Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review.
Identifieur interne : 000D64 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000D63; suivant : 000D65Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review.
Auteurs : N. Doan [Australie] ; Z. Du ; R. Crawford ; P. Reher ; Y. XiaoSource :
- International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 1399-0020 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de survie, Complications peropératoires, Complications postopératoires, Humains, Jeune adulte, Lambeaux chirurgicaux, Maxillaire, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Odontologie factuelle, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Rétention de prothèse dentaire (), Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Évaluation de résultat (soins).
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de survie, Complications peropératoires, Complications postopératoires, Humains, Jeune adulte, Lambeaux chirurgicaux, Maxillaire, Odontologie factuelle, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Rétention de prothèse dentaire, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Évaluation de résultat (soins).
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Prosthesis Retention (statistics & numerical data), Evidence-Based Dentistry, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Maxilla, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Postoperative Complications, Surgical Flaps, Survival Analysis, Young Adult.
- MESH :
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Prosthesis Retention.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Postoperative Complications, Surgical Flaps, Survival Analysis, Young Adult.
Abstract
This article reviews the literature on the outcome of flapless surgery for dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The literature search was carried out in using the keywords: flapless, dental implants and maxilla. A hand search and Medline search were carried out on studies published between 1971 and 2011. The authors included research involving a minimum of 15 dental implants with a follow-up period of 1 year, an outcome measurement of implant survival, but excluded studies involving multiple simultaneous interventions, and studies with missing data. The Cochrane approach for cohort studies and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine were applied. Of the 56 published papers selected, 14 papers on the flapless technique showed high overall implant survival rates. The prospective studies yielded 97.01% (95% CI: 90.72-99.0) while retrospective studies or case series illustrated 95.08% (95% CI: 91.0-97.93) survival. The average of intraoperative complications was 6.55% using the flapless procedure. The limited data obtained showed that flapless surgery in posterior maxilla areas could be a viable and predictable treatment method for implant placement. Flapless surgery tends to be more applicable in this area of the mouth. Further long-term clinical controlled studies are needed.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.002
PubMed: 22784655
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22784655Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review.</title><author><name sortKey="Doan, N" sort="Doan, N" uniqKey="Doan N" first="N" last="Doan">N. Doan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Brisbane</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Du, Z" sort="Du, Z" uniqKey="Du Z" first="Z" last="Du">Z. Du</name></author><author><name sortKey="Crawford, R" sort="Crawford, R" uniqKey="Crawford R" first="R" last="Crawford">R. Crawford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Reher, P" sort="Reher, P" uniqKey="Reher P" first="P" last="Reher">P. Reher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Xiao, Y" sort="Xiao, Y" uniqKey="Xiao Y" first="Y" last="Xiao">Y. Xiao</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22784655</idno><idno type="pmid">22784655</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.002</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F54</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000F54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000F54</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000F54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000F54</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review.</title><author><name sortKey="Doan, N" sort="Doan, N" uniqKey="Doan N" first="N" last="Doan">N. Doan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Brisbane</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Du, Z" sort="Du, Z" uniqKey="Du Z" first="Z" last="Du">Z. Du</name></author><author><name sortKey="Crawford, R" sort="Crawford, R" uniqKey="Crawford R" first="R" last="Crawford">R. Crawford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Reher, P" sort="Reher, P" uniqKey="Reher P" first="P" last="Reher">P. Reher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Xiao, Y" sort="Xiao, Y" uniqKey="Xiao Y" first="Y" last="Xiao">Y. Xiao</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><idno type="eISSN">1399-0020</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Evidence-Based Dentistry</term><term>Humans</term><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Surgical Flaps</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Complications peropératoires</term><term>Complications postopératoires</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Lambeaux chirurgicaux</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Odontologie factuelle</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire ()</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Évaluation de résultat (soins)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Evidence-Based Dentistry</term><term>Humans</term><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Surgical Flaps</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Complications peropératoires</term><term>Complications postopératoires</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Lambeaux chirurgicaux</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Odontologie factuelle</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Évaluation de résultat (soins)</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article reviews the literature on the outcome of flapless surgery for dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The literature search was carried out in using the keywords: flapless, dental implants and maxilla. A hand search and Medline search were carried out on studies published between 1971 and 2011. The authors included research involving a minimum of 15 dental implants with a follow-up period of 1 year, an outcome measurement of implant survival, but excluded studies involving multiple simultaneous interventions, and studies with missing data. The Cochrane approach for cohort studies and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine were applied. Of the 56 published papers selected, 14 papers on the flapless technique showed high overall implant survival rates. The prospective studies yielded 97.01% (95% CI: 90.72-99.0) while retrospective studies or case series illustrated 95.08% (95% CI: 91.0-97.93) survival. The average of intraoperative complications was 6.55% using the flapless procedure. The limited data obtained showed that flapless surgery in posterior maxilla areas could be a viable and predictable treatment method for implant placement. Flapless surgery tends to be more applicable in this area of the mouth. Further long-term clinical controlled studies are needed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22784655</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1399-0020</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>41</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1064-71</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.002</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>This article reviews the literature on the outcome of flapless surgery for dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The literature search was carried out in using the keywords: flapless, dental implants and maxilla. A hand search and Medline search were carried out on studies published between 1971 and 2011. The authors included research involving a minimum of 15 dental implants with a follow-up period of 1 year, an outcome measurement of implant survival, but excluded studies involving multiple simultaneous interventions, and studies with missing data. The Cochrane approach for cohort studies and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine were applied. Of the 56 published papers selected, 14 papers on the flapless technique showed high overall implant survival rates. The prospective studies yielded 97.01% (95% CI: 90.72-99.0) while retrospective studies or case series illustrated 95.08% (95% CI: 91.0-97.93) survival. The average of intraoperative complications was 6.55% using the flapless procedure. The limited data obtained showed that flapless surgery in posterior maxilla areas could be a viable and predictable treatment method for implant placement. Flapless surgery tends to be more applicable in this area of the mouth. Further long-term clinical controlled studies are needed.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Doan</LastName><ForeName>N</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Du</LastName><ForeName>Z</ForeName><Initials>Z</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Crawford</LastName><ForeName>R</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reher</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Xiao</LastName><ForeName>Y</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>09</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8605826</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0901-5027</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Evidence-Based Dentistry</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007431" MajorTopicYN="N">Intraoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017063" MajorTopicYN="N">Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013524" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgical Flaps</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2012</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22784655</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0901-5027(12)00267-6</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.002</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Crawford, R" sort="Crawford, R" uniqKey="Crawford R" first="R" last="Crawford">R. Crawford</name><name sortKey="Du, Z" sort="Du, Z" uniqKey="Du Z" first="Z" last="Du">Z. Du</name><name sortKey="Reher, P" sort="Reher, P" uniqKey="Reher P" first="P" last="Reher">P. Reher</name><name sortKey="Xiao, Y" sort="Xiao, Y" uniqKey="Xiao Y" first="Y" last="Xiao">Y. Xiao</name></noCountry><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Doan, N" sort="Doan, N" uniqKey="Doan N" first="N" last="Doan">N. Doan</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D64 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000D64 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22784655
|texte= Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22784655" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |