Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review</title><author><name sortKey="Kim, Ha Young" sort="Kim, Ha Young" uniqKey="Kim H" first="Ha-Young" last="Kim">Ha-Young Kim</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1">Woorideul Dental Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Shin, Sang Wan" sort="Shin, Sang Wan" uniqKey="Shin S" first="Sang-Wan" last="Shin">Sang-Wan Shin</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, KUMC, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Jeong Yol" sort="Lee, Jeong Yol" uniqKey="Lee J" first="Jeong-Yol" last="Lee">Jeong-Yol Lee</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, KUMC, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">25352954</idno><idno type="pmc">4211048</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211048</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4211048</idno><idno type="doi">10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.325</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002E98</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002E98</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review</title><author><name sortKey="Kim, Ha Young" sort="Kim, Ha Young" uniqKey="Kim H" first="Ha-Young" last="Kim">Ha-Young Kim</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1">Woorideul Dental Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Shin, Sang Wan" sort="Shin, Sang Wan" uniqKey="Shin S" first="Sang-Wan" last="Shin">Sang-Wan Shin</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, KUMC, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Jeong Yol" sort="Lee, Jeong Yol" uniqKey="Lee J" first="Jeong-Yol" last="Lee">Jeong-Yol Lee</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, KUMC, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics</title><idno type="ISSN">2005-7806</idno><idno type="eISSN">2005-7814</idno><imprint><date when="2014">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>PURPOSE</title><p>The aim of this review was to analyze the evaluation criteria on mandibular implant overdentures through a systematic review and suggest standardized evaluation criteria.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>A systematic literature search was conducted by PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) and clinical trial studies comparing attachment systems on mandibular implant overdentures until December, 2011 were selected. Twenty nine studies were finally selected and the data about evaluation methods were collected.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>Evaluation criteria could be classified into 4 groups (implant survival, peri-implant tissue evaluation, prosthetic evaluation, and patient satisfaction). Among 29 studies, 21 studies presented implant survival rate, while any studies reporting implant failure did not present cumulative implant survival rate. Seventeen studies evaluating peri-implant tissue status presented following items as evaluation criteria; marginal bone level (14), plaque Index (13), probing depth (8), bleeding index (8), attachment gingiva level (8), gingival index (6), amount of keratinized gingiva (1). Eighteen studies evaluating prosthetic maintenance and complication also presented following items as evaluation criteria; loose matrix (17), female detachment (15), denture fracture (15), denture relining (14), abutment fracture (14), abutment screw loosening (11), and occlusal adjustment (9). Atypical questionnaire (9), Visual analog scales (VAS) (4), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) (1) were used as the format of criteria to evaluate patients satisfaction in 14 studies.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>For evaluation of implant overdenture, it is necessary to include cumulative survival rate for implant evaluation. It is suggested that peri-implant tissue evaluation criteria include marginal bone level, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and attached gingiva level. It is also suggested that prosthetic evaluation criteria include loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, and occlusal adjustment. Finally standardized criteria like OHIP-EDENT or VAS are required for patient satisfaction.</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Gjengedal, H" uniqKey="Gjengedal H">H Gjengedal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dahl, L" uniqKey="Dahl L">L Dahl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lavik, A" uniqKey="Lavik A">A Lavik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Trovik, Ta" uniqKey="Trovik T">TA Trovik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Berg, E" uniqKey="Berg E">E Berg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boe, Oe" uniqKey="Boe O">OE Boe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Malde, Mk" uniqKey="Malde M">MK Malde</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Roumanas, Ed" uniqKey="Roumanas E">ED Roumanas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garrett, Nr" uniqKey="Garrett N">NR Garrett</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hamada, Mo" uniqKey="Hamada M">MO Hamada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kapur, Kk" uniqKey="Kapur K">KK Kapur</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Roumanas, Ed" uniqKey="Roumanas E">ED Roumanas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garrett, Nr" uniqKey="Garrett N">NR Garrett</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hamada, Mo" uniqKey="Hamada M">MO Hamada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Diener, Rm" uniqKey="Diener R">RM Diener</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kapur, Kk" uniqKey="Kapur K">KK Kapur</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hamada, Mo" uniqKey="Hamada M">MO Hamada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garrett, Nr" uniqKey="Garrett N">NR Garrett</name></author><author><name sortKey="Roumanas, Ed" uniqKey="Roumanas E">ED Roumanas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kapur, Kk" uniqKey="Kapur K">KK Kapur</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freymiller, E" uniqKey="Freymiller E">E Freymiller</name></author><author><name sortKey="Han, T" uniqKey="Han T">T Han</name></author><author><name sortKey="Diener, Rm" uniqKey="Diener R">RM Diener</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, T" uniqKey="Chen T">T Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Levin, S" uniqKey="Levin S">S Levin</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Roumanas, Ed" uniqKey="Roumanas E">ED Roumanas</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Solomons, Yf" uniqKey="Solomons Y">YF Solomons</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kim, Hy" uniqKey="Kim H">HY Kim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Jy" uniqKey="Lee J">JY Lee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shin, Sw" uniqKey="Shin S">SW Shin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bryant, Sr" uniqKey="Bryant S">SR Bryant</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mackie, A" uniqKey="Mackie A">A Mackie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lyons, K" uniqKey="Lyons K">K Lyons</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, Wm" uniqKey="Thomson W">WM Thomson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Stendell Hollis, Nr" uniqKey="Stendell Hollis N">NR Stendell-Hollis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Laudermilk, Mj" uniqKey="Laudermilk M">MJ Laudermilk</name></author><author><name sortKey="West, Jl" uniqKey="West J">JL West</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thompson, Pa" uniqKey="Thompson P">PA Thompson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, Ca" uniqKey="Thomson C">CA Thomson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Gardiner, C" uniqKey="Gardiner C">C Gardiner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gott, M" uniqKey="Gott M">M Gott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Small, N" uniqKey="Small N">N Small</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, S" uniqKey="Payne S">S Payne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Seamark, D" uniqKey="Seamark D">D Seamark</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barnes, S" uniqKey="Barnes S">S Barnes</name></author><author><name sortKey="Halpin, D" uniqKey="Halpin D">D Halpin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ruse, C" uniqKey="Ruse C">C Ruse</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Osborne, Nj" uniqKey="Osborne N">NJ Osborne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, D" uniqKey="Payne D">D Payne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Newman, Ml" uniqKey="Newman M">ML Newman</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Payne, S" uniqKey="Payne S">S Payne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Froggatt, K" uniqKey="Froggatt K">K Froggatt</name></author><author><name sortKey="O Shea, E" uniqKey="O Shea E">E O'Shea</name></author><author><name sortKey="Murphy, K" uniqKey="Murphy K">K Murphy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Larkin, P" uniqKey="Larkin P">P Larkin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Casey, D" uniqKey="Casey D">D Casey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leime, An" uniqKey="Leime A">AN Léime</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ma, S" uniqKey="Ma S">S Ma</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Walton, Tr" uniqKey="Walton T">TR Walton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Walton, Jn" uniqKey="Walton J">JN Walton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Solomons, Yf" uniqKey="Solomons Y">YF Solomons</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Walton, Jn" uniqKey="Walton J">JN Walton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glick, N" uniqKey="Glick N">N Glick</name></author><author><name sortKey="Macentee, Mi" uniqKey="Macentee M">MI Macentee</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Alsabeeha, Nh" uniqKey="Alsabeeha N">NH Alsabeeha</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Swain, Mv" uniqKey="Swain M">MV Swain</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Strassburger, C" uniqKey="Strassburger C">C Strassburger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kerschbaum, T" uniqKey="Kerschbaum T">T Kerschbaum</name></author><author><name sortKey="Heydecke, G" uniqKey="Heydecke G">G Heydecke</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mittmann, N" uniqKey="Mittmann N">N Mittmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Trakas, K" uniqKey="Trakas K">K Trakas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Risebrough, N" uniqKey="Risebrough N">N Risebrough</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Ba" uniqKey="Liu B">BA Liu</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hunter, P" uniqKey="Hunter P">P Hunter</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mericske Stern, R" uniqKey="Mericske Stern R">R Mericske-Stern</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steinlin Schaffner, T" uniqKey="Steinlin Schaffner T">T Steinlin Schaffner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marti, P" uniqKey="Marti P">P Marti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geering, Ah" uniqKey="Geering A">AH Geering</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M">M Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M">M Hooghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D">D van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Davis, Dm" uniqKey="Davis D">DM Davis</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Davis, Dm" uniqKey="Davis D">DM Davis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, Jo" uniqKey="Rogers J">JO Rogers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Packer, Me" uniqKey="Packer M">ME Packer</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K">K Gotfredsen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D">D Wismeijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, Ma" uniqKey="Van Waas M">MA Van Waas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vermeeren, Ji" uniqKey="Vermeeren J">JI Vermeeren</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mulder, J" uniqKey="Mulder J">J Mulder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kalk, W" uniqKey="Kalk W">W Kalk</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ie" uniqKey="Naert I">IE Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S">S Gizani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vuylsteke, M" uniqKey="Vuylsteke M">M Vuylsteke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D">D van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S">S Gizani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vuylsteke, M" uniqKey="Vuylsteke M">M Vuylsteke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D">D van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Davis, Dm" uniqKey="Davis D">DM Davis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Packer, Me" uniqKey="Packer M">ME Packer</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S">S Gizani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vuylsteke, M" uniqKey="Vuylsteke M">M Vuylsteke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D">D Van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Von Wowern, N" uniqKey="Von Wowern N">N von Wowern</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K">K Gotfredsen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K">K Gotfredsen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Holm, B" uniqKey="Holm B">B Holm</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Davis, Dm" uniqKey="Davis D">DM Davis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Packer, Me" uniqKey="Packer M">ME Packer</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Walton, Jn" uniqKey="Walton J">JN Walton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Macentee, Mi" uniqKey="Macentee M">MI MacEntee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glick, N" uniqKey="Glick N">N Glick</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Walton, Jn" uniqKey="Walton J">JN Walton</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Assad, As" uniqKey="Assad A">AS Assad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abd El Dayem, Ma" uniqKey="Abd El Dayem M">MA Abd El-Dayem</name></author><author><name sortKey="Badawy, Mm" uniqKey="Badawy M">MM Badawy</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alsaadi, G" uniqKey="Alsaadi G">G Alsaadi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D">D van Steenberghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M">M Quirynen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alsaadi, G" uniqKey="Alsaadi G">G Alsaadi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M">M Quirynen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Timmerman, R" uniqKey="Timmerman R">R Timmerman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stoker, Gt" uniqKey="Stoker G">GT Stoker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D">D Wismeijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Oosterveld, P" uniqKey="Oosterveld P">P Oosterveld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vermeeren, Ji" uniqKey="Vermeeren J">JI Vermeeren</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, Ma" uniqKey="Van Waas M">MA van Waas</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Macentee, Mi" uniqKey="Macentee M">MI MacEntee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Walton, Jn" uniqKey="Walton J">JN Walton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glick, N" uniqKey="Glick N">N Glick</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M">M Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alsaadi, G" uniqKey="Alsaadi G">G Alsaadi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pauwels, M" uniqKey="Pauwels M">M Pauwels</name></author><author><name sortKey="Haffajee, A" uniqKey="Haffajee A">A Haffajee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D">D van Steenberghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Stoker, Gt" uniqKey="Stoker G">GT Stoker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D">D Wismeijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, Ma" uniqKey="Van Waas M">MA van Waas</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Abd El Dayem, Ma" uniqKey="Abd El Dayem M">MA Abd El-Dayem</name></author><author><name sortKey="Assad, As" uniqKey="Assad A">AS Assad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eldin Sanad, Me" uniqKey="Eldin Sanad M">ME Eldin Sanad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mahmoud Mogahed, Sa" uniqKey="Mahmoud Mogahed S">SA Mahmoud Mogahed</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Cune, M" uniqKey="Cune M">M Cune</name></author><author><name sortKey="Burgers, M" uniqKey="Burgers M">M Burgers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Kampen, F" uniqKey="Van Kampen F">F van Kampen</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Putter, C" uniqKey="De Putter C">C de Putter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, A" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A">A van der Bilt</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kleis, Wk" uniqKey="Kleis W">WK Kleis</name></author><author><name sortKey="K Mmerer, Pw" uniqKey="K Mmerer P">PW Kämmerer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hartmann, S" uniqKey="Hartmann S">S Hartmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Al Nawas, B" uniqKey="Al Nawas B">B Al-Nawas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wagner, W" uniqKey="Wagner W">W Wagner</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Burns, Dr" uniqKey="Burns D">DR Burns</name></author><author><name sortKey="Unger, Jw" uniqKey="Unger J">JW Unger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Coffey, Jp" uniqKey="Coffey J">JP Coffey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Waldrop, Tc" uniqKey="Waldrop T">TC Waldrop</name></author><author><name sortKey="Elswick, Rk" uniqKey="Elswick R">RK Elswick</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mackie, A" uniqKey="Mackie A">A Mackie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lyons, K" uniqKey="Lyons K">K Lyons</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, Wm" uniqKey="Thomson W">WM Thomson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Adv Prosthodont</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Adv Prosthodont</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2005-7806</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2005-7814</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25352954</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4211048</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.325</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Ha-Young</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>Sang-Wan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Jeong-Yol</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>1</label>Woorideul Dental Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</aff><aff id="A2"><label>2</label>Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, KUMC, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</aff><author-notes><corresp>Corresponding author: Jeong-Yol Lee. Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, KUMC, Korea University, 97 Gurodong-gil, Guro-gu, Seoul, 152-703, Republic of Korea. Tel. 82 2 2626 3271: <email>wddc@korea.ac.kr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>325</fpage><lpage>332</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>6</month><year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>5</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>05</day><month>6</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2014 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/"><license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/</ext-link>) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>PURPOSE</title><p>The aim of this review was to analyze the evaluation criteria on mandibular implant overdentures through a systematic review and suggest standardized evaluation criteria.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>A systematic literature search was conducted by PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) and clinical trial studies comparing attachment systems on mandibular implant overdentures until December, 2011 were selected. Twenty nine studies were finally selected and the data about evaluation methods were collected.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>Evaluation criteria could be classified into 4 groups (implant survival, peri-implant tissue evaluation, prosthetic evaluation, and patient satisfaction). Among 29 studies, 21 studies presented implant survival rate, while any studies reporting implant failure did not present cumulative implant survival rate. Seventeen studies evaluating peri-implant tissue status presented following items as evaluation criteria; marginal bone level (14), plaque Index (13), probing depth (8), bleeding index (8), attachment gingiva level (8), gingival index (6), amount of keratinized gingiva (1). Eighteen studies evaluating prosthetic maintenance and complication also presented following items as evaluation criteria; loose matrix (17), female detachment (15), denture fracture (15), denture relining (14), abutment fracture (14), abutment screw loosening (11), and occlusal adjustment (9). Atypical questionnaire (9), Visual analog scales (VAS) (4), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) (1) were used as the format of criteria to evaluate patients satisfaction in 14 studies.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>For evaluation of implant overdenture, it is necessary to include cumulative survival rate for implant evaluation. It is suggested that peri-implant tissue evaluation criteria include marginal bone level, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and attached gingiva level. It is also suggested that prosthetic evaluation criteria include loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, and occlusal adjustment. Finally standardized criteria like OHIP-EDENT or VAS are required for patient satisfaction.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Denture</kwd><kwd>Overlay</kwd><kwd>Mandibular prosthesis</kwd><kwd>Dental implants</kwd><kwd>Outcome assessment</kwd><kwd>Patient satisfaction</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source country="CA">University of British Columbia</funding-source></award-group><award-group><funding-source country="KR">Korea Health Industry Development institute</funding-source><award-id>A110669</award-id></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro"><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Implant overdenture has better quality in its retention and stability than complete denture, and its mastication function is much more effective as well.<xref rid="B1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="B2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="B3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="B4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref> Especially in mandible, 2-implant overdenture has already been proven as the first choice for edentulous patients through the two conferences (McGill consensus (2002), York consensus (2009)).<xref rid="B2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></p><p>Various attachment systems such as ball, bar, and magnet attachment have been used to retain or support the overdenture. The selection of the attachment systems has been mainly depended on the practitioners' personal preference based on their experience and training. Many clinical trials and systematic reviews have tried to evaluate and compare the attachments in various aspects.<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref> However, previous studies used different criteria or method to evaluate treatment outcomes. In proceeding long-term comparative study, establishing standardized evaluation criteria will help in increasing reliability of the study result by minimizing bias.<xref rid="B9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref> There were few reports to suggest a guideline to compare the various attachments and evaluate implant overdenture on edentulous patients.</p><p>This systematic review aimed to analyze the evaluation criteria on mandibular implant overdentures through a systematic review and suggest standardized evaluation criteria.</p></sec><sec sec-type="materials|methods"><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>A systematic literature search was conducted using the combined MeSH terms "mandibular prosthesis" or "Denture, Overlay" and "dental implants" or "dental prosthesis, implant supported" and "clinical study" or "comparative study" or "outcome assessment" or "epidemiologic studies" or "intervention studies" or "patient satisfaction" and limited by "Human" and "English" in the data base, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE). This is to search for all the published data until December 31<sup>th</sup> 2011 which is relevant to evaluation of mandibular implant overdenture. After searching the combined MeSH terms through internet, the next journals were directly found and the data were added. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Implant Dentistry, International Journal of Oral and Maxillo-facial Implants, International Journal of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, International Journal of Prosthetics, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Dental Research, Journal of Oral Implantology, Journal of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Journal of Periodontology, Journal of Prosthetics, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, and Periodontology 2000.</p><p>Among journals which included data on evaluation of implant overdenture until December 2011, randomized and comparative clinical trials between attachments with same number of implants were included. At least one or more evaluation outcomes on implant survival rate, peri-implant tissue, prosthesis, or patient satisfaction should be reported. And intra-osseous implant with root form was only taken into consideration. In addition, a maxillary complete denture was only considered as an opposing prosthesis. Conventional loading was only included. And the articles written in English were included.</p><p>However, case reports or technical reports were excluded, and immediate placement of implant after extraction was excluded as well. The case in which follow up duration after the start of function was less than 1 year was excluded. The case in which there were no evaluation criteria of implant treatment outcomes was also excluded. The type with rigid connection such as milled bar or combinations of attachment types, cantilevered applications of attachments was excluded. The case with no abstract was also excluded (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Articles were selected by 2 different reviewers based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. 1,159 articles in total were searched and 53 of them were selected through titles and abstracts. And then 29 articles were finally selected through full text reading (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>). After evaluation items of implant overdenture were listed, they were classified into the following 4 groups. 1) Survival rate of implant, 2) peri-implant tissue evaluation, 3) prosthetic evaluation, 4) patient satisfaction. Each group was classified into subdivisions and evaluated respectively. The items to evaluate peri-implant tissue were classified into plaque index, calculus index, gingival index, bleeding index, probing depth, attachment gingival level, amount of keratinized mucosa and marginal bone loss. The items to evaluate prosthesis were classified into abutment screw loosening, abutment fracture, female detachment, loose matrix, denture fracture and occlusal adjustment. The methods measuring patient satisfaction were divided into atypical questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). In addition, it was also evaluated whether each method include the following items; overall satisfaction, improved retention, improved stability, chewing ability, speaking ability, appearance satisfaction, food impaction, social function, feeling pain, denture hygiene, denture comfort, easy to getting used, healing satisfaction after surgery.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results"><title>RESULTS</title><p>Twenty nine articles included 21 studies which presented implant survival rate and 17 studies which evaluated periodontal tissue around implant. Also, there were 18 studies which presented prosthetic maintenance and complication, and 14 studies which presented patient satisfaction (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). There were no studies to report cumulative survival rate among any studies reporting implant failure. Seventeen studies evaluating peri-implant tissue status presented following items as evaluation criteria; marginal bone level (14), plaque Index (13), probing depth (8), bleeding index (8), attachment gingiva level (8), gingival index (6), amount of keratinized gingiva (1). In the 18 studies evaluating prosthetic maintenance and complication, the items such as loose matrix (17), female detachment (15), denture fracture (15), denture relining (14), abutment fracture (14), abutment screw loosening (11), and occlusal adjustment (9) were used. Atypical questionnaire (9), VAS (4), OHIP-14 (1) were also used as the format of criteria to evaluate patients satisfaction in 14 studies (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The each method to evaluate patient satisfaction included following items; Overall satisfaction (11), improved retention (9), chewing ability (9), speaking ability (8), improved stability (5), appearance satisfaction (4), food impaction (2), social function (4), feeling pain (2), denture hygiene (2), denture comfort (1), easy to getting used (1), healing satisfaction after surgery (1)(<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>).</p><p>Except for these, there were other studies reporting implant mobility (3), denture retention (3), maintenance cost after treatment (2), and comparing operative time and time which took for prosthesis (1).</p></sec><sec sec-type="discussion"><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>In evaluating implant overdenture, survival rate of implant, peri-implant aspect, prosthetic maintenance and complication have been commonly used as conventional criteria. However, the methods of evaluating mandible implant overdentures were lack of consistency which might cause researchers to mislead to analyze data from the different studies. To increase reliability, some researchers tried to score on each category by the developed method which was called Delphi method.<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref> However, the result was still dependent on their capability and subjectivity.<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref> It seems that there was not a common guideline to evaluate implant overdentures.</p><p>In this study, any studies reporting at least 1 implant failure did not present or describe cumulative implant survival rate. Censored data include patients who are lost to follow up, patients who dropped out, patients who expired from other causes etc.<xref rid="B9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref> The more censored patients are, the more influenced the validity of sample size becomes, and also study design itself could possibly lose credibility due to bias.<xref rid="B9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="B11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref> Therefore, cumulative survival rate of implant considering the censored data is significant in evaluation of survival rate of implant for reliability.</p><p>A variety of periodontal evaluation criteria were also applied to evaluate peri-implant tissue. Among them, plaque index was the most frequently used as the evaluation criteria of peri-implant tissue. Both bleeding index and probing depth were the second frequently used. On the other hand, calculus index, which was not reported at all, was a relatively less important evaluation criteria for periimplant tissue. Not only traditional periodontal index, but sulcus fluid analysis, exudation, and mobility of implant could also be used in examination of tissue around implants.<xref rid="B12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref> In contrast to the soft tissue evaluation which was based on the traditional periodontal index, the evaluation of marginal bone loss was lack of consistency due to different reference points.<xref rid="B13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref> Nevertheless, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, attachment level and marginal bone loss, which were commonly used, might be suggested as minimum criteria to evaluate peri-implant tissue.</p><p>Prosthetic complications of mandibular implant overdenture in edentulous patients were varied a lot as: loss of retention, denture relining, fracture of clip/attachment, fracture of denture, fracture of opposing prosthesis, fracture of acrylic resin base, abutment screw loosening, and fracture of abutment screw. The classification of prosthetic outcome which was called six fields table analysis has been already suggested.<xref rid="B14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref> However, it seemed that a few reports cited the table and prosthetic terminologies such as female and matrix were still confusing. Nevertheless, loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, occlusal adjustment were commonly used without large deviation. The prosthetic evaluation criteria might be relatively well-standardized compared to other criteria.</p><p>Patient satisfaction can be affected by their subjective recognition of their dentures or by individual difference such as age, gender, and personality.<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref> Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has been used as evaluation criteria for dental prosthesis which could improve mastication and pronunciation, self-esteem and satisfaction on their own appearances.<xref rid="B17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="B18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref> The OHIP which was established as evaluation method for OHRQoL in 1994 has been modified and translated. The unique OHIP-EDENT which specialized to edentulous patients, was recently developed.<xref rid="B19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref> OHIP-EDENT is composed of 19 questions, and it is divided into 7 sub-groups (functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap). VAS could be used as another implement to quantify patient satisfaction with reliability and credibility.<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref> To objectively evaluate patient's subjective satisfaction, psychometric instrument such as a structured questionnaire is desirable to be standardized by OHIP or VAS. In addition, assessment items to evaluate patient satisfaction were suggested to include the following apsects; physiological function (chewing and speaking ability), psychological aspects (overall satisfaction, appearance, and improved retention and stability), and social function.</p><p>In summary, the data on cumulative survival rate of implant as evaluation criteria of implant overdenture still seem to be lack in general. Criteria of peri-implant tissue and prosthetic evaluation seem to be relatively well standardized. Also, it seems that the evaluation format to measure patient satisfaction objectively such as OHIP or VAS has not generally used yet.</p></sec><sec sec-type="conclusions"><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>For evaluation of implant overdenture, it is necessary to include cumulative survival rate for implant evaluation. It is suggested that peri-implant tissue evaluation criteria include marginal bone level, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and attached gingiva level. It is also suggested that prosthetic evaluation criteria include loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, and occlusal adjustment. Finally standardized criteria like OHIP-EDENT or VAS are required for patient satisfaction.</p></sec></body><back><fn-group><fn fn-type="supported-by"><p>This research was supported by Hamber Visiting Professorship of Faculty of dentistry, Geriatric Research Center (ELDES), University of British Columbia and by Korea Health Industry Development institute (project No. A110669).</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gjengedal</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahl</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lavik</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Trovik</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Berg</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Boe</surname><given-names>OE</given-names></name><name><surname>Malde</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Randomized clinical trial comparing dietary intake in patients with implant-retained overdentures and conventionally relined denture</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2012</year><volume>25</volume><fpage>340</fpage><lpage>347</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22720283</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roumanas</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrett</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamada</surname><given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapur</surname><given-names>KK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2003</year><volume>16</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14714839</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roumanas</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrett</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamada</surname><given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Diener</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapur</surname><given-names>KK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part V: food preference comparisons</article-title><source>J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2002</year><volume>87</volume><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11807486</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamada</surname><given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrett</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Roumanas</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapur</surname><given-names>KK</given-names></name><name><surname>Freymiller</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Diener</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Levin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part IV: Comparisons of dietary intake</article-title><source>J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2001</year><volume>85</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11174679</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roumanas</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient</article-title><source>J Evid Based Dent Pract</source><year>2010</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>24</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20230960</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Solomons</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2000</year><volume>13</volume><fpage>246</fpage><lpage>253</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11203640</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Bryant</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Attachment systems for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review</article-title><source>J Adv Prosthodont</source><year>2012</year><volume>4</volume><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23236571</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackie</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyons</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomson</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mandibular two-implant overdentures: prosthodontic maintenance using different loading protocols and attachment systems</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2011</year><volume>24</volume><fpage>405</fpage><lpage>416</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21909481</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stendell-Hollis</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Laudermilk</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>West</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomson</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Recruitment of lactating women into a randomized dietary intervention: successful strategies and factors promoting enrollment and retention</article-title><source>Contemp Clin Trials</source><year>2011</year><volume>32</volume><fpage>505</fpage><lpage>511</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21382511</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardiner</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gott</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Small</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Seamark</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Barnes</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Halpin</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruse</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Living with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patients concerns regarding death and dying</article-title><source>Palliat Med</source><year>2009</year><volume>23</volume><fpage>691</fpage><lpage>697</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19825897</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs</article-title><source>Am J Bioeth</source><year>2009</year><volume>9</volume><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20013503</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Froggatt</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Shea</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Larkin</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Casey</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Léime</surname><given-names>AN</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Improving palliative and end-of-life care for older people in Ireland: a new model and framework for institutional care</article-title><source>J Palliat Care</source><year>2009</year><volume>25</volume><fpage>218</fpage><lpage>226</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19824284</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols: a systematic literature review</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2010</year><volume>23</volume><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20305848</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Solomons</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The outcome of implant overdentures from a prosthodontic perspective: proposal for a classification protocol</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2001</year><volume>14</volume><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11842901</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Glick</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Macentee</surname><given-names>MI</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2009</year><volume>22</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>339</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19639067</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alsabeeha</surname><given-names>NH</given-names></name><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Swain</surname><given-names>MV</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2009</year><volume>22</volume><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>440</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20095190</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strassburger</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kerschbaum</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Heydecke</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2006</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>348</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16900816</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mittmann</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Trakas</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Risebrough</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population</article-title><source>Pharmacoeconomics</source><year>1999</year><volume>15</volume><fpage>369</fpage><lpage>376</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10537955</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hunter</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Limited evidence for evaluating differences in marginal bone loss between conventional, early and immediate loading protocols for mandibular two-implant overdentures</article-title><source>J Am Dent Assoc</source><year>2011</year><volume>142</volume><fpage>427</fpage><lpage>428</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21454849</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mericske-Stern</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinlin Schaffner</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Marti</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Geering</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study</article-title><source>Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>1994</year><volume>5</volume><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8038345</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Quirynen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hooghe</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>van Steenberghe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report</article-title><source>J Prosthet Dent</source><year>1994</year><volume>71</volume><fpage>486</fpage><lpage>492</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8006845</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant supported overdentures-the King's experience</article-title><source>J Dent</source><year>1997</year><volume>25</volume><fpage>S33</fpage><lpage>S37</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9080750</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>JO</given-names></name><name><surname>Packer</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The extent of maintenance required by implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year report</article-title><source>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>1996</year><volume>11</volume><fpage>767</fpage><lpage>774</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8990639</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gotfredsen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant supported overdentures-the Copenhagen experience</article-title><source>J Dent</source><year>1997</year><volume>25</volume><fpage>S39</fpage><lpage>S42</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9080751</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wismeijer</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Waas</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermeeren</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulder</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalk</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants</article-title><source>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</source><year>1997</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9258715</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>IE</given-names></name><name><surname>Gizani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vuylsteke</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>van Steenberghe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A randomised clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in mandibular overdenture therapy. A 3-year report</article-title><source>Clin Oral Investig</source><year>1997</year><volume>1</volume><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>88</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Gizani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vuylsteke</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>van Steenberghe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome</article-title><source>Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>1998</year><volume>9</volume><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>177</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10530131</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Packer</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>1999</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>222</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10635189</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Gizani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vuylsteke</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Steenberghe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction</article-title><source>J Oral Rehabil</source><year>1999</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>202</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10194726</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>von Wowern</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Gotfredsen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant-supported overdentures, a prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles? A 5-year follow-up study</article-title><source>Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>2001</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11168267</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gotfredsen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Holm</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2000</year><volume>13</volume><fpage>125</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11203620</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Packer</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The maintenance requirements of mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants using three different attachment mechanisms-balls, magnets, and bars; 3-year results</article-title><source>Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent</source><year>2000</year><volume>8</volume><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11692994</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>MacEntee</surname><given-names>MI</given-names></name><name><surname>Glick</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial</article-title><source>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2002</year><volume>17</volume><fpage>391</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12074455</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2003</year><volume>16</volume><fpage>255</fpage><lpage>260</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12854788</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Assad</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Abd El-Dayem</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Badawy</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosaimplant-supported mandibular overdentures</article-title><source>Implant Dent</source><year>2004</year><volume>13</volume><fpage>386</fpage><lpage>394</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15592001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Alsaadi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>van Steenberghe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Quirynen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome</article-title><source>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2004</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>695</fpage><lpage>702</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15508985</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Alsaadi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Quirynen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2004</year><volume>17</volume><fpage>401</fpage><lpage>410</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15382775</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Timmerman</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Stoker</surname><given-names>GT</given-names></name><name><surname>Wismeijer</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Oosterveld</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermeeren</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>van Waas</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures</article-title><source>J Dent Res</source><year>2004</year><volume>83</volume><fpage>630</fpage><lpage>633</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15271972</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacEntee</surname><given-names>MI</given-names></name><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Glick</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results</article-title><source>J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2005</year><volume>93</volume><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15623995</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quirynen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Alsaadi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Pauwels</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Haffajee</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>van Steenberghe</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Naert</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Microbiological and clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction for two treatment options in the edentulous lower jaw after 10 years of function</article-title><source>Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>2005</year><volume>16</volume><fpage>277</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15877747</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stoker</surname><given-names>GT</given-names></name><name><surname>Wismeijer</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>van Waas</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures</article-title><source>J Dent Res</source><year>2007</year><volume>86</volume><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>280</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17314262</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd El-Dayem</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Assad</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Eldin Sanad</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahmoud Mogahed</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures</article-title><source>Implant Dent</source><year>2009</year><volume>18</volume><fpage>501</fpage><lpage>511</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20009604</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cune</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Burgers</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>van Kampen</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>de Putter</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Bilt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2010</year><volume>23</volume><fpage>310</fpage><lpage>317</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20617218</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kleis</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kämmerer</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartmann</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Nawas</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report</article-title><source>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</source><year>2010</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>209</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19416278</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burns</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Unger</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Coffey</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Waldrop</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Elswick</surname><given-names>RK</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment</article-title><source>J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2011</year><volume>106</volume><fpage>12</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21723989</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackie</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyons</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomson</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name><name><surname>Payne</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mandibular two-implant overdentures: three-year prosthodontic maintenance using the locator attachment system</article-title><source>Int J Prosthodont</source><year>2011</year><volume>24</volume><fpage>328</fpage><lpage>331</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21716970</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig id="F1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption><p>Flowchart of search strategy.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jap-6-325-g001"></graphic></fig><fig id="F2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 2</label><caption><p>Items in the questionnaires used to evaluate patient satisfaction on implant overdenture.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jap-6-325-g002"></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="T1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Inclusion and exclusion criteria for systematic review</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jap-6-325-i001"></graphic><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>MIO = Mandibular implant overdenture.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Included papers by inclusion criteria</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jap-6-325-i002"></graphic></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T3" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Treatment outcome index used to evaluate implant survival rate, peri-implant tissue, prosthetic maintenance and complication and patient satisfaction</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jap-6-325-i003"></graphic><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>SR=Survival rate; CSR=Cumulative survival rate; PI=Plaque index; CI=Calculus index; BI=Bleeding index; GI=Gingival index; PD=Probing depth; AL=Attachment level; KM=Keratinized mucosa; BL=Bone level; SL=Screw loosening; AF=Abutment fracture; FD=Female detachment; LM=Loose matrices; DF=Denture fracture; DR=Denture relining; OA=Occlusal adjustment; PS=pressure spots; AQ=Atypical questionnaire; VAS=Visual analog scale; CIP=Clinical implant performance; NA=Not available.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E98 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002E98 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |