Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Preservation of extraction socket in immediate implant placement: a clinical study</title><author><name sortKey="Di Girolamo, M" sort="Di Girolamo, M" uniqKey="Di Girolamo M" first="M." last="Di Girolamo">M. Di Girolamo</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-222-232">School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arullani, C A" sort="Arullani, C A" uniqKey="Arullani C" first="C. A." last="Arullani">C. A. Arullani</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-222-232">Private Practice, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Calcaterra, R" sort="Calcaterra, R" uniqKey="Calcaterra R" first="R." last="Calcaterra">R. Calcaterra</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-222-232">Department of Social Dentistry, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty - School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manzi, J" sort="Manzi, J" uniqKey="Manzi J" first="J." last="Manzi">J. Manzi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-222-232">School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arcuri, C" sort="Arcuri, C" uniqKey="Arcuri C" first="C." last="Arcuri">C. Arcuri</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af4-222-232">Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baggi, L" sort="Baggi, L" uniqKey="Baggi L" first="L." last="Baggi">L. Baggi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-222-232">Department of Social Dentistry, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty - School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">28042451</idno><idno type="pmc">5159941</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159941</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:5159941</idno><idno type="doi">10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.222</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002524</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Preservation of extraction socket in immediate implant placement: a clinical study</title><author><name sortKey="Di Girolamo, M" sort="Di Girolamo, M" uniqKey="Di Girolamo M" first="M." last="Di Girolamo">M. Di Girolamo</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-222-232">School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arullani, C A" sort="Arullani, C A" uniqKey="Arullani C" first="C. A." last="Arullani">C. A. Arullani</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-222-232">Private Practice, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Calcaterra, R" sort="Calcaterra, R" uniqKey="Calcaterra R" first="R." last="Calcaterra">R. Calcaterra</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-222-232">Department of Social Dentistry, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty - School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manzi, J" sort="Manzi, J" uniqKey="Manzi J" first="J." last="Manzi">J. Manzi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-222-232">School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arcuri, C" sort="Arcuri, C" uniqKey="Arcuri C" first="C." last="Arcuri">C. Arcuri</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af4-222-232">Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Baggi, L" sort="Baggi, L" uniqKey="Baggi L" first="L." last="Baggi">L. Baggi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-222-232">Department of Social Dentistry, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty - School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oral & Implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1974-5648</idno><idno type="eISSN">2035-2468</idno><imprint><date when="2016">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>SUMMARY</title><sec><title>Aim</title><p>The objective of this study was to compare different approaches temporary restoration in an immediate implant placement. To determine the respective influence of each parameter, two treatment groups were formed; a strict and standardized study protocol was applied to minimize the influence of bias and confounding factors. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES) - the esthetic out-come of soft tissue appearance was evaluated.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>Sixteen patients with a single failing tooth in the maxilla and a natural contralateral site were randomly distributed into two groups. Treatment variations affected the provisional restorative in detail, group 1 with immediate implant placement and immediate temporary restoration with the simulation of the first three mm of the root and the seal of the socket, group 2 with immediate implant placement and immediate temporary restoration without the seal of the socket. All patients received the final prosthetic restoration 10–12 weeks after implant placement. Standardized photographs were taken eight months after tooth extraction. Five competent observers analyzed the esthetic outcome according to the PES.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The overall scores of the four treatment groups revealed PES values of 8.47 (SD 2.08, group 1), 6.62 (SD 3.24, group 2). The differences between groups 1 and 2 and were statistically significant (P=0.015 and P=0.047). The single parameter analysis displayed a certain range of fluctuation and heterogeneity.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Immediate implant placement and restoration appear to be a suitable alternative to early implant placement if an experienced surgeon is entrusted with the implantation procedure.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OAI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Oral & Implantology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1974-5648</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2035-2468</issn><publisher><publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">28042451</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5159941</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.222</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">222-232</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Preservation of extraction socket in immediate implant placement: a clinical study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>DI GIROLAMO</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-222-232">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ARULLANI</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-222-232">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>CALCATERRA</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-222-232">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>MANZI</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-222-232">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ARCURI</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af4-222-232">4</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>BAGGI</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-222-232">3</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-222-232"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="af1-222-232"><label>1</label>School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</aff><aff id="af2-222-232"><label>2</label>Private Practice, Rome, Italy</aff><aff id="af3-222-232"><label>3</label>Department of Social Dentistry, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty - School of Dentistry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</aff><aff id="af4-222-232"><label>4</label>Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</aff><author-notes><corresp id="c1-222-232">Correspondence to: Prof. Luigi Baggi, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Via di San Gallicano 25/a, 00153 Rome, Italy, Phone: 0039 06 58543782 - Fax 0039 06 58543686, e-mail: <email>baggi@inmp.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><season>Oct-Dec</season><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>222</fpage><lpage>232</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© Copyright 2016, CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Roma</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><title>SUMMARY</title><sec><title>Aim</title><p>The objective of this study was to compare different approaches temporary restoration in an immediate implant placement. To determine the respective influence of each parameter, two treatment groups were formed; a strict and standardized study protocol was applied to minimize the influence of bias and confounding factors. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES) - the esthetic out-come of soft tissue appearance was evaluated.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>Sixteen patients with a single failing tooth in the maxilla and a natural contralateral site were randomly distributed into two groups. Treatment variations affected the provisional restorative in detail, group 1 with immediate implant placement and immediate temporary restoration with the simulation of the first three mm of the root and the seal of the socket, group 2 with immediate implant placement and immediate temporary restoration without the seal of the socket. All patients received the final prosthetic restoration 10–12 weeks after implant placement. Standardized photographs were taken eight months after tooth extraction. Five competent observers analyzed the esthetic outcome according to the PES.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The overall scores of the four treatment groups revealed PES values of 8.47 (SD 2.08, group 1), 6.62 (SD 3.24, group 2). The differences between groups 1 and 2 and were statistically significant (P=0.015 and P=0.047). The single parameter analysis displayed a certain range of fluctuation and heterogeneity.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Immediate implant placement and restoration appear to be a suitable alternative to early implant placement if an experienced surgeon is entrusted with the implantation procedure.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>esthetic outcome</kwd><kwd>immediate implant placement</kwd><kwd>immediate restoration</kwd><kwd>Pink Esthetic Score</kwd><kwd>single implant</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002524 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002524 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |