[Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Identifieur interne : 001F01 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001F00; suivant : 001F02[Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Auteurs : M S Cune [Pays-Bas] ; F M C. Van Kampen ; A. Van Der BiltSource :
- Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde [ 0028-2200 ] ; 2006.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Mandibule, Mastication (physiologie), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Overdenture, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (), Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Satisfaction du patient, Études croisées.
- MESH :
- physiologie : Mastication.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Mandibule, Mâle, Overdenture, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Satisfaction du patient, Études croisées.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (methods), Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Mandible, Mastication (physiology), Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- methods : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- physiology : Mastication.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Mandible, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine patient satisfaction with implant supported mandibular overdentures using magnet, bar-clip and ball-socket attachments, and to assess the relation between maximum bite force and patient satisfaction. In a crossover clinical trial, 18 edentulous patients with lower denture complaints received 2 mandibular implants and new lower and upper dentures. The lower denture initially came without any kind of attachment system, but was fitted with one of the attachment types after 3 months. The attachments were changed 3 months thereafter, in random order. A questionnaire concerning denture complaints was given at baseline (with the old denture), after 3 months of functioning with the new denture without attachments and after 3 months of functioning with each of the attachments (within-subject comparison). In addition, at the end of the experiment patients were asked to express their overall satisfaction with their dentures on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data regarding maximum bite force were obtained from a previous study with the same population. Mandibular implant supported overdenture treatment reduced various denture complaints. The VAS score reflected patients' preference more accurately than scale-scores. Patients strongly preferred bar-clip (10 subjects) and ball-socket attachments (7 subjects) over magnet attachments (1 subject). Patients' preference could not be predicted on the basis of baseline observations. Maximum bite force was not correlated to scale- or VAS scores.
PubMed: 17058761
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17058761Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Cune, M S" sort="Cune, M S" uniqKey="Cune M" first="M S" last="Cune">M S Cune</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Uit de divisie Heelkundige Specialismen, zorglijn UCRI/MFP/HDS van de zorgeenheid Mondziekten, Kaakchirurgie en Bijzondere Tandheelkunde van het Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht. m.s.cune@med.uu.nl</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Kampen, F M C" sort="Van Kampen, F M C" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="F M C" last="Van Kampen">F M C. Van Kampen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, A" sort="Van Der Bilt, A" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="A" last="Van Der Bilt">A. Van Der Bilt</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17058761</idno><idno type="pmid">17058761</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002662</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002662</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002662</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002662</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002662</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002662</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Cune, M S" sort="Cune, M S" uniqKey="Cune M" first="M S" last="Cune">M S Cune</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Uit de divisie Heelkundige Specialismen, zorglijn UCRI/MFP/HDS van de zorgeenheid Mondziekten, Kaakchirurgie en Bijzondere Tandheelkunde van het Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht. m.s.cune@med.uu.nl</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Kampen, F M C" sort="Van Kampen, F M C" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="F M C" last="Van Kampen">F M C. Van Kampen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, A" sort="Van Der Bilt, A" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="A" last="Van Der Bilt">A. Van Der Bilt</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</title><idno type="ISSN">0028-2200</idno><imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Cross-Over Studies</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (methods)</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mastication (physiology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mastication (physiologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée ()</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Études croisées</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mastication</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mastication</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Cross-Over Studies</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Études croisées</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study was to determine patient satisfaction with implant supported mandibular overdentures using magnet, bar-clip and ball-socket attachments, and to assess the relation between maximum bite force and patient satisfaction. In a crossover clinical trial, 18 edentulous patients with lower denture complaints received 2 mandibular implants and new lower and upper dentures. The lower denture initially came without any kind of attachment system, but was fitted with one of the attachment types after 3 months. The attachments were changed 3 months thereafter, in random order. A questionnaire concerning denture complaints was given at baseline (with the old denture), after 3 months of functioning with the new denture without attachments and after 3 months of functioning with each of the attachments (within-subject comparison). In addition, at the end of the experiment patients were asked to express their overall satisfaction with their dentures on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data regarding maximum bite force were obtained from a previous study with the same population. Mandibular implant supported overdenture treatment reduced various denture complaints. The VAS score reflected patients' preference more accurately than scale-scores. Patients strongly preferred bar-clip (10 subjects) and ball-socket attachments (7 subjects) over magnet attachments (1 subject). Patients' preference could not be predicted on the basis of baseline observations. Maximum bite force was not correlated to scale- or VAS scores.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17058761</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0028-2200</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>113</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2006</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>401-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The purpose of this study was to determine patient satisfaction with implant supported mandibular overdentures using magnet, bar-clip and ball-socket attachments, and to assess the relation between maximum bite force and patient satisfaction. In a crossover clinical trial, 18 edentulous patients with lower denture complaints received 2 mandibular implants and new lower and upper dentures. The lower denture initially came without any kind of attachment system, but was fitted with one of the attachment types after 3 months. The attachments were changed 3 months thereafter, in random order. A questionnaire concerning denture complaints was given at baseline (with the old denture), after 3 months of functioning with the new denture without attachments and after 3 months of functioning with each of the attachments (within-subject comparison). In addition, at the end of the experiment patients were asked to express their overall satisfaction with their dentures on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data regarding maximum bite force were obtained from a previous study with the same population. Mandibular implant supported overdenture treatment reduced various denture complaints. The VAS score reflected patients' preference more accurately than scale-scores. Patients strongly preferred bar-clip (10 subjects) and ball-socket attachments (7 subjects) over magnet attachments (1 subject). Patients' preference could not be predicted on the basis of baseline observations. Maximum bite force was not correlated to scale- or VAS scores.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cune</LastName><ForeName>M S</ForeName><Initials>MS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Uit de divisie Heelkundige Specialismen, zorglijn UCRI/MFP/HDS van de zorgeenheid Mondziekten, Kaakchirurgie en Bijzondere Tandheelkunde van het Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht. m.s.cune@med.uu.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Kampen</LastName><ForeName>F M C</ForeName><Initials>FM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Bilt</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>dut</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Patiënttevredenheid met verschillende mesostructuren op implantaten in de edentate onderkaak.</VernacularTitle></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0400771</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0028-2200</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018592" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Over Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003826" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Complete, Lower</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008409" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastication</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17058761</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, A" sort="Van Der Bilt, A" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="A" last="Van Der Bilt">A. Van Der Bilt</name><name sortKey="Van Kampen, F M C" sort="Van Kampen, F M C" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="F M C" last="Van Kampen">F M C. Van Kampen</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><noRegion><name sortKey="Cune, M S" sort="Cune, M S" uniqKey="Cune M" first="M S" last="Cune">M S Cune</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001F01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17058761
|texte= [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17058761" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |