Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An <italic>Ex Vivo</italic> Model in Human Femoral Heads for Histopathological Study and Resonance Frequency Analysis of Dental Implant Primary Stability</title><author><name sortKey="Hernandez Cortes, Pedro" sort="Hernandez Cortes, Pedro" uniqKey="Hernandez Cortes P" first="Pedro" last="Hernández-Cortés">Pedro Hernández-Cortés</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I1">Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, “San Cecilio” Clinical Hospital, University of Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Monje, Alberto" sort="Monje, Alberto" uniqKey="Monje A" first="Alberto" last="Monje">Alberto Monje</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I2">Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" sort="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P" first="Pablo" last="Galindo-Moreno">Pablo Galindo-Moreno</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I3">Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Catena, Andres" sort="Catena, Andres" uniqKey="Catena A" first="Andrés" last="Catena">Andrés Catena</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I4">Department of Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ortega Oller, Inmaculada" sort="Ortega Oller, Inmaculada" uniqKey="Ortega Oller I" first="Inmaculada" last="Ortega-Oller">Inmaculada Ortega-Oller</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I3">Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Salas Perez, Jose" sort="Salas Perez, Jose" uniqKey="Salas Perez J" first="José" last="Salas-Pérez">José Salas-Pérez</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I3">Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mesa, Francisco" sort="Mesa, Francisco" uniqKey="Mesa F" first="Francisco" last="Mesa">Francisco Mesa</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I5">Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="G Mez Sanchez, Rafael" sort="G Mez Sanchez, Rafael" uniqKey="G Mez Sanchez R" first="Rafael" last="G Mez-Sánchez">Rafael G Mez-Sánchez</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I1">Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, “San Cecilio” Clinical Hospital, University of Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aguilar, Mariano" sort="Aguilar, Mariano" uniqKey="Aguilar M" first="Mariano" last="Aguilar">Mariano Aguilar</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I6">Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aguilar, David" sort="Aguilar, David" uniqKey="Aguilar D" first="David" last="Aguilar">David Aguilar</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I6">Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="O Valle, Francisco" sort="O Valle, Francisco" uniqKey="O Valle F" first="Francisco" last="O'Valle">Francisco O'Valle</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I6">Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I7">Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, 18012 Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">24995307</idno><idno type="pmc">4065718</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065718</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4065718</idno><idno type="doi">10.1155/2014/535929</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002887</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002887</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">An <italic>Ex Vivo</italic> Model in Human Femoral Heads for Histopathological Study and Resonance Frequency Analysis of Dental Implant Primary Stability</title><author><name sortKey="Hernandez Cortes, Pedro" sort="Hernandez Cortes, Pedro" uniqKey="Hernandez Cortes P" first="Pedro" last="Hernández-Cortés">Pedro Hernández-Cortés</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I1">Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, “San Cecilio” Clinical Hospital, University of Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Monje, Alberto" sort="Monje, Alberto" uniqKey="Monje A" first="Alberto" last="Monje">Alberto Monje</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I2">Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" sort="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P" first="Pablo" last="Galindo-Moreno">Pablo Galindo-Moreno</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I3">Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Catena, Andres" sort="Catena, Andres" uniqKey="Catena A" first="Andrés" last="Catena">Andrés Catena</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I4">Department of Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ortega Oller, Inmaculada" sort="Ortega Oller, Inmaculada" uniqKey="Ortega Oller I" first="Inmaculada" last="Ortega-Oller">Inmaculada Ortega-Oller</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I3">Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Salas Perez, Jose" sort="Salas Perez, Jose" uniqKey="Salas Perez J" first="José" last="Salas-Pérez">José Salas-Pérez</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I3">Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mesa, Francisco" sort="Mesa, Francisco" uniqKey="Mesa F" first="Francisco" last="Mesa">Francisco Mesa</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I5">Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="G Mez Sanchez, Rafael" sort="G Mez Sanchez, Rafael" uniqKey="G Mez Sanchez R" first="Rafael" last="G Mez-Sánchez">Rafael G Mez-Sánchez</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I1">Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, “San Cecilio” Clinical Hospital, University of Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aguilar, Mariano" sort="Aguilar, Mariano" uniqKey="Aguilar M" first="Mariano" last="Aguilar">Mariano Aguilar</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I6">Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aguilar, David" sort="Aguilar, David" uniqKey="Aguilar D" first="David" last="Aguilar">David Aguilar</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I6">Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="O Valle, Francisco" sort="O Valle, Francisco" uniqKey="O Valle F" first="Francisco" last="O'Valle">Francisco O'Valle</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I6">Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="I7">Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, 18012 Granada, Spain</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">BioMed Research International</title><idno type="ISSN">2314-6133</idno><idno type="eISSN">2314-6141</idno><imprint><date when="2014">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Objective</italic>. This study was designed to explore relationships of resonance frequency analysis (RFA)—assessed implant stability (ISQ values) with bone morphometric parameters and bone quality in an <italic>ex vivo</italic> model of dental implants placed in human femoral heads and to evaluate the usefulness of this model for dental implant studies. <italic>Material and Methods</italic>. This <italic>ex vivo</italic> study included femoral heads from 17 patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fracture due to osteoporosis (OP) (<italic>n</italic> = 7) or for total prosthesis joint replacement due to severe hip osteoarthrosis (OA) (<italic>n</italic> = 10). Sixty 4.5 × 13 mm Dentsply Astra implants were placed, followed by RFA. CD44 immunohistochemical analysis for osteocytes was also carried out. <italic>Results</italic>. As expected, the analysis yielded significant effects of femoral head type (OA versus OA) (<italic>P</italic> < 0.001), but not of the implants (<italic>P</italic> = 0.455) or of the interaction of the two factors (<italic>P</italic> = 0.848). Bonferroni post hoc comparisons showed a lower mean ISQ for implants in decalcified (50.33 ± 2.92) heads than in fresh (66.93 ± 1.10) or fixated (70.77 ± 1.32) heads (both <italic>P</italic> < 0.001). The ISQ score (fresh) was significantly higher for those in OA (73.52 ± 1.92) versus OP (67.13 ± 1.09) heads. However, mixed linear analysis showed no significant association between ISQ scores and morphologic or histomorphometric results (<italic>P</italic> > 0.5 in all cases), and no significant differences in ISQ values were found as a function of the length or area of the cortical layer (both <italic>P</italic> > 0.08). <italic>Conclusion</italic>. Although RFA-determined ISQ values are not correlated with morphometric parameters, they can discriminate bone quality (OP versus OA). This <italic>ex vivo</italic> model is useful for dental implant studies.</p></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Branemark, Pi" uniqKey="Branemark P">PI Branemark</name></author><author><name sortKey="Adell, R" uniqKey="Adell R">R Adell</name></author><author><name sortKey="Breine, U" uniqKey="Breine U">U Breine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hansson, Bo" uniqKey="Hansson B">BO Hansson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindstrom, J" uniqKey="Lindstrom J">J Lindstrom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ohlsson, A" uniqKey="Ohlsson A">A Ohlsson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T">T Albrektsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Branemark, P I" uniqKey="Branemark P">P-I Branemark</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hansson, H A" uniqKey="Hansson H">H-A Hansson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindstrom, J" uniqKey="Lindstrom J">J Lindstrom</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Misch, Ce" uniqKey="Misch C">CE Misch</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hoar, J" uniqKey="Hoar J">J Hoar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Beck, G" uniqKey="Beck G">G Beck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hazen, R" uniqKey="Hazen R">R Hazen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Misch, Cm" uniqKey="Misch C">CM Misch</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Glauser, R" uniqKey="Glauser R">R Glauser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L Sennerby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meredith, N" uniqKey="Meredith N">N Meredith</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Huang, H M" uniqKey="Huang H">H-M Huang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, S Y" uniqKey="Lee S">S-Y Lee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yeh, C Y" uniqKey="Yeh C">C-Y Yeh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lin, C T" uniqKey="Lin C">C-T Lin</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Cehreli, Mc" uniqKey="Cehreli M">MC Cehreli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kokat, Am" uniqKey="Kokat A">AM Kokat</name></author><author><name sortKey="Comert, A" uniqKey="Comert A">A Comert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akkocaoglu, M" uniqKey="Akkocaoglu M">M Akkocaoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tekdemir, I" uniqKey="Tekdemir I">I Tekdemir</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akca, K" uniqKey="Akca K">K Akca</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Pagliani, L" uniqKey="Pagliani L">L Pagliani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L Sennerby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petersson, A" uniqKey="Petersson A">A Petersson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Verrocchi, D" uniqKey="Verrocchi D">D Verrocchi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Volpe, S" uniqKey="Volpe S">S Volpe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, P" uniqKey="Andersson P">P Andersson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L Sennerby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meredith, N" uniqKey="Meredith N">N Meredith</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Meredith, N" uniqKey="Meredith N">N Meredith</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alleyne, D" uniqKey="Alleyne D">D Alleyne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cawley, P" uniqKey="Cawley P">P Cawley</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chan, H L" uniqKey="Chan H">H-L Chan</name></author><author><name sortKey="El Kholy, K" uniqKey="El Kholy K">K El-Kholy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fu, J H" uniqKey="Fu J">J-H Fu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, P" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P">P Galindo-Moreno</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, H L" uniqKey="Wang H">H-L Wang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Balleri, P" uniqKey="Balleri P">P Balleri</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cozzolino, A" uniqKey="Cozzolino A">A Cozzolino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ghelli, L" uniqKey="Ghelli L">L Ghelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Momicchioli, G" uniqKey="Momicchioli G">G Momicchioli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Varriale, A" uniqKey="Varriale A">A Varriale</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Atsumi, M" uniqKey="Atsumi M">M Atsumi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Park, S H" uniqKey="Park S">S-H Park</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, H L" uniqKey="Wang H">H-L Wang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Guler, Au" uniqKey="Guler A">AU Guler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sumer, M" uniqKey="Sumer M">M Sumer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Duran, I" uniqKey="Duran I">I Duran</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sandikci, Eo" uniqKey="Sandikci E">EO Sandikci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Telcioglu, Nt" uniqKey="Telcioglu N">NT Telcioglu</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Nkenke, E" uniqKey="Nkenke E">E Nkenke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hahn, M" uniqKey="Hahn M">M Hahn</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lell, M" uniqKey="Lell M">M Lell</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Monje, A" uniqKey="Monje A">A Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monje, F" uniqKey="Monje F">F Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suarez, F" uniqKey="Suarez F">F Suarez</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Monje, A" uniqKey="Monje A">A Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ortega Oller, I" uniqKey="Ortega Oller I">I Ortega-Oller</name></author><author><name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, P" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P">P Galindo-Moreno</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Fanuscu, Mi" uniqKey="Fanuscu M">MI Fanuscu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chang, T L" uniqKey="Chang T">T-L Chang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akca, K" uniqKey="Akca K">K Akca</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Abrahamsson, I" uniqKey="Abrahamsson I">I Abrahamsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Linder, E" uniqKey="Linder E">E Linder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Np" uniqKey="Lang N">NP Lang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Nkenke, E" uniqKey="Nkenke E">E Nkenke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hahn, M" uniqKey="Hahn M">M Hahn</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weinzierl, K" uniqKey="Weinzierl K">K Weinzierl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Radespiel Troger, M" uniqKey="Radespiel Troger M">M Radespiel-Troger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Neukam, Fw" uniqKey="Neukam F">FW Neukam</name></author><author><name sortKey="Engelke, K" uniqKey="Engelke K">K Engelke</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Meredith, N" uniqKey="Meredith N">N Meredith</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alleyne, D" uniqKey="Alleyne D">D Alleyne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cawley, P" uniqKey="Cawley P">P Cawley</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I">I Turkyilmaz</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I">I Turkyilmaz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tozum, Tf" uniqKey="Tozum T">TF Tözüm</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tumer, C" uniqKey="Tumer C">C Tumer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozbek, En" uniqKey="Ozbek E">EN Ozbek</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Sim, Cp" uniqKey="Sim C">CP Sim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Np" uniqKey="Lang N">NP Lang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Song, Y D" uniqKey="Song Y">Y-D Song</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jun, S H" uniqKey="Jun S">S-H Jun</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kwon, J J" uniqKey="Kwon J">J-J Kwon</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Arisan, V" uniqKey="Arisan V">V Arisan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karabuda, Zc" uniqKey="Karabuda Z">ZC Karabuda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Avsever, H" uniqKey="Avsever H">H Avsever</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozdemir, T" uniqKey="Ozdemir T">T Özdemir</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I">I Turkyilmaz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Aksoy, U" uniqKey="Aksoy U">U Aksoy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Ea" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E">EA McGlumphy</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Monje, A" uniqKey="Monje A">A Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suarez, F" uniqKey="Suarez F">F Suarez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garaicoa, Ca" uniqKey="Garaicoa C">CA Garaicoa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I">I Turkyilmaz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L">L Sennerby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Ea" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E">EA McGlumphy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tozum, Tf" uniqKey="Tozum T">TF Tozum</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Isoda, K" uniqKey="Isoda K">K Isoda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ayukawa, Y" uniqKey="Ayukawa Y">Y Ayukawa</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tsukiyama, Y" uniqKey="Tsukiyama Y">Y Tsukiyama</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sogo, M" uniqKey="Sogo M">M Sogo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Matsushita, Y" uniqKey="Matsushita Y">Y Matsushita</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koyano, K" uniqKey="Koyano K">K Koyano</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Capek, L" uniqKey="Capek L">L Capek</name></author><author><name sortKey="Simunek, A" uniqKey="Simunek A">A Simunek</name></author><author><name sortKey="Slezak, R" uniqKey="Slezak R">R Slezak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dzan, L" uniqKey="Dzan L">L Dzan</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Nazarian, A" uniqKey="Nazarian A">A Nazarian</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hermannsson, Bj" uniqKey="Hermannsson B">BJ Hermannsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Muller, J" uniqKey="Muller J">J Muller</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zurakowski, D" uniqKey="Zurakowski D">D Zurakowski</name></author><author><name sortKey="Snyder, Bd" uniqKey="Snyder B">BD Snyder</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ohman, C" uniqKey="Ohman C">C Ohman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dall Ra, E" uniqKey="Dall Ra E">E Dall’Ara</name></author><author><name sortKey="Baleani, M" uniqKey="Baleani M">M Baleani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jan, Svs" uniqKey="Jan S">SVS Jan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Viceconti, M" uniqKey="Viceconti M">M Viceconti</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Morita, K" uniqKey="Morita K">K Morita</name></author><author><name sortKey="Doi, K" uniqKey="Doi K">K Doi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Oue, H" uniqKey="Oue H">H Oue</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kajihara, S" uniqKey="Kajihara S">S Kajihara</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hayashi, K" uniqKey="Hayashi K">K Hayashi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akagawa, Y" uniqKey="Akagawa Y">Y Akagawa</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Yoon, H G" uniqKey="Yoon H">H-G Yoon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Heo, S J" uniqKey="Heo S">S-J Heo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koak, J Y" uniqKey="Koak J">J-Y Koak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, S K" uniqKey="Kim S">S-K Kim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, S Y" uniqKey="Lee S">S-Y Lee</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Farre Pages, N" uniqKey="Farre Pages N">N Farre-Pages</name></author><author><name sortKey="Auge Castro, Ml" uniqKey="Auge Castro M">ML Auge-Castro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alaejos Algarra, F" uniqKey="Alaejos Algarra F">F Alaejos-Algarra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mareque Bueno, J" uniqKey="Mareque Bueno J">J Mareque-Bueno</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferres Padro, E" uniqKey="Ferres Padro E">E Ferres-Padro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hernandez Alfaro, F" uniqKey="Hernandez Alfaro F">F Hernandez-Alfaro</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kumar, Vv" uniqKey="Kumar V">VV Kumar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sagheb, K" uniqKey="Sagheb K">K Sagheb</name></author><author><name sortKey="Klein, Mo" uniqKey="Klein M">MO Klein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Al Nawas, B" uniqKey="Al Nawas B">B Al-Nawas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kann, Ph" uniqKey="Kann P">PH Kann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kammerer, Pw" uniqKey="Kammerer P">PW Kammerer</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Martinez, H" uniqKey="Martinez H">H Martinez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Davarpanah, M" uniqKey="Davarpanah M">M Davarpanah</name></author><author><name sortKey="Missika, P" uniqKey="Missika P">P Missika</name></author><author><name sortKey="Celletti, R" uniqKey="Celletti R">R Celletti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lazzara, R" uniqKey="Lazzara R">R Lazzara</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Bischof, M" uniqKey="Bischof M">M Bischof</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nedir, R" uniqKey="Nedir R">R Nedir</name></author><author><name sortKey="Szmukler Moncler, S" uniqKey="Szmukler Moncler S">S Szmukler-Moncler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bernard, J P" uniqKey="Bernard J">J-P Bernard</name></author><author><name sortKey="Samson, J" uniqKey="Samson J">J Samson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Miyamoto, I" uniqKey="Miyamoto I">I Miyamoto</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tsuboi, Y" uniqKey="Tsuboi Y">Y Tsuboi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wada, E" uniqKey="Wada E">E Wada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suwa, H" uniqKey="Suwa H">H Suwa</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iizuka, T" uniqKey="Iizuka T">T Iizuka</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Aad, G" uniqKey="Aad G">G Aad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abbott, B" uniqKey="Abbott B">B Abbott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abdallah, J" uniqKey="Abdallah J">J Abdallah</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Riggs, Bl" uniqKey="Riggs B">BL Riggs</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wahner, Hw" uniqKey="Wahner H">HW Wahner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dunn, Wl" uniqKey="Dunn W">WL Dunn</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mazess, Rb" uniqKey="Mazess R">RB Mazess</name></author><author><name sortKey="Offord, Kp" uniqKey="Offord K">KP Offord</name></author><author><name sortKey="Melton, Lj" uniqKey="Melton L">LJ Melton</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Roze, J" uniqKey="Roze J">J Roze</name></author><author><name sortKey="Babu, S" uniqKey="Babu S">S Babu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Saffarzadeh, A" uniqKey="Saffarzadeh A">A Saffarzadeh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gayet Delacroix, M" uniqKey="Gayet Delacroix M">M Gayet-Delacroix</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hoornaert, A" uniqKey="Hoornaert A">A Hoornaert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Layrolle, P" uniqKey="Layrolle P">P Layrolle</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Comert, A" uniqKey="Comert A">A Cömert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kokat, Am" uniqKey="Kokat A">AM Kokat</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akkocaglu, M" uniqKey="Akkocaglu M">M Akkocaglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tekdemir, I" uniqKey="Tekdemir I">I Tekdemir</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akca, K" uniqKey="Akca K">K Akça</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cehreli, Mc" uniqKey="Cehreli M">MC Çehreli</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Rochefort, Gy" uniqKey="Rochefort G">GY Rochefort</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pallu, S" uniqKey="Pallu S">S Pallu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Benhamou, Cl" uniqKey="Benhamou C">CL Benhamou</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Biomed Res Int</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Biomed Res Int</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">BMRI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>BioMed Research International</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2314-6133</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2314-6141</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24995307</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4065718</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2014/535929</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>An <italic>Ex Vivo</italic> Model in Human Femoral Heads for Histopathological Study and Resonance Frequency Analysis of Dental Implant Primary Stability</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hernández-Cortés</surname><given-names>Pedro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8292-1927</contrib-id><name><surname>Monje</surname><given-names>Alberto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Galindo-Moreno</surname><given-names>Pablo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Catena</surname><given-names>Andrés</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ortega-Oller</surname><given-names>Inmaculada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Salas-Pérez</surname><given-names>José</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-2527</contrib-id><name><surname>Mesa</surname><given-names>Francisco</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gómez-Sánchez</surname><given-names>Rafael</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Aguilar</surname><given-names>Mariano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Aguilar</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287</contrib-id><name><surname>O'Valle</surname><given-names>Francisco</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I6"><sup>6</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I7"><sup>7</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="I1"><sup>1</sup>Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, “San Cecilio” Clinical Hospital, University of Granada, Spain</aff><aff id="I2"><sup>2</sup>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA</aff><aff id="I3"><sup>3</sup>Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</aff><aff id="I4"><sup>4</sup>Department of Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</aff><aff id="I5"><sup>5</sup>Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain</aff><aff id="I6"><sup>6</sup>Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain</aff><aff id="I7"><sup>7</sup>Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, 18012 Granada, Spain</aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">*Francisco O'Valle: <email>fovalle@ugr.es</email></corresp><fn fn-type="other"><p>Academic Editor: Konstantinos Michalakis</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>4</day><month>6</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>2014</volume><elocation-id>535929</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>1</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>5</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>5</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2014 Pedro Hernández-Cortés et al.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><italic>Objective</italic>. This study was designed to explore relationships of resonance frequency analysis (RFA)—assessed implant stability (ISQ values) with bone morphometric parameters and bone quality in an <italic>ex vivo</italic> model of dental implants placed in human femoral heads and to evaluate the usefulness of this model for dental implant studies. <italic>Material and Methods</italic>. This <italic>ex vivo</italic> study included femoral heads from 17 patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fracture due to osteoporosis (OP) (<italic>n</italic> = 7) or for total prosthesis joint replacement due to severe hip osteoarthrosis (OA) (<italic>n</italic> = 10). Sixty 4.5 × 13 mm Dentsply Astra implants were placed, followed by RFA. CD44 immunohistochemical analysis for osteocytes was also carried out. <italic>Results</italic>. As expected, the analysis yielded significant effects of femoral head type (OA versus OA) (<italic>P</italic> < 0.001), but not of the implants (<italic>P</italic> = 0.455) or of the interaction of the two factors (<italic>P</italic> = 0.848). Bonferroni post hoc comparisons showed a lower mean ISQ for implants in decalcified (50.33 ± 2.92) heads than in fresh (66.93 ± 1.10) or fixated (70.77 ± 1.32) heads (both <italic>P</italic> < 0.001). The ISQ score (fresh) was significantly higher for those in OA (73.52 ± 1.92) versus OP (67.13 ± 1.09) heads. However, mixed linear analysis showed no significant association between ISQ scores and morphologic or histomorphometric results (<italic>P</italic> > 0.5 in all cases), and no significant differences in ISQ values were found as a function of the length or area of the cortical layer (both <italic>P</italic> > 0.08). <italic>Conclusion</italic>. Although RFA-determined ISQ values are not correlated with morphometric parameters, they can discriminate bone quality (OP versus OA). This <italic>ex vivo</italic> model is useful for dental implant studies.</p></abstract><funding-group><award-group><funding-source>University of Granada</funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Primary implant stability, which is essential for osseointegration [<xref rid="B1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>, <xref rid="B2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>] and the success of implant therapy [<xref rid="B3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>], is influenced by bone quality and quantity, implant design, and drilling protocol [<xref rid="B4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>]. A quantitative measurement of bone quality is therefore an essential component of dental implantation planning.</p><p>Many methods have been proposed to assess initial implant stability, but most of them are no longer used due to their invasiveness and inaccuracy [<xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>]. Primary implant stability is most frequently determined by using cutting-torque measurements or resonance frequency analysis (RFA) [<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>], which evaluates the micromotion or displacement of the implant in bone under a lateral load, applying microscopic lateral forces to the implant with a vibrating transducer [<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>, <xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>]. Results are given as implant stability quotients (ISQs) [<xref rid="B9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>], which are affected by three main factors: the stiffness of the implant fixture and its interface with surrounding tissue, the design of the transducer, and the total effective implant length above bone level [<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>]. ISQs range from 0 to 100, with higher number indicating greater stability. No definitive threshold value has been established to differentiate a stable, integrated implant from a failing/failed implant; however, it has been suggested that an ISQ value above 57 at 1 year after loading represents a successful implant outcome [<xref rid="B11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>], with a value below 50 indicating a risk of implant failure [<xref rid="B12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>].</p><p>Various<italic> in vivo</italic> studies have been performed on the reliability of RFA to predict implant success, on the influence of bone quality on ISQ values, and on a cut-off point to predict implant failure [<xref rid="B11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>, <xref rid="B13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>–<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>]. In a previous study by our group, ISQ values showed a low sensitivity and did not reliably predict early implant failure, and no cut-off value could be established for differentiating between success and early failure [<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>]. The objective of the present study was to explore the relationships of RFA ISQ values for standardized implants with bone morphometric parameters and bone quality in an<italic> ex vivo</italic> model of dental implants placed in human femoral heads with different trabecular bone qualities, in an evaluation of the usefulness of this model for dental implant studies</p></sec><sec id="sec2"><title>2. Material and Methods </title><p>This<italic> ex vivo</italic> study used femoral heads from 17 patients undergoing surgery in the Orthopedic Surgery Department of our hospital for either femoral neck fracture due to osteoporosis (<italic>n</italic> = 7) or total prosthesis joint replacement due to severe hip osteoarthrosis (<italic>n</italic> = 10). Informed consent was obtained from all patients before the treatment, and the study was independently reviewed and approved by the local ethical committee of our institution.</p><sec id="sec2.1"><title>2.1. Implant Placement</title><p>Sixty 4.5 × 13 mm implants (Dentsply Astra implants, Mölndal, Sweden) were placed immediately after femoral head extraction (4 implants in each femoral head with interimplant distance of 5 mm). Implant placement and drilling protocol were performed for conventional sockets (starting with a round bur and ending with a 4.5 mm twister bur) following the manufacture's recommendations and applying the same final torque (40 N/cm) in all cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.2"><title>2.2. Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA)</title><p>An Osstell ISQ RFA device (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) was used to measure primary implant stability according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Briefly, a metal rod (SmartPeg, Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) was screwed at a torque of 40 N/cm into the implant screw vent. Three measurements were performed for each implant: one parallel to the long axis of the implant and two perpendicular to this axis in two different positions on the transducer. These measurements were performed three times during the study period: immediately after epiphysis extraction (fresh), after 72 h of fixation in 10% buffered formalin (fixated), and at 20 days after fixation (decalcified).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.3"><title>2.3. Sample Biopsies</title><p>Four sample biopsies were obtained from each femoral head using trephines with external diameter of 3 mm and internal diameter of 2 mm, producing a total of 68 trephine core biopsies, 28 from osteoporotic (OP) and 40 from osteoarthrotic (AO) femoral heads. An additional sample was taken from each femoral head using trephines with external diameter of 5 mm and internal diameter of 4 mm (<italic>n</italic> = 17).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.4"><title>2.4. Morphologic and Histomorphometric Analysis</title><p>Biopsy samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 72 h. Samples then were decalcified at room temperature in 10% formaldehyde, 8% formic acid, and 1% methanol (Decalcifier I, Surgipath Europe Ltd., Peterborough, UK), for 20 days. Next, samples were embedded in paraffin. When required, 4 <italic>μ</italic>m sections were cut along the long axis of the biopsy, dewaxed, and rehydrated for staining with hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acid Schiff, and Masson's trichrome.</p><p>Histomorphometric evaluation was carried out using a light microscope BX51 (Olympus Optical Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a high resolution video camera (3CCD, DP70, Olympus) connected to a monitor and PC (Intel Core2, Intel, Santa Clara, CA), using the ImageJ 1.47 histomorphometric software package (NIH, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/">http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/</ext-link>).</p><p>Ten images (10x) of H&E staining per core were captured using fluorescence light. Image normalization and automatic thresholding were used to obtain binary images for measuring the area, circumference, and number of bone particles. The subchondral bone thickness was also evaluated, performing five measurements to obtain mean, maximum, and minimum thickness values.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.5"><title>2.5. CD44 Immunohistochemical Analysis</title><p>For the immunohistochemical study, biopsies were dewaxed and then unmasked for antigen retrieval in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer solution (pH8) at 95°C for 20 min in a PT module (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI, USA). Once tempered, all slides were introduced into an automatic immunostainer (Autostainer480, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the two-step micropolymer-peroxidase-based method (Ultravision Quanto, Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by development with diaminobenzidine. Bone sections were incubated for 10 min with prediluted monoclonal anti-CD44 (clone: 156-3C11). The signal was amplified by incubating for 10 min with amplifier antibody and for a further 10 min with micropolymer conjugated with peroxidase. All reagents were acquired from Master Diagnóstica (Granada, Spain).</p><p>A millimeter scale in the eyepiece of a BH2 microscope (Olympus Optical Company, Ltd.) with a 40x objective was used to count the number of CD44-positive osteocytes per mm<sup>2</sup>; this number was then divided by 0.062 (correction value for 40x magnification).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The mixed linear model, implemented in SPSS version 20.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), was used to analyze differences in ISQs as a function of implants and femoral bone treatment (fresh, fixed, or decalcified). A diagonal repeated-measures covariance structure was developed following Schwarz's Bayesian criterion. This model was also used to analyze the effects of bone type (OP versus OA) on ISQ scores and to disentangle the effects of bone type on morphologic features. Bonferroni corrected comparisons were done when necessary. <italic>P</italic> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The morphometric study showed a difference in trabecular bone quality between OP and OA femoral heads. In comparison to the OA heads, the subchondral bone was significantly thinner (303.1 ± 59.1 versus 716.1 ± 228.4 square micrometers, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002 Bonferroni test), and the subchondral bone area was significantly smaller (3.41 ± 5.2 versus 12.61 ± 7.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, <italic>P</italic> = 0.04 Bonferroni test) in the OP group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The trabecular bone area was also lower (0.29 ± 0.02 versus 0.38 ± 0.02 mm<sup>2</sup>, <italic>P</italic> = 0.004), with greater bone fragmentation (16.71 ± 1.29 versus 12.83 ± 1.14 <italic>n</italic>° particles, <italic>P</italic> = 0.028), in the OP<italic> versus</italic> OA femoral heads (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>In this<italic> ex vivo</italic> model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), high primary stability (ISQ > 70) was obtained in 65% (26/40) of dental implants placed in OA heads but in only 28.6% (8/28) of those placed in OP heads. Low primary stability (ISQ values <60) was observed in 10% (4/40) of implants in OA and 7.1% (2/28) of those in OP heads. Despite the significantly greater thickness and area of OA bone samples, no significant correlation was found between ISQ values and the length or area of the cortical layer (both <italic>P</italic> > 0.08). However, there was a tendency towards higher ISQ values in implants in OA heads.</p><sec id="sec3.1"><title>3.1. ISQ Values Obtained from Fresh versus Fixed versus Decalcified Femoral Heads</title><p>The biomechanical properties of the femoral heads were modified by the fixation and decalcification processes (treatments). The analysis yielded significant effects on ISQ values of femoral head treatment, <italic>F</italic> (2, 54.112) = 20.84, <italic>P</italic> < 0.001, but not of the implants, <italic>F</italic> (3, 41.175) = 0.889, <italic>P</italic> = 0.455, or of the interaction of both factors, <italic>F</italic> (6, 33.296) = 0.439, <italic>P</italic> = 0.848. Bonferroni post hoc comparisons demonstrated lower mean ISQ values for implants in decalcified (50.33 ± 2.92) than in fresh (66.93 ± 1.10) or fixated (70.77 ± 1.32) heads (both <italic>P</italic> < 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). No other significant differences were observed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec3.2"><title>3.2. ISQ Values from the OA versus OP Femoral Head Specimen</title><p>The mean ISQ score was higher for implants in OA (73.52 ± 1.92)<italic> versus</italic> OP (67.13 ± 1.09) heads, <italic>F</italic> (1, 63) = 15.229, <italic>P</italic> < 0.001. When the mean ISQ value for each treatment group (fresh, fixated or calcified) was considered, no significant effect was found for bone type, <italic>F</italic> (1, 40.63) = 0.068, <italic>P</italic> = 0.796, or for the interaction of bone pathology with femur treatment (fresh versus decalcified), <italic>F</italic> (1, 40.63) = 1.841, <italic>P</italic> = 0.182, although significant differences in ISQ values were observed as a function of femoral head treatment, <italic>F</italic> (1, 40.63) = 39.42, <italic>P</italic> < 0.01.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.3"><title>3.3. ISQ Values and Morphologic and Histomorphometric Values</title><p>Mixed linear analysis showed no significant association between ISQ scores and morphologic or histomorphometric results (<italic>P</italic> > 0.5 in all cases).</p></sec><sec id="sec3.4"><title>3.4. ISQ Values and Immunohistochemical Results</title><p>Linear correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between ISQ scores and CD44 count (<italic>r</italic> = −0.025, <italic>P</italic> < 0.472). The number of osteocytes per mm<sup>2</sup> in trabecular bone was the same (<italic>P</italic> = 0.470) between OP (135.74 ± 40.19) and OA (147.17 ± 47.59) samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study explored the relationship between RFA ISQ values and bone morphometric parameters or bone quality in an<italic> ex vivo</italic> model of dental implants placed in human femoral heads. This model reduces the risk of bias due to external factors and avoids the limitations of<italic> in vivo</italic> research.</p><p>Several studies [<xref rid="B17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>–<xref rid="B19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>] have attempted to establish correlations between bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and ISQ values. One study of the sensitivity of ISQ values to detect early implant failure, based on immediate postimplant values, reported 73.7% correct classifications, with an incorrect classification of 55% of implant failures, whereas 86.2% correct classifications were obtained with delayed (4-month) ISQ values at the cost of assuming the survival of all implants [<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>].</p><p>Experimental and clinical studies have shown bone density to be a major determinant of RFA-assessed primary stability after implant placement, supporting observations by Meredith and coworkers [<xref rid="B20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>]. Thus, RFA results were found to correlate with insertion torque measurements [<xref rid="B21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>, <xref rid="B22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>], clinically-assessed bone density [<xref rid="B23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>], and CT-assessed bone density (in Hounsfield units) [<xref rid="B21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>, <xref rid="B24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>]. Some studies have demonstrated a relationship between bone density and implant primary stability<italic> in vivo</italic> [<xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>–<xref rid="B27" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>], while others have used<italic> ex vivo </italic>models in cadaver bone [<xref rid="B28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>] and femoral heads of swine [<xref rid="B29" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>]. However, there are difficulties in extrapolating results obtained in animals to humans, and lower bone density values can be expected in dry cadaver bone than in fresh vital bone [<xref rid="B28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>]. The present study aimed to overcome these limitations by using fresh human femoral heads, the same drilling protocol for implant placement, and the same implant system, minimizing biases and obtaining more accurate data on the relationship between ISQ values and peri-implant bone.</p><p>To our best knowledge, only one study has used human femoral heads to determine implant stability by RFA [<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>]; it reported a slightly lower mean ISQ (59.3 ± 2.4) than in the present study, possibly because they derived the heads from frozen cadavers. A further factor may be the smaller diameter of the implants used in our study, because ISQ values have been shown to be influenced by implant diameter [<xref rid="B30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>].</p><p>Biomechanical conditions can be changed by fixation and decalcification processes. Formalin fixation destroys the three-dimensional conformation of proteins by cross-linking their structure, producing a loss of elasticity in bone [<xref rid="B31" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>], although it has been reported that short-term formalin fixation does not affect its mechanical characteristics [<xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>]. It is not yet clear how fixation with formalin influences ISQ values and the mechanical characteristics of bone. However, Morita and coworkers, using a rabbit tibia model, observed that formalin fixation appears to affect bone mechanical characteristics by binding amino-proteins and forming bridges between the formalin and protein, which potentially influences three-dimensional protein structure, whereas it does not appear to influence ISQ values [<xref rid="B33" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>].</p><p>The present results are in agreement with previous reports on the relationship between ISQ values and bone density by localization [<xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>, <xref rid="B14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>, <xref rid="B34" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>–<xref rid="B39" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>]. The osteoporotic bone in our study was bone type III-IV and the osteoarthrosis bone was type I-II according to Lekholm and Zarb bone classification [<xref rid="B40" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>]. Although the osteoporotic bone biopsy samples felt more fragile, no significant difference in ISQ values was found between the OA and OP bone, although this may be explained by the small sample size. This limitation may also explain the lack of significant difference in ISQ values between the bone types as a function of morphologic or histomorphometric results, given that bone density is known to be much lower in patients with osteoporosis [<xref rid="B41" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>]. These results suggest that the ISQ value is not determined by a specific amount of trabeculae but rather by the cortical thickness around the implant neck [<xref rid="B39" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>, <xref rid="B40" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>]. In a recent<italic> ex vivo</italic> study in human cadavers, Roze et al. [<xref rid="B42" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>] found that ISQ values differed among cortical, mixed, and cancellous types of bone. They reported that ISQ values were significantly correlated with cortical thickness but not with bone histomorphometric parameters. Cehreli et al. [<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>], using the same model as in the present study, also found that ISQ values in fresh femoral heads were influenced by the cortical bone thickness. In fact, the discrepancy in ISQ values with the present study may be related to the thickness values, which were less uniform in our series. Although the trabecular bone thickness may play a minimal role in implant primary stability, it is of major importance in peri-implant bone healing [<xref rid="B39" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>, <xref rid="B42" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>]. In disagreement with previous findings, our results show that the utilization of OP and OA femoral heads offers a feasible model to determine safely the relationship between ISQ values and cortical layer thickness (<italic>P</italic> = 0.04). However, no significant difference was found between OP and OA heads when correlated with the cortical layer (<italic>P</italic> = 0.08). Hence, despite a tendency towards increased ISQ values in OA heads, the results do not offer sufficient reliability for selecting the appropriate implant loading protocol based on implant primary stability.</p><p>ISQ values were lower in decalcified samples than in fresh or fixed samples (<italic>P</italic> < 0.001), supporting the use of formalin-fixed samples as a means of extending the time frame for their study. ISQ values obtained by Cömert et al. [<xref rid="B43" ref-type="bibr">43</xref>] in fresh-frozen human bone were similar to those in formalin-fixed bone, and the preservation of the latter's biomechanical properties makes it appropriate for the study of primary stability. We highlight that the significantly lower ISQ values in decalcified samples indicate the involvement of calcium in RFA-assessed primary stability.</p><p>We counted the number of osteoblastic (CD44-positive) cells as a quantitative measure of bone quality. Osteocytes, which represent 95% of bone cells, are old osteoblasts that fill lacunae through a network of tubules connected to the outer surface of the trabeculae [<xref rid="B44" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>]. The lack of a significant difference between OA and OA bone in the present study suggests that the CD44 count is not a reliable indicator of bone quality (<italic>r</italic> = −0.025, <italic>P</italic> = 0.472).</p></sec><sec id="sec5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>It is possible to discriminate bone quality (osteoporotic versus osteoarthrosis) by using RFA (ISQs), and the<italic> ex vivo</italic> model described here is useful for dental implant-related studies. However, no correlation was found between RFA-assessed primary implant stability and trabecular bone structures or cortical layer thickness. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to elucidate the influence of cortical thicknesses on primary implant stability and the role played by the trabecular structure in implant stability after the healing process.</p></sec></body><back><ack><title>Acknowledgments </title><p>The authors thank M.D. Rodríguez-Martínez, from the Pathology Department of the School of Medicine, University of Granada, for her expert technical assistance and R. Davies, professional translator, for help with the English version of the paper.</p></ack><sec sec-type="conflict"><title>Conflict of Interests</title><p>The authors do not have any financial interests, either directly or indirectly, in the products or information listed in the paper. This investigation was partially supported by Research Group no. CTS-138 (Junta de Andalucía, Spain).</p></sec><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Branemark</surname><given-names>PI</given-names></name><name><surname>Adell</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Breine</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansson</surname><given-names>BO</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindstrom</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohlsson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies</article-title><source><italic>Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery</italic></source><year>1969</year><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0014636440</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">4924041</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albrektsson</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Branemark</surname><given-names>P-I</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansson</surname><given-names>H-A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindstrom</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man</article-title><source><italic>Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica</italic></source><year>1981</year><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>170</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0019435541</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7246093</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Misch</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoar</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Beck</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Hazen</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Misch</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A bone quality-based implant system: a preliminary report of stage I & stage II</article-title><source><italic>Implant Dentistry</italic></source><year>1998</year><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0031638278</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9588972</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glauser</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Meredith</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2004</year><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>428</fpage><lpage>434</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-4644230057</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15248877</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H-M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeh</surname><given-names>C-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>C-T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2002</year><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0036481346</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12005147</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cehreli</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kokat</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Comert</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Akkocaoglu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tekdemir</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Akca</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1163</fpage><lpage>1169</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-70249144681</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19681964</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pagliani</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Petersson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Verrocchi</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Volpe</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The relationship between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and lateral displacement of dental implants: an <italic>in vitro</italic> study</article-title><source><italic>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</italic></source><year>2013</year><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>221</fpage><lpage>227</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84873250429</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23278128</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Meredith</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications</article-title><source><italic>Periodontology 2000</italic></source><year>2008</year><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-42149147336</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18412573</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meredith</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Alleyne</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cawley</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>1996</year><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>261</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0030224153</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9151590</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>H-L</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Kholy</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>J-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Galindo-Moreno</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H-L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant primary stability determined by resonance frequency analysis in surgically created defects: a pilot cadaver study</article-title><source><italic>Implant Dentistry</italic></source><year>2010</year><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>509</fpage><lpage>519</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-78650530132</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21119355</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balleri</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cozzolino</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghelli</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Momicchioli</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Varriale</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Stability measurements of osseointegrated implants using Osstell in partially edentulous jaws after 1 year of loading: a pilot study</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</italic></source><year>2002</year><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>128</fpage><lpage>132</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0036987398</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12516644</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atsumi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>S-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H-L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Methods used to assess implant stability: current status</article-title><source><italic>The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants</italic></source><year>2007</year><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>743</fpage><lpage>754</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-35648929918</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17974108</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guler</surname><given-names>AU</given-names></name><name><surname>Sumer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Duran</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sandikci</surname><given-names>EO</given-names></name><name><surname>Telcioglu</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Resonance frequency analysis of 208 Straumann dental implants during the healing period</article-title><source><italic>Journal of Oral Implantology</italic></source><year>2013</year><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>161</fpage><lpage>167</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84876948322</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22103915</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nkenke</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hahn</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lell</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Anatomic site evaluation of the zygomatic bone for dental implant placement</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2003</year><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>72</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0038623198</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12562368</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monje</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Monje</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Suarez</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Comparison of implant primary stability between maxillary edentulous ridges receiving intramembranous origin block grafts</article-title><source><italic>Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal</italic></source><year>2013</year><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>e449</fpage><lpage>e454</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84877096661</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monje</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ortega-Oller</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Galindo-Moreno</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Sensitivity of resonance frequency analysis for detecting early implant failure: a case-control study</article-title><source><italic>The International Journal Oral & Maxillofacial Implants</italic></source><year>2014</year><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>456</fpage><lpage>461</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fanuscu</surname><given-names>MI</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>T-L</given-names></name><name><surname>Akca</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone</article-title><source><italic>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</italic></source><year>2007</year><volume>65</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>2487</fpage><lpage>2491</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-36148965544</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18022474</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abrahamsson</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Linder</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Lang</surname><given-names>NP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: an experimental study in the Labrador dog</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>313</fpage><lpage>318</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-60049098379</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19405177</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nkenke</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hahn</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinzierl</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Radespiel-Troger</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Neukam</surname><given-names>FW</given-names></name><name><surname>Engelke</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2003</year><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>601</fpage><lpage>609</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0345304947</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12969364</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meredith</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Alleyne</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Cawley</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>1996</year><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>261</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0030224153</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9151590</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turkyilmaz</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants</article-title><source><italic>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</italic></source><year>2006</year><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>754</fpage><lpage>759</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-33747877743</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16938104</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turkyilmaz</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Tözüm</surname><given-names>TF</given-names></name><name><surname>Tumer</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozbek</surname><given-names>EN</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement</article-title><source><italic>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</italic></source><year>2006</year><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>881</fpage><lpage>888</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-33751351701</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17168930</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sim</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lang</surname><given-names>NP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell <italic>mentor</italic> during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2010</year><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>598</fpage><lpage>604</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-77953982728</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20666786</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Y-D</given-names></name><name><surname>Jun</surname><given-names>S-H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>J-J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability</article-title><source><italic>The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-67649173038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19344026</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arisan</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Karabuda</surname><given-names>ZC</given-names></name><name><surname>Avsever</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Özdemir</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</italic></source><year>2013</year><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>893</fpage><lpage>906</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22251553</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turkyilmaz</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Aksoy</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>McGlumphy</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</italic></source><year>2008</year><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>231</fpage><lpage>237</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-55149116779</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18384409</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monje</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Suarez</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Garaicoa</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Effect of location on primary stability and healing of dental implants</article-title><source><italic>Implant Dentistry</italic></source><year>2014</year><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24384740</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turkyilmaz</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sennerby</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>McGlumphy</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Tozum</surname><given-names>TF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-65649110848</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18422713</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Isoda</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayukawa</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsukiyama</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Sogo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsushita</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Koyano</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2012</year><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>832</fpage><lpage>836</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84862184538</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21545533</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Capek</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Simunek</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Slezak</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Dzan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of the orientation of the Osstell transducer during measurement of dental implant stability using resonance frequency analysis: a numerical approach</article-title><source><italic>Medical Engineering & Physics</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>764</fpage><lpage>769</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-68349122619</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19297232</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nazarian</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hermannsson</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Muller</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zurakowski</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Snyder</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of tissue preservation on murine bone mechanical properties</article-title><source><italic>Journal of Biomechanics</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>86</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-58149302697</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19081098</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohman</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Dall’Ara</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Baleani</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>SVS</given-names></name><name><surname>Viceconti</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The effects of embalming using a 4% formalin solution on the compressive mechanical properties of human cortical bone</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Biomechanics</italic></source><year>2008</year><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1294</fpage><lpage>1298</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-56549086201</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18771829</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morita</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Doi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Oue</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kajihara</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayashi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Akagawa</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of formalin fixation on the implant stability quotient and mechanical characteristics of bone</article-title><source><italic>British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</italic></source><year>2013</year><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>550</fpage><lpage>554</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84881312260</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23036835</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>H-G</given-names></name><name><surname>Heo</surname><given-names>S-J</given-names></name><name><surname>Koak</surname><given-names>J-Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S-K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S-Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of bone quality and implant surgical technique on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value</article-title><source><italic>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics</italic></source><year>2011</year><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84883145311</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21503187</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farre-Pages</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Auge-Castro</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Alaejos-Algarra</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Mareque-Bueno</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferres-Padro</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernandez-Alfaro</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Relation between bone density and primary implant stability</article-title><source><italic>Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal</italic></source><year>2011</year><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>e62</fpage><lpage>e67</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-78751659916</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">16799</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>VV</given-names></name><name><surname>Sagheb</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>MO</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Nawas</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Kann</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kammerer</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Relation between bone quality values from ultrasound transmission velocity and implant stability parameters—an <italic>ex vivo</italic> study</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2012</year><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>975</fpage><lpage>980</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-84863868151</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22092939</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martinez</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Davarpanah</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Missika</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Celletti</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazzara</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2001</year><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>423</fpage><lpage>432</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0035490935</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11564101</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bischof</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nedir</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Szmukler-Moncler</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernard</surname><given-names>J-P</given-names></name><name><surname>Samson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. A clinical resonance-frequency analysis study with sandblasted-and-etched ITI implants</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2004</year><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>529</fpage><lpage>539</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-7944232457</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15355394</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miyamoto</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuboi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wada</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Suwa</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Iizuka</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery—clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study</article-title><source><italic>Bone</italic></source><year>2005</year><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>776</fpage><lpage>780</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-28844480575</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16154396</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aad</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Abbott</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdallah</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Observation of a centrality-dependent dijet asymmetry in lead-lead collisions at sqrt[S(NN)] = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC</article-title><source><italic>Physical Review Letter</italic></source><year>2010</year><volume>105</volume><issue>25</issue><fpage>19 pages</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">252303</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Riggs</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahner</surname><given-names>HW</given-names></name><name><surname>Dunn</surname><given-names>WL</given-names></name><name><surname>Mazess</surname><given-names>RB</given-names></name><name><surname>Offord</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Melton</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names><suffix>III</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis</article-title><source><italic>The Journal of Clinical Investigation</italic></source><year>1981</year><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>328</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-0019505458</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7462421</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roze</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Babu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Saffarzadeh</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gayet-Delacroix</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoornaert</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Layrolle</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Correlating implant stability to bone structure</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1140</fpage><lpage>1145</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-70249105029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19519789</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cömert</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kokat</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Akkocaglu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tekdemir</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Akça</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Çehreli</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fresh-frozen vs. embalmed bone: is it possible to use formalin-fixed human bone for biomechanical experiments on implants?</article-title><source><italic>Clinical Oral Implants Research</italic></source><year>2009</year><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>521</fpage><lpage>525</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-64549095336</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19522977</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rochefort</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name><name><surname>Pallu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Benhamou</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Osteocyte: the unrecognized side of bone tissue</article-title><source><italic>Osteoporosis International</italic></source><year>2010</year><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>1457</fpage><lpage>1469</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="other">2-s2.0-77956461991</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20204595</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig id="fig1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Femoral head cortical area. Note the different area between osteoporosis (a) and osteoarthrosis (b) in 3 mm diameter trephine biopsies. Narrow: different thickness of subchondral bone.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="BMRI2014-535929.001"></graphic></fig><fig id="fig2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Image analysis process. (a) Osteoarthrosis femoral head sample. (b) Osteoporosis femoral head sample. Note the following: (a) and (d) are trabecular area (yellow) hematoxylin-eosin stained and visualized with fluorescence microscopy, (b) and (e) are threshold images, and (c) and (f) are binary images with interest area in black.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="BMRI2014-535929.002"></graphic></fig><fig id="fig3" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Fresh femoral head with coxarthrosis ((a) and (b)) and osteoporosis ((c) and (d)). (a) Frontal view of dental implant. (b) Dental implant with the SmartPeg placed for determination of implant primary stability in terms of implant stability quotients (ISQ value).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="BMRI2014-535929.003"></graphic></fig><fig id="fig4" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Comparison of ISQ values of dental implants in femoral heads under different physicochemical conditions.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="BMRI2014-535929.004"></graphic></fig><fig id="fig5" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>CD44-positive osteocytes in trabecular bone. (a) Femoral head with osteoarthrosis. (b) Femoral head with osteoporosis (micropolymer-peroxidase-based method, original magnification ×20).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="BMRI2014-535929.005"></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="tab1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Comparison of ISQ values between osteoarthrosis and osteoporosis groups.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Variable</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Osteoarthrosis</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Osteoporosis</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>P</italic> values*</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1">ISQ fresh</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">73.53 ± 1.26</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">67.13 ± 1.09</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1">ISQ fixed</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">72.33 ± 1.65</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">70.39 ± 1.61</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.406</td></tr><tr><td align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1">ISQ decalcified</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">46.47 ± 4.34</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">51.03 ± 3.53</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.421</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *Bonferroni test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 0028879 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 0028879 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |