Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans</title><author><name sortKey="Rocci, M" sort="Rocci, M" uniqKey="Rocci M" first="M." last="Rocci">M. Rocci</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-oai-34-42">Private practice in Chieti</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rocci, A" sort="Rocci, A" uniqKey="Rocci A" first="A." last="Rocci">A. Rocci</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-oai-34-42">Private practice in Chieti</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martignoni, M" sort="Martignoni, M" uniqKey="Martignoni M" first="M." last="Martignoni">M. Martignoni</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-oai-34-42">Private practice in Rome</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" sort="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T" first="T." last="Albrektsson">T. Albrektsson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-oai-34-42">MD, PhD, Odhc</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A." last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af4-oai-34-42">Tor Vergata University, Rome</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gargari, M" sort="Gargari, M" uniqKey="Gargari M" first="M." last="Gargari">M. Gargari</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af4-oai-34-42">Tor Vergata University, Rome</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">23285334</idno><idno type="pmc">3476499</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476499</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3476499</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002505</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002505</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans</title><author><name sortKey="Rocci, M" sort="Rocci, M" uniqKey="Rocci M" first="M." last="Rocci">M. Rocci</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-oai-34-42">Private practice in Chieti</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rocci, A" sort="Rocci, A" uniqKey="Rocci A" first="A." last="Rocci">A. Rocci</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-oai-34-42">Private practice in Chieti</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martignoni, M" sort="Martignoni, M" uniqKey="Martignoni M" first="M." last="Martignoni">M. Martignoni</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-oai-34-42">Private practice in Rome</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" sort="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T" first="T." last="Albrektsson">T. Albrektsson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-oai-34-42">MD, PhD, Odhc</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A." last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af4-oai-34-42">Tor Vergata University, Rome</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gargari, M" sort="Gargari, M" uniqKey="Gargari M" first="M." last="Gargari">M. Gargari</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af4-oai-34-42">Tor Vergata University, Rome</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oral & Implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1974-5648</idno><idno type="eISSN">2035-2468</idno><imprint><date when="2008">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>SUMMARY</title><p>The aim of the present study was to compare two implant surfaces, the TiOblast (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting the surface and already present in literature and the Osseospeed (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting and treating the surface with fluoride ions and recently launched onto the market with the modified surfaces of the latest generation. This study is part of a more extensive research project whose protocol required the insertion of 10 couples of implants; thus in the present discussion partial data are being taken into consideration, with an eye at collecting more data in the future, regarding both microscopy and histomorphometric histological analysis on 5 couples of implants. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the modified surfaces of the latest generation can guarantee a greater osseointegration both from a qualitative and quantitative level compared to the surfaces presently used and that they may represent the first example of “bioactivity”, that is, an active interaction with the processes of new bone formation and tissue healing.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OAI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Oral & Implantology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1974-5648</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2035-2468</issn><publisher><publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23285334</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3476499</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">oai-34-42</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ROCCI</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-oai-34-42"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ROCCI</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-oai-34-42"><sup>*</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-oai-34-42"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>MARTIGNONI</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-oai-34-42"><sup>**</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ALBREKTSSON</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-oai-34-42"><sup>***</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>BARLATTANI</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af4-oai-34-42"><sup>****</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>GARGARI</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af4-oai-34-42"><sup>****</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="af1-oai-34-42"><label>*</label>Private practice in Chieti</aff><aff id="af2-oai-34-42"><label>**</label>Private practice in Rome</aff><aff id="af3-oai-34-42"><label>***</label>MD, PhD, Odhc</aff><aff id="af4-oai-34-42"><label>****</label>Tor Vergata University, Rome</aff><author-notes><corresp id="c1-oai-34-42">Correspondence: Dott. Antonio Rocci, Cunidental, V.le Benedetto Croce, 158 - 66100 Chieti, Tel. 0871 560574 - Fax 0871 560904, E-mail: <email>anrocci@tin.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>6</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><season>Apr-Jun</season><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>©2008 CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Rome, Italy</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2008</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><title>SUMMARY</title><p>The aim of the present study was to compare two implant surfaces, the TiOblast (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting the surface and already present in literature and the Osseospeed (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting and treating the surface with fluoride ions and recently launched onto the market with the modified surfaces of the latest generation. This study is part of a more extensive research project whose protocol required the insertion of 10 couples of implants; thus in the present discussion partial data are being taken into consideration, with an eye at collecting more data in the future, regarding both microscopy and histomorphometric histological analysis on 5 couples of implants. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the modified surfaces of the latest generation can guarantee a greater osseointegration both from a qualitative and quantitative level compared to the surfaces presently used and that they may represent the first example of “bioactivity”, that is, an active interaction with the processes of new bone formation and tissue healing.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="it"><title>RIASSUNTO</title><p>Il presente studio è finalizzato alla comparazione tra due superfici implantari, la superficie <italic>TiOblast</italic> (Astra Tech) ottenuta per sabbiatura e già presente in letteratura e la superficie <italic>Osseospeed</italic> (Astra Tech), ottenuta per sabbiatura ed implementazione con fluoro in forma ionica, di recente introduzione sul mercato nell’ambito delle superfici modificate di ultima generazione. Questo studio è parte di un progetto di ricerca più ampio, il cui protocollo ha previsto l’inserimento di 10 coppie di impianti; pertanto nella presente discussione vengono presi in considerazione dati parziali, che ci riserviamo di ampliare, riguardanti l’analisi istologica al microscopio ottico ed istomorfometrica su 5 coppie di impianti. L’obiettivo della ricerca è quello di verificare che le superfici modificate di nuova generazione possano garantire un’osteointegrazione qualitativamente e quantitativamente maggiore rispetto alle superfici attualmente in uso e che dunque possano rappresentare un primo esempio di “bioattività”, cioè di interazione attiva con i processi di neoformazione ossea e guarigione tissutale.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group><kwd>sandblasted surface</kwd><kwd>fluoride</kwd><kwd>histology</kwd><kwd>histomorphometry</kwd><kwd>microthreads</kwd><kwd>macrothreads</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002505 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002505 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |