Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption</title><author><name sortKey="Danza, Matteo" sort="Danza, Matteo" uniqKey="Danza M" first="Matteo" last="Danza">Matteo Danza</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Dental School, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zollino, Ilaria" sort="Zollino, Ilaria" uniqKey="Zollino I" first="Ilaria" last="Zollino">Ilaria Zollino</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Avantaggiato, Anna" sort="Avantaggiato, Anna" uniqKey="Avantaggiato A" first="Anna" last="Avantaggiato">Anna Avantaggiato</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lucchese, Alessandra" sort="Lucchese, Alessandra" uniqKey="Lucchese A" first="Alessandra" last="Lucchese">Alessandra Lucchese</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carinci, Francesco" sort="Carinci, Francesco" uniqKey="Carinci F" first="Francesco" last="Carinci">Francesco Carinci</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">23960506</idno><idno type="pmc">3723294</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3723294</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3723294</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.02.002</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002562</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002562</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption</title><author><name sortKey="Danza, Matteo" sort="Danza, Matteo" uniqKey="Danza M" first="Matteo" last="Danza">Matteo Danza</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Dental School, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zollino, Ilaria" sort="Zollino, Ilaria" uniqKey="Zollino I" first="Ilaria" last="Zollino">Ilaria Zollino</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Avantaggiato, Anna" sort="Avantaggiato, Anna" uniqKey="Avantaggiato A" first="Anna" last="Avantaggiato">Anna Avantaggiato</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lucchese, Alessandra" sort="Lucchese, Alessandra" uniqKey="Lucchese A" first="Alessandra" last="Lucchese">Alessandra Lucchese</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carinci, Francesco" sort="Carinci, Francesco" uniqKey="Carinci F" first="Francesco" last="Carinci">Francesco Carinci</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Saudi Dental Journal</title><idno type="ISSN">1013-9052</idno><imprint><date when="2011">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>Around dental implants exists a “biologic width” of few millimeters that have to be preserved in order to not have adverse effect on soft and hard tissues around implant. Because the minimum distance between adjacent implants has not been determined yet, we therefore, decided to perform a retrospective study on a series of spiral family implants (SFIs) to verify the minimum inter-implants’ distance that has an impact on crestal bone resorption.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Fifty-nine implants were investigated with a mean follow-up of 14 months. Implant diameter was 3.75, 4.2, 5 and 6 mm in 11 (18.6%), 29 (49.2%), 17 (28.8%) and 2 (3.4%) SFIs. Implant length was shorter than 13 mm, equal to 13 mm and 16 mm in 23 (39%), 23 (39%) and 13 (22%) SFIs. Implants were inserted to replace 13 incisors (22%), 7 cuspids (11.9%), 30 premolars (50.8%) and 9 molars (15.3%). Twenty-seven fixtures were inserted in post-extractive sockets and the remaining 32 in healed bone; 36 (61%) were immediately loaded. In addition to the above mentioned implant-related factors, several host- and surgery-factors were investigated. Independent samples T-test, univariate and multivariate analysis were used to detect those variables associated with the clinical outcome.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Data were evaluated with a two steps statistical analysis (i.e. univariate and multivariate) after having grouped implants in two series: those with an implant-implant distance less of 1.8 mm and those with an implant-implants distance greater than 1.8 mm. In univariate analysis, post-extractive implants and number of prosthetic units were statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, only post-extractive implants have a significant adverse effect on crestal bone resorption.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Adjacent implants inserted with a distance lower and higher than 1.8 mm have difference in crestal bone resorption but this difference is not statistically significant in a short period follow up. This could due to the specific implant used that has a reverse conical neck. No statistical difference was detected between implant subtypes. Post-extractive implant insertion is the major determinant in terms of peri-implant bone resorption in a short period follow-up.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Saudi Dent J</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Saudi Dent J</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>The Saudi Dental Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1013-9052</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23960506</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3723294</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SDENTJ74</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.02.002</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Danza</surname><given-names>Matteo</given-names></name><xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">a</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zollino</surname><given-names>Ilaria</given-names></name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Avantaggiato</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lucchese</surname><given-names>Alessandra</given-names></name><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Carinci</surname><given-names>Francesco</given-names></name><email>crc@unife.it</email><email>http://www.carinci.org</email><xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">b</xref><xref rid="cor1" ref-type="corresp">⁎</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>a</label>Dental School, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy</aff><aff id="aff2"><label>b</label>Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy</aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>⁎</label>Corresponding author. Address: Chair of Maxillofacial Surgery, Arcispedale S. Anna, Corso Giovecca 203, 44100 Ferrara, Italy. Tel./fax: +39 0532 455582. <email>crc@unife.it</email><email>http://www.carinci.org</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>19</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><pmc-comment> PMC Release delay is 0 months and 0 days and was based on .</pmc-comment>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>7</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>7</month><year>2010</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>9</month><year>2010</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2011 King Saud University. Production and Hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder></copyright-holder></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>Around dental implants exists a “biologic width” of few millimeters that have to be preserved in order to not have adverse effect on soft and hard tissues around implant. Because the minimum distance between adjacent implants has not been determined yet, we therefore, decided to perform a retrospective study on a series of spiral family implants (SFIs) to verify the minimum inter-implants’ distance that has an impact on crestal bone resorption.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Fifty-nine implants were investigated with a mean follow-up of 14 months. Implant diameter was 3.75, 4.2, 5 and 6 mm in 11 (18.6%), 29 (49.2%), 17 (28.8%) and 2 (3.4%) SFIs. Implant length was shorter than 13 mm, equal to 13 mm and 16 mm in 23 (39%), 23 (39%) and 13 (22%) SFIs. Implants were inserted to replace 13 incisors (22%), 7 cuspids (11.9%), 30 premolars (50.8%) and 9 molars (15.3%). Twenty-seven fixtures were inserted in post-extractive sockets and the remaining 32 in healed bone; 36 (61%) were immediately loaded. In addition to the above mentioned implant-related factors, several host- and surgery-factors were investigated. Independent samples T-test, univariate and multivariate analysis were used to detect those variables associated with the clinical outcome.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Data were evaluated with a two steps statistical analysis (i.e. univariate and multivariate) after having grouped implants in two series: those with an implant-implant distance less of 1.8 mm and those with an implant-implants distance greater than 1.8 mm. In univariate analysis, post-extractive implants and number of prosthetic units were statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, only post-extractive implants have a significant adverse effect on crestal bone resorption.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Adjacent implants inserted with a distance lower and higher than 1.8 mm have difference in crestal bone resorption but this difference is not statistically significant in a short period follow up. This could due to the specific implant used that has a reverse conical neck. No statistical difference was detected between implant subtypes. Post-extractive implant insertion is the major determinant in terms of peri-implant bone resorption in a short period follow-up.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Implant</kwd><kwd>Tooth</kwd><kwd>Width</kwd><kwd>Resorption</kwd><kwd>Biology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 0025629 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 0025629 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |