Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician<sup>®</sup> and procera implant bridge<sup>®</sup>: case report</title><author><name sortKey="Spinelli, D" sort="Spinelli, D" uniqKey="Spinelli D" first="D." last="Spinelli">D. Spinelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ottria, L" sort="Ottria, L" uniqKey="Ottria L" first="L." last="Ottria">L. Ottria</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Vico, G" sort="De Vico, G" uniqKey="De Vico G" first="G." last="De Vico">G. De Vico</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, R" sort="Bollero, R" uniqKey="Bollero R" first="R." last="Bollero">R. Bollero</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A." last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, P" sort="Bollero, P" uniqKey="Bollero P" first="P." last="Bollero">P. Bollero</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">24175051</idno><idno type="pmc">3808939</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808939</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3808939</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001B04</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001B04</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician<sup>®</sup> and procera implant bridge<sup>®</sup>: case report</title><author><name sortKey="Spinelli, D" sort="Spinelli, D" uniqKey="Spinelli D" first="D." last="Spinelli">D. Spinelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ottria, L" sort="Ottria, L" uniqKey="Ottria L" first="L." last="Ottria">L. Ottria</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Vico, G" sort="De Vico, G" uniqKey="De Vico G" first="G." last="De Vico">G. De Vico</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, R" sort="Bollero, R" uniqKey="Bollero R" first="R." last="Bollero">R. Bollero</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A." last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, P" sort="Bollero, P" uniqKey="Bollero P" first="P." last="Bollero">P. Bollero</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oral & Implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1974-5648</idno><idno type="eISSN">2035-2468</idno><imprint><date when="2013">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>SUMMARY</title><p>Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution. Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="case-report"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OAI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Oral & Implantology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1974-5648</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2035-2468</issn><publisher><publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24175051</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3808939</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">25-36</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Case Report</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician<sup>®</sup> and procera implant bridge<sup>®</sup>: case report</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>SPINELLI</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-25-36"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>OTTRIA</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>DE VICO</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>BOLLERO</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>BARLATTANI</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>BOLLERO</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></contrib><aff id="af1-25-36">Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="c1-25-36">Correspondence to: Dario Spinelli, E-mail: <email>dariospinelli@hotmail.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><month>2</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>10</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>©2013 CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Rome, Italy</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><title>SUMMARY</title><p>Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution. Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>dental implants</kwd><kwd>computer guided flapless implant placement</kwd><kwd>immediate loading</kwd><kwd>prosthetic rehabilitation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B04 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B04 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |