Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Implants <italic>versus</italic> Fixed Dental Prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Zitzmann, N U" sort="Zitzmann, N U" uniqKey="Zitzmann N" first="N. U." last="Zitzmann">N. U. Zitzmann</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1-0022034513504927">Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Krastl, G" sort="Krastl, G" uniqKey="Krastl G" first="G." last="Krastl">G. Krastl</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1-0022034513504927">Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weiger, R" sort="Weiger, R" uniqKey="Weiger R" first="R." last="Weiger">R. Weiger</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1-0022034513504927">Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kuhl, S" sort="Kuhl, S" uniqKey="Kuhl S" first="S." last="Kühl">S. Kühl</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2-0022034513504927">Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology, and Oral Medicine, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sendi, P" sort="Sendi, P" uniqKey="Sendi P" first="P." last="Sendi">P. Sendi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3-0022034513504927">Department for Reconstructive Dentistry and TMJ Disorders, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland, and Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, Basel University Hospital, Hebelstrasse 10, 3rd Floor, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">24158338</idno><idno type="pmc">3860069</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860069</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3860069</idno><idno type="doi">10.1177/0022034513504927</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002426</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002426</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Implants <italic>versus</italic> Fixed Dental Prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Zitzmann, N U" sort="Zitzmann, N U" uniqKey="Zitzmann N" first="N. U." last="Zitzmann">N. U. Zitzmann</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1-0022034513504927">Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Krastl, G" sort="Krastl, G" uniqKey="Krastl G" first="G." last="Krastl">G. Krastl</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1-0022034513504927">Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weiger, R" sort="Weiger, R" uniqKey="Weiger R" first="R." last="Weiger">R. Weiger</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1-0022034513504927">Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kuhl, S" sort="Kuhl, S" uniqKey="Kuhl S" first="S." last="Kühl">S. Kühl</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2-0022034513504927">Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology, and Oral Medicine, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sendi, P" sort="Sendi, P" uniqKey="Sendi P" first="P." last="Sendi">P. Sendi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3-0022034513504927">Department for Reconstructive Dentistry and TMJ Disorders, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland, and Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, Basel University Hospital, Hebelstrasse 10, 3rd Floor, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Dental Research</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-0345</idno><idno type="eISSN">1544-0591</idno><imprint><date when="2013">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>For the restoration of an anterior missing tooth, implant-supported single crowns (ISCs) or fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) are indicated, but it is not clear which type of restoration is more cost-effective. A self-selected trial was performed with 15 patients with ISCs and 11 with FDPs. Patient preferences were recorded with visual analog scales before treatment, 1 month following restoration, and then annually. Quality-adjusted tooth years (QATYs) were estimated by considering the type of reconstruction for replacing the missing tooth and its effect on the adjacent teeth. A stochastic cost-effectiveness model was developed using Monte Carlo simulation. The expected costs and QATYs were summarized in cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. ISC was the dominant strategy, with a QATY increase of 0.01 over 3 years and 0.04 over 10 years with a higher probability of being cost-effective. While both treatment options provided satisfactory long-term results from the patient’s perspective, the lower initial costs, particularly laboratory fees, were responsible for the dominance of ISCs over FDPs.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Dent Res</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J. Dent. Res</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">spjdr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Dental Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0022-0345</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1544-0591</issn><publisher><publisher-name>SAGE Publications</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24158338</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3860069</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0022034513504927</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10.1177_0022034513504927</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Clinical Investigations</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Implants <italic>versus</italic> Fixed Dental Prostheses</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zitzmann</surname><given-names>N.U.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1-0022034513504927">1</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="corresp1-0022034513504927">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Krastl</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1-0022034513504927">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Weiger</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1-0022034513504927">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kühl</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2-0022034513504927">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sendi</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3-0022034513504927">3</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1-0022034513504927"><label>1</label>Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</aff><aff id="aff2-0022034513504927"><label>2</label>Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology, and Oral Medicine, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland</aff><aff id="aff3-0022034513504927"><label>3</label>Department for Reconstructive Dentistry and TMJ Disorders, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland, and Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, Basel University Hospital, Hebelstrasse 10, 3rd Floor, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland</aff><author-notes><corresp id="corresp1-0022034513504927"><label>*</label><email>N.Zitzmann@unibas.ch</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub"><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>92</volume><issue>12 Suppl</issue><issue-title>Clinical Research Supplement on Implant Dentistry</issue-title><fpage>183S</fpage><lpage>188S</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© International & American Associations for Dental Research</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder content-type="society">International & American Associations for Dental Research</copyright-holder></permissions><abstract><p>For the restoration of an anterior missing tooth, implant-supported single crowns (ISCs) or fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) are indicated, but it is not clear which type of restoration is more cost-effective. A self-selected trial was performed with 15 patients with ISCs and 11 with FDPs. Patient preferences were recorded with visual analog scales before treatment, 1 month following restoration, and then annually. Quality-adjusted tooth years (QATYs) were estimated by considering the type of reconstruction for replacing the missing tooth and its effect on the adjacent teeth. A stochastic cost-effectiveness model was developed using Monte Carlo simulation. The expected costs and QATYs were summarized in cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. ISC was the dominant strategy, with a QATY increase of 0.01 over 3 years and 0.04 over 10 years with a higher probability of being cost-effective. While both treatment options provided satisfactory long-term results from the patient’s perspective, the lower initial costs, particularly laboratory fees, were responsible for the dominance of ISCs over FDPs.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>dental economics</kwd><kwd>cost effectiveness</kwd><kwd>single-tooth implants</kwd><kwd>fixed partial denture</kwd><kwd>dental restoration</kwd><kwd>patient satisfaction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002426 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002426 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |