Influence of Implant Surface Topography on Primary Stability in a Standardized Osteoporosis Rabbit Model Study
Identifieur interne : 003149 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 003148; suivant : 003150Influence of Implant Surface Topography on Primary Stability in a Standardized Osteoporosis Rabbit Model Study
Auteurs : Hiroshi Oue ; Kazuya Doi ; Yoshifumi Oki ; Yusuke Makihara ; Takayasu Kubo ; Vittoria Perrotti ; Adriano Piattelli ; Yasumasa Akagawa ; Kazuhiro TsugaSource :
- Journal of Functional Biomaterials [ 2079-4983 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
Evaluating primary stability is important to predict the prognosis of dental implant treatment. Primary stability is decreased in a low bone density site such as osteoporosis. However, it is difficult to apply in small animal and the effect of the different implant surface topography for the primary stability at low bone density site has not yet fully been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of implant surface topography on primary stability in a standardized osteoporosis animal model. Six rabbits underwent ovariectomy and administrated glucocorticoid to induce an osteoporosis model. Sham-operations were performed in additional six rabbits. Implants with machined or oxidized-surfaces were inserted into the femur epiphyses and insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. In sham model, the IT and ISQ did not differ significantly between the both implant. However, the IT value of oxidized-surface implant was significantly higher than that of the machined implant in the osteoporosis model. Meanwhile, ISQ did not significantly differ between the machined and oxidized-surfaced implants. In conclusion, the IT of implants is higher with rough than with smooth surfaces but that there are no differences in ISQ value between different surfaces in a standardized osteoporosis bone reduced rabbit model.
Url:
DOI: 10.3390/jfb6010143
PubMed: 25794350
PubMed Central: 4384105
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4384105Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of Implant Surface Topography on Primary Stability in a Standardized Osteoporosis Rabbit Model Study</title><author><name sortKey="Oue, Hiroshi" sort="Oue, Hiroshi" uniqKey="Oue H" first="Hiroshi" last="Oue">Hiroshi Oue</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Doi, Kazuya" sort="Doi, Kazuya" uniqKey="Doi K" first="Kazuya" last="Doi">Kazuya Doi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Oki, Yoshifumi" sort="Oki, Yoshifumi" uniqKey="Oki Y" first="Yoshifumi" last="Oki">Yoshifumi Oki</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Makihara, Yusuke" sort="Makihara, Yusuke" uniqKey="Makihara Y" first="Yusuke" last="Makihara">Yusuke Makihara</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kubo, Takayasu" sort="Kubo, Takayasu" uniqKey="Kubo T" first="Takayasu" last="Kubo">Takayasu Kubo</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Perrotti, Vittoria" sort="Perrotti, Vittoria" uniqKey="Perrotti V" first="Vittoria" last="Perrotti">Vittoria Perrotti</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-jfb-06-00143">Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti-Via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti 66100, Italy; E-Mails:<email>v.perrotti@unich.it</email> (V.P.);<email>apiattelli@unich.it</email> (A.P.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-jfb-06-00143">Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti-Via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti 66100, Italy; E-Mails:<email>v.perrotti@unich.it</email> (V.P.);<email>apiattelli@unich.it</email> (A.P.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Akagawa, Yasumasa" sort="Akagawa, Yasumasa" uniqKey="Akagawa Y" first="Yasumasa" last="Akagawa">Yasumasa Akagawa</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-jfb-06-00143">Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Ohu University, 31-1 sankakudo, Kooriyama, Fukushima 963-8611, Japan; E-Mail:<email>akagawa@den.ohu-u.ac.jp</email></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tsuga, Kazuhiro" sort="Tsuga, Kazuhiro" uniqKey="Tsuga K" first="Kazuhiro" last="Tsuga">Kazuhiro Tsuga</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">25794350</idno><idno type="pmc">4384105</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4384105</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4384105</idno><idno type="doi">10.3390/jfb6010143</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">003149</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">003149</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Influence of Implant Surface Topography on Primary Stability in a Standardized Osteoporosis Rabbit Model Study</title><author><name sortKey="Oue, Hiroshi" sort="Oue, Hiroshi" uniqKey="Oue H" first="Hiroshi" last="Oue">Hiroshi Oue</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Doi, Kazuya" sort="Doi, Kazuya" uniqKey="Doi K" first="Kazuya" last="Doi">Kazuya Doi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Oki, Yoshifumi" sort="Oki, Yoshifumi" uniqKey="Oki Y" first="Yoshifumi" last="Oki">Yoshifumi Oki</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Makihara, Yusuke" sort="Makihara, Yusuke" uniqKey="Makihara Y" first="Yusuke" last="Makihara">Yusuke Makihara</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kubo, Takayasu" sort="Kubo, Takayasu" uniqKey="Kubo T" first="Takayasu" last="Kubo">Takayasu Kubo</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Perrotti, Vittoria" sort="Perrotti, Vittoria" uniqKey="Perrotti V" first="Vittoria" last="Perrotti">Vittoria Perrotti</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-jfb-06-00143">Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti-Via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti 66100, Italy; E-Mails:<email>v.perrotti@unich.it</email> (V.P.);<email>apiattelli@unich.it</email> (A.P.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-jfb-06-00143">Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti-Via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti 66100, Italy; E-Mails:<email>v.perrotti@unich.it</email> (V.P.);<email>apiattelli@unich.it</email> (A.P.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Akagawa, Yasumasa" sort="Akagawa, Yasumasa" uniqKey="Akagawa Y" first="Yasumasa" last="Akagawa">Yasumasa Akagawa</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-jfb-06-00143">Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Ohu University, 31-1 sankakudo, Kooriyama, Fukushima 963-8611, Japan; E-Mail:<email>akagawa@den.ohu-u.ac.jp</email></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tsuga, Kazuhiro" sort="Tsuga, Kazuhiro" uniqKey="Tsuga K" first="Kazuhiro" last="Tsuga">Kazuhiro Tsuga</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143">Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Functional Biomaterials</title><idno type="eISSN">2079-4983</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>Evaluating primary stability is important to predict the prognosis of dental implant treatment. Primary stability is decreased in a low bone density site such as osteoporosis. However, it is difficult to apply in small animal and the effect of the different implant surface topography for the primary stability at low bone density site has not yet fully been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of implant surface topography on primary stability in a standardized osteoporosis animal model. Six rabbits underwent ovariectomy and administrated glucocorticoid to induce an osteoporosis model. Sham-operations were performed in additional six rabbits. Implants with machined or oxidized-surfaces were inserted into the femur epiphyses and insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. In sham model, the IT and ISQ did not differ significantly between the both implant. However, the IT value of oxidized-surface implant was significantly higher than that of the machined implant in the osteoporosis model. Meanwhile, ISQ did not significantly differ between the machined and oxidized-surfaced implants. In conclusion, the IT of implants is higher with rough than with smooth surfaces but that there are no differences in ISQ value between different surfaces in a standardized osteoporosis bone reduced rabbit model.</p></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ostman, P O" uniqKey="Ostman P">P.O. Östman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hellman, M" uniqKey="Hellman M">M. Hellman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wendelhag, I" uniqKey="Wendelhag I">I. Wendelhag</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L. Sennerby</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Suito, H" uniqKey="Suito H">H. Suito</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tomotake, Y" uniqKey="Tomotake Y">Y. Tomotake</name></author><author><name sortKey="Watanabe, M" uniqKey="Watanabe M">M. Watanabe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nagao, D" uniqKey="Nagao D">D. Nagao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ishida, Y" uniqKey="Ishida Y">Y. Ishida</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ichikawa, T" uniqKey="Ichikawa T">T. Ichikawa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Johansson, B" uniqKey="Johansson B">B. Johansson</name></author><author><name sortKey="B Ckm, T" uniqKey="B Ckm T">T. Bäckm</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hirsch, J M" uniqKey="Hirsch J">J.M. Hirsch</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, G" uniqKey="Iezzi G">G. Iezzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scarano, A" uniqKey="Scarano A">A. Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Di Stefano, D" uniqKey="Di Stefano D">D. Di Stefano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Arosio, P" uniqKey="Arosio P">P. Arosio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Doi, K" uniqKey="Doi K">K. Doi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ricci, L" uniqKey="Ricci L">L. Ricci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A">A. Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Perrotti, V" uniqKey="Perrotti V">V. Perrotti</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Shibli, J A" uniqKey="Shibli J">J.A. Shibli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Aguiar, K C" uniqKey="Aguiar K">K.C. Aguiar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Melo, L" uniqKey="Melo L">L. Melo</name></author><author><name sortKey="D Vila, S" uniqKey="D Vila S">S. d’Avila</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zen Bio, E G" uniqKey="Zen Bio E">E.G. Zenóbio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Faveri, M" uniqKey="Faveri M">M. Faveri</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, G" uniqKey="Iezzi G">G. Iezzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A">A. Piattelli</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Becker, W" uniqKey="Becker W">W. Becker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hujoel, P P" uniqKey="Hujoel P">P.P. Hujoel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Becker, B E" uniqKey="Becker B">B.E. Becker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Willingham, H" uniqKey="Willingham H">H. Willingham</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T">T. Albrektsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johansson, C" uniqKey="Johansson C">C. Johansson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lundgren, A K" uniqKey="Lundgren A">A.K. Lundgren</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sul, Y" uniqKey="Sul Y">Y. Sul</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gottlow, J" uniqKey="Gottlow J">J. Gottlow</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Glauser, R" uniqKey="Glauser R">R. Glauser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Portmann, M" uniqKey="Portmann M">M. Portmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ruhstaller, P" uniqKey="Ruhstaller P">P. Ruhstaller</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lundgren, A K" uniqKey="Lundgren A">A.K. Lundgren</name></author><author><name sortKey="H Mmerle, C" uniqKey="H Mmerle C">C. Hämmerle</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gottlow, J" uniqKey="Gottlow J">J. Gottlow</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Turner, R T" uniqKey="Turner R">R.T. Turner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Maran, A" uniqKey="Maran A">A. Maran</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lotinun, S" uniqKey="Lotinun S">S. Lotinun</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hefferan, T" uniqKey="Hefferan T">T. Hefferan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Evans, G L" uniqKey="Evans G">G.L. Evans</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhang, M" uniqKey="Zhang M">M. Zhang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sibonga, J D" uniqKey="Sibonga J">J.D. Sibonga</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, M" uniqKey="Piattelli M">M. Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scarano, A" uniqKey="Scarano A">A. Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Paolantonio, M" uniqKey="Paolantonio M">M. Paolantonio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, G" uniqKey="Iezzi G">G. Iezzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petrone, G" uniqKey="Petrone G">G. Petrone</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A">A. Piattelli</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Casta Eda, S" uniqKey="Casta Eda S">S. Castañeda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Largo, R" uniqKey="Largo R">R. Largo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Calvo, E" uniqKey="Calvo E">E. Calvo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rodriguez Salvanes, F" uniqKey="Rodriguez Salvanes F">F. Rodríguez-Salvanés</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marcos, M E" uniqKey="Marcos M">M.E. Marcos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Diaz Curiel, M" uniqKey="Diaz Curiel M">M. Díaz-Curiel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Herrero Beaumont, G" uniqKey="Herrero Beaumont G">G. Herrero-Beaumont</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Doi, K" uniqKey="Doi K">K. Doi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kubo, T" uniqKey="Kubo T">T. Kubo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Takeshita, R" uniqKey="Takeshita R">R. Takeshita</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kajihara, S" uniqKey="Kajihara S">S. Kajihara</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kato, S" uniqKey="Kato S">S. Kato</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kawazoe, Y" uniqKey="Kawazoe Y">Y. Kawazoe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shiba, T" uniqKey="Shiba T">T. Shiba</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akagawa, Y" uniqKey="Akagawa Y">Y. Akagawa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Jemt, T" uniqKey="Jemt T">T. Jemt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lekholm, U" uniqKey="Lekholm U">U. Lekholm</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Scarano, A" uniqKey="Scarano A">A. Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Degidi, M" uniqKey="Degidi M">M. Degidi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, G" uniqKey="Iezzi G">G. Iezzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petrone, G" uniqKey="Petrone G">G. Petrone</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A">A. Piattelli</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Casta Eda, S" uniqKey="Casta Eda S">S. Castañeda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Calvo, E" uniqKey="Calvo E">E. Calvo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Largo, R" uniqKey="Largo R">R. Largo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gonzalez Gonzalez, R" uniqKey="Gonzalez Gonzalez R">R. González-González</name></author><author><name sortKey="De La Piedra, C" uniqKey="De La Piedra C">C. de la Piedra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Diaz Curiel, M" uniqKey="Diaz Curiel M">M. Díaz-Curiel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Herrero Beaumont, G" uniqKey="Herrero Beaumont G">G. Herrero-Beaumont</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Almagro, M I" uniqKey="Almagro M">M.I. Almagro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Roman Blas, J A" uniqKey="Roman Blas J">J.A. Roman-Blas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bellido, M" uniqKey="Bellido M">M. Bellido</name></author><author><name sortKey="Casta Eda, S" uniqKey="Casta Eda S">S. Castañeda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cortez, R" uniqKey="Cortez R">R. Cortez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Herrero Beaumont, G" uniqKey="Herrero Beaumont G">G. Herrero-Beaumont</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Da Cunha, H A" uniqKey="Da Cunha H">H.A. Da Cunha</name></author><author><name sortKey="Francischone, C E" uniqKey="Francischone C">C.E. Francischone</name></author><author><name sortKey="Filho, H N" uniqKey="Filho H">H.N. Filho</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Oliveira, R C" uniqKey="De Oliveira R">R.C. de Oliveira</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I">I. Turkyilmaz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L. Sennerby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yilmaz, B" uniqKey="Yilmaz B">B. Yilmaz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bilecenoglu, B" uniqKey="Bilecenoglu B">B. Bilecenoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozbek, E N" uniqKey="Ozbek E">E.N. Ozbek</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Friberg, B" uniqKey="Friberg B">B. Friberg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L. Sennerby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Linden, B" uniqKey="Linden B">B. Linden</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grondahl, K" uniqKey="Grondahl K">K. Gröndahl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lekholm, U" uniqKey="Lekholm U">U. Lekholm</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Al Nawas, B" uniqKey="Al Nawas B">B. Al-Nawas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wagner, W" uniqKey="Wagner W">W. Wagner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grotz, K A" uniqKey="Grotz K">K.A. Grötz</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Degidi, M" uniqKey="Degidi M">M. Degidi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A">A. Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shibli, J A" uniqKey="Shibli J">J.A. Shibli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Perrotti, V" uniqKey="Perrotti V">V. Perrotti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, G" uniqKey="Iezzi G">G. Iezzi</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Wennerberg, A" uniqKey="Wennerberg A">A. Wennerberg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T">T. Albrektsson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Doi, K" uniqKey="Doi K">K. Doi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kajihara, S" uniqKey="Kajihara S">S. Kajihara</name></author><author><name sortKey="Morita, K" uniqKey="Morita K">K. Morita</name></author><author><name sortKey="Makihara, Y" uniqKey="Makihara Y">Y. Makihara</name></author><author><name sortKey="Okada, S" uniqKey="Okada S">S. Okada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akagawa, Y" uniqKey="Akagawa Y">Y. Akagawa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Morita, K" uniqKey="Morita K">K. Morita</name></author><author><name sortKey="Doi, K" uniqKey="Doi K">K. Doi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Oue, H" uniqKey="Oue H">H. Oue</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kajihara, S" uniqKey="Kajihara S">S. Kajihara</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hayashi, K" uniqKey="Hayashi K">K. Hayashi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akagawa, Y" uniqKey="Akagawa Y">Y. Akagawa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Funct Biomater</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Funct Biomater</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jfb</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Functional Biomaterials</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2079-4983</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MDPI</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25794350</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4384105</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jfb6010143</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jfb-06-00143</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Influence of Implant Surface Topography on Primary Stability in a Standardized Osteoporosis Rabbit Model Study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Oue</surname><given-names>Hiroshi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jfb-06-00143">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Doi</surname><given-names>Kazuya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jfb-06-00143">1</xref><xref rid="c1-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="corresp">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Oki</surname><given-names>Yoshifumi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jfb-06-00143">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Makihara</surname><given-names>Yusuke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jfb-06-00143">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kubo</surname><given-names>Takayasu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jfb-06-00143">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Perrotti</surname><given-names>Vittoria</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-jfb-06-00143">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>Adriano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-jfb-06-00143">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Akagawa</surname><given-names>Yasumasa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-jfb-06-00143">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tsuga</surname><given-names>Kazuhiro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jfb-06-00143">1</xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Puoci</surname><given-names>Francesco</given-names></name><role>Academic Editor</role></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="af1-jfb-06-00143"><label>1</label>Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan; E-Mails:<email>hiroshi-o@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (H.O.);<email>yos-oki14@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.O.);<email>yusuke0318@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (Y.M.);<email>kubocky@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (T.K.);<email>tsuga@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email> (K.T.)</aff><aff id="af2-jfb-06-00143"><label>2</label>Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti-Via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti 66100, Italy; E-Mails:<email>v.perrotti@unich.it</email> (V.P.);<email>apiattelli@unich.it</email> (A.P.)</aff><aff id="af3-jfb-06-00143"><label>3</label>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry, Ohu University, 31-1 sankakudo, Kooriyama, Fukushima 963-8611, Japan; E-Mail:<email>akagawa@den.ohu-u.ac.jp</email></aff><author-notes><corresp id="c1-jfb-06-00143"><label>*</label>Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: <email>kazuya17@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</email>.</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>3</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><month>3</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>143</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>08</day><month>2</month><year>2015</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>09</day><month>3</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><license><license-p><pmc-comment>CREATIVE COMMONS</pmc-comment>This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>).</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Evaluating primary stability is important to predict the prognosis of dental implant treatment. Primary stability is decreased in a low bone density site such as osteoporosis. However, it is difficult to apply in small animal and the effect of the different implant surface topography for the primary stability at low bone density site has not yet fully been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of implant surface topography on primary stability in a standardized osteoporosis animal model. Six rabbits underwent ovariectomy and administrated glucocorticoid to induce an osteoporosis model. Sham-operations were performed in additional six rabbits. Implants with machined or oxidized-surfaces were inserted into the femur epiphyses and insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. In sham model, the IT and ISQ did not differ significantly between the both implant. However, the IT value of oxidized-surface implant was significantly higher than that of the machined implant in the osteoporosis model. Meanwhile, ISQ did not significantly differ between the machined and oxidized-surfaced implants. In conclusion, the IT of implants is higher with rough than with smooth surfaces but that there are no differences in ISQ value between different surfaces in a standardized osteoporosis bone reduced rabbit model.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>primary stability</kwd><kwd>osteoporosis</kwd><kwd>glucocorticoid</kwd><kwd>implant surface</kwd><kwd>rabbit model</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dental implant therapy has been successfully used to replace missing teeth, particularly in healthy bone [<xref rid="B1-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="B2-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>]. The long-term success of implant therapy depends on the achievement of favorable primary stability at implant placement. Primary stability is influenced by various factors, and the two main factors affecting primary stability are density and quantity of bone at the implant site and implant design [<xref rid="B3-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="B4-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>]. </p><p>It is well known that primary stability in low bone density sites is decreased. Recently, the problems faced with osteoporosis have received attention in not only the orthopaedic field but also dental implant therapy. Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease that causes systematic loss of bone density and strength [<xref rid="B5-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>]. Therefore, low bone density caused by osteoporosis might lead to decreased primary stability. Indeed, osteoporosis may be a risk factor for implant failure [<xref rid="B6-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>]. </p><p>The screw-type implant aids easy acquisition of primary stability and is now standard. Moreover, implant surface topography is a key factor in the achievement of osseointegration. The most common modification of implant topography is surface roughness; this is achieved by acid etching, sandblasting, or oxidization. Anodic oxidization modifies the chemical composition and the degree of crystallinity [<xref rid="B7-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>]. Oxidized titanium implants, such as the TiUnite™ produced by spark anodized, have a moderately rough implant surface that enhances the speed of osseointegration by stimulating bone growth, thereby reducing the risk of implant failure during the early healing phase [<xref rid="B8-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>]. </p><p>The development of low bone density animal models has been essential in studies of bone mass as well as the development of new drugs for osteoporosis [<xref rid="B9-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>]. Ovariectomy is recognized as the gold standard in experimental animal osteoporosis models using rats or mice. However, insertion of commercialized dental implants is difficult in these models because the bone quantity is insufficient for implant placement. Although rabbit model have been used to evaluate osseointegration or implant stability of commercialized dental implants [<xref rid="B10-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>], rabbits are remarkably resistant to conventional strategies for inducing bone loss, and thus ovariectomy is seldom successful. For this reason, the influence of surface topography on primary stability at low bone density sites remains unverified <italic>in vivo</italic>. Recently, an experimental osteoporosis model using rabbits has been established in which significant bone loss is achieved within a short period by combining ovariectomy with glucocorticoid administration [<xref rid="B11-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>]. Glucocorticoids mainly affect bone quality by decreasing bone formation through osteoblastogenesis reduction and increased osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis. The analysis of various surface modification or novel biomaterials with commercialized dental implant has been performed in healthy animals [<xref rid="B12-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>]. In the future, the significance of these analyses in osteoporotic animal will be demanded in research fields of implant material and biomaterial. This experimental rabbit osteoporosis models enable investigation of dental implants inserted in a standardized low bone density site. </p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface topography on primary stability in an osteoporosis rabbit model.</p></sec><sec><title>2. Results and Discussion</title><sec><title>2.1. Results</title><sec><title>2.1.1. Insertion Torque</title><p>The insertion torque (IT) value was higher in the sham than osteoporotic (OP) models in both the rough-surfaced and smooth-surfaced groups. In the sham model, IT of the rough group was 33.1 ± 6.1 N·cm and that of the smooth group was 26.1 ± 5.7 N·cm, with no significant difference between 2 groups. In the OP model, the IT value of the rough group was 13.6 ± 3.6 N·cm and that of the smooth group was 7.1 ± 2.7 N·cm. A significant difference was found between the rough-surfaced and smooth-surfaced groups (<italic>P</italic> < 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f001">Figure 1</xref>). </p><fig id="jfb-06-00143-f001" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Insertion torque (IT) value of Sham model group was higher than that of the osteoporotic (OP) model group (<italic>P</italic> < 0.05); (<bold>b</bold>) In the OP model, IT value of rough group was higher than that of smooth group (<italic>P</italic> < 0.05); (<bold>c</bold>) In the sham model, there was no significant difference between the groups.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jfb-06-00143-g001"></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>2.1.2. Resonance Frequency Analysis</title><p>The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was higher in the sham than OP model in both the rough and smooth groups. In the sham model, the ISQ values of the rough and smooth implants were 73.4 ± 3.1 and 70.3 ± 8.6, respectively. The corresponding values in the OP model were 63.6 ± 4.5 and 56.3 ± 14.4, respectively. In both models, no significant difference was observed between rough and smooth implants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f002">Figure 2</xref>).</p><fig id="jfb-06-00143-f002" position="float"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>(<bold>a</bold>) Implant stability quotient (ISQ) value of the Sham model group was higher than that of the OP model group (<italic>P</italic> < 0.05); (<bold>b</bold>,<bold>c</bold>) In both models, ISQ values were no significantly different between the smooth and rough groups.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jfb-06-00143-g002"></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>2.1.3. Mechanical Strength of Bone</title><p>The maximum mechanical bone strength of the sham model (295.9 ± 32.9 N) was significantly higher than that of the OP model (202.7 ± 25.5 N, <italic>P</italic> < 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f003">Figure 3</xref>). </p><fig id="jfb-06-00143-f003" position="float"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>The bars represent maximum loads in the sham model and OP model, and the error bars indicate the corresponding standard deviations (SDs). The maximum load of the sham model (295.5 ± 32.9 N) was significantly higher than that of the OP model (202.7 ± 25.5 N) (*<italic>P</italic> < 0.05).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jfb-06-00143-g003"></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>2.2. Discussion</title><p>The IT and ISQ values of the Sham model were higher than that of the OP model. The IT value was higher with rough surface topography than smooth surface topography in the osteoporosis model, meanwhile, the ISQ value did not differ significantly between these two groups. </p><p>Implant stability is regarded as indication of the mechanical connection between the implant surface and surrounding bone [<xref rid="B13-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>]. Superior primary stability at implant placement leads to long-term success of implant treatment and indication of immediate loading [<xref rid="B4-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="B8-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>]. The acquisition of primary stability depends on the bone quality and quantity [<xref rid="B14-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>], as well as the implant surface topography and design. At sites with poor bone density, such as in osteoporosis, the primary stability is decreased. </p><p>Although rabbits have been widely used in studies involving dental implants, ovariectomy alone might be insufficient to induce osteoporosis in an osteoporosis rabbit model [<xref rid="B11-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="B15-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>]. An experimental rabbit model of osteoporosis combining the effects of ovariectomy and glucocorticoid administration has been reported to show significant bone loss within a short period. This osteoporosis model is consistent, easy to be induced, and highly reproducible [<xref rid="B15-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>]. The decline in oestrogen levels induced by ovariectomy increases osteoclast recruitment, differentiation, and survival; consequently, bone resorption exceeds bone formation. Furthermore, glucocorticoid induces decreased bone formation through osteoblastogenesis reduction and increased osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis [<xref rid="B16-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>]. Increased osteoclastic resorption and decreased new bone formation in cortical and trabecular bones, due to glucocorticoid administration and oestrogenic deprivation, have been previously demonstrated in the experimental osteoporosis rabbit model used in this study [<xref rid="B15-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>]. With dual-energy X-ray analysis, bone mineral density was significantly decreased in an ovariectomy model with glucocorticoid administration compared with a normal model. In addition, according to the results of mechanical strength analysis in the present study, the maximum mechanical bone strength of the OP model was lower than that of the sham model. Therefore, the OP model demonstrated a loss of bone density and mechanical strength. Commercialized dental implant cannot be applied in the mouse or rat models. However, this experimental rabbit osteoporosis model could be used for the investigation of the various surface modification or biomaterials with commercialized dental implants in the future study. </p><p>Implant stability is considered an important indicator of the success of an implant [<xref rid="B14-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="B17-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>]. Intraoperative methods for assessment of primary stability drilling resistance, insertion torque force, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Measurement of IT is useful for these the resistance force between implant thread and cortical bone site and is a reflection of the entire bone condition at the placement site. During implant insertion, IT is calculated as the torsional loading between bone interface and implant thread. A high IT is associated with superior primary stability and could reduce micro-motion after placement. IT value is generally affected by cortical bone thickness of the placement site [<xref rid="B18-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>]. The study results revealed that IT was higher in the sham than OP model in both the rough-surface and smooth-surface groups. IT values did not differ significantly between both groups in the sham model. On the other hand, IT of the rough group was significantly higher than that of the smooth group in the OP model. This finding suggests that the resistance of torsional load induced during implant placement is greater with a rough-surface thread than smooth-surface thread at sites with reduced bone density and thickness of cortical bone due to glucocorticoid administration. Therefore, implant surface topography could affect IT in the OP model but not in the sham model. It is considered that both groups could gain high friction during implant insertion in the sham model because bone density and thickness was sufficient for implant placement. Therefore, if bone quality at the implant placement site is appropriate, IT is affected by placement site condition rather than implant surface topography. Taken together, results of present study suggest that bone density and quantity are important factors for primary stability and rough-surface topography is predictably effective with low bone density at the implant placement site.</p><p>The ISQ of successfully stabilized implant is reported to range from 57 to 82 [<xref rid="B19-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>]. In this present study, ISQ values of the sham model were recorded as >60, indicating that implants in both groups were adequately stabilized at the placement site. ISQ values of the OP model were significantly lower than those of the sham model. There were no significant differences in the ISQ values between the rough-surface and smooth-surface groups in the sham model, whereas the ISQ values in the rough group tended to be higher than those in the smooth group in the OP model. This may mean that the ISQ value reflects the bone attachment area between the implant thread surface and corresponded surrounding bone. </p><p>Compared with machined implants, oxidized titanium implants, such as the TiUnite™ implant, have been shown to have superior stability because bone healing or formation is accelerated after implant placement. Oxidized modified surface modification is beneficial for predictable achievement of osseointegration; however, it has been reported that ISQ values at implant placement are not significantly different between oxidized and machined surfaces [<xref rid="B8-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>]. In the present study, ISQ values immediately after implant placement did not differ significantly between rough and smooth groups in both the sham and OP models, it indicates that implant surface topography did not affect RFA measurements significantly. RFA might be mainly affected by bone quality and quantity around the implant and might be unable to detect differences in implant surface topography. Further, ISQ measurements alone might not be useful as a method to evaluate primary stability in certain placement site bone conditions such as decreased trabecular bone. Favorable ISQ and IT measurements do not necessarily indicate perfect primary stability. In addition, the relationship between ISQ and IT is not clear [<xref rid="B18-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>,<xref rid="B20-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="B21-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>]. Accordingly, it is highly recommended that multiple methods should be used to assess primary stability in clinical situations. The influence of implant surface topography on primary stability in standardized bone-reduced site has not been fully investigated so far. Therefore, the results of this study could provide beneficial knowledge as to measurement of primary stability on osteoporosis. </p></sec></sec><sec><title>3. Experimental Section </title><sec><title>3.1. Ethics</title><p>This study was approved by the Research Facilities Committee for Laboratory Animal Science, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Hiroshima (#A01-10).</p></sec><sec><title>3.2. Study Design and Animals</title><p>The study design of the animal procedure is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f004">Figure 4</xref>. Twelve female New Zealand White rabbits (age, 17 weeks; body weight, 3.0–3.5 kg) were used in this study. Glucocorticoid-induced OP model animals were prepared according to previously described methods [<xref rid="B11-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>]. Animals were randomly selected for ovariectomy or sham operation (<italic>n</italic> = 6 in each model). Two weeks after ovariectomy, the six animals received intramuscular injections of glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg/kg/day; Depo-Medrol<sup>®</sup>, Pfizer, Tokyo, Japan) for 4 consecutive weeks. The six sham-operated rabbits did not receive glucocorticoid and represented the non-induced osteoporotic model (sham model).</p><fig id="jfb-06-00143-f004" position="float"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Design of the animal experiment.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jfb-06-00143-g004"></graphic></fig><p>Twelve oxidized surface-modified titanium dental implants (Brånemark system, MkIII TiUnite™, 3.75 mm diameter, 7 mm length, Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f005">Figure 5</xref>a) and 12 machined-surface titanium dental implants (Brånemark system, MkIII, 3.75 mm diameter, 7 mm length, Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f005">Figure 5</xref>b) were used in this study. The average surface roughness of the machined surface implant (smooth group) is 0.9 µm and of the oxidized surface (rough group) is 1.1 µm [<xref rid="B22-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>]. </p><fig id="jfb-06-00143-f005" position="float"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>SEM image of the surface topography at the implant thread portion. (<bold>a</bold>) The surface of the oxidized implant; (<bold>b</bold>) The surface of the machined implant.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jfb-06-00143-g005"></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>3.3. Measurement of Primary Stability</title><p>All procedures were performed under anesthesia with sodium pentobarbital (10 mg/kg, i.v.; Somnopentyl, Kyoritsu Seiyaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). </p><p>All implant sockets were prepared according to the Brånemark protocol in the manufacturer’s instructions in the distal epiphysis of the knee joint of both femurs. Briefly, after the knee joint was exposed, a surgical micro-motor (Osseocare 2000<sup>®</sup>, Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) with rotary speed not exceeding 800 rpm was used for consecutive application of a 2.0 mm round drill, 2.0 mm twist drill, 3.0 mm pilot drill, 3.0 mm twist drill, and countersink drill. After implant socket preparation, the implant was inserted until the color indicator was level with the bone ridge. The maximum IT during the insertion was recorded by digital torque gauge (BTG-E100CN, Tonichi, Tokyo, Japan). After implant insertion, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed using an Osstell<sup>®</sup> (Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) to measure the ISQ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="jfb-06-00143-f006">Figure 6</xref>). Measurements were done 3 times from 2 different directions, and the values obtained for each implant were averaged. The ISQ measurements were carried out according to previous study [<xref rid="B23-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>].</p><fig id="jfb-06-00143-f006" position="float"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>The measurement of implant stability quotient was performed using an Osstell<sup>®</sup>. The measurement was performed 3 times along both short and long axes to obtain average values in the placed implant.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jfb-06-00143-g006"></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>3.4. Analysis of Mechanical Strength of Bone</title><p>Three-point bending tests were carried out according to previous study [<xref rid="B24-jfb-06-00143" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>]. After the animals had been sacrificed, tibias of the OP and sham models were harvested and samples of bone 60.0 mm long were prepared by cutting 25.0 mm and 85.0 mm from the proximal end. A load was applied to the sample until the sample fractured (cross-head speed, 1 mm/min). Then, maximum load was recorded as the mechanical strength of the bone.</p></sec><sec><title>3.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data of IT, ISQ and maximum load are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. Statistically significant differences were accepted as <italic>P</italic> < 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>4. Conclusions </title><p>In conclusion, the present study indicates that in a standardized bone reduced animal model, IT values of rough-surface implants are higher than those of smooth surface implants, and that there are no differences in ISQ measurements between different surfaces. Further studies in osteoporosis models might be expected to be conducted both <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo,</italic> including in the clinical situations. The osteoporosis rabbit model with ovariectomy and glucocorticoid administration appears beneficial for further experimental study of commercialized dental implants in osteoporosis. </p></sec></body><back><ack><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>This study was supported by Scientific Research (No. 2339044300 and No.245929180) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.</p></ack><notes><title>Author Contributions</title><p>K.D., H.O. and Y.A. conceived and designed the experiments; K.D., H.O., T.K. and Y.M. performed the experiments; K.D. and A.P. analyzed the data; K.D. and H.O. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; K.D., V.P., Y.A. and K.T wrote the paper.</p></notes><notes><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest. </p></notes><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="B1-jfb-06-00143"><label>1.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Östman</surname><given-names>P.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hellman</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wendelhag</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery</article-title><source>Int. J. Prosthodont.</source><year>2006</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16479765</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2-jfb-06-00143"><label>2.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suito</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomotake</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagao</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishida</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ichikawa</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Survival of immediate implant restoration: A retrospective study through 9-year-observation</article-title><source>J. Prosthodont. Res.</source><year>2011</year><volume>55</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21300587</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3-jfb-06-00143"><label>3.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johansson</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bäckm</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirsch</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cutting torque measurements in conjunction with implant placement in grafted and nongrafted maxillas as an objective evaluation of bone density: a possible method for identifying early implant failures?</article-title><source>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</source><year>2004</year><volume>6</volume><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00022.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15595704</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4-jfb-06-00143"><label>4.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iezzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scarano</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Stefano</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arosio</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Doi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricci</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrotti</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Correlation between the bone density recorded by a computerized implant motor and by a histomorphometric analysis: A preliminary <italic>in vitro</italic> study on bovine ribs</article-title><source>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</source><year>2015</year><volume>17</volume><fpage>e35</fpage><lpage>e44</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cid.12121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23879771</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5-jfb-06-00143"><label>5.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shibli</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aguiar</surname><given-names>K.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Melo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>d’Avila</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zenóbio</surname><given-names>E.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faveri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iezzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Histological comparison between implants retrieved from patients with and without osteoporosis</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.</source><year>2008</year><volume>37</volume><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>327</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18262765</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6-jfb-06-00143"><label>6.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hujoel</surname><given-names>P.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>B.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Willingham</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Osteoporosis and implant failure: An exploratory case-control study</article-title><source>J. Periodontol.</source><year>2000</year><volume>71</volume><fpage>625</fpage><lpage>631</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.625</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10807128</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7-jfb-06-00143"><label>7.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albrektsson</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Johansson</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lundgren</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sul</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottlow</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Experimental studies on oxidezed implants. A histomorphometrical and biomechanical analysis</article-title><source>Appl. Osseointegration Res.</source><year>2000</year><volume>1</volume><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>24</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8-jfb-06-00143"><label>8.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glauser</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Portmann</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruhstaller</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lundgren</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hämmerle</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottlow</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Stability measurements of immediately loaded machined and oxidized implants in the posterior maxilla. A comparative clinical study using resonance frequency analysis</article-title><source>Appl. Osseontegration Res.</source><year>2001</year><volume>2</volume><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>29</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9-jfb-06-00143"><label>9.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>R.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maran</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lotinun</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hefferan</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>G.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sibonga</surname><given-names>J.D.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Animal models for osteoporosis</article-title><source>Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord.</source><year>2001</year><volume>2</volume><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1010067326811</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11704974</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10-jfb-06-00143"><label>10.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scarano</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paolantonio</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iezzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrone</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits</article-title><source>J. Oral Implantol.</source><year>2002</year><volume>28</volume><fpage>2</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12498456</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11-jfb-06-00143"><label>11.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castañeda</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Largo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calvo</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodríguez-Salvanés</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marcos</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Díaz-Curiel</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrero-Beaumont</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits</article-title><source>Skeletal Radiol.</source><year>2006</year><volume>35</volume><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00256-005-0022-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16247642</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12-jfb-06-00143"><label>12.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubo</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeshita</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kajihara</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawazoe</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shiba</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akagawa</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Inorganic polyphosphate adsorbed onto hydroxyapatite for guided bone regeneration: An animal study</article-title><source>Dent. Mater. J.</source><year>2014</year><volume>33</volume><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4012/dmj.2013-275</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24500369</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13-jfb-06-00143"><label>13.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jemt</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lekholm</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: A 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</source><year>1995</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>303</fpage><lpage>311</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7615326</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14-jfb-06-00143"><label>14.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scarano</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Degidi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iezzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrone</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: A retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans</article-title><source>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</source><year>2006</year><volume>8</volume><fpage>218</fpage><lpage>222</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00022.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17100747</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15-jfb-06-00143"><label>15.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castañeda</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calvo</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Largo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>González-González</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>de la Piedra</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Díaz-Curiel</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrero-Beaumont</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Characterization of a new experimental model of osteoporosis in rabbits</article-title><source>J. Bone Miner. Metab.</source><year>2008</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00774-007-0797-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18095064</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16-jfb-06-00143"><label>16.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almagro</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Roman-Blas</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bellido</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castañeda</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cortez</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrero-Beaumont</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>PTH [1-34] enhances bone response around titanium implants in a rabbit model of osteoporosis</article-title><source>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</source><year>2013</year><volume>24</volume><fpage>1027</fpage><lpage>1034</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22626278</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17-jfb-06-00143"><label>17.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Da Cunha</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Francischone</surname><given-names>C.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Filho</surname><given-names>H.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>de Oliveira</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</source><year>2004</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>578</fpage><lpage>585</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15346756</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18-jfb-06-00143"><label>18.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turkyilmaz</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yilmaz</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bilecenoglu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozbek</surname><given-names>E.N.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: A human cadaver study</article-title><source>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</source><year>2009</year><volume>11</volume><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00095.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18384400</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19-jfb-06-00143"><label>19.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Friberg</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Linden</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gröndahl</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lekholm</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.</source><year>1999</year><volume>28</volume><fpage>266</fpage><lpage>272</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10416893</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20-jfb-06-00143"><label>20.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Nawas</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Grötz</surname><given-names>K.A.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</source><year>2006</year><volume>21</volume><fpage>726</fpage><lpage>732</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17066633</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21-jfb-06-00143"><label>21.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Degidi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piattelli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shibli</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrotti</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iezzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bone formation around immediately loaded and submerged dental implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface after 4 and 8 weeks: A human histologic and histomorphometric analysis</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</source><year>2009</year><volume>24</volume><fpage>896</fpage><lpage>901</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19865630</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22-jfb-06-00143"><label>22.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wennerberg</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Albrektsson</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>On implant surfaces: A review of current knowledge and opinions</article-title><source>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2010</year><volume>25</volume><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20209188</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23-jfb-06-00143"><label>23.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kajihara</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morita</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Makihara</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Okada</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akagawa</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The influence of fixation in formalin on the measurement of stability of implants using resonance frequency analysis and Periotest M<sup>®</sup>: A study in a dog</article-title><source>Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.</source><year>2014</year><volume>52</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.02.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23477695</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24-jfb-06-00143"><label>24.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morita</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Doi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oue</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kajihara</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayashi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akagawa</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of formalin fixation on the implant stability quotient and mechanical characteristics of bone</article-title><source>Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.</source><year>2013</year><volume>51</volume><fpage>550</fpage><lpage>554</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23036835</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003149 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003149 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4384105
|texte= Influence of Implant Surface Topography on Primary Stability in a Standardized Osteoporosis Rabbit Model Study
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25794350" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |