A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
Identifieur interne : 000F79 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000F78; suivant : 000F80A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
Auteurs : D. Ongül [Turquie] ; B. Gökçen-Röhlig ; B. Ermet ; H. KeskinSource :
- Australian dental journal [ 1834-7819 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylic Resins.
- instrumentation : Dental Impression Technique.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Models, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy, Humans, Periodontal Splints, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of different direct implant impression techniques for edentulous arches with multiple implants.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01685.x
PubMed: 22624759
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22624759Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Ongul, D" sort="Ongul, D" uniqKey="Ongul D" first="D" last="Ongül">D. Ongül</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. degerkongul@yahoo.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Istanbul</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gokcen Rohlig, B" sort="Gokcen Rohlig, B" uniqKey="Gokcen Rohlig B" first="B" last="Gökçen-Röhlig">B. Gökçen-Röhlig</name></author><author><name sortKey=" Ermet, B" sort=" Ermet, B" uniqKey=" Ermet B" first="B" last=" Ermet">B. Ermet</name></author><author><name sortKey="Keskin, H" sort="Keskin, H" uniqKey="Keskin H" first="H" last="Keskin">H. Keskin</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22624759</idno><idno type="pmid">22624759</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01685.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001058</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001058</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001058</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001058</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001058</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001058</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Ongul, D" sort="Ongul, D" uniqKey="Ongul D" first="D" last="Ongül">D. Ongül</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. degerkongul@yahoo.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Istanbul</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gokcen Rohlig, B" sort="Gokcen Rohlig, B" uniqKey="Gokcen Rohlig B" first="B" last="Gökçen-Röhlig">B. Gökçen-Röhlig</name></author><author><name sortKey=" Ermet, B" sort=" Ermet, B" uniqKey=" Ermet B" first="B" last=" Ermet">B. Ermet</name></author><author><name sortKey="Keskin, H" sort="Keskin, H" uniqKey="Keskin H" first="H" last="Keskin">H. Keskin</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Australian dental journal</title><idno type="eISSN">1834-7819</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dimensional Measurement Accuracy</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Periodontal Splints</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Attelles parodontales</term><term>Humains</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Précision de la mesure dimensionnelle</term><term>Résines acryliques</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dimensional Measurement Accuracy</term><term>Humans</term><term>Periodontal Splints</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Attelles parodontales</term><term>Humains</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Précision de la mesure dimensionnelle</term><term>Résines acryliques</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of different direct implant impression techniques for edentulous arches with multiple implants.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22624759</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2012</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1834-7819</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>57</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Australian dental journal</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Aust Dent J</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>184-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01685.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of different direct implant impression techniques for edentulous arches with multiple implants.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Five experimental groups (n = 5) were assembled. Experimental models were created by a direct splinted technique (EG2 to EG5) and a non-splinted technique (EG1). In EG2 and EG3 synOcta impression copings were splinted with an acrylic resin bar, and in EG4 and EG5 with a light-curing composite resin bar. In EG3 and EG5 the resin bars were sectioned, while the other experimental groups were not. Three-dimensional discrepancies were measured by a computerized coordinate measuring machine. Distortion values among the groups were analysed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. The post hoc Tukey's test was then performed for multiple comparisons.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The highest accuracy was obtained in EG2 (mean deviation: 12.70 μm). The acrylic bars demonstrated less deviation (12.70 μm and 22.71 μm) from the master model than the light-curing composite resin groups and the non-splinted group (41.09 μm). The post hoc Tukey's test showed no significant difference among the groups when the effect of splint design on accuracy was investigated.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">For situations where impressions of multiple implants are to be made, splinting impression copings with acrylic resin demonstrate superior results than the non-splinted technique and splinting with light-curing composite.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2012 Australian Dental Association.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ongül</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. degerkongul@yahoo.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gökçen-Röhlig</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Şermet</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Keskin</LastName><ForeName>H</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>11</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Australia</Country><MedlineTA>Aust Dent J</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0370612</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0045-0421</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000180" MajorTopicYN="N">Acrylic Resins</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D061827" MajorTopicYN="N">Dimensional Measurement Accuracy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010516" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Splints</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22624759</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01685.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey=" Ermet, B" sort=" Ermet, B" uniqKey=" Ermet B" first="B" last=" Ermet">B. Ermet</name><name sortKey="Gokcen Rohlig, B" sort="Gokcen Rohlig, B" uniqKey="Gokcen Rohlig B" first="B" last="Gökçen-Röhlig">B. Gökçen-Röhlig</name><name sortKey="Keskin, H" sort="Keskin, H" uniqKey="Keskin H" first="H" last="Keskin">H. Keskin</name></noCountry><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Ongul, D" sort="Ongul, D" uniqKey="Ongul D" first="D" last="Ongül">D. Ongül</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F79 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000F79 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22624759
|texte= A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22624759" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |