Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature.
Identifieur interne : 000596 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000595; suivant : 000597Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature.
Auteurs : Regina Mericske-Stern ; Andreas WorniSource :
- European journal of oral implantology [ 1756-2406 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
So far there is little evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCT) or systematic reviews on the preferred or best number of implants to be used for the support of a fixed prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla or mandible, and no consensus has been reached. Therefore, we reviewed articles published in the past 30 years that reported on treatment outcomes for implant-supported fixed prostheses, including survival of implants and survival of prostheses after a minimum observation period of 1 year.
PubMed: 24977248
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24977248Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature.</title><author><name sortKey="Mericske Stern, Regina" sort="Mericske Stern, Regina" uniqKey="Mericske Stern R" first="Regina" last="Mericske-Stern">Regina Mericske-Stern</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worni, Andreas" sort="Worni, Andreas" uniqKey="Worni A" first="Andreas" last="Worni">Andreas Worni</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24977248</idno><idno type="pmid">24977248</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000790</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000790</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000790</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000790</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000790</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000790</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature.</title><author><name sortKey="Mericske Stern, Regina" sort="Mericske Stern, Regina" uniqKey="Mericske Stern R" first="Regina" last="Mericske-Stern">Regina Mericske-Stern</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worni, Andreas" sort="Worni, Andreas" uniqKey="Worni A" first="Andreas" last="Worni">Andreas Worni</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1756-2406</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">So far there is little evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCT) or systematic reviews on the preferred or best number of implants to be used for the support of a fixed prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla or mandible, and no consensus has been reached. Therefore, we reviewed articles published in the past 30 years that reported on treatment outcomes for implant-supported fixed prostheses, including survival of implants and survival of prostheses after a minimum observation period of 1 year.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24977248</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1756-2406</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7 Suppl 2</Volume><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Season>Summer</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>S133-53</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND AND AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">So far there is little evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCT) or systematic reviews on the preferred or best number of implants to be used for the support of a fixed prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla or mandible, and no consensus has been reached. Therefore, we reviewed articles published in the past 30 years that reported on treatment outcomes for implant-supported fixed prostheses, including survival of implants and survival of prostheses after a minimum observation period of 1 year.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify eligible studies. Short and long-term clinical studies were included with prospective and retrospective study designs to see if relevant information could be obtained on the number of implants related to the prosthetic technique. Articles reporting on implant placement combined with advanced surgical techniques such as sinus floor elevation (SFE) or extensive grafting were excluded. Two reviewers extracted the data independently.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">A primary search was broken down to 222 articles. Out of these, 29 studies comprising 26 datasets fulfilled the inclusion criteria. From all studies, the number of planned and placed implants was available. With two exceptions, no RCTs were found, and these two studies did not compare different numbers of implants per prosthesis. Eight studies were retrospective; all the others were prospective. Fourteen studies calculated cumulative survival rates for 5 and more years. From these data, the average survival rate was between 90% and 100%. The analysis of the selected articles revealed a clear tendency to plan 4 to 6 implants per prosthesis. For supporting a cross-arch fixed prosthesis in the maxilla, the variation is slightly greater.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In spite of a dispersion of results, similar outcomes are reported with regard to survival and number of implants per jaw. Since the 1990s, it was proven that there is no need to install as many implants as possible in the available jawbone. The overwhelming majority of articles dealing with standard surgical procedures to rehabilitate edentulous jaws uses 4 to 6 implants.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mericske-Stern</LastName><ForeName>Regina</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Worni</LastName><ForeName>Andreas</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101473719</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1756-2406</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24977248</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">32210</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Mericske Stern, Regina" sort="Mericske Stern, Regina" uniqKey="Mericske Stern R" first="Regina" last="Mericske-Stern">Regina Mericske-Stern</name><name sortKey="Worni, Andreas" sort="Worni, Andreas" uniqKey="Worni A" first="Andreas" last="Worni">Andreas Worni</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000596 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000596 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24977248
|texte= Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24977248" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |