Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review
Identifieur interne : 000446 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000445; suivant : 000447Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review
Auteurs : Fabrizio Carini [Italie] ; Salvatore Longoni [Italie] ; Ernesto Amosso [Italie] ; Jacopo Paleari [Italie] ; Stefania Carini [Italie] ; Gianluca Porcaro [Italie]Source :
- Annali di Stomatologia [ 1824-0852 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
Reconstruction of segmental defects and the atrophic maxilla and mandible is performed using various techniques. Bone substitutes have received a wealth of reports in the literature demonstrating a long-term success when used in alveolar bone augmentation procedures.
We reviewed articles comparing TiMesh GBR technique with different percentage of bone: autogenous bone alone (AB); anorganic bovine bone alone (ABB); 50:50 or 70:30. From an initial pool of 122, we selected 14 studies. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test was used for statistical analysis.
We present a table analysing fundamental parameters to value a successful GBR therapy. Autogenous bone remains the gold standard in GBR technique with TiMesh; however, the combination between AB/ABB in relation 50:50 and 70:30 allows reducing surgical cost exploiting properties of eterologous bone.
The use of autologous bone is associated with a height and width gain of bone, which are greater compared to other techniques, with a lower exposure of the mesh and a lower bone resorption. The use of heterologous graft leads to a lower bone earn and to percentage of resorption greater than autologous graft but does not differ from the gain and resorption of the bone of AB/ABB in percentage 50:50 and 70:30.
Url:
PubMed: 25678948
PubMed Central: 4308965
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000446
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4308965Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone <italic>versus</italic>
autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Carini, Fabrizio" sort="Carini, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Carini F" first="Fabrizio" last="Carini">Fabrizio Carini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Longoni, Salvatore" sort="Longoni, Salvatore" uniqKey="Longoni S" first="Salvatore" last="Longoni">Salvatore Longoni</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Amosso, Ernesto" sort="Amosso, Ernesto" uniqKey="Amosso E" first="Ernesto" last="Amosso">Ernesto Amosso</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Paleari, Jacopo" sort="Paleari, Jacopo" uniqKey="Paleari J" first="Jacopo" last="Paleari">Jacopo Paleari</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Carini, Stefania" sort="Carini, Stefania" uniqKey="Carini S" first="Stefania" last="Carini">Stefania Carini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af2-27-36">School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Porcaro, Gianluca" sort="Porcaro, Gianluca" uniqKey="Porcaro G" first="Gianluca" last="Porcaro">Gianluca Porcaro</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25678948</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4308965</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4308965</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4308965</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000446</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000446</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000446</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000446</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone <italic>versus</italic>
autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Carini, Fabrizio" sort="Carini, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Carini F" first="Fabrizio" last="Carini">Fabrizio Carini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Longoni, Salvatore" sort="Longoni, Salvatore" uniqKey="Longoni S" first="Salvatore" last="Longoni">Salvatore Longoni</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Amosso, Ernesto" sort="Amosso, Ernesto" uniqKey="Amosso E" first="Ernesto" last="Amosso">Ernesto Amosso</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Paleari, Jacopo" sort="Paleari, Jacopo" uniqKey="Paleari J" first="Jacopo" last="Paleari">Jacopo Paleari</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Carini, Stefania" sort="Carini, Stefania" uniqKey="Carini S" first="Stefania" last="Carini">Stefania Carini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af2-27-36">School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Porcaro, Gianluca" sort="Porcaro, Gianluca" uniqKey="Porcaro G" first="Gianluca" last="Porcaro">Gianluca Porcaro</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-27-36">Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Annali di Stomatologia</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1824-0852</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1971-1441</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>Summary</title>
<sec><title>Aim of the study</title>
<p>Reconstruction of segmental defects and the atrophic maxilla and mandible is performed using various techniques. Bone substitutes have received a wealth of reports in the literature demonstrating a long-term success when used in alveolar bone augmentation procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>We reviewed articles comparing TiMesh GBR technique with different percentage of bone: autogenous bone alone (AB); anorganic bovine bone alone (ABB); 50:50 or 70:30. From an initial pool of 122, we selected 14 studies. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test was used for statistical analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>We present a table analysing fundamental parameters to value a successful GBR therapy. Autogenous bone remains the gold standard in GBR technique with TiMesh; however, the combination between AB/ABB in relation 50:50 and 70:30 allows reducing surgical cost exploiting properties of eterologous bone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The use of autologous bone is associated with a height and width gain of bone, which are greater compared to other techniques, with a lower exposure of the mesh and a lower bone resorption. The use of heterologous graft leads to a lower bone earn and to percentage of resorption greater than autologous graft but does not differ from the gain and resorption of the bone of AB/ABB in percentage 50:50 and 70:30.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="review-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Ann Stomatol (Roma)</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Ann Stomatol (Roma)</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annali_Stomatologia</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Annali di Stomatologia</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1824-0852</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1971-1441</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25678948</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4308965</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">27-36</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Review Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone <italic>versus</italic>
autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Carini</surname>
<given-names>Fabrizio</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>MD, DDS</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-27-36">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Longoni</surname>
<given-names>Salvatore</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>MD, DMD, DDS</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-27-36">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Amosso</surname>
<given-names>Ernesto</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>DMD</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-27-36">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Paleari</surname>
<given-names>Jacopo</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>DMD, DDS</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-27-36">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Carini</surname>
<given-names>Stefania</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>MS-6</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-27-36">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Porcaro</surname>
<given-names>Gianluca</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>DMD, DDS</degrees>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-27-36">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-27-36"></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-27-36"><label>1</label>
Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</aff>
<aff id="af2-27-36"><label>2</label>
School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy</aff>
<author-notes><corresp id="c1-27-36">Corresponding author: Gianluca Porcaro, School of Oral Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy, E-mail: <email>gianluca.porcaro@unimib.it</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><season>Apr-Jun</season>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>No 2 Suppl to No 2</issue>
<fpage>27</fpage>
<lpage>36</lpage>
<permissions><copyright-statement>©2014 CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Rome, Italy</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract><title>Summary</title>
<sec><title>Aim of the study</title>
<p>Reconstruction of segmental defects and the atrophic maxilla and mandible is performed using various techniques. Bone substitutes have received a wealth of reports in the literature demonstrating a long-term success when used in alveolar bone augmentation procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>We reviewed articles comparing TiMesh GBR technique with different percentage of bone: autogenous bone alone (AB); anorganic bovine bone alone (ABB); 50:50 or 70:30. From an initial pool of 122, we selected 14 studies. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test was used for statistical analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>We present a table analysing fundamental parameters to value a successful GBR therapy. Autogenous bone remains the gold standard in GBR technique with TiMesh; however, the combination between AB/ABB in relation 50:50 and 70:30 allows reducing surgical cost exploiting properties of eterologous bone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The use of autologous bone is associated with a height and width gain of bone, which are greater compared to other techniques, with a lower exposure of the mesh and a lower bone resorption. The use of heterologous graft leads to a lower bone earn and to percentage of resorption greater than autologous graft but does not differ from the gain and resorption of the bone of AB/ABB in percentage 50:50 and 70:30.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group><kwd>GBR technique</kwd>
<kwd>TiMesh</kwd>
<kwd>alveolar ridge augmentation</kwd>
<kwd>anorganic bovine bone</kwd>
<kwd>bone substitute</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000446 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000446 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Pmc |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= PMC:4308965 |texte= Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25678948" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |