Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Effects of New Design of Access Hole on Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Crowns</title><author><name sortKey="Derafshi, Reza" sort="Derafshi, Reza" uniqKey="Derafshi R" first="Reza" last="Derafshi">Reza Derafshi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Farzin, Mitra" sort="Farzin, Mitra" uniqKey="Farzin M" first="Mitra" last="Farzin">Mitra Farzin</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Taghva, Masoumeh" sort="Taghva, Masoumeh" uniqKey="Taghva M" first="Masoumeh" last="Taghva">Masoumeh Taghva</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heidary, Hossein" sort="Heidary, Hossein" uniqKey="Heidary H" first="Hossein" last="Heidary">Hossein Heidary</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Atashkar, Berivan" sort="Atashkar, Berivan" uniqKey="Atashkar B" first="Berivan" last="Atashkar">Berivan Atashkar</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">26106637</idno><idno type="pmc">4476119</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476119</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4476119</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000319</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000319</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">The Effects of New Design of Access Hole on Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Crowns</title><author><name sortKey="Derafshi, Reza" sort="Derafshi, Reza" uniqKey="Derafshi R" first="Reza" last="Derafshi">Reza Derafshi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Farzin, Mitra" sort="Farzin, Mitra" uniqKey="Farzin M" first="Mitra" last="Farzin">Mitra Farzin</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Taghva, Masoumeh" sort="Taghva, Masoumeh" uniqKey="Taghva M" first="Masoumeh" last="Taghva">Masoumeh Taghva</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heidary, Hossein" sort="Heidary, Hossein" uniqKey="Heidary H" first="Hossein" last="Heidary">Hossein Heidary</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Atashkar, Berivan" sort="Atashkar, Berivan" uniqKey="Atashkar B" first="Berivan" last="Atashkar">Berivan Atashkar</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2">Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">2345-6485</idno><idno type="eISSN">2345-6418</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Statement of the Problem</title><p> One disadvantage of cement-retained crowns is the lack of predictable irretrievability. This problem can be overcome through designing a screw access hole in the metal substructure of cement-retained restoration and using porcelain stain to define this area.
</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of existence of screw access hole on porcelain fracture resistance of metal-ceramic implant-supported crowns.
</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Method</title><p> Thirty six standardized metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated and divided into 3 groups (n=12); group 1 conventional cement-retained metal-ceramic crowns as control group, group 2 cement-retained MC crowns in which porcelain stain was used to define the location of screw access channel, and group 3 cement-retained metal-ceramic crowns in the metal substructure of which a hole and ledge was designed in the location of screw access channel. The specimens were cemented (TempBond, Kerr) to their dedicated abutments. A hole was made in the location of screw access channel in group 2 and 3 and filled with photo-polymerized composite resin (3M; ESPE). All specimens were thermocycled and loaded in universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 2mm/min until fracture. Mean values of load at fracture were calculated in each group and compared with One-way ANOVA (α=0.05).
</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p> Mean value of the load required to fracture the restorations was 1947±487 N in group 1, 1927±539 N in group 2, and 2170±738 N in group 3. No statistically significant difference was found between the fracture resistance values of the three groups (<italic>p</italic>> 0.05)
</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p> Presence of screw access channel in cement-retained implant restorations does not compromise fracture resistance.
</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Moraschini, V" uniqKey="Moraschini V">V Moraschini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Poubel, La" uniqKey="Poubel L">LA Poubel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferreira, Vf" uniqKey="Ferreira V">VF Ferreira</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barboza Edos, S" uniqKey="Barboza Edos S">S Barboza Edos</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kwon, T" uniqKey="Kwon T">T Kwon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bain, Pa" uniqKey="Bain P">PA Bain</name></author><author><name sortKey="Levin, L" uniqKey="Levin L">L Levin</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Attard, Nj" uniqKey="Attard N">NJ Attard</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zarb, Ga" uniqKey="Zarb G">GA Zarb</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ozkan, Y" uniqKey="Ozkan Y">Y Ozkan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozcan, M" uniqKey="Ozcan M">M Ozcan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akoglu, B" uniqKey="Akoglu B">B Akoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ucankale, M" uniqKey="Ucankale M">M Ucankale</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kulak Ozkan, Y" uniqKey="Kulak Ozkan Y">Y Kulak Ozkan</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hofstede, Tm" uniqKey="Hofstede T">TM Hofstede</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ercoli, C" uniqKey="Ercoli C">C Ercoli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hagan, Me" uniqKey="Hagan M">ME Hagan</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ekfeldt, A" uniqKey="Ekfeldt A">A Ekfeldt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Ge" uniqKey="Carlsson G">GE Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Borjesson, G" uniqKey="Borjesson G">G Börjesson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Becker, W" uniqKey="Becker W">W Becker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Becker, Be" uniqKey="Becker B">BE Becker</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Taylor, Td" uniqKey="Taylor T">TD Taylor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Agar, Jr" uniqKey="Agar J">JR Agar</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Levine, Ra" uniqKey="Levine R">RA Levine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Clem, D" uniqKey="Clem D">D Clem</name></author><author><name sortKey="Beagle, J" uniqKey="Beagle J">J Beagle</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ganeles, J" uniqKey="Ganeles J">J Ganeles</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, P" uniqKey="Johnson P">P Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Solnit, G" uniqKey="Solnit G">G Solnit</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Andersson, B" uniqKey="Andersson B">B Andersson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Odman, P" uniqKey="Odman P">P Odman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindvall, Am" uniqKey="Lindvall A">AM Lindvall</name></author><author><name sortKey="Br Nemark, Pi" uniqKey="Br Nemark P">PI Brånemark</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kerstein, Rb" uniqKey="Kerstein R">RB Kerstein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Castellucci, F" uniqKey="Castellucci F">F Castellucci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Osorio, J" uniqKey="Osorio J">J Osorio</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Adell, R" uniqKey="Adell R">R Adell</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T">T Albrektsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zarb, G" uniqKey="Zarb G">G Zarb</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worthington, P" uniqKey="Worthington P">P Worthington</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eriksson, Ar" uniqKey="Eriksson A">AR Eriksson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Br Nemark, Pi" uniqKey="Br Nemark P">PI Brånemark</name></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, B" uniqKey="Svensson B">B Svensson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van, Steenberghe" uniqKey="Van S">Steenberghe van</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chee, W" uniqKey="Chee W">W Chee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Felton, Da" uniqKey="Felton D">DA Felton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, Pf" uniqKey="Johnson P">PF Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sullivan, Dy" uniqKey="Sullivan D">DY Sullivan</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Michalakis, Kx" uniqKey="Michalakis K">KX Michalakis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hirayama, H" uniqKey="Hirayama H">H Hirayama</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garefis, Pd" uniqKey="Garefis P">PD Garefis</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Rajan, M" uniqKey="Rajan M">M Rajan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunaseelan, R" uniqKey="Gunaseelan R">R Gunaseelan</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Farina, Ap" uniqKey="Farina A">AP Farina</name></author><author><name sortKey="Spazzin, Ao" uniqKey="Spazzin A">AO Spazzin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pantoja, Jm" uniqKey="Pantoja J">JM Pantoja</name></author><author><name sortKey="Consani, Rl" uniqKey="Consani R">RL Consani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mesquita, Mf" uniqKey="Mesquita M">MF Mesquita</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Ea" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E">EA McGlumphy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mendel, Da" uniqKey="Mendel D">DA Mendel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Holloway, Ja" uniqKey="Holloway J">JA Holloway</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Pietrabissa, R" uniqKey="Pietrabissa R">R Pietrabissa</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gionso, L" uniqKey="Gionso L">L Gionso</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quaglini, V" uniqKey="Quaglini V">V Quaglini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Di, Martino" uniqKey="Di M">Martino Di</name></author><author><name sortKey="Simion, M" uniqKey="Simion M">M Simion</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hebel, Ks" uniqKey="Hebel K">KS Hebel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gajjar, Rc" uniqKey="Gajjar R">RC Gajjar</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Torrado, E" uniqKey="Torrado E">E Torrado</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ercoli, C" uniqKey="Ercoli C">C Ercoli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Al, Mardini" uniqKey="Al M">Mardini Al</name></author><author><name sortKey="Graser, Gn" uniqKey="Graser G">GN Graser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tallents, Rh" uniqKey="Tallents R">RH Tallents</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cordaro, L" uniqKey="Cordaro L">L Cordaro</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Zarone, F" uniqKey="Zarone F">F Zarone</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sorrentino, R" uniqKey="Sorrentino R">R Sorrentino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Traini, T" uniqKey="Traini T">T Traini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Di Lorio, D" uniqKey="Di Lorio D">D Di lorio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Caputi, S" uniqKey="Caputi S">S Caputi</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Engquist, B" uniqKey="Engquist B">B Engquist</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nilson, H" uniqKey="Nilson H">H Nilson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Astrand, P" uniqKey="Astrand P">P Astrand</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Guichet, Dl" uniqKey="Guichet D">DL Guichet</name></author><author><name sortKey="Caputo, Aa" uniqKey="Caputo A">AA Caputo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Choi, H" uniqKey="Choi H">H Choi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sorensen, Ja" uniqKey="Sorensen J">JA Sorensen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kent, Dk" uniqKey="Kent D">DK Kent</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koka, S" uniqKey="Koka S">S Koka</name></author><author><name sortKey="Froeschle, Ml" uniqKey="Froeschle M">ML Froeschle</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Breeding, Lc" uniqKey="Breeding L">LC Breeding</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dixon, Dl" uniqKey="Dixon D">DL Dixon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bogacki, Mt" uniqKey="Bogacki M">MT Bogacki</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tietge, Jd" uniqKey="Tietge J">JD Tietge</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Covey, Da" uniqKey="Covey D">DA Covey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kent, Dk" uniqKey="Kent D">DK Kent</name></author><author><name sortKey="St Germain, Ha Jr" uniqKey="St Germain H">HA Jr St Germain</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koka, S" uniqKey="Koka S">S Koka</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Schweitzer, Dm" uniqKey="Schweitzer D">DM Schweitzer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Berg, Rw" uniqKey="Berg R">RW Berg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mancia, Go" uniqKey="Mancia G">GO Mancia</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Daher, T" uniqKey="Daher T">T Daher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Morgano, Sm" uniqKey="Morgano S">SM Morgano</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Braden, M" uniqKey="Braden M">M Braden</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Karl, M" uniqKey="Karl M">M Karl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Graef, F" uniqKey="Graef F">F Graef</name></author><author><name sortKey="Taylor, Td" uniqKey="Taylor T">TD Taylor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Heckmann, Sm" uniqKey="Heckmann S">SM Heckmann</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Warpeha, Ws Jr" uniqKey="Warpeha W">WS Jr Warpeha</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goodkind, Rj" uniqKey="Goodkind R">RJ Goodkind</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Al Omari, Wm" uniqKey="Al Omari W">WM Al Omari</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shadid, R" uniqKey="Shadid R">R Shadid</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abu Naba A, L" uniqKey="Abu Naba A L">L Abu Naba'a</name></author><author><name sortKey="El Masoud, B" uniqKey="El Masoud B">B El Masoud</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Braun, S" uniqKey="Braun S">S Braun</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hnat, Wp" uniqKey="Hnat W">WP Hnat</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freudenthaler, Jw" uniqKey="Freudenthaler J">JW Freudenthaler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marcotte, Mr" uniqKey="Marcotte M">MR Marcotte</name></author><author><name sortKey="Honigle, K" uniqKey="Honigle K">K Hönigle</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, Be" uniqKey="Johnson B">BE Johnson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Da Rocha, Pv" uniqKey="Da Rocha P">PV Da Rocha</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freitas, Ma" uniqKey="Freitas M">MA Freitas</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Morais Alves Da Cunha, T" uniqKey="De Morais Alves Da Cunha T">T de Morais Alves da Cunha</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Pallis, K" uniqKey="Pallis K">K Pallis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Griggs, Ja" uniqKey="Griggs J">JA Griggs</name></author><author><name sortKey="Woody, Rd" uniqKey="Woody R">RD Woody</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guillen, Ge" uniqKey="Guillen G">GE Guillen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Miller, Aw" uniqKey="Miller A">AW Miller</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Dent (Shiraz)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Dent (Shiraz)</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Dentistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2345-6485</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2345-6418</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Shiraz University of Medical Sciences</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Shiraz, Iran</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">26106637</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4476119</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jds-16-61</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The Effects of New Design of Access Hole on Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Crowns</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Derafshi</surname><given-names>Reza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Farzin</surname><given-names>Mitra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Taghva</surname><given-names>Masoumeh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Heidary</surname><given-names>Hossein</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Atashkar</surname><given-names>Berivan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label>Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;</aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor">Correspondence: Heidary H.; Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Tel: +98-71-36263193-4 E-mail: dr.hheidary@gmail.com </corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>3</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>1 Suppl</issue><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><month>12</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><month>3</month><year>2015</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><month>4</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2015: Journal of dentistry (Shiraz)</copyright-statement><license><license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link>) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Statement of the Problem</title><p> One disadvantage of cement-retained crowns is the lack of predictable irretrievability. This problem can be overcome through designing a screw access hole in the metal substructure of cement-retained restoration and using porcelain stain to define this area.
</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of existence of screw access hole on porcelain fracture resistance of metal-ceramic implant-supported crowns.
</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Method</title><p> Thirty six standardized metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated and divided into 3 groups (n=12); group 1 conventional cement-retained metal-ceramic crowns as control group, group 2 cement-retained MC crowns in which porcelain stain was used to define the location of screw access channel, and group 3 cement-retained metal-ceramic crowns in the metal substructure of which a hole and ledge was designed in the location of screw access channel. The specimens were cemented (TempBond, Kerr) to their dedicated abutments. A hole was made in the location of screw access channel in group 2 and 3 and filled with photo-polymerized composite resin (3M; ESPE). All specimens were thermocycled and loaded in universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 2mm/min until fracture. Mean values of load at fracture were calculated in each group and compared with One-way ANOVA (α=0.05).
</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p> Mean value of the load required to fracture the restorations was 1947±487 N in group 1, 1927±539 N in group 2, and 2170±738 N in group 3. No statistically significant difference was found between the fracture resistance values of the three groups (<italic>p</italic>> 0.05)
</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p> Presence of screw access channel in cement-retained implant restorations does not compromise fracture resistance.
</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Dental Implants</kwd><kwd>Cement-retained</kwd><kwd>Fracture Resistance</kwd><kwd>Metal Ceramic Crowns</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Dental implants have been approved for their durable predictable success in treatment of both completely[<xref rid="B1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>-<xref rid="B2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>] and partially edentulous patients.[<xref rid="B3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>-<xref rid="B4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>] Metal ceramic restorations are generally used during the restoration phase of implant, particularly in treatment of partially edentulous cases.[<xref rid="B5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>] Implant-supported crowns can be either screw-retained[<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>-<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>] or cement-retained;[<xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>-<xref rid="B9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>] however, there still exists controversies over the best retention type for implant-supported restorations.[<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>-<xref rid="B14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>]
</p><p>Retrievability is the main advantage of screw-retained prosthesis,[<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>-<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>] because the prosthesis might need to be removed to repair the crown (in case of ceramic-fracture or screw loosening). This feature also provides a better assessment of oral hygiene and peri-implant probing, as well as replacing the components in case of screw loosening or fracture.[<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>-<xref rid="B18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>] However, the laboratory procedures required for screw-retained restorations are usually more sophisticated, expensive, and associated with inherent mechanical complications such as screw-loosening and fractures.[<xref rid="B19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>-<xref rid="B20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>] It is generally difficult and costly to remove and replace the fractured screws.[<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>]
</p><p>Furthermore, natural occlusal morphology might be interfered due to the presence of a screw access opening,[<xref rid="B21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>] which might also disrupt the porcelain continuity and lead to unstable occlusal contents.[<xref rid="B22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>-<xref rid="B23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>]As reported by a number of studies, presence of screw access opening in these restorations reduces the fracture resistance of the porcelain.[<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>, <xref rid="B22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>, <xref rid="B24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>-<xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>]
</p><p>Among the advantages of cement-retained restorations are the lower costs of fabrication, facilitated procedure of implant restoratives, and a better passive fit, as well as preventing the interference of screw access opening with the esthetic or the occlusion of the restoration.[<xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>, <xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>] Meanwhile, cement-retained restorations have some drawbacks including the difficulty in retrieving and removing the excess cement around the crown, in addition to cement loss which may lead to peri-implant inflammation.[<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>, <xref rid="B26" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>-<xref rid="B27" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>]
</p><p>Cement-retained restorations have been advised for treating partial edentulous patients with implant[<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>] and they are better to be the first treatment option when esthetic is concerned.[<xref rid="B28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>] Besides, cement-retained implant prosthesis is chiefly concerned with the difficulty of being removed when the abutment screw has loosened or the porcelain has fractured and need to be corrected.
</p><p>Literatures have suggested several methods to provide retrievability of cement-retained implant restorations; using provisional cement is one of them, although the retention may be damaged.[<xref rid="B28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>] Placing a lingual retrieval slot at the abutment/prosthesis interface is another solution.[<xref rid="B29" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>] Other approaches are making use of ceramic stain on the occlusal surface of posterior restoration,[<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>] digital photographs or vacuum-formed templates to identify the position of screw.[<xref rid="B30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>] In these methods, the screw channel is filled with composite resin when the restoration is removed. One concern is that, existence of screw channel in the framework may jeopardize the strength of restoration.
</p><p>In the present study, a special feature was designed in the metal framework to support the remaining porcelain after the screw access channel was created. There is little data in the literature regarding the fracture resistance of cemented prostheses with screw access channel. The current investigation aimed to evaluate the influence of access hole in the occlusal surface of cement-retained implant restoration with and without specially designed feature on the fracture resistance of the restoration. The null hypothesis was that creating screw access on cement-retained crowns to permit retrievability would not compromise the strength of restoration. </p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Method</title><p>A 5×6.5 implant analog (Dio Corp.; Busan, Korea) was connected to a straight abutment. Then it was duplicated as 36 brass dies by using a lathe (CNC 350; Arix Co., Tainan Hesin, Taiwan). Then, five millimeters of each die was embedded vertically in an acrylic resin block with the aid of a dental surveyor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>).
</p><fig id="F1" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Brass die embedded in acrylic resin block</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jds-16-61-g001"></graphic></fig><p>Subsequently 36 metal ceramic crowns were fabricated with 3 designs; group 1 consisted of 12 conventional metal-ceramic crowns with cement-retained restorations as control group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>a), group 2 included 12 crowns with porcelain stain used to define the location of screw access channel (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>b). Group 3 was constituted of 12 crowns during framework fabrication of which, a ledge was designed in wax-up in the location of screw access channel (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>c). The ledge was 1.5 mm in height and 1 mm in thickness around a 2-mm hole in the center of occlusal surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). This area was defined in the crown by using porcelain stain.
</p><fig id="F2" position="float"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>: 12 conventional metal-ceramic implant frameworks of group 1 b: Group 2; implant framewoks c: Group 3; implant frameworks</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jds-16-61-g002"></graphic></fig><fig id="F3" position="float"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>The ledge designed in the location of screw access channel of the third group of metal ceramic crowns</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jds-16-61-g003"></graphic></fig><p>Porcelain application to all specimens was standardized by using a silicone index. The crowns were then cemented on their dedicated master dies with zinc oxide-eugenol cement (TempBond; Kerr Mfg Co., Romulus, MI) in rocking motion and held in place with constant finger pressure until the cement set. The excess cement was removed using an explorer. A hole was made in the location of screw access channel in group 2 and 3 by using a 2-mm fissure bur on a high speed handpiece, and was filled with photo-polymerized composite resin (3M; ESPE Dental Products, Canada).</p><p>Finally, all specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles between 50-65<sup>°</sup>C for 30 seconds with 12-second intervals according to the literature.[<xref rid="B31" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>-<xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>] Each specimen was subjected to vertical compression load by using a universal testing machine (Zwick-Roell Z020; Zwick Gmb H & Co. KG, Ulm, Germany) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).
</p><fig id="F4" position="float"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Frontal view of specimen positioned in the universal testing machine</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jds-16-61-g004"></graphic></fig><p>The force was applied perpendicular to the occlusal surface in the central part of the restoration with a cross-head speed of 2mm/min. In order to simulate the contact established by the opposing tooth, the rounded edges of the loading pin simultaneously contacted the triangular ridges of both buccal and lingual cusps of the crowns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The specimens were loaded to failure. Maximum values of loads at failure were recorded for each specimen. Mean values of fracture resistance for all groups were calculated and compared by using one-way ANOVA. The level of statistical significance was set at α=0.05.
</p><fig id="F5" position="float"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Close up view of loading apparatus</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jds-16-61-g005"></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="T1" position="float"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Fracture load (newton) of the three groups</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>N</bold></th><th style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Mean</bold></th><th style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>SD*</bold></th><th style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Min</bold></th><th style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><bold>Max</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> Group 1 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 12 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 1947 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 487 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 1370 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 3120 </td></tr><tr><td style=" color:#000000;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> Group 2 </td><td style=" color:#000000;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 12 </td><td style=" color:#000000;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 1928 </td><td style=" color:#000000;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 539 </td><td style=" color:#000000;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 766 </td><td style=" color:#000000;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 2610 </td></tr><tr><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> control </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 12 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 2190 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 738 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 1210 </td><td style=" color:#000000;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background-color:#BFBFBF;" align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> 3810 </td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>*Standard deviation</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>The mean fracture resistance value was 2190±738 N in group 3 (special design), 1928±539 N in group 2 and 1947±487 N in control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). No statistically significant difference was detected among the three groups regarding the fracture resistance value (<italic>p</italic>= 0.491).
</p></sec><sec sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>With respect to the obtained results of the present study, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. The fracture resistance of specially designed cement-retained crowns with screw access was higher than the other two groups; this difference was not significant though (<italic>p</italic>> 0.05).
</p><p>Zarone <italic>et al.</italic>[<xref rid="B23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>] evaluated the fracture resistance of screw-retained versus cement-retained single metal-ceramic crowns. They found no significant difference between the two groups. However, fracture resistance values of cement-retained crowns were higher; which is in accordance with the results of the current study.
</p><p>In another study, Karl <italic>et al.</italic>[<xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>] observed more chipping fractures in screw-retained fixed dental prostheses than cemented models. They did not fill the access opening with any materials. The authors proposed filling the access hole with intraoral ceramic-repair resin composites to stabilize the occlusal surface of screw-retained implant restorations.
</p><p>Several studies [<xref rid="B22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>, <xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>-<xref rid="B34" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>] revealed the fracture resistance of screw-retained restorations with screw access hole to be less than cement retained restorations. The difference between the results obtained by the current study and other studies can be attributed to the cementing of the specimens. In the present study, the specimens were cement-retained with an access hole, while in other studies the specimens were screw-retained with an access hole which might had contained a screw or not. Other reasons that justify the difference in results could be related to the different procedures of fabricating the specimens, different sizes of screw access opening, filling the access hole with composite resin or leaving it unfilled, the type of resin repair system used, the type and cycles of force used for loading, the area on which the force was applied, luting the restorations or not, and the type of cement which was used. It should be noted that the minimum load which caused fracture in specimens in the aforementioned studies was more than the maximum masticatory forces.[<xref rid="B35" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>] Therefore, both types of the restorations can be considered predictable in the implant prosthetic restoration phase.
</p><p>The especially cement-retained design proposed in the present study offered the advantages of cement-retained restorations in conjunction with the likelihood of the restoration retrievability. Furthermore, according to the study of Rocha <italic>et al.</italic>, screw access hole in cement-retained implant restoration had not any negative influence on the retention.[<xref rid="B36" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>]
</p><p>There were some limitations in the present study, one of which was the single static force that was used to load the specimens and it differed from the dynamic load in the oral environment. In mouth, the restoration may also fracture due to fatigue loading.[<xref rid="B37" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>] In the present study, the crowns were cemented using zinc oxide-eugenol cement which is used more clinically and no permanent cement was tested.
</p><p>Future researchers are recommended to investigate larger sample sizes under physiologic fatigue loading. Employing different types of cements for luting the specimens is also advised. </p></sec><sec sec-type="conclusion"><title>Conclusion</title><p>Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions are drawn:</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Presence of screw access opening in cement-retained implant restoration would not compromise the fracture resistance. </p></list-item><list-item><p>Designing a ledge in the framework of cement-retained implant restorations in the location of screw access opening could be a useful method to retrieve restoration, without compromising its strength. </p></list-item></list></sec></body><back><ack><title>Acknowledgment</title><p>The authors thank the Vice-Chancellery of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for supporting this research study (Grant#92-01-03-5988). The article is based on a thesis by Dr. Hosein Heidary. The authors also would like to thank Dr. Vosoughi from the Dental Research Development Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for his contributions in the process of statistical analyses.</p></ack><sec><title></title><p><bold>Conflicting Interest: </bold>The authors declare no conflict of interest.
</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="B1"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moraschini</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Poubel</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>VF</given-names></name><name><surname>Barboza Edos</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</source><year>2015</year><volume> 44</volume><fpage> 377</fpage><lpage>388</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25467739</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Bain</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Levin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Systematic review of short- (5-10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants</article-title><source> J Dent</source><year>2014</year><volume> 42</volume><fpage> 1228</fpage><lpage>1241</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24975989</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Attard</surname><given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Zarb</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2003</year><volume> 89</volume><fpage> 352</fpage><lpage>359</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12690347</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ozkan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozcan</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Akoglu</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Ucankale</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kulak Ozkan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Three-year treatment outcomes with three brands of implants placed in the posterior maxilla and mandible of partially edentulous patients</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2007</year><volume> 97</volume><fpage> 78</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17341375</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hofstede</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ercoli</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hagan</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Alternative complete-arch cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial denture</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>1999</year><volume> 82</volume><fpage> 94</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10384169</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekfeldt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlsson</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Börjesson</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical evaluation of single tooth restorations supported by osseoin-tegrated implants: aretrospective study</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>1994</year><volume> 9</volume><fpage> 179</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8206553</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>1995</year><volume> 74</volume><fpage> 51</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7674191</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Agar</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2002</year><volume> 88</volume><fpage> 89</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12239483</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levine</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Clem</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Beagle</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ganeles</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Solnit</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal></etal></person-group><article-title>Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solid-screw ITI implant forposterior single-tooth replacements</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2002</year><volume> 17</volume><fpage> 550</fpage><lpage>556</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12182298</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Odman</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindvall</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Brånemark</surname><given-names>PI</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5 years: results from a prospective study on CeraOne</article-title><source> Int J Prosthodont</source><year>1998</year><volume> 11</volume><fpage> 212</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9728114</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kerstein</surname><given-names>RB</given-names></name><name><surname>Castellucci</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Osorio</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Ideal gingival form with computer-generated permanent healing abutments</article-title><source> Compend Contin Educ Dent</source><year>2000</year><volume> 21</volume><fpage> 793</fpage><lpage>797</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11908351</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adell</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Zarb</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws</article-title><source>Proceedings of Toronto conference on osseointegration in clinical dentistry</source><year>1983</year><publisher-loc>St.Louis, MO</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Mosby</publisher-name><fpage> 1</fpage><lpage>165</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albrektsson</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Zarb</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Worthington</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Eriksson</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>1986</year><volume> 1</volume><fpage> 11</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3527955</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brånemark</surname><given-names>PI</given-names></name><name><surname>Svensson</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>van</surname><given-names>Steenberghe</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism</article-title><source> Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>1995</year><volume> 6</volume><fpage> 227</fpage><lpage>231</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8603114</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chee</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Felton</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>PF</given-names></name><name><surname>Sullivan</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better?</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>1999</year><volume> 14</volume><fpage> 137</fpage><lpage>141</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10074764</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Michalakis</surname><given-names>KX</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirayama</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Garefis</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2003</year><volume> 18</volume><fpage> 719</fpage><lpage>728</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14579961</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajan</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gunaseelan</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained implant prosthesis</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2004</year><volume> 92</volume><fpage> 578</fpage><lpage>580</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15583566</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farina</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name><name><surname>Spazzin</surname><given-names>AO</given-names></name><name><surname>Pantoja</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Consani</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Mesquita</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>An in vitro comparison of joint stability of implant-supported fixed prosthetic suprastructures retained with different prosthetic screws and levels of fit under masticatory simulation conditions</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2012</year><volume> 27</volume><fpage> 833</fpage><lpage>838</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22848885</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McGlumphy</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mendel</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Holloway</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Implant screw mechanics</article-title><source> Dent Clin North Am</source><year>1998</year><volume> 42</volume><fpage> 71</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9421671</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pietrabissa</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Gionso</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Quaglini</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Di</surname><given-names>Martino</given-names></name><name><surname>Simion</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses</article-title><source> Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>2000</year><volume> 11</volume><fpage> 448</fpage><lpage>457</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11168237</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hebel</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Gajjar</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>1997</year><volume> 77</volume><fpage> 28</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9029462</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torrado</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ercoli</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Al</surname><given-names>Mardini</given-names></name><name><surname>Graser</surname><given-names>GN</given-names></name><name><surname>Tallents</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Cordaro</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2004</year><volume> 91</volume><fpage> 532</fpage><lpage>537</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15211294</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zarone</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorrentino</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Traini</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Di lorio</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Caputi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis</article-title><source> Dent Mater</source><year>2007</year><volume> 23</volume><fpage> 296</fpage><lpage>301</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16564081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Engquist</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Nilson</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Astrand</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Single-tooth replacement by osseointegrated Brånemark implants. A retro-spective study of 82 implants</article-title><source> Clin Oral Implants Res</source><year>1995</year><volume> 6</volume><fpage> 238</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8603116</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guichet</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Caputo</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorensen</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs</article-title><source> Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</source><year>2000</year><volume> 15</volume><fpage> 239</fpage><lpage>246</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10795456</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kent</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Koka</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Froeschle</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Retention of cemented implant-supported restorations</article-title><source> J Prosthodont</source><year>1997</year><volume> 6</volume><fpage> 193</fpage><lpage>196</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9497775</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Breeding</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Dixon</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Bogacki</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Tietge</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>1992</year><volume> 68</volume><fpage> 737</fpage><lpage>741</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1432793</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Covey</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kent</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>St Germain</surname><given-names>HA Jr</given-names></name><name><surname>Koka</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2000</year><volume> 83</volume><fpage> 344</fpage><lpage>348</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10709044</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schweitzer</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Berg</surname><given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>Mancia</surname><given-names>GO</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A technique for retrieval of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2011</year><volume> 106</volume><fpage> 134</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21821168</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daher</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Morgano</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The use of digital photographs to locate implant abutment screws for implant-supported cement- retainedrestorations</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2008</year><volume> 100</volume><fpage> 238</fpage><lpage>239</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18762037</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braden</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Heat conduction in normal human teeth</article-title><source> Arch Oral Biol</source><year>1964</year><volume> 9</volume><fpage> 479</fpage><lpage>486</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14179056</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karl</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Graef</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Heckmann</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2007</year><volume> 97</volume><fpage> 137</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17394911</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Warpeha</surname><given-names>WS Jr</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodkind</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Design and technique variables affecting fracture resistance of metal-ceramic restorations</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>1976</year><volume> 35</volume><fpage> 291</fpage><lpage>298</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">768455</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al Omari</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name><name><surname>Shadid</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Abu Naba'a</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>El Masoud</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns</article-title><source> J Prosthodont</source><year>2010</year><volume> 19</volume><fpage> 263</fpage><lpage>273</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20136704</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hnat</surname><given-names>WP</given-names></name><name><surname>Freudenthaler</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Marcotte</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hönigle</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A study of maximum bite force during growth and development</article-title><source> Angle Orthod</source><year>1996</year><volume> 66</volume><fpage> 261</fpage><lpage>264</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8863960</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Da Rocha</surname><given-names>PV</given-names></name><name><surname>Freitas</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>de Morais Alves da Cunha</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2013</year><volume> 109</volume><fpage> 264</fpage><lpage>268</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23566608</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pallis</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Griggs</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Woody</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Guillen</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fracture resistance of three all-ceramic restorative systems for posterior applications</article-title><source> J Prosthet Dent</source><year>2004</year><volume> 91</volume><fpage> 561</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15211299</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000319 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000319 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |