Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time
Identifieur interne : 000201 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000200; suivant : 000202Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time
Auteurs : Michele Mario Figliuzzi ; Amerigo Giudice ; Maria Giulia Cristofaro ; Delfina Pacifico ; Pasquale Biamonte ; Leonzio FortunatoSource :
- Annali di Stomatologia [ 1824-0852 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to assess peri-implant bone remodeling of post-extractive implants over 2 years.
30 patients meeting pre-established inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. One implant for each patient was inserted in the post-extraction sockets according to a defined surgical protocol (atramautic extraction, curettage of extraction socket, implant insertion, grafting with collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone, and a trimmed collagen membrane to completely cover the socket, suture). A temporary adhesive bridge, with an adequate profile, was bonded to the adjacent teeth. X-ray evaluation with a standardized stent was carried out at different times. Measurements were obtained from the implant edge to the bone peak. The values obtained at time 0 and at 2 years were compared by t-student test.
Our results showed that after one year 73% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 20% of patient had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 7% of patient had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm of bone reabsorption. After two years 62% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 24% had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 14% had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm.
The results showed no significant differences in bone reabsorption in most patients over 2 years.
Url:
PubMed: 26161250
PubMed Central: 4475908
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000201
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4475908Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time</title><author><name sortKey="Figliuzzi, Michele Mario" sort="Figliuzzi, Michele Mario" uniqKey="Figliuzzi M" first="Michele Mario" last="Figliuzzi">Michele Mario Figliuzzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Giudice, Amerigo" sort="Giudice, Amerigo" uniqKey="Giudice A" first="Amerigo" last="Giudice">Amerigo Giudice</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cristofaro, Maria Giulia" sort="Cristofaro, Maria Giulia" uniqKey="Cristofaro M" first="Maria Giulia" last="Cristofaro">Maria Giulia Cristofaro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pacifico, Delfina" sort="Pacifico, Delfina" uniqKey="Pacifico D" first="Delfina" last="Pacifico">Delfina Pacifico</name></author><author><name sortKey="Biamonte, Pasquale" sort="Biamonte, Pasquale" uniqKey="Biamonte P" first="Pasquale" last="Biamonte">Pasquale Biamonte</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fortunato, Leonzio" sort="Fortunato, Leonzio" uniqKey="Fortunato L" first="Leonzio" last="Fortunato">Leonzio Fortunato</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">26161250</idno><idno type="pmc">4475908</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475908</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4475908</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000201</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000201</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000201</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000201</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time</title><author><name sortKey="Figliuzzi, Michele Mario" sort="Figliuzzi, Michele Mario" uniqKey="Figliuzzi M" first="Michele Mario" last="Figliuzzi">Michele Mario Figliuzzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Giudice, Amerigo" sort="Giudice, Amerigo" uniqKey="Giudice A" first="Amerigo" last="Giudice">Amerigo Giudice</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cristofaro, Maria Giulia" sort="Cristofaro, Maria Giulia" uniqKey="Cristofaro M" first="Maria Giulia" last="Cristofaro">Maria Giulia Cristofaro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pacifico, Delfina" sort="Pacifico, Delfina" uniqKey="Pacifico D" first="Delfina" last="Pacifico">Delfina Pacifico</name></author><author><name sortKey="Biamonte, Pasquale" sort="Biamonte, Pasquale" uniqKey="Biamonte P" first="Pasquale" last="Biamonte">Pasquale Biamonte</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fortunato, Leonzio" sort="Fortunato, Leonzio" uniqKey="Fortunato L" first="Leonzio" last="Fortunato">Leonzio Fortunato</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annali di Stomatologia</title><idno type="ISSN">1824-0852</idno><idno type="eISSN">1971-1441</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>Summary</title><sec><title>Aim</title><p>The aim of this research was to assess peri-implant bone remodeling of post-extractive implants over 2 years.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>30 patients meeting pre-established inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. One implant for each patient was inserted in the post-extraction sockets according to a defined surgical protocol (atramautic extraction, curettage of extraction socket, implant insertion, grafting with collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone, and a trimmed collagen membrane to completely cover the socket, suture). A temporary adhesive bridge, with an adequate profile, was bonded to the adjacent teeth. X-ray evaluation with a standardized stent was carried out at different times. Measurements were obtained from the implant edge to the bone peak. The values obtained at time 0 and at 2 years were compared by t-student test.</p></sec><sec><title>Result</title><p>Our results showed that after one year 73% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 20% of patient had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 7% of patient had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm of bone reabsorption. After two years 62% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 24% had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 14% had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>The results showed no significant differences in bone reabsorption in most patients over 2 years.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Ann Stomatol (Roma)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Ann Stomatol (Roma)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annali_Stomatologia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Annali di Stomatologia</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1824-0852</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1971-1441</issn><publisher><publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">26161250</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4475908</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">29-34</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Figliuzzi</surname><given-names>Michele Mario</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-29-34"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Giudice</surname><given-names>Amerigo</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cristofaro</surname><given-names>Maria Giulia</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pacifico</surname><given-names>Delfina</given-names></name><degrees>DDS</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Biamonte</surname><given-names>Pasquale</given-names></name><degrees>DDS</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fortunato</surname><given-names>Leonzio</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></contrib><aff id="af1-29-34">Department of Periodontics and Oral Sciences, University, “Magna Graecia” Catanzaro, Italy</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="c1-29-34">Corresponding author: Michele Mario Figliuzzi, Department of Periodontics and Oral Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” Catanzaro, Via De Maria, 9, 89900 Vibo Valentia, Italy, Phone: +39 0963 592568, E-mail: <email>figliuzzi@unicz.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><season>Jan-Mar</season><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>5</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2015, CIC Edizioni Internazionali</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><title>Summary</title><sec><title>Aim</title><p>The aim of this research was to assess peri-implant bone remodeling of post-extractive implants over 2 years.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>30 patients meeting pre-established inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. One implant for each patient was inserted in the post-extraction sockets according to a defined surgical protocol (atramautic extraction, curettage of extraction socket, implant insertion, grafting with collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone, and a trimmed collagen membrane to completely cover the socket, suture). A temporary adhesive bridge, with an adequate profile, was bonded to the adjacent teeth. X-ray evaluation with a standardized stent was carried out at different times. Measurements were obtained from the implant edge to the bone peak. The values obtained at time 0 and at 2 years were compared by t-student test.</p></sec><sec><title>Result</title><p>Our results showed that after one year 73% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 20% of patient had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 7% of patient had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm of bone reabsorption. After two years 62% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 24% had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 14% had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>The results showed no significant differences in bone reabsorption in most patients over 2 years.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>dental implants</kwd><kwd>post-extractive implants</kwd><kwd>immediate loading</kwd><kwd>bone remodeling</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000201 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000201 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4475908
|texte= Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26161250" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |