EdenteV2, PubMed, Checkpoint, bibRecord, 001060

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.

Identifieur interne : 001060 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001059; suivant : 001061

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.

Auteurs : S. Heberer [Allemagne] ; D. Hildebrand ; K. Nelson

Source :

Journal of oral rehabilitation [ 1365-2842 ] ; 2011.

RBID : pubmed:21070328

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Restoration, Temporary, Female, Humans, Immediate Dental Implant Loading, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Prospective Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric.
MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Restoration, Temporary, Female, Humans, Immediate Dental Implant Loading, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric.

Abstract

The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I-Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan-Meier or Pearson Chi-Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I-Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I-Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x
PubMed: 21070328

Affiliations:

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001537
to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001537

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:21070328

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Heberer, S" sort="Heberer, S" uniqKey="Heberer S" first="S" last="Heberer">S. Heberer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin Dental Practice, Berlin</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="3">Berlin</region>
<settlement type="city">Berlin</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hildebrand, D" sort="Hildebrand, D" uniqKey="Hildebrand D" first="D" last="Hildebrand">D. Hildebrand</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nelson, K" sort="Nelson, K" uniqKey="Nelson K" first="K" last="Nelson">K. Nelson</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:21070328</idno>
<idno type="pmid">21070328</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001537</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001537</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001537</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001537</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001537</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001537</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Heberer, S" sort="Heberer, S" uniqKey="Heberer S" first="S" last="Heberer">S. Heberer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin Dental Practice, Berlin</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="3">Berlin</region>
<settlement type="city">Berlin</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hildebrand, D" sort="Hildebrand, D" uniqKey="Hildebrand D" first="D" last="Hildebrand">D. Hildebrand</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nelson, K" sort="Nelson, K" uniqKey="Nelson K" first="K" last="Nelson">K. Nelson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Dental Restoration, Temporary</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Immediate Dental Implant Loading</term>
<term>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Bouche édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Estimation de Kaplan-Meier</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Loi du khi-deux</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Pose immédiate d'implant dentaire</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Restaurations dentaires temporaires</term>
<term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Dental Restoration, Temporary</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Immediate Dental Implant Loading</term>
<term>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Estimation de Kaplan-Meier</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Loi du khi-deux</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Pose immédiate d'implant dentaire</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Restaurations dentaires temporaires</term>
<term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I-Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan-Meier or Pearson Chi-Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I-Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I-Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21070328</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1365-2842</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>38</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>447-53</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I-Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan-Meier or Pearson Chi-Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I-Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I-Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heberer</LastName>
<ForeName>S</ForeName>
<Initials>S</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hildebrand</LastName>
<ForeName>D</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nelson</LastName>
<ForeName>K</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Oral Rehabil</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0433604</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0305-182X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003794" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Restoration, Temporary</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057893" MajorTopicYN="Y">Immediate Dental Implant Loading</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D053208" MajorTopicYN="N">Kaplan-Meier Estimate</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21070328</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li>
</country>
<region><li>Berlin</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Berlin</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Hildebrand, D" sort="Hildebrand, D" uniqKey="Hildebrand D" first="D" last="Hildebrand">D. Hildebrand</name>
<name sortKey="Nelson, K" sort="Nelson, K" uniqKey="Nelson K" first="K" last="Nelson">K. Nelson</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Allemagne"><region name="Berlin"><name sortKey="Heberer, S" sort="Heberer, S" uniqKey="Heberer S" first="S" last="Heberer">S. Heberer</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001060 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001060 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:21070328
   |texte=   Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:21070328" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study.

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki