Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessment of the Effects of Curacel and Bone Wax on the Acute Oroantral Opening Site by means of Computer Tomography and Histopathology</title><author><name sortKey="Muglali, Mehtap" sort="Muglali, Mehtap" uniqKey="Muglali M" first="Mehtap" last="Muglali">Mehtap Muglali</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ozak, Ahmet" sort="Ozak, Ahmet" uniqKey="Ozak A" first="Ahmet" last="Ozak">Ahmet Ozak</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yar M, Murat" sort="Yar M, Murat" uniqKey="Yar M M" first="Murat" last="Yar M">Murat Yar M</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff3">Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nural, Mehmet Selim" sort="Nural, Mehmet Selim" uniqKey="Nural M" first="Mehmet Selim" last="Nural">Mehmet Selim Nural</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff4">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Celebi, Nukhet" sort="Celebi, Nukhet" uniqKey="Celebi N" first="Nukhet" last="Celebi">Nukhet Celebi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff5">Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aksoz, Tolga" sort="Aksoz, Tolga" uniqKey="Aksoz T" first="Tolga" last="Aksoz">Tolga Aksoz</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff4">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">23730062</idno><idno type="pmc">3386401</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386401</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3386401</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s12663-011-0281-2</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000B41</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000B41</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Assessment of the Effects of Curacel and Bone Wax on the Acute Oroantral Opening Site by means of Computer Tomography and Histopathology</title><author><name sortKey="Muglali, Mehtap" sort="Muglali, Mehtap" uniqKey="Muglali M" first="Mehtap" last="Muglali">Mehtap Muglali</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ozak, Ahmet" sort="Ozak, Ahmet" uniqKey="Ozak A" first="Ahmet" last="Ozak">Ahmet Ozak</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yar M, Murat" sort="Yar M, Murat" uniqKey="Yar M M" first="Murat" last="Yar M">Murat Yar M</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff3">Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nural, Mehmet Selim" sort="Nural, Mehmet Selim" uniqKey="Nural M" first="Mehmet Selim" last="Nural">Mehmet Selim Nural</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff4">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Celebi, Nukhet" sort="Celebi, Nukhet" uniqKey="Celebi N" first="Nukhet" last="Celebi">Nukhet Celebi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff5">Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aksoz, Tolga" sort="Aksoz, Tolga" uniqKey="Aksoz T" first="Tolga" last="Aksoz">Tolga Aksoz</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff4">Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0972-8279</idno><idno type="eISSN">0974-942X</idno><imprint><date when="2011">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>In this study, the effects of Curacel TM oxidized regenerated cellulose and bone wax on the healing bone were compared to each other by means of CT based bone density measurement and histopathological evaluation.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>The bone density measurements of the control group were significantly higher than those of both Curacel and bone wax groups.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>There was no significant difference between Curacel and bone wax. Histopathologically, the bone wax group showed more osteoblastic activation than Curacel group. For all measurement parameters (osteoblastic activation, osteoclastic activation, fibrous connective tissue, osseous trabeculae), Curacel and bone wax groups had worse results than control group. It is concluded that Curacel has no superiority over bone wax in terms of osseous healing in the oroantral region. There is no need to use oxidized regenerated cellulose or bone wax for small oroantral openings since the healing is better without any intervention. In addition, bone density measurement and histopathological evaluation were consistent in terms of osseous healing of the oroantral opening.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Maxillofac Oral Surg</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Maxillofac Oral Surg</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0972-8279</issn><issn pub-type="epub">0974-942X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name><publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23730062</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3386401</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">281</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12663-011-0281-2</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Paper</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Assessment of the Effects of Curacel and Bone Wax on the Acute Oroantral Opening Site by means of Computer Tomography and Histopathology</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Muglali</surname><given-names>Mehtap</given-names></name><address><phone>+90 362 3121919/3004</phone><fax>+90 362 4576032</fax><email>mehtapm@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ozak</surname><given-names>Ahmet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yarım</surname><given-names>Murat</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nural</surname><given-names>Mehmet Selim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff4">4</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Celebi</surname><given-names>Nukhet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff5">5</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Aksoz</surname><given-names>Tolga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff4">4</xref></contrib><aff id="Aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Samsun, Turkey</aff><aff id="Aff2"><label>2</label>Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</aff><aff id="Aff3"><label>3</label>Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</aff><aff id="Aff4"><label>4</label>Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey</aff><aff id="Aff5"><label>5</label>Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey</aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>9</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>6</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>160</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>4</month><year>2011</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>8</month><year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2011</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract id="Abs1"><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>In this study, the effects of Curacel TM oxidized regenerated cellulose and bone wax on the healing bone were compared to each other by means of CT based bone density measurement and histopathological evaluation.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>The bone density measurements of the control group were significantly higher than those of both Curacel and bone wax groups.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>There was no significant difference between Curacel and bone wax. Histopathologically, the bone wax group showed more osteoblastic activation than Curacel group. For all measurement parameters (osteoblastic activation, osteoclastic activation, fibrous connective tissue, osseous trabeculae), Curacel and bone wax groups had worse results than control group. It is concluded that Curacel has no superiority over bone wax in terms of osseous healing in the oroantral region. There is no need to use oxidized regenerated cellulose or bone wax for small oroantral openings since the healing is better without any intervention. In addition, bone density measurement and histopathological evaluation were consistent in terms of osseous healing of the oroantral opening.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Oroantral communication</kwd><kwd>Curacel</kwd><kwd>Bone wax</kwd><kwd>Wound healing</kwd><kwd>Oxidized regenerated cellulose</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2012</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B41 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B41 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |