Professional encroachment: a comparison of the emergence of denturists in Canada and Oregon.
Identifieur interne : 001058 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 001057; suivant : 001059Professional encroachment: a comparison of the emergence of denturists in Canada and Oregon.
Auteurs : D I Rosenstein ; L P Joseph ; L J Mackenzie ; R. WydenSource :
- American Journal of Public Health [ 0090-0036 ] ; 1980.
Abstract
In 1978, supporters of denturism in Oregon succeeded in passing an initiative which allows denturists to provide dentures directly to the public. The steps which led to the referendum included three unsuccessful attempts to have the state legislature enact a law legalizing denturism. After capturing broad-based consumer support, the issue was placed on the ballot and passed by an overwhelming margin. Both the denturists and the dentists in Oregon adopted strategies similar to those used in Canada over 20 years ago when the issue was raised in a number of provinces. As was the case in Canada, the denturists prevailed. Denturists stressed the price differential and the issue of freedom of choice. Dentists stressed health and safety issues. The public perceived the dentists' campaign as negative and self-serving. This perception may have contributed to the election results. In order to avoid this tarnished image, dentists must anticipate the public's needs, and formulate strategies to meet such needs.
Url:
PubMed: 7377437
PubMed Central: 1619448
Links to Exploration step
PMC:1619448Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Professional encroachment: a comparison of the emergence of denturists in Canada and Oregon.</title><author><name sortKey="Rosenstein, D I" sort="Rosenstein, D I" uniqKey="Rosenstein D" first="D I" last="Rosenstein">D I Rosenstein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Joseph, L P" sort="Joseph, L P" uniqKey="Joseph L" first="L P" last="Joseph">L P Joseph</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mackenzie, L J" sort="Mackenzie, L J" uniqKey="Mackenzie L" first="L J" last="Mackenzie">L J Mackenzie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wyden, R" sort="Wyden, R" uniqKey="Wyden R" first="R" last="Wyden">R. Wyden</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">7377437</idno><idno type="pmc">1619448</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1619448</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:1619448</idno><date when="1980">1980</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001058</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001058</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Professional encroachment: a comparison of the emergence of denturists in Canada and Oregon.</title><author><name sortKey="Rosenstein, D I" sort="Rosenstein, D I" uniqKey="Rosenstein D" first="D I" last="Rosenstein">D I Rosenstein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Joseph, L P" sort="Joseph, L P" uniqKey="Joseph L" first="L P" last="Joseph">L P Joseph</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mackenzie, L J" sort="Mackenzie, L J" uniqKey="Mackenzie L" first="L J" last="Mackenzie">L J Mackenzie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wyden, R" sort="Wyden, R" uniqKey="Wyden R" first="R" last="Wyden">R. Wyden</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">American Journal of Public Health</title><idno type="ISSN">0090-0036</idno><idno type="eISSN">1541-0048</idno><imprint><date when="1980">1980</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>In 1978, supporters of denturism in Oregon succeeded in passing an initiative which allows denturists to provide dentures directly to the public. The steps which led to the referendum included three unsuccessful attempts to have the state legislature enact a law legalizing denturism. After capturing broad-based consumer support, the issue was placed on the ballot and passed by an overwhelming margin. Both the denturists and the dentists in Oregon adopted strategies similar to those used in Canada over 20 years ago when the issue was raised in a number of provinces. As was the case in Canada, the denturists prevailed. Denturists stressed the price differential and the issue of freedom of choice. Dentists stressed health and safety issues. The public perceived the dentists' campaign as negative and self-serving. This perception may have contributed to the election results. In order to avoid this tarnished image, dentists must anticipate the public's needs, and formulate strategies to meet such needs.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Am J Public Health</journal-id><journal-title>American Journal of Public Health</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0090-0036</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1541-0048</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">7377437</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">1619448</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Professional encroachment: a comparison of the emergence of denturists in Canada and Oregon.</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rosenstein</surname><given-names>D I</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>L P</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mackenzie</surname><given-names>L J</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wyden</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>6</month><year>1980</year></pub-date><volume>70</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>614</fpage><lpage>618</lpage><abstract><p>In 1978, supporters of denturism in Oregon succeeded in passing an initiative which allows denturists to provide dentures directly to the public. The steps which led to the referendum included three unsuccessful attempts to have the state legislature enact a law legalizing denturism. After capturing broad-based consumer support, the issue was placed on the ballot and passed by an overwhelming margin. Both the denturists and the dentists in Oregon adopted strategies similar to those used in Canada over 20 years ago when the issue was raised in a number of provinces. As was the case in Canada, the denturists prevailed. Denturists stressed the price differential and the issue of freedom of choice. Dentists stressed health and safety issues. The public perceived the dentists' campaign as negative and self-serving. This perception may have contributed to the election results. In order to avoid this tarnished image, dentists must anticipate the public's needs, and formulate strategies to meet such needs.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001058 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001058 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:1619448
|texte= Professional encroachment: a comparison of the emergence of denturists in Canada and Oregon.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:7377437" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |