Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode</title><author><name sortKey="Kamburo Lu, K" sort="Kamburo Lu, K" uniqKey="Kamburo Lu K" first="K" last="Kamburo Lu">K. Kamburo Lu</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kolsuz, E" sort="Kolsuz, E" uniqKey="Kolsuz E" first="E" last="Kolsuz">E. Kolsuz</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Murat, S" sort="Murat, S" uniqKey="Murat S" first="S" last="Murat">S. Murat</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eren, H" sort="Eren, H" uniqKey="Eren H" first="H" last="Eren">H. Eren</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yuksel, S" sort="Yuksel, S" uniqKey="Yuksel S" first="S" last="Yüksel">S. Yüksel</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Yılıdrım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Paksoy, C S" sort="Paksoy, C S" uniqKey="Paksoy C" first="C S" last="Paksoy">C S Paksoy</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">23956236</idno><idno type="pmc">3922259</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922259</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3922259</idno><idno type="doi">10.1259/dmfr.20130176</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002307</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002307</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode</title><author><name sortKey="Kamburo Lu, K" sort="Kamburo Lu, K" uniqKey="Kamburo Lu K" first="K" last="Kamburo Lu">K. Kamburo Lu</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kolsuz, E" sort="Kolsuz, E" uniqKey="Kolsuz E" first="E" last="Kolsuz">E. Kolsuz</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Murat, S" sort="Murat, S" uniqKey="Murat S" first="S" last="Murat">S. Murat</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eren, H" sort="Eren, H" uniqKey="Eren H" first="H" last="Eren">H. Eren</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yuksel, S" sort="Yuksel, S" uniqKey="Yuksel S" first="S" last="Yüksel">S. Yüksel</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Yılıdrım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Paksoy, C S" sort="Paksoy, C S" uniqKey="Paksoy C" first="C S" last="Paksoy">C S Paksoy</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0250-832X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1476-542X</idno><imprint><date when="2013">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Objectives:</title><p>To investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) images obtained with and without artefact reduction (AR) in detecting simulated buccal peri-implant and buccal periodontal defects.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods:</title><p>42 implants inserted into edentulous mandibles, and 38 teeth present in dry mandibles were used. Simulated buccal peri-implant defects (<italic>n</italic> = 22) and buccal periodontal defects (<italic>n</italic> = 22) were prepared. 20 implants and 18 teeth without simulated defects were the control group. Images of the mandibles were obtained using a Planmeca ProMax<sup>®</sup> 3D Max CBCT unit (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Image reconstructions were prepared without and with low, medium and high AR modes. Images were viewed randomly by six observers twice for the presence of defects. Kappa coefficient was calculated. F2_LD_F1 design for non-parametric analysis of longitudinal data was used. Area under curves (AUCs) were calculated for each observer. Significance level was taken as <italic>α</italic> = 0.05.</p></sec><sec><title>Results:</title><p>Intraobserver kappa ranged from 0.140 to 0.792 for peri-implant and from 0.189 to 1.0 for periodontal defects. All factors were statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), except for image mode and implant brand. Pairwise interactions were found between periodontal defects and peri-implant defects (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), observers (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), observer and image mode (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), defect model and observer (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001) and defect model, image mode and observer (<italic>p</italic> = 0.04). AUC values ranged from 0.39 to 0.52 for peri-implant and from 0.45 to 0.71 for periodontal defects. Higher AUC values were found for periodontal defects than for peri-implant defects.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions:</title><p>Buccal peri-implant defects were more difficult to detect than buccal periodontal defects. No difference was found among CBCT images obtained with and without AR modes.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Dentomaxillofac Radiol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Dentomaxillofac Radiol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">dmfr</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">dmf</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0250-832X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1476-542X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The British Institute of Radiology.</publisher-name><publisher-loc>48–50 St John Street, London EC1M 4DG, UK</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23956236</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3922259</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">dmfr13176</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1259/dmfr.20130176</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode</article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">CBCT image quality assurance</alt-title><alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">K Kamburoğlu <italic>et al</italic></alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kamburoğlu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kolsuz</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Murat</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Eren</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yüksel</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Paksoy</surname><given-names>C S</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><addr-line>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey;</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><addr-line>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Yılıdrım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey</addr-line></aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>*</label>Correspondence to: Dr Kıvanç Kamburoğlu, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: <email xlink:href="dtkivo@yahoo.com">dtkivo@yahoo.com</email>; <email xlink:href="kamburogluk@dentistry.ankara.edu.tr">kamburogluk@dentistry.ankara.edu.tr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>8</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>8</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>42</volume><issue>8</issue><elocation-id>20130176</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>5</month><year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>7</month><year>2013</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>7</month><year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2013 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives:</title><p>To investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) images obtained with and without artefact reduction (AR) in detecting simulated buccal peri-implant and buccal periodontal defects.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods:</title><p>42 implants inserted into edentulous mandibles, and 38 teeth present in dry mandibles were used. Simulated buccal peri-implant defects (<italic>n</italic> = 22) and buccal periodontal defects (<italic>n</italic> = 22) were prepared. 20 implants and 18 teeth without simulated defects were the control group. Images of the mandibles were obtained using a Planmeca ProMax<sup>®</sup> 3D Max CBCT unit (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Image reconstructions were prepared without and with low, medium and high AR modes. Images were viewed randomly by six observers twice for the presence of defects. Kappa coefficient was calculated. F2_LD_F1 design for non-parametric analysis of longitudinal data was used. Area under curves (AUCs) were calculated for each observer. Significance level was taken as <italic>α</italic> = 0.05.</p></sec><sec><title>Results:</title><p>Intraobserver kappa ranged from 0.140 to 0.792 for peri-implant and from 0.189 to 1.0 for periodontal defects. All factors were statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), except for image mode and implant brand. Pairwise interactions were found between periodontal defects and peri-implant defects (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), observers (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), observer and image mode (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001), defect model and observer (<italic>p</italic> < 0.001) and defect model, image mode and observer (<italic>p</italic> = 0.04). AUC values ranged from 0.39 to 0.52 for peri-implant and from 0.45 to 0.71 for periodontal defects. Higher AUC values were found for periodontal defects than for peri-implant defects.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions:</title><p>Buccal peri-implant defects were more difficult to detect than buccal periodontal defects. No difference was found among CBCT images obtained with and without AR modes.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>buccal peri-implant defects</kwd><kwd>buccal periodontal defects</kwd><kwd>CBCT</kwd><kwd>artefacts</kwd><kwd>artefact reduction</kwd><kwd>diagnosis</kwd></kwd-group><counts><fig-count count="6"></fig-count><table-count count="4"></table-count><ref-count count="25"></ref-count><page-count count="9"></page-count></counts></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 0023071 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 0023071 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |