue, LaCrosse, WI 45601, USA. cjdrago@gundluth.org</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Prosthodont</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9301275</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1059-941X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003760">Dental Impression Materials</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011145">Polyvinyls</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012833">Siloxanes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C034183">vinyl polysiloxane</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001071" MajorTopicYN="N">Appointments and Schedules</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003760" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Materials</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003766" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Occlusion</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003819" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Bases</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003824" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Complete</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011145" MajorTopicYN="N">Polyvinyls</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017755" MajorTopicYN="N">Prosthesis Fitting</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012833" MajorTopicYN="N">Siloxanes</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2003</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2003</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2003</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14508741</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00082-2</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1059941X03000822</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Drago, Carl J" sort="Drago, Carl J" uniqKey="Drago C" first="Carl J" last="Drago">Carl J. Drago</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002758 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002758 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:14508741
|texte= A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:14508741" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |