Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.
Identifieur interne : 000A76 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000A75; suivant : 000A77Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.
Auteurs : Michael Stimmelmayr [Allemagne] ; Jan-Frederik Güth ; Kurt Erdelt ; Arndt Happe ; Markus Schlee ; Florian BeuerSource :
- Clinical oral investigations [ 1436-3771 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Mâchoire édentée.
- Humains, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Technique de prise d'empreinte.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Precise implant-supported prosthodontics requires accurate impressions. Many in vitro studies comparing different implant impression techniques were performed. The purpose of this in vivo study was to compare the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of implants clinically.
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0885-z
PubMed: 23224041
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23224041Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.</title><author><name sortKey="Stimmelmayr, Michael" sort="Stimmelmayr, Michael" uniqKey="Stimmelmayr M" first="Michael" last="Stimmelmayr">Michael Stimmelmayr</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413, Cham, Germany, michael.stimmelmayr@med.uni-muenchen.de.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413, Cham, Germany</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Germany</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Germany</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Germany</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guth, Jan Frederik" sort="Guth, Jan Frederik" uniqKey="Guth J" first="Jan-Frederik" last="Güth">Jan-Frederik Güth</name></author><author><name sortKey="Erdelt, Kurt" sort="Erdelt, Kurt" uniqKey="Erdelt K" first="Kurt" last="Erdelt">Kurt Erdelt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Happe, Arndt" sort="Happe, Arndt" uniqKey="Happe A" first="Arndt" last="Happe">Arndt Happe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schlee, Markus" sort="Schlee, Markus" uniqKey="Schlee M" first="Markus" last="Schlee">Markus Schlee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Beuer, Florian" sort="Beuer, Florian" uniqKey="Beuer F" first="Florian" last="Beuer">Florian Beuer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23224041</idno><idno type="pmid">23224041</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00784-012-0885-z</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A85</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A85</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A85</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A85</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000A85</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000A85</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.</title><author><name sortKey="Stimmelmayr, Michael" sort="Stimmelmayr, Michael" uniqKey="Stimmelmayr M" first="Michael" last="Stimmelmayr">Michael Stimmelmayr</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413, Cham, Germany, michael.stimmelmayr@med.uni-muenchen.de.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413, Cham, Germany</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Germany</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Germany</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Germany</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guth, Jan Frederik" sort="Guth, Jan Frederik" uniqKey="Guth J" first="Jan-Frederik" last="Güth">Jan-Frederik Güth</name></author><author><name sortKey="Erdelt, Kurt" sort="Erdelt, Kurt" uniqKey="Erdelt K" first="Kurt" last="Erdelt">Kurt Erdelt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Happe, Arndt" sort="Happe, Arndt" uniqKey="Happe A" first="Arndt" last="Happe">Arndt Happe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schlee, Markus" sort="Schlee, Markus" uniqKey="Schlee M" first="Markus" last="Schlee">Markus Schlee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Beuer, Florian" sort="Beuer, Florian" uniqKey="Beuer F" first="Florian" last="Beuer">Florian Beuer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral investigations</title><idno type="eISSN">1436-3771</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (pathology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Precise implant-supported prosthodontics requires accurate impressions. Many in vitro studies comparing different implant impression techniques were performed. The purpose of this in vivo study was to compare the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of implants clinically.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23224041</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1436-3771</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>17</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral investigations</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Investig</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1929-35</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00784-012-0885-z</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Precise implant-supported prosthodontics requires accurate impressions. Many in vitro studies comparing different implant impression techniques were performed. The purpose of this in vivo study was to compare the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of implants clinically.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Four implants were inserted nearly bilateral in ten edentulous jaws. From each jaw, two different impressions (A, transfer; B, splinted pick-up) were taken. Respectively two stone casts of each jaw were produced and scan bodies were mounted on the lab analogues to digitize the casts. One scan body of the digitized casts was each superimposed and the deviations of the remaining three scan bodies were measured three dimensionally. The fit of the suprareconstructions was evaluated clinically on both casts and in the mouth.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The mean discrepancy of scan body 2 was 192 μm (±96), 282 μm (±97) for scan body 3, and 366 μm (±114) for scan body 4. The discrepancies between two scan bodies were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.010; ANOVA test). Comparing the data with the span between the scan bodies, a linear regression line could be drawn to show the dependency between the misfit and the length of the span. Clinically, the fit on the cast produced by the splinted pick-up technique was favorable.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The discrepancy between the splinted pick-up impression technique and the transfer technique were in a range with clinical influence.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CLINICAL RELEVANCE" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">For better accuracy of implant-supported prosthodontics, the splinted pick-up technique should be used for impressions of four implants evenly spread in edentulous jaws.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stimmelmayr</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413, Cham, Germany, michael.stimmelmayr@med.uni-muenchen.de.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Güth</LastName><ForeName>Jan-Frederik</ForeName><Initials>JF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Erdelt</LastName><ForeName>Kurt</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Happe</LastName><ForeName>Arndt</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schlee</LastName><ForeName>Markus</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Beuer</LastName><ForeName>Florian</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Investig</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9707115</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1432-6981</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):86-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20209190</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Nov;23(11):782-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8953484</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Quintessence Int. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(10):845-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20927421</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994 Mar-Apr;9(2):169-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8206552</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 Winter;7(4):468-75</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1299642</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):285-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18922257</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):167-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20386220</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):555-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10793388</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):715-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20657866</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):192-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15101589</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):851-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21647591</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(1):11-28</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19213357</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):39-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18416411</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):214-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18657149</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004 Mar;12(1):9-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15058176</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18548918</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):328-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20074246</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):747-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17066636</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthodont. 1993 Jun;2(2):75-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8242170</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):752-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20657870</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Winter;5(4):331-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2094651</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2001;10(2):85-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11450418</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6):349-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17618917</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Winter;6(4):448-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1820314</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2006 Oct 7;201(7):429-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17031344</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):427-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19629543</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Apr;63(4):444-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2184229</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Sep;88(3):329-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12426505</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jan;81(1):7-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9878969</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2007 Jun;16(2):187-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17563509</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e63-76</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19438937</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1137-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22009182</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):470-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15523336</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2004 Dec;13(4):358-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15591998</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1276-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19040443</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):29-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17508620</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>26</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23224041</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00784-012-0885-z</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Beuer, Florian" sort="Beuer, Florian" uniqKey="Beuer F" first="Florian" last="Beuer">Florian Beuer</name><name sortKey="Erdelt, Kurt" sort="Erdelt, Kurt" uniqKey="Erdelt K" first="Kurt" last="Erdelt">Kurt Erdelt</name><name sortKey="Guth, Jan Frederik" sort="Guth, Jan Frederik" uniqKey="Guth J" first="Jan-Frederik" last="Güth">Jan-Frederik Güth</name><name sortKey="Happe, Arndt" sort="Happe, Arndt" uniqKey="Happe A" first="Arndt" last="Happe">Arndt Happe</name><name sortKey="Schlee, Markus" sort="Schlee, Markus" uniqKey="Schlee M" first="Markus" last="Schlee">Markus Schlee</name></noCountry><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Stimmelmayr, Michael" sort="Stimmelmayr, Michael" uniqKey="Stimmelmayr M" first="Michael" last="Stimmelmayr">Michael Stimmelmayr</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A76 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000A76 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23224041
|texte= Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23224041" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |