Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis

Identifieur interne : 002334 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 002333; suivant : 002335

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis

Auteurs : Marco Cicciu ; Ennio Bramanti ; Giada Matacena ; Eugenio Guglielmino ; Giacomo Risitano

Source :

RBID : PMC:4057829

Abstract

Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.


Url:
PubMed: 24955150
PubMed Central: 4057829

Links to Exploration step

PMC:4057829

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cicciu, Marco" sort="Cicciu, Marco" uniqKey="Cicciu M" first="Marco" last="Cicciu">Marco Cicciu</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au1">
<institution>Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bramanti, Ennio" sort="Bramanti, Ennio" uniqKey="Bramanti E" first="Ennio" last="Bramanti">Ennio Bramanti</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au2">
<institution>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Matacena, Giada" sort="Matacena, Giada" uniqKey="Matacena G" first="Giada" last="Matacena">Giada Matacena</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au2">
<institution>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Guglielmino, Eugenio" sort="Guglielmino, Eugenio" uniqKey="Guglielmino E" first="Eugenio" last="Guglielmino">Eugenio Guglielmino</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au3">
<institution>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Risitano, Giacomo" sort="Risitano, Giacomo" uniqKey="Risitano G" first="Giacomo" last="Risitano">Giacomo Risitano</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au3">
<institution>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24955150</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4057829</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057829</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4057829</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002334</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002334</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cicciu, Marco" sort="Cicciu, Marco" uniqKey="Cicciu M" first="Marco" last="Cicciu">Marco Cicciu</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au1">
<institution>Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bramanti, Ennio" sort="Bramanti, Ennio" uniqKey="Bramanti E" first="Ennio" last="Bramanti">Ennio Bramanti</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au2">
<institution>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Matacena, Giada" sort="Matacena, Giada" uniqKey="Matacena G" first="Giada" last="Matacena">Giada Matacena</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au2">
<institution>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Guglielmino, Eugenio" sort="Guglielmino, Eugenio" uniqKey="Guglielmino E" first="Eugenio" last="Guglielmino">Eugenio Guglielmino</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au3">
<institution>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Risitano, Giacomo" sort="Risitano, Giacomo" uniqKey="Risitano G" first="Giacomo" last="Risitano">Giacomo Risitano</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="au3">
<institution>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1940-5901</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Int J Clin Exp Med</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Int J Clin Exp Med</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ijcem</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1940-5901</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>e-Century Publishing Corporation</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24955150</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4057829</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cicciu</surname>
<given-names>Marco</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="au1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bramanti</surname>
<given-names>Ennio</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="au2">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matacena</surname>
<given-names>Giada</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="au2">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guglielmino</surname>
<given-names>Eugenio</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="au3">3</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Risitano</surname>
<given-names>Giacomo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="au3">3</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="au1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="au2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="au3">
<label>3</label>
<institution>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina</institution>
<addr-line>ME, IT</addr-line>
</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp>
<bold>Address correspondence to:</bold>
Marco Cicciù, Department of Human Pathology, Dental School, Messina University, Via Consolare Valeria 98100, Messina, Italy. Tel: 0039-090 221 6911; E-mail:
<email>acromarco@yahoo.it</email>
; Ennio Bramanti, Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina, ME, IT. E-mail:
<email>enniobramanti@hotmail.it</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>817</fpage>
<lpage>825</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>07</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2014</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2014</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>IJCEM Copyright © 2014</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>FEM analysis</kwd>
<kwd>bone tissue</kwd>
<kwd>load</kwd>
<kwd>dental implant</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002334 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002334 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4057829
   |texte=   FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24955150" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022