[Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].
Identifieur interne : 001931 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001930; suivant : 001932[Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].
Auteurs : G T Stoker [Pays-Bas] ; D. WismeijerSource :
- Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde [ 0028-2200 ] ; 2008.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- physiologie : Remodelage osseux.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Conception de prothèse dentaire, Facteurs temps, Humains, Mandibule, Mâchoire édentée, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- physiology : Bone Remodeling.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Humans, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Most edentulous patients experience retention problems with their lower denture, which often results in functional problems and also social ones. Since the introduction of the osseointegration concept for the edentulous patient, this patient group has been successfully treated, with demonstrably positive effects for long periods of time. The traditional protocol calls for late loading of the implants. Immediate loading of 4 implants with a bar-retained overdenture or a fixed dental prosthesis has proved to be as successful as the delayed (non-immediate) loading concept. The treatment of the edentulous patient with an overdenture on two implants has until recently been based on a treatment protocol which called for early, but not immediate, yet not definitive retention form. However, recent research shows that immediate loading of 2 implants with an overdenture is just as successful and what's more not more expensive. Because of newly developed treatment concepts delayed loading no longer has to be an automatic choice.
PubMed: 19058504
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19058504Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Stoker, G T" sort="Stoker, G T" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="G T" last="Stoker">G T Stoker</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Orale Functieleer van de Universiteit van Amsterdam/Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA). geertstoker@wxs.nl</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19058504</idno><idno type="pmid">19058504</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001F55</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001F55</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001F55</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001F55</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001F55</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001F55</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Stoker, G T" sort="Stoker, G T" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="G T" last="Stoker">G T Stoker</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Orale Functieleer van de Universiteit van Amsterdam/Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA). geertstoker@wxs.nl</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</title><idno type="ISSN">0028-2200</idno><imprint><date when="2008" type="published">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Remodeling (physiology)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Remodelage osseux (physiologie)</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Remodelage osseux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Remodeling</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Most edentulous patients experience retention problems with their lower denture, which often results in functional problems and also social ones. Since the introduction of the osseointegration concept for the edentulous patient, this patient group has been successfully treated, with demonstrably positive effects for long periods of time. The traditional protocol calls for late loading of the implants. Immediate loading of 4 implants with a bar-retained overdenture or a fixed dental prosthesis has proved to be as successful as the delayed (non-immediate) loading concept. The treatment of the edentulous patient with an overdenture on two implants has until recently been based on a treatment protocol which called for early, but not immediate, yet not definitive retention form. However, recent research shows that immediate loading of 2 implants with an overdenture is just as successful and what's more not more expensive. Because of newly developed treatment concepts delayed loading no longer has to be an automatic choice.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19058504</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2008</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>08</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0028-2200</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>115</Volume><Issue>11</Issue><PubDate><Year>2008</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>589-95</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Most edentulous patients experience retention problems with their lower denture, which often results in functional problems and also social ones. Since the introduction of the osseointegration concept for the edentulous patient, this patient group has been successfully treated, with demonstrably positive effects for long periods of time. The traditional protocol calls for late loading of the implants. Immediate loading of 4 implants with a bar-retained overdenture or a fixed dental prosthesis has proved to be as successful as the delayed (non-immediate) loading concept. The treatment of the edentulous patient with an overdenture on two implants has until recently been based on a treatment protocol which called for early, but not immediate, yet not definitive retention form. However, recent research shows that immediate loading of 2 implants with an overdenture is just as successful and what's more not more expensive. Because of newly developed treatment concepts delayed loading no longer has to be an automatic choice.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stoker</LastName><ForeName>G T</ForeName><Initials>GT</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Orale Functieleer van de Universiteit van Amsterdam/Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA). geertstoker@wxs.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wismeijer</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>dut</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Prothetische dilemma's. Vroeg of laat belasten van implantaten in de edentate onderkaak.</VernacularTitle></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0400771</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0028-2200</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016723" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Remodeling</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2008</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2008</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19058504</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><noRegion><name sortKey="Stoker, G T" sort="Stoker, G T" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="G T" last="Stoker">G T Stoker</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001931 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001931 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19058504
|texte= [Prosthetic dilemmas. Immediate versus conventional loading of implants in the edentulous mandible].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19058504" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |