Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.
***** Acces problem to record *****\

Identifieur interne : 001802 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 0018019; suivant : 0018030 ***** probable Xml problem with record *****

Links to Exploration step


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Dental record documentation in selected ambulatory care facilities.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hand, J S" sort="Hand, J S" uniqKey="Hand J" first="J S" last="Hand">J S Hand</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Reynolds, W E" sort="Reynolds, W E" uniqKey="Reynolds W" first="W E" last="Reynolds">W E Reynolds</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">6440203</idno>
<idno type="pmc">1424640</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1424640</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:1424640</idno>
<date when="1984">1984</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001802</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001802</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Dental record documentation in selected ambulatory care facilities.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hand, J S" sort="Hand, J S" uniqKey="Hand J" first="J S" last="Hand">J S Hand</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Reynolds, W E" sort="Reynolds, W E" uniqKey="Reynolds W" first="W E" last="Reynolds">W E Reynolds</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Public Health Reports</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0033-3549</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2877</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="1984">1984</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>Having recognized the differences in financial incentives between institutional providers and private practitioners participating in the Medicaid program, the New York State Health Department developed a streamlined mechanism of prior approval for 13 selected institutional providers of dental care. As part of the evaluation of this process, a retrospective audit of 316 dental records was conducted to assess the level of documentation present in the dental record. A followup audit was conducted 3 months after implementation of a plan to correct any deficiencies identified. More than 50 percent of the facilities were unable to present all the records requested at the time of the initial audit. Few of the audited records were free of deficiencies, and documentation of the results of the intra-oral examination was lacking in most facilities. The followup audit demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the level of record documentation. These results demonstrate that, even when good recordkeeping procedures were identified and agreed to by these institutional dental providers, performance was inadequate. However, the study also demonstrates that adequate records can be kept if sufficient incentives are provided. Efforts to evaluate retrospectively the delivery of dental care that are dependent on the dental record as a primary data source are unlikely to succeed unless incentives to encourage good recordkeeping are incorporated. Further research is needed to develop appropriate incentives that would operate in other practice settings.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Public Health Rep</journal-id>
<journal-title>Public Health Reports</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0033-3549</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1468-2877</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">6440203</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">1424640</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Dental record documentation in selected ambulatory care facilities.</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hand</surname>
<given-names>J S</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reynolds</surname>
<given-names>W E</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<season>Nov-Dec</season>
<year>1984</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>99</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>583</fpage>
<lpage>590</lpage>
<abstract>
<p>Having recognized the differences in financial incentives between institutional providers and private practitioners participating in the Medicaid program, the New York State Health Department developed a streamlined mechanism of prior approval for 13 selected institutional providers of dental care. As part of the evaluation of this process, a retrospective audit of 316 dental records was conducted to assess the level of documentation present in the dental record. A followup audit was conducted 3 months after implementation of a plan to correct any deficiencies identified. More than 50 percent of the facilities were unable to present all the records requested at the time of the initial audit. Few of the audited records were free of deficiencies, and documentation of the results of the intra-oral examination was lacking in most facilities. The followup audit demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the level of record documentation. These results demonstrate that, even when good recordkeeping procedures were identified and agreed to by these institutional dental providers, performance was inadequate. However, the study also demonstrates that adequate records can be kept if sufficient incentives are provided. Efforts to evaluate retrospectively the delivery of dental care that are dependent on the dental record as a primary data source are unlikely to succeed unless incentives to encourage good recordkeeping are incorporated. Further research is needed to develop appropriate incentives that would operate in other practice settings.</p>
</abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001802  | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001802  | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     
   |texte=   
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022