Replacement of Missing Anterior Tooth Using Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report with 3 Years of Follow Up
Identifieur interne : 000883 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000882; suivant : 000884Replacement of Missing Anterior Tooth Using Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report with 3 Years of Follow Up
Auteurs : Manawar Ahmad ; B. Dhanasekar ; I. N. Aparna ; Hina NaimSource :
- The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society [ 0972-4052 ] ; 2012.
Abstract
As more and more dental practitioners are focusing on implant-supported fixed restorations, some clinicians favor the use of cement retained restorations while others consider screw-retained prosthesis to be the best choice. As both types of prostheses have certain advantages and disadvantages, clinicians should be aware of the limitations of each type. Screw-retained implant restorations have an advantage of predictable retention, retrievability and lack of potentially retained sub-gingival cement. However, a few disadvantages exist such as precise placement of the implant for optimal and esthetic location of the screw access hole and obtaining passive fit. On the other hand, cement retained restorations eliminates unaesthetic screw access holes; have passive fit of castings; reduce stress to splinted implants because of minor misfit of the framework; reduced complexity of lab procedures; enhanced esthetics; reduced cost factors and non disrupted morphology of the occlusal table. This case report presents the replacement of missing left central incisor using screw-retained implant prosthesis due to palatal trajectory of the implant placement and inadequate abutment height for retention of cement retained prosthesis.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0188-8
PubMed: 25183915
PubMed Central: 4148511
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4148511Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Replacement of Missing Anterior Tooth Using Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report with 3 Years of Follow Up</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ahmad, Manawar" sort="Ahmad, Manawar" uniqKey="Ahmad M" first="Manawar" last="Ahmad">Manawar Ahmad</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Dhanasekar, B" sort="Dhanasekar, B" uniqKey="Dhanasekar B" first="B." last="Dhanasekar">B. Dhanasekar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Aparna, I N" sort="Aparna, I N" uniqKey="Aparna I" first="I. N." last="Aparna">I. N. Aparna</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Naim, Hina" sort="Naim, Hina" uniqKey="Naim H" first="Hina" last="Naim">Hina Naim</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Melaka Manipal Dental College, Manipal Campus, Manipal, India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25183915</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4148511</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148511</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4148511</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0188-8</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000883</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000883</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Replacement of Missing Anterior Tooth Using Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report with 3 Years of Follow Up</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ahmad, Manawar" sort="Ahmad, Manawar" uniqKey="Ahmad M" first="Manawar" last="Ahmad">Manawar Ahmad</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Dhanasekar, B" sort="Dhanasekar, B" uniqKey="Dhanasekar B" first="B." last="Dhanasekar">B. Dhanasekar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Aparna, I N" sort="Aparna, I N" uniqKey="Aparna I" first="I. N." last="Aparna">I. N. Aparna</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Naim, Hina" sort="Naim, Hina" uniqKey="Naim H" first="Hina" last="Naim">Hina Naim</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Melaka Manipal Dental College, Manipal Campus, Manipal, India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1998-4057</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>As more and more dental practitioners are focusing on implant-supported fixed restorations, some clinicians favor the use of cement retained restorations while others consider screw-retained prosthesis to be the best choice. As both types of prostheses have certain advantages and disadvantages, clinicians should be aware of the limitations of each type. Screw-retained implant restorations have an advantage of predictable retention, retrievability and lack of potentially retained sub-gingival cement. However, a few disadvantages exist such as precise placement of the implant for optimal and esthetic location of the screw access hole and obtaining passive fit. On the other hand, cement retained restorations eliminates unaesthetic screw access holes; have passive fit of castings; reduce stress to splinted implants because of minor misfit of the framework; reduced complexity of lab procedures; enhanced esthetics; reduced cost factors and non disrupted morphology of the occlusal table. This case report presents the replacement of missing left central incisor using screw-retained implant prosthesis due to palatal trajectory of the implant placement and inadequate abutment height for retention of cement retained prosthesis.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="case-report"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Indian Prosthodont Soc</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Indian Prosthodont Soc</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0972-4052</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1998-4057</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Springer India</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25183915</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4148511</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">188</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0188-8</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Clinical Report</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Replacement of Missing Anterior Tooth Using Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report with 3 Years of Follow Up</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Ahmad</surname>
<given-names>Manawar</given-names>
</name>
<address><email>ahmad955mls@gmail.com</email>
</address>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dhanasekar</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<address><email>docdhana@hotmail.com</email>
</address>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Aparna</surname>
<given-names>I. N.</given-names>
</name>
<address><email>aparnaaniraghu@gmail.com</email>
</address>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Naim</surname>
<given-names>Hina</given-names>
</name>
<address><email>drhinaprostho@gmail.com</email>
</address>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2"></xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="Aff1"><label></label>
Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India</aff>
<aff id="Aff2"><label></label>
Melaka Manipal Dental College, Manipal Campus, Manipal, India</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>297</fpage>
<lpage>300</lpage>
<history><date date-type="received"><day>23</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2012</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2012</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© Indian Prosthodontic Society 2012</copyright-statement>
</permissions>
<abstract id="Abs1"><p>As more and more dental practitioners are focusing on implant-supported fixed restorations, some clinicians favor the use of cement retained restorations while others consider screw-retained prosthesis to be the best choice. As both types of prostheses have certain advantages and disadvantages, clinicians should be aware of the limitations of each type. Screw-retained implant restorations have an advantage of predictable retention, retrievability and lack of potentially retained sub-gingival cement. However, a few disadvantages exist such as precise placement of the implant for optimal and esthetic location of the screw access hole and obtaining passive fit. On the other hand, cement retained restorations eliminates unaesthetic screw access holes; have passive fit of castings; reduce stress to splinted implants because of minor misfit of the framework; reduced complexity of lab procedures; enhanced esthetics; reduced cost factors and non disrupted morphology of the occlusal table. This case report presents the replacement of missing left central incisor using screw-retained implant prosthesis due to palatal trajectory of the implant placement and inadequate abutment height for retention of cement retained prosthesis.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Dental implants</kwd>
<kwd>Implant prosthesis</kwd>
<kwd>Screw retained implant prosthesis</kwd>
<kwd>Cement retained implant prosthesis</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name>
<meta-value>© Indian Prosthodontic Society 2014</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000883 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000883 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Pmc |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= PMC:4148511 |texte= Replacement of Missing Anterior Tooth Using Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report with 3 Years of Follow Up }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25183915" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |