Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire</title><author><name sortKey="Annibali, Susanna" sort="Annibali, Susanna" uniqKey="Annibali S" first="Susanna" last="Annibali">Susanna Annibali</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vestri, Anna Rita" sort="Vestri, Anna Rita" uniqKey="Vestri A" first="Anna Rita" last="Vestri">Anna Rita Vestri</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Experimental Medicine</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pilotto, Annalisa" sort="Pilotto, Annalisa" uniqKey="Pilotto A" first="Annalisa" last="Pilotto">Annalisa Pilotto</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="La Monaca, Gerardo" sort="La Monaca, Gerardo" uniqKey="La Monaca G" first="Gerardo" last="La Monaca">Gerardo La Monaca</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Di Carlo, Stefano" sort="Di Carlo, Stefano" uniqKey="Di Carlo S" first="Stefano" last="Di Carlo">Stefano Di Carlo</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cristalli, Maria Paola" sort="Cristalli, Maria Paola" uniqKey="Cristalli M" first="Maria Paola" last="Cristalli">Maria Paola Cristalli</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">22238708</idno><idno type="pmc">3254380</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3254380</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3254380</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002259</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002259</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire</title><author><name sortKey="Annibali, Susanna" sort="Annibali, Susanna" uniqKey="Annibali S" first="Susanna" last="Annibali">Susanna Annibali</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vestri, Anna Rita" sort="Vestri, Anna Rita" uniqKey="Vestri A" first="Anna Rita" last="Vestri">Anna Rita Vestri</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Experimental Medicine</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pilotto, Annalisa" sort="Pilotto, Annalisa" uniqKey="Pilotto A" first="Annalisa" last="Pilotto">Annalisa Pilotto</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="La Monaca, Gerardo" sort="La Monaca, Gerardo" uniqKey="La Monaca G" first="Gerardo" last="La Monaca">Gerardo La Monaca</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Di Carlo, Stefano" sort="Di Carlo, Stefano" uniqKey="Di Carlo S" first="Stefano" last="Di Carlo">Stefano Di Carlo</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af3-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cristalli, Maria Paola" sort="Cristalli, Maria Paola" uniqKey="Cristalli M" first="Maria Paola" last="Cristalli">Maria Paola Cristalli</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annali di Stomatologia</title><idno type="ISSN">1824-0852</idno><idno type="eISSN">1971-1441</idno><imprint><date when="2011">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>Summary</title><sec><title>Aim</title><p>This pilot study evaluated patients’ experience of oral surgical and prosthetic procedures as well as their opinions regarding function, aesthetics, comfort, and satisfaction with treatment outcomes.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Forty-nine subjects treated with oral implants completed questionnaires comprising 44 questions. Three questionnaires were used related to implant-supported single-tooth, fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant-retained overdentures. The questions related to demographic data (age, sex, employment, marital status and educational level), the source of information, the reason they underwent implant treatment, the discomfort related to all phases of treatment, and their functional and aesthetic satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Most of the patients (53.8%) were employed and had received a high school certificate or a university diploma. Patients heard about implants from various sources, including referring dentists (55.8%), relatives and friends (23.1%), and television, radio and the Internet (17.3%). The main reasons for choosing implant treatment were restoring lost teeth (35,5%), following dentist’s advice (33,3%), improving stability of the removable denture (15.4%), eating habits (13.5%) and aesthetics (1.9%). Most patients considered that the procedure took a long time (44.2%) but was not traumatic (62.5%). Pain was almost absent in most cases (64.5%) and swelling, when present, was generally moderate (48.1%) and seldom was marked (17.3%). Patients were very satisfied about the aesthetics (82.7%) and function (94.2%), and considered the implant prosthesis to be part of themselves (84.6%). Most of the patients considered the implant prostheses to be easy to clean (73.1%), and would repeat the treatment if necessary (86.5%) and recommend it to other people (94.2%).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Although the present study is limited by the small sample, the outcomes suggest that oral implant rehabilitation meets patients’ needs and aesthetic demands.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Ann Stomatol (Roma)</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Annali di Stomatologia</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1824-0852</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1971-1441</issn><publisher><publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">22238708</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3254380</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ads-1-3_4-2</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Annibali</surname><given-names>Susanna</given-names></name><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Vestri</surname><given-names>Anna Rita</given-names></name><degrees>MD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-0024_2_patients_annibali"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pilotto</surname><given-names>Annalisa</given-names></name><degrees>DDS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>La Monaca</surname><given-names>Gerardo</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Di Carlo</surname><given-names>Stefano</given-names></name><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-0024_2_patients_annibali"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cristalli</surname><given-names>Maria Paola</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="af4-0024_2_patients_annibali">“Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy</aff></contrib-group><aff id="af1-0024_2_patients_annibali"><label>1</label> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Oral Surgery Unit</aff><aff id="af2-0024_2_patients_annibali"><label>2</label> Department of Experimental Medicine</aff><aff id="af3-0024_2_patients_annibali"><label>3</label> Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit</aff><author-notes><corresp id="c1-0024_2_patients_annibali">Corresponding author: Dott. Gerardo La Monaca, Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome Via Caserta, 6 - 00161 Rome, Italy, Phone: +39-06-49976651, E-mail: <email>gerrylamonaca@tiscali.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>2</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><season>Jul-Dec</season><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3-4</issue><fpage>2</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>©2010 CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Rome, Italy</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><title>Summary</title><sec><title>Aim</title><p>This pilot study evaluated patients’ experience of oral surgical and prosthetic procedures as well as their opinions regarding function, aesthetics, comfort, and satisfaction with treatment outcomes.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Forty-nine subjects treated with oral implants completed questionnaires comprising 44 questions. Three questionnaires were used related to implant-supported single-tooth, fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant-retained overdentures. The questions related to demographic data (age, sex, employment, marital status and educational level), the source of information, the reason they underwent implant treatment, the discomfort related to all phases of treatment, and their functional and aesthetic satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Most of the patients (53.8%) were employed and had received a high school certificate or a university diploma. Patients heard about implants from various sources, including referring dentists (55.8%), relatives and friends (23.1%), and television, radio and the Internet (17.3%). The main reasons for choosing implant treatment were restoring lost teeth (35,5%), following dentist’s advice (33,3%), improving stability of the removable denture (15.4%), eating habits (13.5%) and aesthetics (1.9%). Most patients considered that the procedure took a long time (44.2%) but was not traumatic (62.5%). Pain was almost absent in most cases (64.5%) and swelling, when present, was generally moderate (48.1%) and seldom was marked (17.3%). Patients were very satisfied about the aesthetics (82.7%) and function (94.2%), and considered the implant prosthesis to be part of themselves (84.6%). Most of the patients considered the implant prostheses to be easy to clean (73.1%), and would repeat the treatment if necessary (86.5%) and recommend it to other people (94.2%).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Although the present study is limited by the small sample, the outcomes suggest that oral implant rehabilitation meets patients’ needs and aesthetic demands.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>patient opinion</kwd><kwd>oral implants</kwd><kwd>patient satisfaction</kwd><kwd>function</kwd><kwd>aesthetics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002259 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002259 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |